Our new Indie Games subforum is now open for business in G&T. Go and check it out, you might land a code for a free game. If you're developing an indie game and want to post about it, follow these directions. If you don't, he'll break your legs! Hahaha! Seriously though.
Our rules have been updated and given their own forum. Go and look at them! They are nice, and there may be new ones that you didn't know about! Hooray for rules! Hooray for The System! Hooray for Conforming!

Forced Vacation Time

TheMarshalTheMarshal Registered User regular
So, my company currently occupies two offices in the same building, and at the end of the year (presumably coinciding with the end of the lease on the office), we're going to be consolidating everyone into one new office in the same building. The thing is, this is going to require two weeks of construction, for which they are forcing us to use vacation time.

These two weeks actually coincide with 5 days of already-established company holidays, so it only means that we have to take 5 vacation days (but still, that's 6 months of accrual for most people!).

Below the cut is the schedule
Spoiler:

They're making EVERYONE take the days as vacation, even if people don't have the 5 days saved up. They'll just be deducting from future vacation accrual.

So of course my question is: "Is this kosher in California?"

TheMarshal on

Posts

  • ThanatosThanatos Registered User regular
    Call the California Department of Labor and ask. That's what they're there for.

  • DarkewolfeDarkewolfe Registered User regular
    That's pretty standard. Double check in California, but it's very likely that that's perfectly fine and normal. I know it sucks to have to take vacation when you don't necessarily want it, but if that happened to me I'd be ecstatic. There is no way I would ever be able to get more than 4 days in a row off, let alone a two week vacation.

  • AiouaAioua Novus Ordo Seclorum Lord of the ForumRegistered User regular
    http://www.dir.ca.gov/dlse/FAQ_Vacation.htm
    Q.
    Can my employer tell me when to take my vacation?

    A.
    Yes, your employer has the right to manage its vacation pay responsibilities, and one of the ways it can do this is by controlling when vacation can be taken and the amount of vacation that may be taken at any particular time.

    Just being the general FAQ it doesn't exactly cover your situation, but if it seems to imply that the employer has pretty broad discresion.

    life's a game that you're bound to lose / like using a hammer to pound in screws
    fuck up once and you break your thumb / if you're happy at all then you're god damn dumb
    that's right we're on a fucked up cruise / God is dead but at least we got booze
    bad things happen, no one knows why / the sun burns out and everyone dies
  • John MatrixJohn Matrix Registered User
    That really sucks, sorry, man.

  • ascannerlightlyascannerlightly Registered User
    Aioua wrote: »
    Yes, your employer has the right to manage its vacation pay responsibilities, and one of the ways it can do this is by controlling when vacation can be taken and the amount of vacation that may be taken at any particular time.
    this is pretty much universal, i think. whatever type of business it is, it's going to have slow periods and busy periods. this saying "when vacation can be" really refers to them telling you when you "can't" IE the last two weeks of october if you work in a costume store, etc.

    if your office is closed for renovation/maintenance/emergency repair i really doubt they can force you to use vacation days. i think they can tell you to either use vacation days or suck up the unpaid time off as they will be closed regardless of which you choose to do.

    as was suggested, call the labor board.

    armedroberty.jpg
  • Bendery It Like BeckhamBendery It Like Beckham Hopeless Registered User regular
    You could always propose that you keep your vacation time and just lose 2 weeks pay.

    But... really is that what you want to do? This is set up so you can keep your income while they work on the office.

    headphones2.jpg SC2:Bendery.235
  • JeffHJeffH Registered User
    Man, be happy that you get those company holidays. 12/24, 12/30, 12/31? I'm envious.

  • SpacemilkSpacemilk Registered User
    In California, I don't know. In Houston, this has been happening quite a lot lately. My boyfriend's company (Schlumberger) has been forcing their employees to use up banked vacation. Several times this year they've issued ultimatums: "Use your vacation before such-and-such date. Tough luck if that doesn't fall near a holiday."

    I don't really understand his company's logic in forcing people to use vacations but it sounds like your company has a pretty legit reason. I think the cali labor board is going to rule in favor of your company - there's no way you can do work during renovations, so they should not have to pay you during that time, or you can take vacation.

