Our new Indie Games subforum is now open for business in G&T. Go and check it out, you might land a code for a free game. If you're developing an indie game and want to post about it, follow these directions. If you don't, he'll break your legs! Hahaha! Seriously though.
Our rules have been updated and given their own forum. Go and look at them! They are nice, and there may be new ones that you didn't know about! Hooray for rules! Hooray for The System! Hooray for Conforming!

Awareness Campaigns

TankHammerTankHammer Extreme GhostbusterRegistered User regular
I recently started looking into various methods of public-awareness and charity campaigns in recent years. We've seen some very interesting and creative ways of getting word out lately, mostly due to the effect mainstream advertising has had in desensitizing us to the ads all around us.

(PRODUCT)RED is one of my favorites so far, going to consumer products and other commonly-seen items and having these companies make red versions. The red iPod Nano made headlines when the campaign launched and I have to say that Motorola's red phones are pretty attractive. The campaign is to raise support and awareness to battle the AIDS epidemic in Africa, as worthy a cause as I can think of.

A few more, older campaigns such as the anti-smoking "Truth" and "Crazy-world" campaigns that didn't take children's intelligence for granted, illustrating statistics and being generally more aggressive than any past "say no to smoking" ads I saw growing up.

I'd like to see more of these campaigns, maybe a few that don't get as much recognition as they should. If any of you have shared an interest in this type of not-for-profit marketing and have a few notable campaigns you'd like to make note of, go for it.

TankHammer on
4icmw.jpg TankHammer | 2zivq6q.jpg JoeJRicc
«1

Posts

  • IncenjucarIncenjucar Registered User regular
    I would have to say that perhaps the best campaign would be to have a website devoted to actually important things that people forget or don't hear about in the media, then advertising that with examples of content.

    It would be pretty nice to have a website devoted to "Shit you really should know."

    freefallagent.jpg
  • TankHammerTankHammer Extreme Ghostbuster Registered User regular
    I almost forgot to mention the wonderful "Live Strong" campaign and all those absurd knockoffs that came after it. "Oh hey, you have a cheap, rubber bracelet. What does that support?"
    "What this? Oh this is my New York Yankees bracelet. It cost me 2 dollars and all the proceeds go to the NYY gift-shop."
    "Bu- Okay nevermind, I'm just going to have to kill you."

    4icmw.jpg TankHammer | 2zivq6q.jpg JoeJRicc
  • IncenjucarIncenjucar Registered User regular
    I almost forgot to mention the wonderful "Live Strong" campaign and all those absurd knockoffs that came after it. "Oh hey, you have a cheap, rubber bracelet. What does that support?"
    "What this? Oh this is my New York Yankees bracelet. It cost me 2 dollars and all the proceeds go to the NYY gift-shop."
    "Bu- Okay nevermind, I'm just going to have to kill you."

    Yeah.

    They have ones for XBox too.

    I saw'em at Best Buy.

    For a moment, it looked like a Playstation.

    freefallagent.jpg
  • A few more, older campaigns such as the anti-smoking "Truth" and "Crazy-world" campaigns that didn't take children's intelligence for granted, illustrating statistics and being generally more aggressive than any past "say no to smoking" ads I saw growing up.
    One of the worst awareness campaigns I've ever seen, right up with the "anti-drug" ones. Demonising smokers is not going to convince them to quit. Ever. Insulting the intelligence, actually more accurately the mental competence of the entire population of the country also doesn't make people want to listen to you, and I know more people who have started smoking because of these campaigns than quit.

    It's not as bad as the "smoking pot will make you rape your friends" commercial, but it's definitely not an effective approach. I've seen two commercials that approach "quit-smoking" in a way that sympathises with the smoker who wants to quit but can't, up against dozens that essentially brand all smokers as people who walk into kindergarten classes and shoot the place up with a MAC-10 for a laugh.

    DAMM
    Drunks Against Mad Mothers
  • TankHammerTankHammer Extreme Ghostbuster Registered User regular
    A few more, older campaigns such as the anti-smoking "Truth" and "Crazy-world" campaigns that didn't take children's intelligence for granted, illustrating statistics and being generally more aggressive than any past "say no to smoking" ads I saw growing up.
    One of the worst awareness campaigns I've ever seen, right up with the "anti-drug" ones. Demonising smokers is not going to convince them to quit. Ever. Insulting the intelligence, actually more accurately the mental competence of the entire population of the country also doesn't make people want to listen to you, and I know more people who have started smoking because of these campaigns than quit.

