Our new Indie Games subforum is now open for business in G&T. Go and check it out, you might land a code for a free game. If you're developing an indie game and want to post about it, follow these directions. If you don't, he'll break your legs! Hahaha! Seriously though.
Our rules have been updated and given their own forum. Go and look at them! They are nice, and there may be new ones that you didn't know about! Hooray for rules! Hooray for The System! Hooray for Conforming!
This is Jack. He has sadly taken the place of our NOBLE FLAG, the FLAG OF SAINT DAVID
Here is a picture of Davo and BORIS having a just wonderful time together.
Spoiler:
Anyway, there's just been an election don't y'know. Some dreadful oiks (Gordon Something? And that Clegg fellow, went to Westminster I believe, terribly second rate at Latin so I'm told) were thoroughly defeated by the wonderful David Cameron. Unfortunately, some terrible skullduggery has resulted in the blossoming of a beautiful romance...
"Darling you look simply LOVELY this morning... but you looked fantastic last night".
The closet in which the government has been lurking has been found to be surprisingly full of DAMNED LIBERAL DEMOCRATS and not as many Etonians as expected(this is disappointing); however, the important jobs went to old boys (cheers cheers).
All this nonsense aside.
Use this thread to cast aspersions upon the political judgement of your peers; complain about the Daily Mail, rage against the Grauniad dictionary-raping machine, laugh as the independent is controlled by its shadowy Russian overlords and cry a little as the Telegraph mourns another piece of England lost to the ravening hordes of Polish Plumbers.
I am deeply suspicious of the Great Repeal Bill in the coalition agreement.
Yes, there's some legislation badly in need of repeal.
The Human Rights Act, however, is not among that legislation.
Actually, it really is. The problem with the Human Rights Act (in fact, with the European Convention on Human Rights, which it reflects) is not that the principle is bad, but the legislation is. Many of the articles are entirely sensible & right, but the definitions are so badly written that they are being extended to pretty much anything the plaintiff can get away with.
Having studied pretty much all the high-profile cases where it's actually been invoked, you're entirely mistaken. That's simply how the less reasonable bits of the media like to paint it. Unelss you actually have some solid examples of the law being invoked wrongly with success?
More to the point, the key articles were already enshrined in the British legal and judicial systems (fair trial, life, reterospectivity, etc). Also, it may have passed notice, but Britain wasn't exactly a morass of rights abuse pre-1998, certainly not compared to some areas of the EU or prospective EU (Turkey) which the 1990's / 2000's political obsession with Human Rights was concerned with. It has essentially enshrined protection for people who did not need it, and opened up the law to exploitation by the unscrupulous.
Actually, the fair trial provisions were much, much weaker, and the binding of other public bodies besides the court similarly so. I really don't think you've done your research properly.
(I specialised in HR at University)
Another serious point which is increasingly becoming a problem is the argument by some activists that the HRA / ECHR binds us into not having dealings with any countries which do not conform to the standards in HRA / ECHR. This is, frankly, unworkable. You've probably heard of organisation bringing lawsuits to argue we shouldn't work with Afghanistan, Pakistan etc for these reasons, and may well agree. You probably wouldn't be quite so happy that the logical extension to their argument is that legally we should cut government aid to pretty much all of Africa as well.
Theoretical arguments yet to be tested in court are no basis for repealing anything.
I'm afraid you need something a bit more substantial than the wild claims above. Try doing your own research into HR law isnetad of just believing the media.
Eric Pickles' wife produced a wonderful comment regarding his performance on Question Time:
"You looked a bit slimmer after your diet. On the other hand, you were crap"
EDIT fix your fucking country plx, I have some money in pounds that I'd like to get at a favourable rate
the canadian is making demands while the queen is still activated, and seeking targets
most unwise
That's ok, we'll just have our governor-general speak french and eat some more raw seal meat to make you pale-skinned nannies swoon in nausea again. Besides if she really starts kicking up trouble we can just release a pack of well groomed Corgis to distract her.
