Our new Indie Games subforum is now open for business in G&T. Go and check it out, you might land a code for a free game. If you're developing an indie game and want to post about it, follow these directions. If you don't, he'll break your legs! Hahaha! Seriously though.
Our rules have been updated and given their own forum. Go and look at them! They are nice, and there may be new ones that you didn't know about! Hooray for rules! Hooray for The System! Hooray for Conforming!

Processing Words: The Powerful way

Apothe0sisApothe0sis Registered User regular
So, at work, we use Office - which means I have to deal with Word 2007 and soon Word 2010. I don't often have to do so, but when I do, it is always a pain. Word is so accursedly random in its application of design principles it makes me want to hatchet the server as an act of misdirected rage. The fact that it hides almost everything related to formatting makes the infuriating times when it does something unexpected all the worse. Given that I have, in the past, had the joy of working pure TeX* this is driving me mental.

I would like to know if anyone has any solutions for editting Word Documents by hand so that I can make sure that list and formatting hierarchies actually operate as expected would be idea. Alternatively, if I have to do it with CSS and HTML or XML and who knows what, that would be fine. Or creating documents in something else which is then ultimately converted to .docx works as well.

I also welcome stories about how much you hate MS Office.

*This is semi-sasrcastic.

Apothe0sis on
What I see sees me.
SODOMISE INTOLERANCE
Tide goes in. Tide goes out.

Posts

  • GarthorGarthor Registered User regular
    edited March 2010
    IIRC, the .docx format is basically a .zip file with a bunch of folders containing metadata in .xml format. Not sure if that's helpful at all to you in the present, though.

    Pony_Sig.png
  • GothicLargoGothicLargo Registered User
    edited March 2010
    Stand up a wiki server at work that uses some type of wiki markup. Word use will plummet.

    atfc.jpg
  • StormwatcherStormwatcher Up all night To get luckyRegistered User regular
    edited March 2010
    I actually like the Ribbon. I can find anything pretty easily, and I can have it out of the way when I'm just typing. It's also awesome for reviewing huge docs (an entire book).

    It's all right there.

    Steam: Stormwatcher | XBL: Stormwatcher 21 | PSN: Stormwatcher33 | Gamecenter: Stormwatcher33 | 3DS: 0130-2805-2850
    steam_sig.png
  • Apothe0sisApothe0sis Registered User regular
    edited March 2010
    I actually like the Ribbon. I can find anything pretty easily, and I can have it out of the way when I'm just typing. It's also awesome for reviewing huge docs (an entire book).

    It's all right there.

    You are a strange and terrible person.

    I find it inconcievable that anyone would use Word for serious typesetting.

    What I see sees me.
    SODOMISE INTOLERANCE
    Tide goes in. Tide goes out.
  • taerictaeric Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited March 2010
    Apothe0sis wrote: »
    I actually like the Ribbon. I can find anything pretty easily, and I can have it out of the way when I'm just typing. It's also awesome for reviewing huge docs (an entire book).

    It's all right there.

    You are a strange and terrible person.

    I find it inconcievable that anyone would use Word for serious typesetting.

    I find the implication that people who like word know what "typesetting" is rather amusing. Most people like it because it has a much smaller barrier of entry. Not because they are particularly happy with the end result.

  • amnesiasoftamnesiasoft Thick Creamy Furry Registered User regular
    edited March 2010
  • StormwatcherStormwatcher Up all night To get luckyRegistered User regular
    edited March 2010
    Apothe0sis wrote: »
    I actually like the Ribbon. I can find anything pretty easily, and I can have it out of the way when I'm just typing. It's also awesome for reviewing huge docs (an entire book).

    It's all right there.

    You are a strange and terrible person.

    I find it inconcievable that anyone would use Word for serious typesetting.

    I don't do typesetting, I'm fixing a translation.

    400 pages.

    And for straight translation work it's great too.

    Steam: Stormwatcher | XBL: Stormwatcher 21 | PSN: Stormwatcher33 | Gamecenter: Stormwatcher33 | 3DS: 0130-2805-2850
    steam_sig.png
  • FeralFeral Who needs a medical license when you've got style? Registered User regular
    edited March 2010
    I like the Ribbon, but I still have to agree with Apo. Word still does the same shit it did in 1995, like changing font sizes unexpectedly when you delete a line from an outline, or leaving a blank page at the end of a document with nothing on it if the page preceding it ends with a table, obstinately refusing to bullet lists correctly, etc.

    Wordperfect did shit like that about one-tenth as often, and when it did you could turn on "view codes" and delete the offending markup manually.