    It sucks, I'm sorry. =/ Will you at least be able to make it a fun vacation, rather than a sitting-around vacation? (which is unfortunately what my boyfriend and his coworkers usually end up with, it's not fun)

  • I work in California. My company closes the office every year for 3-4 days between Christmas and New Year (on the other hand, employees start with 3 weeks per year, so it mostly evens out). I can either take vacation or take time off without pay. So, at the very least, yes, they can force you to take vacation in oder to be paid. I can't say whether they must offer you the option of taking the time without pay. The company is probably letting people go negative in their vacation accrual since making the people without enough vacation miss all or part of a paycheck probably wouldn't go over well.

  • DeebaserDeebaser Way out in the water See it swimmin'?Registered User regular
    its probably kosher and good goddamn that is some CHOICE vacation time. Two weeks stradling christmas / New years... that's pretty goddamn awesome.

    #FreeThan
    #FreeScheck
    #FreeSKFM
  • adytumadytum Registered User regular
    Deebaser wrote: »
    its probably kosher and good goddamn that is some CHOICE vacation time. Two weeks stradling christmas / New years... that's pretty goddamn awesome.

    That's the worst and most expensive time of year to be actually traveling, so good luck doing anything besides sitting at home.

    If I ever worked for somewhere that did this, I would seriously consider looking for new employment.

    etxvv5.jpg
  • VisionOfClarityVisionOfClarity Registered User
    You can find plenty of deals that time of year and if you're not traveling on Christmas Eve or the day after New Years it won't be too bad.

  • TheMarshalTheMarshal Registered User regular
    Yeah, I've pretty much decided that I'll be using those two weeks to polish up my resume and do some side work that I can show off to potential employers.

  • KetarKetar Registered User regular
    adytum wrote: »
    Deebaser wrote: »
    its probably kosher and good goddamn that is some CHOICE vacation time. Two weeks stradling christmas / New years... that's pretty goddamn awesome.

    That's the worst and most expensive time of year to be actually traveling, so good luck doing anything besides sitting at home.

    If I ever worked for somewhere that did this, I would seriously consider looking for new employment.

    The expense of traveling at that time of year is very much dependent on where one is traveling to. Going somewhere that isn't in its peak travel season at that time of year can actually be quite cheap.

    As far as the work situation - they have to close, and you have to use vacation time if you want to be paid for that period of closure. It isn't clear whether the option to not use vacation time, and not be paid at all for those extra days, is an option to you. Either way, this isn't really an atypical move at all given the situation - businesses that can afford to pay their employees during an abnormal period of non-work like that are more the exception than the rule.

  • GothicLargoGothicLargo Registered User
    Well, I will say that it's fairly unusual to me that they're going to debit the time from your own vacation pool.

    Most of the time if a company was going to do such an extensive move, they would simply say "Everyone, we're going to be closed for a week, you all get those days as bonus vacation, nobody gets to complain you're still being paid."

    It's generally easier to address such extraordinary interruptions to work by erring in favor of the employees so they aren't inclined to argue with HR. If they're erring in favor of accounting (by using credited personal vacation time), then they're either remarkably stingy or really short on money.

    atfc.jpg
  • KetarKetar Registered User regular
    Well, I will say that it's fairly unusual to me that they're going to debit the time from your own vacation pool.

    Most of the time if a company was going to do such an extensive move, they would simply say "Everyone, we're going to be closed for a week, you all get those days as bonus vacation, nobody gets to complain you're still being paid."

    No, companies that would make that kind of gesture really are the exception to the rule.

  • see317see317 Registered User regular
    Ketar wrote: »
    Well, I will say that it's fairly unusual to me that they're going to debit the time from your own vacation pool.

    Most of the time if a company was going to do such an extensive move, they would simply say "Everyone, we're going to be closed for a week, you all get those days as bonus vacation, nobody gets to complain you're still being paid."

    No, companies that would make that kind of gesture really are the exception to the rule.

    Really. Largo, if you've found and are working for a company that does this you are a lucky lucky person.
    Most corporations will screw their employees as far as legally possible, and then try to push just a little further.