    It's not as bad as the "smoking pot will make you rape your friends" commercial, but it's definitely not an effective approach. I've seen two commercials that approach "quit-smoking" in a way that sympathises with the smoker who wants to quit but can't, up against dozens that essentially brand all smokers as people who walk into kindergarten classes and shoot the place up with a MAC-10 for a laugh.
    I have no idea what commercials you were watching but the ones I saw didn't demonize smokers, they called out the tobacco industry on lying to the public and marketing towards children by citing actual tobacco board meetings. It certainly wasn't the reactionary level of the "anti-drug" and "harmless" commercials. These are campaigns focused on hard evidence and deterring people from smoking. They worked well.
    I think they were well-exercised campaigns. I don't think you saw the ones I am referring to.

    4icmw.jpg TankHammer | 2zivq6q.jpg JoeJRicc
  • A few more, older campaigns such as the anti-smoking "Truth" and "Crazy-world" campaigns that didn't take children's intelligence for granted, illustrating statistics and being generally more aggressive than any past "say no to smoking" ads I saw growing up.
    One of the worst awareness campaigns I've ever seen, right up with the "anti-drug" ones. Demonising smokers is not going to convince them to quit. Ever. Insulting the intelligence, actually more accurately the mental competence of the entire population of the country also doesn't make people want to listen to you, and I know more people who have started smoking because of these campaigns than quit.

    It's not as bad as the "smoking pot will make you rape your friends" commercial, but it's definitely not an effective approach. I've seen two commercials that approach "quit-smoking" in a way that sympathises with the smoker who wants to quit but can't, up against dozens that essentially brand all smokers as people who walk into kindergarten classes and shoot the place up with a MAC-10 for a laugh.
    I have no idea what commercials you were watching but the ones I saw didn't demonize smokers, they called out the tobacco industry on lying to the public and marketing towards children by citing actual tobacco board meetings. It certainly wasn't the reactionary level of the "anti-drug" and "harmless" commercials. These are campaigns focused on hard evidence and deterring people from smoking. They worked well.
    I think they were well-exercised campaigns. I don't think you saw the ones I am referring to.
    I've seen all of them. A few are sort of the way you describe, although your description is incredibly generous. They weren't targetted at getting people to quit smoking regardless, the objective was to make the American public hate cigarettes with enough burning passion to get them to go out and vote. So yeah, they worked really well. They also painted smokers as willful mass-murderers, which is utter nonsense and was totally uncalled for.

    DAMM
    Drunks Against Mad Mothers
  • SamSam Registered User
    The Marijuana ones are ridiculous too,like the one with the guy with his hand stuck in his mouth and the smart ass holier than thou woman speaking for him. They don't illustrate facts, all they illustrate is self righteous moral masturbation, and they're a waste of money.

  • TankHammerTankHammer Extreme Ghostbuster Registered User regular
    I must have missed the "smokers are mass-murderers" commercials. I remember ones featuring body bags but that was more along the lines of "the companies making cigarettes are mass-murderers". Nonetheless cigarettes are nothing but bad for you so I don't have a problem trying to get people off them. Before someone will pay attention to those sympathetic commercials that want to help you quit, they need to want to quit. I'm sure if I watched more TV I might have seen those other ones you're mentioning and wouldn't have agreed with them.

    C'mon let's get some more informative ad campaigns in here. I'm curious as to how many groups are getting the word out in a positive way.

    Even though I severely disagree with PETA and any kind of militaristic pro-vegitarian/veganism campaign I do have to give kudos to the "We are not nuggets" (see below) ad they ran. It's got a big impact.
    300-STU159.jpg
    Morally they are wrong to use emotional advertising and put it in things like my little sister's teen magazines, but their marketing department made a very strong statement here.

    You don't have to agree with the message to recognize a strong campaign.

    4icmw.jpg TankHammer | 2zivq6q.jpg JoeJRicc
  • Sam wrote:
    The Marijuana ones are ridiculous too,like the one with the guy with his hand stuck in his mouth and the smart ass holier than thou woman speaking for him. They don't illustrate facts, all they illustrate is self righteous moral masturbation, and they're a waste of money.
    They also don't work at all, which from a marketting perspective is the real problem with them. The fact that they don't talk about facts, frequently spin outright lies, and moralise mindlessly for the sake of an excuse to pass judgement on someone and feel superior are all bad things, but not really relavent because if doing all those things worked, it would be an excellent campaign. And doing all those things can work, you just have to hire a way smarter marketting team than apparently any of the ones willing to work on these projects.