WHO'S WHO: KEY CABINET POSTS
PM: David Cameron
Deputy PM: Nick Clegg
Foreign Sec: William Hague
Chancellor: George Osborne
Business/banking: Vince Cable
Defence: Liam Fox
Health: Andrew Lansley
Energy/Climate: Chris Huhne
Justice Sec: Ken Clarke
Home Sec: Theresa May
Education: Michael Gove
Chief Sec to Treasury: David Laws
Scottish Sec: Danny Alexander
Communities Sec: Eric Pickles
Culture/Olympics: Jeremy Hunt
Work and Pensions: Iain Duncan Smith
Tory chair: Baroness Warsi
PSN | Steam
---
I've got a spare copy of Portal, if anyone wants it message me.
Note the power gesture of Cameron with his hand on Cleggs back, essentially saying "i'm in charge here".
Also, what the fuck with the security guards? I'm sure they're probably ex-army or something, but lard almighty. It's 10 Downing Street, they should be fit ex-army types not balding 50 year olds.
PSN | Steam
---
I've got a spare copy of Portal, if anyone wants it message me.
Cameron and Clegg have travelled back from the future to look after their younger selves. I am willing to bet money one of those guards will take a bullet for them.
Seriously though, all power to the Coalition and a restoration of Gladstonian Britain.
Also, the HRA - I have yet to see a detailed legal argument, as opposed to an opinion piece in a newspaper or on TV, that raises convincing argument against it. Can anyone give me a link to some academic articles on the pros or cons of the HRA? I ideally would like a detailed, reasoned argument with reference to examples
Posts
Boris has the best of fashion senses.
"The politics of failure have failed, time to make them work again!"
A nice steaming bowl of faggots and gravy, yum
EDIT fix your fucking country plx, I have some money in pounds that I'd like to get at a favourable rate
Actually, the fair trial provisions were much, much weaker, and the binding of other public bodies besides the court similarly so. I really don't think you've done your research properly.
(I specialised in HR at University)
Theoretical arguments yet to be tested in court are no basis for repealing anything.
I'm afraid you need something a bit more substantial than the wild claims above. Try doing your own research into HR law isnetad of just believing the media.
If we fix our country your rate will only get worse, we have a really awesome exchange rate OUT, just fucks anyone coming in.
Re-read that post more carefully. I bolded the important bit.
the canadian is making demands while the queen is still activated, and seeking targets
most unwise
"You looked a bit slimmer after your diet. On the other hand, you were crap"
That's ok, we'll just have our governor-general speak french and eat some more raw seal meat to make you pale-skinned nannies swoon in nausea again. Besides if she really starts kicking up trouble we can just release a pack of well groomed Corgis to distract her.
Reporting.
---
I've got a spare copy of Portal, if anyone wants it message me.
oh dear.
On the other hand I enjoyed watching Warsi steamroll Griffin on QT.
No, it's Ian and Duncan Smith.
---
I've got a spare copy of Portal, if anyone wants it message me.
Oh, thats who that was?
She was a pain in the ass.
I eagerly await the forthcoming slash-fiction.
Note the power gesture of Cameron with his hand on Cleggs back, essentially saying "i'm in charge here".
Also, what the fuck with the security guards? I'm sure they're probably ex-army or something, but lard almighty. It's 10 Downing Street, they should be fit ex-army types not balding 50 year olds.
---
I've got a spare copy of Portal, if anyone wants it message me.
There is a policeman on the door. I'm sure he knows what he's doing.
Also, I hope David and Nick aren't one of those couples that do everything together. You know the ones.
You glorious bastard.
13th May: Clegg assasinated.
14th May: Emergency powers enacted to deal with the 'unprecedented financial and political challenges that the country is set to face'.
15th May: ???
16th May: Bow to God Emperor Cameron, Lord and Savior of the Empire.
Also, the HRA - I have yet to see a detailed legal argument, as opposed to an opinion piece in a newspaper or on TV, that raises convincing argument against it. Can anyone give me a link to some academic articles on the pros or cons of the HRA? I ideally would like a detailed, reasoned argument with reference to examples
(it's now harder, if you hadn't already guessed)
Old: 50% of MPs + 1 extra MP
New: 55% of MPs
Yes, that first result is, well, interesting
306 (no. of Tory seats) / 650 *100 = 47%. Interesting, eh?