As was foretold, we've added advertisements to the forums! If you have questions, or if you encounter any bugs, please visit this thread: https://forums.penny-arcade.com/discussion/240191/forum-advertisement-faq-and-reports-thread/
Options

[WoW] [Raiding] is way too easy

1356762

Posts

  • Options
    SeptusSeptus Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    Langly wrote: »
    also, in a few blue posts they have said that ICC will be pretty hard, even on normal settings. Although, I guess that still remains to be seen.

    edit: although I really like the hard/normal setting logistics for ICC. being able to switch it on and off for different bosses is how it should be.

    Whatever the difficulty, I'm pretty sure their comments lead me to believe that anyone and everyone who wants to raid normal ICC, can.

    Which is awesome.

    Septus on
    PSN: Kurahoshi1
  • Options
    NobodyNobody Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    Anyone else notice quite a huge difference in terms of raiding nowadays? I mean, I've been playing since open beta and nothing has really been puggable up to WOTLK. I mean, I have a feeling I'm going to see "LFM 25 Icecrown Citadel pst stats/achievement" Which is sort of discouraging in comparison to something like Sunwell Plateau D:

    Before the end of TBC I was seeing pugs of all of the raids except Sunwell. I remember seeing pugs for MC, Ony, AQ20, and ZG in classic.

    Blizzard specifically stated that they wanted to avoid the Sunwell situation (and, well, Naxx in classic) for the average raid in WoTLK hence the "easier" normal modes, however they've also promised that the heroic modes in Icecrown will be enough to keep the progression minded guilds happy.

    Nobody on
  • Options
    JoshmviiJoshmvii Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    I think ToC and it's pugability has made people forget about Ulduar a little bit though. A lot of Ulduar is quite puggable, but I guarantee you 99% of the pugs that are clearing normal ToC couldn't kill Mimiron, or especially Yogg.

    Obviously normal mode ICC is not going to be tuned to be impossible to PuG, but if it's like Ulduar the deeper bosses will still be a good challenge.

    Joshmvii on
  • Options
    LanglyLangly Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    Septus wrote: »
    Langly wrote: »
    also, in a few blue posts they have said that ICC will be pretty hard, even on normal settings. Although, I guess that still remains to be seen.

    edit: although I really like the hard/normal setting logistics for ICC. being able to switch it on and off for different bosses is how it should be.

    Whatever the difficulty, I'm pretty sure their comments lead me to believe that anyone and everyone who wants to raid normal ICC, can.

    Which is awesome.

    oh yeah, I am all for having the raid being accessible to anyone who wants to do it, I had just seen a blue post saying that it would be a bit more difficult than the other wotlk raids, and more comparable to sunwell.

    With the difficulty thing, it is like Ulduar, but I appreciate not having to flip some in-game switch to make it hard. Just toggling it on and off is much more user friendly and intuitive.

    Langly on
  • Options
    douglydougly Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    I'm highly doubting any new content will be anywhere near Sunwell difficulty on regular mode. They'd lose way too many accounts if they suddenly made progression too hard for casual players.

    Even the Sunwell trash makes the regular trial look like a joke.

    dougly on
    puffin.png
  • Options
    SeptusSeptus Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    If large numbers of pug raids are completing ICC by the end of February, I'd say that's a success.

    Septus on
    PSN: Kurahoshi1
  • Options
    EndEnd Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    dougly wrote: »
    I'm highly doubting any new content will be anywhere near Sunwell difficulty on regular mode. They'd lose way too many accounts if they suddenly made progression too hard for casual players.

    Of course it wouldn't be, considering how difficult that would make hard mode ICC.