    DAMM
    Drunks Against Mad Mothers
  • Nonetheless cigarettes are nothing but bad for you so I don't have a problem trying to get people off them.
    A) False. They are also delicious. If you buy decent tobacco anyway.
    B) Then maybe they should try a way that works. It's fucking common knowledge that calling someone an asshole over and over won't turn them over to your side, look at disenfranchised Catholics for fuck's sake. The only reason anyone with even the tiniest fraction of a functional brain would call an entire group of people assholes over and over is to turn the rest of the audience against that group.

    DAMM
    Drunks Against Mad Mothers
  • ALockslyALocksly Registered User
    I must have missed the "smokers are mass-murderers" commercials. I remember ones featuring body bags but that was more along the lines of "the companies making cigarettes are mass-murderers". Nonetheless cigarettes are nothing but bad for you so I don't have a problem trying to get people off them. Before someone will pay attention to those sympathetic commercials that want to help you quit, they need to want to quit. I'm sure if I watched more TV I might have seen those other ones you're mentioning and wouldn't have agreed with them.

    C'mon let's get some more informative ad campaigns in here. I'm curious as to how many groups are getting the word out in a positive way.

    Even though I severely disagree with PETA and any kind of militaristic pro-vegitarian/veganism campaign I do have to give kudos to the "We are not nuggets" (see below) ad they ran. It's got a big impact.
    300-STU159.jpg
    Morally they are wrong to use emotional advertising and put it in things like my little sister's teen magazines, but their marketing department made a very strong statement here.

    You don't have to agree with the message to recognize a strong campaign.

    there strong and then there's this

    Trying to makeg little kids terrified of their parents is such a fucked up idea on so many levels.

    Yes,... yes, I agree. It's totally unfair that sober you gets into trouble for things that drunk you did.
  • RoloRolo Registered User regular
    I love Freevibe and their useless anti-marijuana campaign ads.

    IF YOU SMOKE THE GANJA EVEN ONCE

    AND THEN YOU LIVE IN A HOUSE THAT KEEPS A LOADED GUN IN THE KITCHEN

    AND THEN YOU HAVE A FRIEND OVER WHO ALSO GETS HIGH

    AND THEN YOU AND YOUR FRIEND ARE IN THE KITCHEN

    AND YOU OPEN THE CABINET IN WHICH THE GUN IS KEPT AND TAKE THE GUN OUT

    AND THEN TURN THE SAFETY OFF

    AND THEN YOU POINT THE GUN AT YOUR FRIENDS' FACE

    AND THEN YOU PULL THE TRIGGER

    MARIJUANA KILLS BY IMPARING JUDGEMENT KIDS

    BOOM HEADSHOT

  • jothkijothki Registered User regular
    Was anyone else lucky enough to see that anti-drug commercial that ran after 9/11 but was immediately pulled? It was set up almost exactly like those Mastercard commercials to the point where at the end, I was saying to myself "Blowing up the World Trade Center: Priceless".

  • TankHammerTankHammer Extreme Ghostbuster Registered User regular
    ALocksly wrote:
    there strong and then there's this

    Trying to makeg little kids terrified of their parents is such a fucked up idea on so many levels.
    Yeah this one is famous. PETA is a bunch of deranged psychopathic terrorists. I do not refute this. I hope they are all hunted down one day, but still man, my heart pangs for those nuggets.
    Meat is way too delicious to give up though. It'll be a cold day in hell when I stop eating BBQ and other still-animal-shaped meats.

    PETA is disgusting and they pull in a lot of ignorant bleeding-hearts who don't know how fucked up they are.

    Also, let's please not turn this into a "Anti-Drug commercials are so inaccurate to reality" thread. Maybe there's a "Smokin Weed ain't so Bad" campaign you know about you'd like to discuss?

    4icmw.jpg TankHammer | 2zivq6q.jpg JoeJRicc
  • Rhesus PositiveRhesus Positive Damn these electric sex pants! Registered User regular
    Also, let's please not turn this into a "Anti-Drug commercials are so inaccurate to reality" thread. Maybe there's a "Smokin Weed ain't so Bad" campaign you know about you'd like to discuss?

    marijuanaposter.jpg

    robothero wrote: »
    damn rhesus, you're like a cyclical procedure of poor decisions
    PSNID: RhesusPositive
    I'm doing Movember for Men's Health! Donate if you can - thanks.
  • mrflippymrflippy Registered User regular
  • TankHammerTankHammer Extreme Ghostbuster Registered User regular
    NRA?