    Ringo wrote: »
    Well except what see317 said. That guy's always wrong.
  • DeebaserDeebaser Way out in the water See it swimmin'?Registered User regular
    adytum wrote: »
    Deebaser wrote: »
    its probably kosher and good goddamn that is some CHOICE vacation time. Two weeks stradling christmas / New years... that's pretty goddamn awesome.

    That's the worst and most expensive time of year to be actually traveling, so good luck doing anything besides sitting at home.

    If I ever worked for somewhere that did this, I would seriously consider looking for new employment.

    Spend time with your friends/family. If saving money is really that important you can still pick up a reasonable flight if you're flexible and willing to take a shitty flight.

    You may want to look for a new job, but this is a pretty standard HR move and at least they'll take vacation from future PTO accrual rather than dock the employees in the red.

    #FreeThan
    #FreeScheck
    #FreeSKFM
  • GothicLargoGothicLargo Registered User
    see317 wrote: »
    Really. Largo, if you've found and are working for a company that does this you are a lucky lucky person.
    Most corporations will screw their employees as far as legally possible, and then try to push just a little further.

    The employees of the company I work for collectively own 80% of the company.

    atfc.jpg
  • DarkewolfeDarkewolfe Registered User regular
    see317 wrote: »
    Really. Largo, if you've found and are working for a company that does this you are a lucky lucky person.
    Most corporations will screw their employees as far as legally possible, and then try to push just a little further.

    The employees of the company I work for collectively own 80% of the company.

    Also pretty rare.

    I don't really think this is the company trying to dick over the employees. They have to do the building renovations, in theory. They can't afford to rent additional space. It's a part of the year where a large portion of employees, especially those with families, want to take lots of vacation anyway. It may not be perfect for everyone, but I don't think this is an example of the man really holding someone down.

    If you don't like your job that much anyway, it's certainly a great time to brush up your resume. Don't perceive this alone as a sign that your company is evil and will mistreat you eternally, though.

  • TheMarshalTheMarshal Registered User regular
    When they did renovations two years ago, they just gave us the extra time off without making us use our vacation time. It's just obvious that we're not in as great a position as we were a few years ago.

    Honestly, I get that they've timed it so that we use the least number of vacation days, and they're willing to debit us from future vacation instead of forcing those without any time saved up to go without pay, so they're definitely trying to look out for us. My decision to look elsewhere for employment has more to do with the actions management took (or didn't take) for us to get into the situation we're in now than this. I was upset with this at the time, but the more I look at it, the more I understand that they're doing the best they can with a bad situation. I just no longer want to deal with the people who got us into this situation.

  • ED!ED! Registered User regular
    My (former) company instituted this and has done it since 2004: Offices are closed for a week and a half totalling 32 hours or so overall, and you are required to use vacation or personal leave. Thing is they give you exactly 32 hours of personal leave so "technically" you have enough time to cover it. Of course folks rarely have that personal leave by the end of the year as personal issues come up. So you are forced to use actual vacation time; and if you don't have it - you just don't get paid for those hours (sick leave is not able to be used unless you are actually ill). So essentially they are closing offices during the slowest months, and forcing you to either not take Personal leave during the year, or to use your accrued vacation time during a specified (non active) period. It's pretty damn clever on how dickish it is.

    "Get the hell out of me" - [ex]girlfriend
  • ascannerlightlyascannerlightly Registered User
    ED! wrote: »
    It's pretty damn clever on how dickish it is.
    ain't capitalism grand?

    armedroberty.jpg
  • FyreWulffFyreWulff Registered User, ClubPA regular
    ED! wrote: »
    My (former) company instituted this and has done it since 2004: Offices are closed for a week and a half totalling 32 hours or so overall, and you are required to use vacation or personal leave. Thing is they give you exactly 32 hours of personal leave so "technically" you have enough time to cover it. Of course folks rarely have that personal leave by the end of the year as personal issues come up. So you are forced to use actual vacation time; and if you don't have it - you just don't get paid for those hours (sick leave is not able to be used unless you are actually ill). So essentially they are closing offices during the slowest months, and forcing you to either not take Personal leave during the year, or to use your accrued vacation time during a specified (non active) period. It's pretty damn clever on how dickish it is.