    End on
    I wish that someway, somehow, that I could save every one of us
    zaleiria-by-lexxy-sig.jpg
  • Options
    DhalphirDhalphir don't you open that trapdoor you're a fool if you dareRegistered User regular
    edited November 2009
    Anyone else notice quite a huge difference in terms of raiding nowadays? I mean, I've been playing since open beta and nothing has really been puggable up to WOTLK. I mean, I have a feeling I'm going to see "LFM 25 Icecrown Citadel pst stats/achievement" Which is sort of discouraging in comparison to something like Sunwell Plateau D:

    normal modes should be puggable

    Dhalphir on
  • Options
    ForarForar #432 Toronto, Ontario, CanadaRegistered User regular
    edited November 2009
    Dhalphir wrote: »
    normal modes should be puggable

    This.

    Hard modes for better/extra gear, titles and bragging rights are fine by me, but the core basic instance should be doable by a baseline crew that doesn't require weeks of practice and cohesion.

    It should of course require more than "i rollded my faec on keeys and i getz epicz", but the ability to at least see an entire expansion's worth of content shouldn't be beyond half or more of the playerbase.

    Forar on
    First they came for the Muslims, and we said NOT TODAY, MOTHERFUCKER!
  • Options
    eatmosushieatmosushi __BANNED USERS regular
    edited November 2009
    until they create the pvp equiv of raiding, im not playing wow

    eatmosushi on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] Spun uncontrollably skyward... Driven brutally into the ground
  • Options
    fortyforty Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    Anyone else notice quite a huge difference in terms of raiding nowadays? I mean, I've been playing since open beta and nothing has really been puggable up to WOTLK. I mean, I have a feeling I'm going to see "LFM 25 Icecrown Citadel pst stats/achievement" Which is sort of discouraging in comparison to something like Sunwell Plateau D:
    It's really discouraging that a group of people who have done some content before on separate occasions can get together and do that content?

    forty on
  • Options
    Munkus BeaverMunkus Beaver You don't have to attend every argument you are invited to. Philosophy: Stoicism. Politics: Democratic SocialistRegistered User, ClubPA regular
    edited November 2009
    eatmosushi wrote: »
    until they create the pvp equiv of raiding, im not playing wow

    This is not at all relevant to this thread.

    Munkus Beaver on
    Humor can be dissected as a frog can, but dies in the process.
  • Options
    ForarForar #432 Toronto, Ontario, CanadaRegistered User regular
    edited November 2009
    forty wrote: »
    It's really discouraging that a group of people who have done some content before on separate occasions can get together and do that content?

    If it's not glass chewing, it's not raiding, m i rite?!

    Forar on
    First they came for the Muslims, and we said NOT TODAY, MOTHERFUCKER!
  • Options
    rizriz Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    Forar wrote: »
    That's all I'm saying. Focusing hard on having an edge on getting a key piece isn't bad, as long as it's done intelligently. Examples of people who might've shown this level of focus or dedication to an extreme is unfortunate, but doesn't mean that having priorities is necessarily a bad thing. Just otherwise smart/good people with bad priorities.

    Yeah of course I agree that having priorities is fine, but when someone lets their priority get unreasonable is detrimental to the raid.


    Anyway, more relevant to posts on this page: One thing that I think is going to bother me about ICC is, it has been nice being able to gear up alts without having to get people to commit to hours of a raid to do it. "Anyone for a quick ToC10?" after a regular raid or at 8 p.m. on an off night usually garners a decent response. ToC10 is easy and fast as long as your group isn't pants-on-head. On the other hand, it was a huge struggle to get any gear for alts from Ulduar, and I can only assume it was because of the sheer SIZE of Ulduar, combined with trash clears, that made it more of a commitment than people were willing to make at random times. ToC10 is like running two heroics for badges, but I imagine we'll have Ulduar-like problems with ICC.

    But at least there's only ONE instance ID for it, instead of having to run normal 10, heroic 10, normal 25, and heroic 25 in the same week.

    riz on
  • Options
    JoshmviiJoshmvii Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    Well it's still a raid. With triumph emblems going heroic, anybody can gear an alt in full 232s with some 245 pieces and of course the conquest loot, etc. ICC is not going to be 'like 2 heroics' like ToC is, but it shouldn't be. It's the capstone raid of the expansion. It's going to have trash that people have to actually think on, and bosses that will require some coordination I'm sure.