    4icmw.jpg TankHammer | 2zivq6q.jpg JoeJRicc
  • mrflippymrflippy Registered User regular
    NRA?
    Some feminist group if I remember correctly. I've since forgotten exactly where I pulled that from.

  • SenjutsuSenjutsu fiddy too Registered User regular
    mrflippy wrote:
    faster.jpg
    I'm betting one look at her bull-dike side-burns can scare an intruder off even faster

    Sarksus wrote: »
    I'm gonna get a PhD in incest.
  • dlinfinitidlinfiniti Registered User regular
    i dont think that massive double clip she has there is legal

    AAAAA!!! PLAAAYGUUU!!!!
  • Bionic MonkeyBionic Monkey Registered User, ClubPA
    Nonetheless cigarettes are nothing but bad for you so I don't have a problem trying to get people off them.
    A) False. They are also delicious. If you buy decent tobacco anyway.
    B) Then maybe they should try a way that works. It's fucking common knowledge that calling someone an asshole over and over won't turn them over to your side, look at disenfranchised Catholics for fuck's sake. The only reason anyone with even the tiniest fraction of a functional brain would call an entire group of people assholes over and over is to turn the rest of the audience against that group.
    I'm thinking you're a smoker? Because I have never, not once, seen a Truth ad that attacked smokers themselves. I've only ever seen them attack the tobacco industry.

    sig_megas_armed.jpg
  • LRGLRG Registered User
    *Ring ring*
    Kid picks up phone

    "John, wassup, man?"

    "I was so high last night..."

    "What? Well, how she'd get home?"

    "John, you no that's not me, man"
    *Click*

    Moral of the story: Marijuana will make you do bad things.

    EDIT: I should add more to the discussion than that.

    Basically, I don't know what the hell the hope to accomplish with shitty fear-mongering commercials like that. They don't even tell you what the kid did that was so bad, all you know is he was "soooo high last night" and now his friend hates him or something. They arn't even trying with commercials like this.

    The best anti-weed commercials are the ones that tell you your "wasting your life". Of course, if all kids do when high is sit on Pete's couch, you gotta wonder why its illegal at all.

    So your either wasting your life on Pete's couch or your doing something horrible to a friend or yours. This shit is called propaganda and anyone with half a brain knows it.

  • KrizKriz Registered User
    there was a recent anti-drug commercial that was actually pretty sane.

    the basic gist was "no, smoking pot will not kill you, but there's better things to do than just vegetate all stoned on your friend's couch".

    it was certainly a lot more accurate than "you and your friends killed a little girl while driving your weed-mobile out of the mcdonalds drive-thru".

  • TankHammerTankHammer Extreme Ghostbuster Registered User regular
    Kriz wrote:
    there was a recent anti-drug commercial that was actually pretty sane.

    the basic gist was "no, smoking pot will not kill you, but there's better things to do than just vegetate all stoned on your friend's couch".

    it was certainly a lot more accurate than "you and your friends killed a little girl while driving your weed-mobile out of the mcdonalds drive-thru".
    I agree.

    Also thanks Bionic Monkey, I didn't want to say anything to 'attack him' directly but there's a bias at work there.
    If there are "Truth" commercials that depict smokers as horrible people I'll be more than happy to watch them and critique them, but so far all I see are people just being all "Hey big tobacco, you said on this date you wanted to get kids to pick up smoking to replace the old people who are falling off" end scene.

    4icmw.jpg TankHammer | 2zivq6q.jpg JoeJRicc
  • GoslingGosling Team Monica Watertown, WIRegistered User regular
    Truth is a hit-or-miss proposition. Either they come up with something clever- "This is Fang. Who wants to pet Fang? ...This is Fluffy now. Now who wants to pet Fluffy?"- or something completely asinine- using an entire New York street corner to pile up body bags or shredded paper.

    The reason for the latter being, dude, people are trying to get to work. New York is not known for flowing traffic. Do not make people late for work who did not request to be told that smoking is bad. This will just make people angry at you. A few, and I have heard of at least one, will light up out of sheer spite.

    I'm trying, through my blog, to break into the journalism industry. Any eyes and ears that pick up on any leads towards that end are greatly appreciated. PM me if you happen to hear anything.
  • GoumindongGoumindong Registered User regular
    dlinfiniti wrote:
    i dont think that massive double clip she has there is legal

    That is a single clip, and it probably is legal.