    Anyway, I'm certain there's some XML mojo you can do, as Garthor implied above, I just don't know about it personally. It's worth investigating, though.

    I am comforted by Richard Dawkins’ theory of memes. Those are mental units: thoughts, ideas, gestures, notions, songs, beliefs, rhymes, ideals, teachings, sayings, phrases, clichés that move from mind to mind as genes move from body to body. After a lifetime of writing, teaching, broadcasting and telling too many jokes, I will leave behind more memes than many. They will all also eventually die, but so it goes. - Roger Ebert, I Do Not Fear Death
  • Zilla360Zilla360 Spaaaace! EarthRegistered User regular
    edited March 2010
    Start up a wiki server at work that uses some type of wiki markup. Word use will plummet.

  • BirudojinBirudojin Registered User
    edited March 2010
    Sadly, in my experience, people both don't know how to use a wiki in general, but also end up with 4 different wiki pages on the same subject, each written by a different person and in a different year, and a word document covering the same subject in addition to it. Neither the wiki pages nor the word doc are maintained and are uniformly out of date within a two week timeframe.

    Really, LaTeX is about as good of a solution as I can think of offhand that might work, with the major problem being that it can be a pain to learn and is massive overkill for things like meeting notes.

    darleysam wrote: »
    See the Salarians they be walkin' like this: doot doot doot...
  • XaviarXaviar Registered User regular
    edited March 2010
    WaaaAAAAAAAAAaaaaaaaaaAAAAAAaaaaVVVVVVVVvvvvvvE. =P

    steam_sig.png
  • shadydentistshadydentist Registered User regular
    edited March 2010
    I will thank Word for introducing me to Calibri, which has quickly become my favorite sans-serif.

    Steam & GT
    Spoiler:
  • amnesiasoftamnesiasoft Thick Creamy Furry Registered User regular
    edited March 2010
    I will thank Word for introducing me to Calibri, which has quickly become my favorite sans-serif.
    Yeah, basically all the fonts added with Vista and the new Offices are amazing.

  • StormwatcherStormwatcher Up all night To get luckyRegistered User regular
    edited March 2010
    Birudojin wrote: »
    Sadly, in my experience, people both don't know how to use a wiki in general, but also end up with 4 different wiki pages on the same subject, each written by a different person and in a different year, and a word document covering the same subject in addition to it. Neither the wiki pages nor the word doc are maintained and are uniformly out of date within a two week timeframe.

    Really, LaTeX is about as good of a solution as I can think of offhand that might work, with the major problem being that it can be a pain to learn and is massive overkill for things like meeting notes.

    I don't think latex would work for me, though. I have to deliver the revisions and translations in Word format. and it gets especially tricky when I need to use the whole "track changes" thing.

    Anyways, Open Office is free and looks just like pre-2k7 word. maybe people should use that instead. I still love Word 2007.

    Steam: Stormwatcher | XBL: Stormwatcher 21 | PSN: Stormwatcher33 | Gamecenter: Stormwatcher33 | 3DS: 0130-2805-2850
    steam_sig.png
  • Apothe0sisApothe0sis Registered User regular
    edited March 2010
    I feel I should clarify, my concern isn't that Office Uses the Ribbon, that's not hiding anything, it's just a pain to navigate.

    My concerns fall much more in line with Feral's. Word just does things randomly, and there's very rarely a predictable manner by which to fix it.

    I think a way to resolve that sort of behaviour is to have an option to show markup within Word, so you can fix these issues, if they occur and are important, without having to essentially try a whole range of random formatting changes back and forth in a trial and error manner.

    Currently, I'm having an issue with Lists under other list items, the numbering won't start again - so I get 1.1, 1.2, 2.3, 2.4, 3.5, 3.6 and so forth. I've tried a range of things to fix this, and short of removing all formatting and applying everything again in a very careful manner, I cannot reset things to work as expected. I am sitting around wishing that there was a function that allowed you to view and edit the markup used by Word to define what was Bold, or which list a particular list item was an item of and so forth. It would be a glorious thing.

    What I see sees me.
    SODOMISE INTOLERANCE
    Tide goes in. Tide goes out.
  • JasconiusJasconius bird internet Saint Petersburg RussiaRegistered User regular
    edited March 2010
    The odds are that you will not want to mess with the XML source of a DOCX file.

    I am not sure, but deduction would suggest that the output echoes that of the old MS Front Page, which used a horrible XML implementation to bridge web pages and word files.

    Laden with namespaces and redundant tags, etc.

    I've never had many problems with Word, but I've had the luxury of delegating extensive formatting to people who have the time to do that sort of thing. :)

  • Alistair HuttonAlistair Hutton Registered User regular
    edited March 2010
    Look into DocBook.