    I think people are trying to go too far to the extreme of 'normal modes are easy' and assume that normal modes are meant to not take any effort, which still isn't the case on the harder bosses in Ulduar and hopefully will be the case in ICC.

    Joshmvii on
  • Options
    DhalphirDhalphir don't you open that trapdoor you're a fool if you dareRegistered User regular
    edited November 2009
    eatmosushi wrote: »
    until they create the pvp equiv of raiding, im not playing wow

    tell us what the pvp equivalent of raiding is then.

    Dhalphir on
  • Options
    SenshiSenshi BALLING OUT OF CONTROL WavefrontRegistered User regular
    edited November 2009
    Faction Champs

    olol

    Senshi on
  • Options
    HevachHevach Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    Dhalphir wrote: »
    eatmosushi wrote: »
    until they create the pvp equiv of raiding, im not playing wow

    tell us what the pvp equivalent of raiding is then.

    Battlegrounds. Though they did kind of marginalize them as a progression path with arenas, rated battlegrounds would bring it back I think.

    Hevach on
  • Options
    Munkus BeaverMunkus Beaver You don't have to attend every argument you are invited to. Philosophy: Stoicism. Politics: Democratic SocialistRegistered User, ClubPA regular
    edited November 2009
    This is not a thread to discuss pvp. This is still an on topic thread.

    Munkus Beaver on
    Humor can be dissected as a frog can, but dies in the process.
  • Options
    GlyphGlyph Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    Drops from ToGC 10/25 aren't enough to justify the effort for me. They look the same as the non-heroic drops, just with that glowing green "Heroic" stamp-of-approval and slightly higher stats that you would only notice upon inspection. They really should make it more distinct is what I'm saying.

    Glyph on
  • Options
    aunsophaunsoph Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    Glyph wrote: »
    Drops from ToGC 10/25 aren't enough to justify the effort for me. They look the same as the non-heroic drops, just with that glowing green "Heroic" stamp-of-approval and slightly higher stats that you would only notice upon inspection. They really should make it more distinct is what I'm saying.

    I don't know... the differences seem good enough to me.

    Going from Legguards of Feverish Dedication to the Heroic Legguards of Feverish Dedication would net me, as a JC Tank +44 Stamina plus about 0.25% Avoidance, 100 Armor and 1 Expertise.

    That's a sizable upgrade, IMO. It's even more noticeable if you were to compare both versions of the Justicebringer 2H.

    P.S: Glyph, I saw that you mentioned being from Destromath in that locked thread. What's your character? :P

    aunsoph on
  • Options
    HevachHevach Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    The stats aren't just a little bit higher, the difference is pretty substantial accross a set, especially factoring in all the extra sockets they tacked on to most of it.

    Sure, I look just like a scrubby alt warlock who got carred through normal TOC for a few weeks, but anybody who cares is either going to see the guild name, titles, and glory mounts and assume the gear matches, and leave it at that, or they'll click on me and look at their little gearscore mod, in which case sheer itemlevels win the day.

    Hevach on
  • Options
    TheCrumblyCrackerTheCrumblyCracker Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    The extra sockets really makes tank HP skyrocket. Going from the 10man normal boots off of Beasts to Heroic boots off of beats netted me a 33% increase in the stamina on the item.

    33%!
    That's huge!
    Every socket increases my base stamina by 30. Thanks to awesome bear scaling, every stamina is actually 1.22 stamina. (Imp MOTW + HOTW = 12% buff. Kings = 10% buff. Bears = awesome)

    TheCrumblyCracker on
  • Options
    KainyKainy Pimpin' and righteous Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    For DPS the extra sockets are amazing, my Heroic Gormok's Band gives me 132 strength. The difference that 13 ilvl gives for weapon damage and spellpower on weapons, as well, is tremendous for any DPS.

