Our new Indie Games subforum is now open for business in G&T. Go and check it out, you might land a code for a free game. If you're developing an indie game and want to post about it, follow these directions. If you don't, he'll break your legs! Hahaha! Seriously though.
Our rules have been updated and given their own forum. Go and look at them! They are nice, and there may be new ones that you didn't know about! Hooray for rules! Hooray for The System! Hooray for Conforming!

He belongs in a museum - Indiana Jones 5 on the way

1234568»

Posts

  • WashWash Registered User regular
    Spielberg's the one with the hard on for LeBeouf, putting him in movie after movie.

    Not sure why. He's not particularly good.

    annakarinasig1.jpg
  • AtomikaAtomika (citation needed)Registered User regular
    Duffel wrote: »
    It's not like Roy Schneider or Liam Neeson or Tom Cruise or any other number of people we could list were selected on that basis.

    No, but then again he didn't give those people their big break and shoe-horn them into four mega-budget movies in three years.

  • nosnibornosnibor Registered User
    Something that sort of bothered me- doesn't killing off Indy's dad ignore the end of Last Crusade? Both Indy and Henry drank from the Grail, they should have everlasting life.

    I could be way off the mark, but my guess is they just decided "the grail is just super healing, you can still die" because they couldn't get or didn't want Sean Connery.

    When you're a spy, it's a good idea to give away your trade secrets in a voiceover on a TV show.
  • VariableVariable Stroke Me Lady Fame Registered User regular
    supernatural isn't inherently worse than sci fi, and I think it still fits with the indiana jones universe, the movie just sucked. not ALL differences between the films are at fault.

    "He who makes a beast of himself gets rid of the pain of being a man" - Dr. Johnson
    Sig%20-%20Reggie%20Watts.png
  • AtomikaAtomika (citation needed)Registered User regular
    nosnibor wrote: »
    Something that sort of bothered me- doesn't killing off Indy's dad ignore the end of Last Crusade? Both Indy and Henry drank from the Grail, they should have everlasting life.

    I could be way off the mark, but my guess is they just decided "the grail is just super healing, you can still die" because they couldn't get or didn't want Sean Connery.

    It clearly says in the Last Crusade that the effects of the grail are only permanent if you stay in the temple. That's why the knight was still there.

  • Mike DangerMike Danger "Diane..." a place both wonderful and strangeRegistered User regular
  • DuffelDuffel Registered User
    Did Henry Sr. actually drink from the Grail or did he just have it poured on him?

    EDIT: Also, should we be spoiling any of this?

  • CenoCeno Chumble spuzz. Registered User regular
    The everlasting life would only last if you stayed in the Grail Temple, I believe.

    Beated. Oh schnap.

    steam_sig.png
    GFWL: Genesius Prime / PSN: Genesius_Prime / Origin: genesiusprime / 3DS: 4871-3718-5715
  • AtomikaAtomika (citation needed)Registered User regular
    Variable wrote: »
    supernatural isn't inherently worse than sci fi, and I think it still fits with the indiana jones universe

    But does it, really? In the Indiana Jones universe, life goes on as normal, and occasionally someone incurs the wrath of God by trying really hard to do so. That's a long cry from, "Oh, yeah, those Incas were really aliens."

  • CenoCeno Chumble spuzz. Registered User regular
    Re: spoilers

    As far as I'm concerned, movies get a two-week grace period after release. After that, you're SOL, especially if you're in a forum dedicated to said film.

    steam_sig.png
    GFWL: Genesius Prime / PSN: Genesius_Prime / Origin: genesiusprime / 3DS: 4871-3718-5715
  • taerictaeric Registered User, ClubPA
    Out of curiosity, what were the plots like in Young Indiana Jones? Were they always supernatural, as well?

  • YarYar Registered User regular
    It wasn't that you had to stay in the temple, it was that the grail had to stay. The idea is that if you really wanted everlasting life, you'd have to drink from it regularly. But it could never be taken out of the temple.

    It certainly wasn't "clearly stated" that the grail only worked if you stayed in the temple. It was clearly stated that the grail could never be removed from the temple.

    EDIT: Which, by the way, reminds me that whoever was criticizing TLC earlier because Indiana gets dumped on and his dad just dismisses him and obviously prefers the grail quest... must have forgotten when Henry, Sr., convinces Indy to abandon the grail so that he can save his own life. Pretty much ends the notion that his father cared more about the grail than his son.

  • DarkWarriorDarkWarrior __BANNED USERS
    The grail didn't start in the temple so of course it can be used outside it, problem is if you try the cave comes crashing it. Problem with that is if you aren't sitting around begging for Indy to follow you, you can quite easily get it out of the cave and live for eternity.

    Of course that didn't seem to be turning out very well for the knight.

    ...it's in the shape of a giant c**k.
  • Gandalf_the_CrazedGandalf_the_Crazed Registered User regular
    Yeah, my primary problem with KotCS (and there were many) was the shift from supernatural to sci-fi. It's not that I dislike sci-fi or anything. It's just that the particular kind of questing that the first three movies featured were entirely wrapped up in a non-scientific, religious/spiritual/supernatural framework. This had a few practical effects.