  • matt has a problemmatt has a problem Six pack on a dick Registered User regular
    Goumindong wrote:
    dlinfiniti wrote:
    i dont think that massive double clip she has there is legal

    That is a single clip, and it probably is legal.
    All clips are legal, now that the assault rifle ban expired.

    h1DI1.jpg
  • LRG wrote:
    *Ring ring*
    Kid picks up phone

    "John, wassup, man?"

    "I was so high last night..."

    "What? Well, how she'd get home?"

    "John, you no that's not me, man"
    *Click*

    Moral of the story: Marijuana will make you do bad things.

    EDIT: I should add more to the discussion than that.

    Basically, I don't know what the hell the hope to accomplish with shitty fear-mongering commercials like that. They don't even tell you what the kid did that was so bad, all you know is he was "soooo high last night" and now his friend hates him or something. They arn't even trying with commercials like this.

    The best anti-weed commercials are the ones that tell you your "wasting your life". Of course, if all kids do when high is sit on Pete's couch, you gotta wonder why its illegal at all.

    So your either wasting your life on Pete's couch or your doing something horrible to a friend or yours. This shit is called propaganda and anyone with half a brain knows it.
    The implication is "zomg I got high and accidentally tried to rape my friend!" Which is absurd not only because pot doesn't take away free will, but also because rape is never a fucking accident. :x

    irt selective-listeners;
    You didn't see the "my dad was a horrible son of a bitch because he smoked and he deserves to be dead like he is" commercial or the "gang up on smokers and/or be a bunch of passive-aggressive emo fucks instead of asking someone to put out their cigarette" commercial? Or the "everyone who smokes is killing Johnny with second-hand cancer if they smoke in the car" radio commercial that specifically stated that the meaningless statistic it spat at listeners was dependent upon the driver keeping all the windows fully closed the whole time? I suppose people who aren't being directly attacked by these commercials would be able to tune them out pretty easily. Aside from the people who are desperate to find a "crusade for vengeance" to take part in so that they can feel like a badass and moralise at people, that is.

    DAMM
    Drunks Against Mad Mothers
  • PodlyPodly RUDEASS TITTIES Registered User regular
    God those truth commercials were (are?) terrible. It makes me want to find an even more toxic cigarette to kill off the population with.

    follow my music twitter soundcloud tumblr
    biden%20sig.png
  • F-Zero_RacerF-Zero_Racer Registered User regular
    A fairly recent campaign against smokers is the whole no stank you ads.

    Personally, I find them insulting, and i'm not even a smoker. They're just so stupid, and make smokers look like they never get a date, they don't have ANY money and so forth.

    Ugh.

  • BigJoeMBigJoeM Registered User regular
    You do know those ads are paid for by tobacco companies as a result of a class action lawsuit right?

    It's not surprising that the commercials suck at their intended purpose.

  • BigJoeM wrote:
    You do know those ads are paid for by tobacco companies as a result of a class action lawsuit right?

    It's not surprising that the commercials suck at their intended purpose.
    Not all of them are, actually. Some are funded by other parties. I forget which are which, though. And actually they were very successful in their intended purpose. Which was never to get people to quit smoking, but rather to make the public hate cigarettes enough to go vote. We're only two pages in, it's not unreasonable for you to read the thread before posting.

    DAMM
    Drunks Against Mad Mothers
  • Irond WillIrond Will Super Moderator, Moderator mod
    ALocksly wrote:
    there strong and then there's this

    Trying to makeg little kids terrified of their parents is such a fucked up idea on so many levels.

    Man who guts fish in a suit?

    Also, while I like the design/ layout of the nuggets advert, I don't really think I get the point they're trying to make.

  • BigJoeMBigJoeM Registered User regular
    Not all of them are, actually. Some are funded by other parties. I forget which are which, though. And actually they were very successful in their intended purpose. Which was never to get people to quit smoking, but rather to make the public hate cigarettes enough to go vote. We're only two pages in, it's not unreasonable for you to read the thread before posting.

    Actually i did read the thread and saw the same criticism i've seen since the ads started that they're condescending about the dangers of cigarettes and have people joke about taking up smoking to spite the ads.

    I joke about it myself and hate smoking with an absolute passion.

    It is surprising that the Phillip Morris ads do a much better job at actually dealing with underage smoking (which is far more worthwhile) than the truth ads.

