New iPhone leaked

Tasteticle

The Far Side wrote: »

JohnnyCache wrote: »

The Far Side wrote: »

JohnnyCache wrote: »

the new 4g will have 90% of nexus one functionality instead of 60%

android users are seriously the linux users of the smart phone world


this post proves its true.

teefs, come on. Linux is a fiddly thing for nerds. Android phones just... have better hardware and do more stuff and don't cost as much.

let it go, man. Let it go.

this is 2010, man, bizzaro future. Now we like microsoft and fear apple. Step out of '95, man.

sorry the iphone rocks and is better than your dinky google phone.

as someone who has used both phones quite extensively I can say that while the iphone is easier to use, the nexus one objectively beats it in terms of functionality. Really they are both great.

HyperAquaBlast

CrackedLens wrote: »

so my contract with sprint is up this month

might have to switch and get one of these

looks pretty sexy

Dude check out the HTC Evo thats coming out for sprint in the summer. That thing should be pretty awesome unless you want the Apple life which I may jump into this summer myself.

So from what I have skimmed apparently both engadget and gizmodo found new iphones in two different bars haphazardly. Eh?

Blake T

Ok googling the snapdragon processor reveals that there are currently five phones using that.

So there are five phones. :^:

lostwords

I just want a damn wristwatch phone alright. I miss my huge digital calculator wristwatch from back I. The day

Abracadaniel

lostwords wrote: »

I just want a damn wristwatch phone alright. I miss my huge digital calculator wristwatch from back I. The day

http://dvice.com/archives/2009/07/samsungs-worlds.php

Blake T

HyperAquaBlast wrote: »

CrackedLens wrote: »

so my contract with sprint is up this month

might have to switch and get one of these

looks pretty sexy

Dude check out the HTC Evo thats coming out for sprint in the summer. That thing should be pretty awesome unless you want the Apple life which I may jump into this summer myself.

So from what I have skimmed apparently both engadget and gizmodo found new iphones in two different bars haphazardly. Eh?

engadget says that the dudes at gizmodo found it they are just reporting it..

Langly

I'm pretty sure "found it in a bar" is code for "Someone leaked us this phone, probably for money dollars"

Centipede Damascus

Engadget was saying a couple of days ago that someone was shopping the thing around saying that it was found in a bar and they wanted money for it

apparently Gizmodo are the ones that ponied up

Tasteticle

is "found it in a bar" the new "fell off the back of a truck"

GRMike

Nah, I believe they found it in a bar. Just like I found my lunch today in the breakroom fridge.

Centipede Damascus

well apparently it was in some sort of camouflage case so it's at least somewhat believable

Langly

Centipede Damascus wrote: »

well apparently it was in some sort of camouflage case so it's at least somewhat believable

This guy was at his bachelor party

KalTorak

In other news, a position opened up in Apple's R&D department today. In other other news, Steve Jobs is looking noticably well-fed.

Butters

Centipede Damascus wrote: »

well apparently it was in some sort of camouflage case so it's at least somewhat believable

So it was stolen while in a camouflage case then?

Shabooty

nexus one is coming to sprint

thinking of replacing my pre with it, seeing as palm is dieing

Usagi

Just reading the whole article now, didn't realize they took it apart

Why would you do that?

KalTorak

To verify its autheticity, apparently.

Butters

Usagi wrote: »

Just reading the whole article now, didn't realize they took it apart

Why would you do that?

Verify part origins and thus the quality of the internals for authenticity. I mean why not take it apart? What are you gonna do use it?

Usagi

Except that it's y'know, not theirs

Abracadaniel

Apple already fired off the kill-switch and wiped it. Shame, would have been neat to see what it was doing with OS4

CrackedLens

GRMike wrote: »

Nah, I believe they found it in a bar. Just like I found my lunch today in the breakroom fridge.

you're that guy?

i hate you so much

GRMike

CrackedLens wrote: »

GRMike wrote: »

Nah, I believe they found it in a bar. Just like I found my lunch today in the breakroom fridge.

you're that guy?

i hate you so much

No, I'm not that guy, but Gizmodo is.

CrackedLens

but you just said...

Abracadaniel

I'm curious about how Apple is gonna react.

Besides hiring a goddamn band of mercenaries to kill the guy who leaked it.

Langly

Usagi wrote: »

Except that it's y'know, not theirs

It's not really from some guy finding it at a bar, though. I'm sure some dude on production staff just sold it to them.

GRMike

CrackedLens wrote: »

but you just said...

I was being facetious.

I have my own office with my own fridge.

Breakrooms are for chumps.

Abracadaniel

Langly wrote: »

Usagi wrote: »

Except that it's y'know, not theirs

It's not really from some guy finding it at a bar, though. I'm sure some dude on production staff just sold it to them.

"You give me $$$, and if you go to X at Y time there might be a lost phone you'd be interested in."

Shabooty

who ever did it is so fired

well, I mean, obviously

Abracadaniel

out of a cannon

Butters

Usagi wrote: »

Except that it's y'know, not theirs

Well yeah but you're talking about guys that likely offered money for it to be stolen in the first place.

GRMike

Smart Hero wrote: »

out of a cannon

in to the sun

ascot

I hope they get done for theft by finding

Langly

ascot wrote: »

I hope they get done for theft by finding

I don't think this sentence means anything.

Ganluan

I just assumed Apple did this on purpose.

HyperAquaBlast

ascot wrote: »

I hope they get done for theft by finding

I hope you make sense.

ascot

Langly wrote: »

ascot wrote: »

I hope they get done for theft by finding

I don't think this sentence means anything.

Seriously?

edit - you idiots should learn to google. In the UK there is a law that finding something and not attempting to reunite it with the owner is essentially theft. Particularly if there is monetary gain involved.

KalTorak

I refer you to the case of Finders v. Keepers

Abracadaniel

Maybe get done means charged?

Langly

"done for theft by finding" doesn't make sense.

I understand that what you meant to say was "I hope that they are convicted of buying stolen goods," but that's not what you said.

Abracadaniel

It was the 'get done' for me.