    Bunch of places force vacation time to be used by the end of the year. I know City of Omaha employees have to burn vacation near year's end.

    Also interestingly, my dad cannot work a certain number of hours at his job consecutively without a vacation, so he's burning some of his vacation time for the entire next week. If you choose to try and test the rule, you'll be escorted out of the building. (But not fired)

  • CenturionCenturion Registered User regular
    ED! wrote: »
    It's pretty damn clever on how dickish it is.
    ain't capitalism grand?

    The dickish thing ist that most of you yanks get so little vacation time, not that your employer can make you take it during periods when business is low. I live in Germany and here you get a legal minimum of four weeks of paid vacation per year (most people get more, I get six) which kind of takes the sting out of having to take two weeks during the slower times of the year.

  • ASimPersonASimPerson And they will tremble again at the sound of our silence.Registered User regular
    This is pretty standard. I work for a Big McLargeHuge company in California and this is the second year in a row they're doing a "shutdown" during the week after Christmas.

    I don't mind it because I would take the time off anyway, but I know some of my co-workers aren't exactly crazy about the policy.

    redoctober2.png
    SE++ Forum Battle Archive | PST = Pacific Standard Time | DRUNKSTUCK: A Homestuck recap
  • ascannerlightlyascannerlightly Registered User
    Centurion wrote: »
    ED! wrote: »
    It's pretty damn clever on how dickish it is.
    ain't capitalism grand?

    The dickish thing ist that most of you yanks get so little vacation time, not that your employer can make you take it during periods when business is low. I live in Germany and here you get a legal minimum of four weeks of paid vacation per year (most people get more, I get six) which kind of takes the sting out of having to take two weeks during the slower times of the year.
    well, that's germany. you people are crazy. what with your "suggested" speed limits, and your "lederhosen".

    armedroberty.jpg
  • DarkewolfeDarkewolfe Registered User regular
    And your hot German women and great beer...

    Did anyone ever find a state or situation in the U.S. where they couldn't do this to you?

  • CenturionCenturion Registered User regular
    I'm not sure if there is a place in the world where employers can't shut down for a while and force people to take their vacation then. Here, the law states that the employer is supposed to take the employees wishes into account when planning vacations unless important business concerns prevent it. Office renovations or relocations would be such an important business concern, so here in Germany the OP's employer could do the same thing, but employees would be less likely to complain because they would still have several weeks to take on their own schedule. I'm not sure how it would work here for people who don't have enough vacation time left, I doubt a German employer could take the time from future vacation accruals.

  • Jealous DevaJealous Deva Registered User regular
    ED! wrote: »
    (sick leave is not able to be used unless you are actually ill).

    I'm not sure this is entirely legal, at least in my state I'm pretty sure sick leave and personal leave are the same thing under the law and if you want to use sick leave because you're sick of working so damn much it's perfectly fine.

    Edit: I guess after looking into it this is not the case and the places I've worked for in the past have just been flexible about using sick leave for personal time.

  • DeebaserDeebaser Way out in the water See it swimmin'?Registered User regular
    Well there are a great many companies that don't even have "sick leave". For example at my company if you're sick, then you're sick. Stay home. They'll pay you. Just keep your germs out of the damned office.

    #FreeThan
    #FreeScheck
    #FreeSKFM
  • Gilbert0Gilbert0 Registered User regular
    Deebaser wrote: »
    Well there are a great many companies that don't even have "sick leave". For example at my company if you're sick, then you're sick. Stay home. They'll pay you. Just keep your germs out of the damned office.

    Same.

    3 weeks of vacation
    1 week of "personal days" - appoitments, whatever, usually just an extra week of vacation

    Sick days, I call in, say I'm sick and I come back when healthy. No set limit or pool of days.

    Kickstart Standard Action - Season 3 the fantasy-comedy webseries for geeks of all kinds.
  • KalkinoKalkino Buttons Londres Registered User regular
    Perfectly legal to do this in the UK as well, with 2x the length of holiday to be forced notice. It is a real morale killer though, but what can you do?

    Freedom for the Northern Isles!
Sign In or Register to comment.