  • .. Registered User, ClubPA
    Irond Will wrote:
    Also, while I like the design/ layout of the nuggets advert, I don't really think I get the point they're trying to make.
    I think they are going for the "Don't eat meat!" angle. Chicks are considered cute, so I think they are suggesting most people don't want to kill (and eat) cute things. If they used chickens/roosters, which most people do not find cute, it would be less effective.

    "Oh my god, they kill cute little chicks to make chicken nuggets!? I can't eat them now!" That sort of thing.

    Gimme stuff. Please. And I don't just mean my Secret Satan.
  • Low KeyLow Key Registered User
    BigJoeM wrote:
    You do know those ads are paid for by tobacco companies as a result of a class action lawsuit right?

    It's not surprising that the commercials suck at their intended purpose.
    Not all of them are, actually. Some are funded by other parties. I forget which are which, though. And actually they were very successful in their intended purpose. Which was never to get people to quit smoking, but rather to make the public hate cigarettes enough to go vote. We're only two pages in, it's not unreasonable for you to read the thread before posting.

    Most definitely. The long term goal of smoking awareness campaigns isn't so much to make people go "oh wow, lung cancer. You don't say. I'm gonna ring up the Quit helpline right now", but to foster a public environment so passively hostile to smoking that people quit out of sheer awkwardness.

  • FencingsaxFencingsax Registered User regular
    Low Key wrote:
    BigJoeM wrote:
    You do know those ads are paid for by tobacco companies as a result of a class action lawsuit right?

    It's not surprising that the commercials suck at their intended purpose.
    Not all of them are, actually. Some are funded by other parties. I forget which are which, though. And actually they were very successful in their intended purpose. Which was never to get people to quit smoking, but rather to make the public hate cigarettes enough to go vote. We're only two pages in, it's not unreasonable for you to read the thread before posting.

    Most definitely. The long term goal of smoking awareness campaigns isn't so much to make people go "oh wow, lung cancer. You don't say. I'm gonna ring up the Quit helpline right now", but to foster a public environment so passively hostile to smoking that people quit out of sheer awkwardness.

    To be fair, many people are much more swayed by what strangers they meet think of them more than someone saying "Hey, this is why you should vote this way".


    Because 9% think it's too high, and shouldn't be cut! 9% of respondents could not fully
    get their arms around the question. There should be another box you can check for, "I
    have utterly no idea what you're talking about. Please, God, don't ask for my input."
  • Irond WillIrond Will Super Moderator, Moderator mod
    . wrote:
    Irond Will wrote:
    Also, while I like the design/ layout of the nuggets advert, I don't really think I get the point they're trying to make.
    I think they are going for the "Don't eat meat!" angle. Chicks are considered cute, so I think they are suggesting most people don't want to kill (and eat) cute things. If they used chickens/roosters, which most people do not find cute, it would be less effective.

    "Oh my god, they kill cute little chicks to make chicken nuggets!? I can't eat them now!" That sort of thing.
    I see - I was wondering if there was something more to it than "the infantile form of animals are cute. They will someday be consumed". I guess the message there gets a meh from me.

  • Casual EddyCasual Eddy Registered User regular
    Remarking on the ads about pot causing you to rape/kill your friends...

    So I was on campus in highschool and I wanted lunch off campus - but I couldn't go because I was finishing some assignment due later in the day. So I ask a friend of mine to pick me up some takeout somewhere and drop it off in my next class.

    The class goes by and I get no food. I'm left hungry and despondent for the last two periods of the day. Later I see her and she said - "Oh sorry.. I got high and forgot to get you lunch."

    Really, that seems like a much more effective ad. Smoke pot, leave your friends hungry. She didn't blow my head off, she left me craving some pizza.



    I didn't think the Truth ads sucked. Cigarettes do actually kill people which is somehow still lost on a lot of people. It's miles better than 'make sure to talk about it you dumbass parents.' And I can't recall a single ad which demonized smokers.

  • electricitylikesmeelectricitylikesme Registered User regular
    I'll go you one better: in one timeline, the guy goes to a party and gets laid. In the other he stays at home and gets high.

    I think the message is pretty clear to hormonally charged 14 year olds.

    Dis' wrote: »
    Cancer is when cells stop letting the body mooch off their hard work - clearly a community of like-minded cells should isolate themselves and do the best job each can do, even if the rest of the body collapses!
Sign In or Register to comment.