    At work for producing documentation we are writing in MarkDown syntax, translating that to DocBook using PanDoc. Tweaking the DocBook files with some xsl's and then generating a pdf from that. Instead of making a PDF you could use the DocBook to WordML XSL here http://sourceforge.net/projects/docbook/ to translate to Word. Or you could translate to HTML and open that in word before saving as docx

  • DigDug2000DigDug2000 Registered User
    edited March 2010
    Apothe0sis wrote: »
    I feel I should clarify, my concern isn't that Office Uses the Ribbon, that's not hiding anything, it's just a pain to navigate.

    My concerns fall much more in line with Feral's. Word just does things randomly, and there's very rarely a predictable manner by which to fix it.

    I think a way to resolve that sort of behaviour is to have an option to show markup within Word, so you can fix these issues, if they occur and are important, without having to essentially try a whole range of random formatting changes back and forth in a trial and error manner.

    Currently, I'm having an issue with Lists under other list items, the numbering won't start again - so I get 1.1, 1.2, 2.3, 2.4, 3.5, 3.6 and so forth. I've tried a range of things to fix this, and short of removing all formatting and applying everything again in a very careful manner, I cannot reset things to work as expected. I am sitting around wishing that there was a function that allowed you to view and edit the markup used by Word to define what was Bold, or which list a particular list item was an item of and so forth. It would be a glorious thing.
    Word has a pretty powerful editor for setting up multi-level list styles (something that's not that easy, whether you're in LaTeX or HTML+CSS). Have you played with the style (Home -> Muti-Level List button -> Define new multi-level list). There's a setting in there for "Restart Level after" that controls this. Someone likely already played with it, because none of the default styles have that sort of list numbering.

    Or if you're in the mood to rewrite, you can always rewrite the document in HTML and import it again. Then you can use Notepad or something. Like was said, if you want to see markup, you can open up the XML and edit it, but its not an XML language that many people know or work with. Its not nice and happy and will deal with mistakes you make like HTML is. For 99% of users, editing it by hand to do anything.... advanced, is more likely to just screw things up than fix 'em.

  • Dark ShroudDark Shroud Registered User regular
    edited March 2010
    I'm going to take this opportunity to promote AbiWord.

    That being said I'm currently using the Office 2010 beta. It took me a little time to get used to the ribbon interface especially since I've been using Word since Office '97. But now that I've gotten used to it I prefer it over the old menu system.

  • Apothe0sisApothe0sis Registered User regular
    edited March 2010
    DigDug2000 wrote: »
    Apothe0sis wrote: »
    I feel I should clarify, my concern isn't that Office Uses the Ribbon, that's not hiding anything, it's just a pain to navigate.

    My concerns fall much more in line with Feral's. Word just does things randomly, and there's very rarely a predictable manner by which to fix it.

    I think a way to resolve that sort of behaviour is to have an option to show markup within Word, so you can fix these issues, if they occur and are important, without having to essentially try a whole range of random formatting changes back and forth in a trial and error manner.

    Currently, I'm having an issue with Lists under other list items, the numbering won't start again - so I get 1.1, 1.2, 2.3, 2.4, 3.5, 3.6 and so forth. I've tried a range of things to fix this, and short of removing all formatting and applying everything again in a very careful manner, I cannot reset things to work as expected. I am sitting around wishing that there was a function that allowed you to view and edit the markup used by Word to define what was Bold, or which list a particular list item was an item of and so forth. It would be a glorious thing.
    Word has a pretty powerful editor for setting up multi-level list styles (something that's not that easy, whether you're in LaTeX or HTML+CSS). Have you played with the style (Home -> Muti-Level List button -> Define new multi-level list). There's a setting in there for "Restart Level after" that controls this. Someone likely already played with it, because none of the default styles have that sort of list numbering.

    Or if you're in the mood to rewrite, you can always rewrite the document in HTML and import it again. Then you can use Notepad or something. Like was said, if you want to see markup, you can open up the XML and edit it, but its not an XML language that many people know or work with. Its not nice and happy and will deal with mistakes you make like HTML is. For 99% of users, editing it by hand to do anything.... advanced, is more likely to just screw things up than fix 'em.

    Man, don't even get me started on defining multilevel list styles or just styles in general. It's so.... urgh.

    What I see sees me.
    SODOMISE INTOLERANCE
    Tide goes in. Tide goes out.
  • risumonrisumon Registered User regular
    edited March 2010
    Still using office 2003 here. *flex*

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • SeeksSeeks Registered User regular
    edited March 2010
    Currently, I'm having an issue with Lists under other list items, the numbering won't start again - so I get 1.1, 1.2, 2.3, 2.4, 3.5, 3.6 and so forth.