    Kainy on
    IcyLiquid wrote: »
    There's anti-fuckery code in there now :) Sorry :)
  • Options
    IshtaarIshtaar Fun is underrated. Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    Hevach wrote: »
    The stats aren't just a little bit higher, the difference is pretty substantial across a set, especially factoring in all the extra sockets they tacked on to most of it.

    This. I'm a *huge* fan of sockets. No idea what ICC will bring when it goes live, and the ability to regem to pick up a few % haste or crit is amazing.

    Ishtaar on
    FFXIV: Sith Lord ~ D3: Ish ~ Steam:Ishie
  • Options
    JustinSane07JustinSane07 Really, stupid? Brockton__BANNED USERS regular
    edited November 2009
    I'm beginning to hate sockets because epic gems are starting to cost me gold since i'm out of Conquest emblems.

    JustinSane07 on
  • Options
    JoshmviiJoshmvii Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    You can put me in the group of people who is glad they made the hard mode loot just higher ilvl versions of the same items. The increase in stats/especially sockets on the heroic versions makes a huge difference.

    I will admit I hope ICC heroic mode bosses do have some unique loot, just because it's fun to have a drop that you can only get that way. Maybe a mix of the same items with higher ilvl and some unique stuff. =)

    Joshmvii on
  • Options
    E.CoyoteE.Coyote Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    I'm beginning to hate sockets because epic gems are starting to cost me gold since i'm out of Conquest emblems.

    I tend to use the honor from wintergrasp quests to buy gems. It nets 1-3 gems per week depending on how well your side does.

    E.Coyote on
  • Options
    DhalphirDhalphir don't you open that trapdoor you're a fool if you dareRegistered User regular
    edited November 2009
    I also like the way that heroic mode loot is just a straight and flat upgrade. It removes the issue you had previously where things that dropped in normal mode or rather, easier fights, were better than heroic stuff because of stat allocation.

    Dhalphir on
  • Options
    fortyforty Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    The extra sockets really makes tank HP skyrocket. Going from the 10man normal boots off of Beasts to Heroic boots off of beats netted me a 33% increase in the stamina on the item.

    33%!
    That's huge!
    Every socket increases my base stamina by 30. Thanks to awesome bear scaling, every stamina is actually 1.22 stamina. (Imp MOTW + HOTW = 12% buff. Kings = 10% buff. Bears = awesome)
    Doesn't SotF give 6% stamina as well?

    forty on
  • Options
    TheCrumblyCrackerTheCrumblyCracker Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    That it does! So it's closer to 1.3 stamina per.

    Bears rule.

    TheCrumblyCracker on
  • Options
    fortyforty Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    So which bosses will be eligible for the weekly raid quest? Any? A select subset? Mostly tending toward earlier/easier bosses in raids?

    I'm gonna rage so bad if the first week ends up being "kill the fifth boss in ICC" on my server and then other people are getting Jaraxxus or something.

    forty on
  • Options
    JoshmviiJoshmvii Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    It looked to me like it was generally the '2nd boss' of a wing. Some examples I saw were XT-002, Patchwerk, and Jaraxxus. So I figure it'll stick to something like that so the ICC ones would be early/easy bosses too.

    Joshmvii on
  • Options
    fortyforty Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    It had still better not be ICC the first week.

    forty on
  • Options
    JoshmviiJoshmvii Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    Shit I hope my server's first raid weekly is in ICC. That way we can spend all our raid time that week in there. I'm sure the first handful of bosses are going to be a joke anyway for most people.

    Joshmvii on
  • Options
    HevachHevach Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    Ishtaar wrote: »
    Hevach wrote: »
    The stats aren't just a little bit higher, the difference is pretty substantial across a set, especially factoring in all the extra sockets they tacked on to most of it.

    This. I'm a *huge* fan of sockets. No idea what ICC will bring when it goes live, and the ability to regem to pick up a few % haste or crit is amazing.