    First, the supernatural doesn't need to make sense in each and every aspect. It's not generally understood to work on a mathematical, cause-and-effect basis like technology and science do. This allowed for more elasticity and, yes, bullshitting in the plot. I'm OK with that. All supernatural fiction occasionally pulls out some new piece of shiny to explain away the latest mindfuck.

    Second, there's a great difference in setting between the first 3 movies and KotCS. In the first three, large parts of the adventure took place in populated areas -- the library scene comes to mind, as does the dig taking place outside the city in Raiders. This allowed for a very different dynamic of adventuring than traipsing through the jungle, where the only things you ran into (besides the people who came with you) were ants and monkeys. The reason sci-fi wouldn't have worked in such a context is that it's harder to accept that high technology (which, presumably, would screw with the surrounding area in some ways, such as the intense magnetic fields put out by the Crystal Skull) would lie dormant and undetected than it is to believe that a holy relic would do so. I think the best scenes from the old films are the ones that take place in populated areas, and so their exclusion from KotCS had a greatly negative impact on its quality.

    That said, I enjoyed KotCS (though not as much as the first 3), and I'll go see 5. *shrug*

    oie_70260dWqoNCrn.jpg
  • VariableVariable Stroke Me Lady Fame Registered User regular
    Variable wrote: »
    supernatural isn't inherently worse than sci fi, and I think it still fits with the indiana jones universe

    But does it, really? In the Indiana Jones universe, life goes on as normal, and occasionally someone incurs the wrath of God by trying really hard to do so. That's a long cry from, "Oh, yeah, those Incas were really aliens."

    I feel that it does. I see your point but it worked for me... in theory. it didn't actually work because it was poorly done but I like the idea of moving to sci fi. I think it fits with the series.

    "He who makes a beast of himself gets rid of the pain of being a man" - Dr. Johnson
    Sig%20-%20Reggie%20Watts.png
  • HamHamJHamHamJ Registered User regular
    taeric wrote: »
    Out of curiosity, what were the plots like in Young Indiana Jones? Were they always supernatural, as well?

    From what I've seen, they were not even that. They were completely normal. Like, Indi fights graverobber. Indi joins the Mexican Revolution. Indi joins WWI. Indi gets captured by the Germans and pretends to be a French officer and has to break out of a POW camp. Etc.

    While racing light mechs, your Urbanmech comes in second place, but only because it ran out of ammo.
  • BubbaTBubbaT Registered User
    taeric wrote: »
    Out of curiosity, what were the plots like in Young Indiana Jones? Were they always supernatural, as well?

    No, they're historical fiction. It almost turns into Abbott & Costello & Indy Meet (Insert Historical Figure) Before They Were Stars sometimes. Indy shows up everywhere with everyone. He goes on safari in Africa with Teddy Roosevelt, and meets T.E. Lawrence in the Middle East. He meets a girl in Austria and gets romance advice from Sigmund Freud, he gets captured in WWI and becomes cellmates with Charles De Gaulle, he gets stranded in a Dublin pub just in time to meet Sean O'Casey during the Easter Rising, he visits Paris and dates Mata Hari, etc.

    There's also an episode detailing his pursuit of the diamond from Temple of Doom, while being contested by Chinese gangsters.


    On a side note, production values are up the wazzoo for a TV series. Episodes were filmed all around the world with great cinematography, sets and costumes are excellent, etc.

  • taerictaeric Registered User, ClubPA
    That is what I was able to gather from reading the episode listings I got from a quick google. Actually sounds more like forest gump. (In that he meets tons of historical figures.)

    How does this jibe with everyone? Do people miss the lack of the supernatural? (Or is it just that nobody ever has really watched these shows?)

  • VariableVariable Stroke Me Lady Fame Registered User regular
    there were some decent books (decent when I was 12-13 and read them) that dealt with lots of mythology and whatnot that I think would have fit with the movies.

    lemme see if I can find one on amazon...

    http://www.amazon.com/Indiana-Jones-Peril-Delphi-No/dp/0553289314/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1253131569&sr=8-1

    that's the first one. I remembered the name! wow! maybe someone else read them and can explain that they're actually good or actually shit. I have only the vaguest of memories.

    "He who makes a beast of himself gets rid of the pain of being a man" - Dr. Johnson
    Sig%20-%20Reggie%20Watts.png
  • taerictaeric Registered User, ClubPA
    Ok... just flipping through and looking at all of the other items in there..... we have one with Indy fighting a cybernetic nazi. Just, wow.

    Edit: So, that is evidently a new book. Just reading the first paragraph is hard to explain. Sad, I think, is the best word to describe my reaction to reading it. :(

  • VariableVariable Stroke Me Lady Fame Registered User regular
    taeric wrote: »
    Ok... just flipping through and looking at all of the other items in there..... we have one with Indy fighting a cybernetic nazi. Just, wow.

    Edit: So, that is evidently a new book. Just reading the first paragraph is hard to explain. Sad, I think, is the best word to describe my reaction to reading it. :(

    I was gonna say, I don't remember even seeing that on the shelf back then.

    "He who makes a beast of himself gets rid of the pain of being a man" - Dr. Johnson
    Sig%20-%20Reggie%20Watts.png
Sign In or Register to comment.