    Just screwing around in openoffice, it looks like it... almost solves this problem. It starts the numbering over in any case. What it does instead is it lists things, but without the first part in the "sub list" or whatever. Here's what it looks like:


    1. Thing number one.
    .....1. Thing number one part one.
    .....2. Thing number one part two.
    2. Thing two.
    .....1. Thing number two part one.
    .....2. Thing number two part two.


    Just pretend the periods are spaces, since the formatting here won't place nice.

    I'm not terribly experience with Openoffice though (99.9% of all my editing happens with notepad-like programs), so there might be a way to make it do the "1.1, 1.2" thing that I just don't know about.

    userbar.jpg
    desura_Userbar.png
  • xzzyxzzy Registered User regular
    edited March 2010
    Birudojin wrote: »
    Sadly, in my experience, people both don't know how to use a wiki in general, but also end up with 4 different wiki pages on the same subject, each written by a different person and in a different year, and a word document covering the same subject in addition to it. Neither the wiki pages nor the word doc are maintained and are uniformly out of date within a two week timeframe.

    That's not really a problem with the tool, but the people maintaining it.

    Good documentation needs a person dedicated to the task, it's a serious job and it has a pretty precise skill set.

    I haven't encountered a single manager in my career who's realized this. They always treat documentation like it's something people do as they complete tasks, and having a big pool of documentation means the job is done. Makes it very hard to hire an actual technical writer.

  • StormwatcherStormwatcher Up all night To get luckyRegistered User regular
    edited March 2010
    I'm going to take this opportunity to promote AbiWord.

    That being said I'm currently using the Office 2010 beta. It took me a little time to get used to the ribbon interface especially since I've been using Word since Office '97. But now that I've gotten used to it I prefer it over the old menu system.

    This. Once you go over the little learning curve (or learning very low slope) it works so much better than regular windows 3 era menus and submenus and hidden pages.

    It offers you a hell lot more options and tools a lot less clicks away.

    I tried open office, but it tacked an entire extra megabyte to the file I was working with. Nope, thanks but no thanks.

    Steam: Stormwatcher | XBL: Stormwatcher 21 | PSN: Stormwatcher33 | Gamecenter: Stormwatcher33 | 3DS: 0130-2805-2850
    steam_sig.png
  • BirudojinBirudojin Registered User
    edited March 2010
    xzzy wrote: »
    Birudojin wrote: »
    Sadly, in my experience, people both don't know how to use a wiki in general, but also end up with 4 different wiki pages on the same subject, each written by a different person and in a different year, and a word document covering the same subject in addition to it. Neither the wiki pages nor the word doc are maintained and are uniformly out of date within a two week timeframe.

    That's not really a problem with the tool, but the people maintaining it.

    Good documentation needs a person dedicated to the task, it's a serious job and it has a pretty precise skill set.

    I haven't encountered a single manager in my career who's realized this. They always treat documentation like it's something people do as they complete tasks, and having a big pool of documentation means the job is done. Makes it very hard to hire an actual technical writer.

    I agree - however, as you said, people don't realize it, and until they do, that will continue to be the state of functionality with those tools. Giving people an awesome tool is useless if they either cannot or will not use it correctly or support it correctly however :(

    darleysam wrote: »
    See the Salarians they be walkin' like this: doot doot doot...
  • Apothe0sisApothe0sis Registered User regular
    edited April 2010
    Christ.

    So, it turns out that buried within Microsoft's Brass Ackwoods Style system there is indeed a way to see formatting as applied to a given bunch of text (and all you have to do is Click The Style part of the Ribbon -> Manage Styles -> Style Inspector -> Reveal Formatting! Simple!)

    Of course, that still doesn't let me restart lists number at a given point in any useful fashion.

    EDIT: And I have solved this issue, I had to also define a custom list style.

    Way to have a bajillion disparate things you need to do to perform a single function Word.

    What I see sees me.
    SODOMISE INTOLERANCE
    Tide goes in. Tide goes out.
  • MugsleyMugsley Registered User regular
    edited April 2010
    I've run into similar problems with list numbering. In the end, I just end up brute-forcing it to make it work; which sucks. I'm glad you've found a way to reveal codes (easily my favorite feature of WordPerfect back in the day), so that should help alleviate some problems when I run into them.


    We should be getting an Office upgrade here soon. I don't have a lot of experience with The Ribbon, but what little I do have, I've liked it. Except for the fact that I keep forgetting to look UP for the Undo and Save buttons.

Sign In or Register to comment.