    I'm hoping they go the direction they did in Sunwell and have lots of red sockets on DPS gear and blue sockets on tank gear, so you can gem your primary stat straight in every slot and hardly lose most of your socket bonuses.

    Hevach on
  • Options
    JoshmviiJoshmvii Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    Hevach wrote: »
    Ishtaar wrote: »
    Hevach wrote: »
    The stats aren't just a little bit higher, the difference is pretty substantial across a set, especially factoring in all the extra sockets they tacked on to most of it.

    This. I'm a *huge* fan of sockets. No idea what ICC will bring when it goes live, and the ability to regem to pick up a few % haste or crit is amazing.

    I'm hoping they go the direction they did in Sunwell and have lots of red sockets on DPS gear and blue sockets on tank gear, so you can gem your primary stat straight in every slot and hardly lose most of your socket bonuses.

    I'm fine with this, but I'm fine with the way they did the ToC gear too which is just to have attractive set bonuses. I have several tank pieces with red socket and a 12 stam bonus. So yeah, I'll take 10 agi/27 stam over 30 stam. I hate when a piece of gear has a 6 dodge rating set bonus or something. Nobody is going to give up 15 stam for that.

    Joshmvii on
  • Options
    OptyOpty Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    forty wrote: »
    So which bosses will be eligible for the weekly raid quest? Any? A select subset? Mostly tending toward earlier/easier bosses in raids?

    I'm gonna rage so bad if the first week ends up being "kill the fifth boss in ICC" on my server and then other people are getting Jaraxxus or something.
    Here's the list: Lord Marrowgar, Lord Jaraxxus, XT-002 Deconstructor, Ignis, Razorscale, Flame Leviathan, Malygos, Patchwerk, Instructor Razuvious, Noth the Plaguebringer, Anub'Rekhan, Sartharion. So it's either the first or second boss of each raid.

    Opty on
  • Options
    fortyforty Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    Joshmvii wrote: »
    Shit I hope my server's first raid weekly is in ICC. That way we can spend all our raid time that week in there. I'm sure the first handful of bosses are going to be a joke anyway for most people.
    Sadly my guild is not that competent that I'd bank on them getting much of ICC down in the first week.

    Additionally, the first week one of a new raid tends to be notoriously bad in the bugs, lag, disconnects, crashing, etc. department. If there's ever one week where I wouldn't mind skipping out on the newest raid zone, it's the very first week.

    Edit: Thanks, Opty! Of that list, the ones that will probably be the most problematic to get done (via PUG or thrown-together-from-scraps guild raid, not A team) will be Marrowgar (just since it will have the harshest gear requirements and presumably will be tuned harder) and Malygos (because people just seem to love to be bad at this encounter).

    forty on
  • Options
    RanlinRanlin Oh gosh Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    Joshmvii wrote: »
    Hevach wrote: »
    Ishtaar wrote: »
    Hevach wrote: »
    The stats aren't just a little bit higher, the difference is pretty substantial across a set, especially factoring in all the extra sockets they tacked on to most of it.

    This. I'm a *huge* fan of sockets. No idea what ICC will bring when it goes live, and the ability to regem to pick up a few % haste or crit is amazing.

    I'm hoping they go the direction they did in Sunwell and have lots of red sockets on DPS gear and blue sockets on tank gear, so you can gem your primary stat straight in every slot and hardly lose most of your socket bonuses.

    I'm fine with this, but I'm fine with the way they did the ToC gear too which is just to have attractive set bonuses. I have several tank pieces with red socket and a 12 stam bonus. So yeah, I'll take 10 agi/27 stam over 30 stam. I hate when a piece of gear has a 6 dodge rating set bonus or something. Nobody is going to give up 15 stam for that.

    As a bear, I find most of my gear options being loaded with yellow sockets, oh boy~ :/

    Ranlin on
This discussion has been closed.