Our new Indie Games subforum is now open for business in G&T. Go and check it out, you might land a code for a free game. If you're developing an indie game and want to post about it, follow these directions. If you don't, he'll break your legs! Hahaha! Seriously though.
Our rules have been updated and given their own forum. Go and look at them! They are nice, and there may be new ones that you didn't know about! Hooray for rules! Hooray for The System! Hooray for Conforming!

[THE POLITICS OF ALBION] Chop Chop Chop

surrealitychecksurrealitycheck Registered User regular
uni0970_s.jpg

This is Jack. He has sadly taken the place of our NOBLE FLAG, the FLAG OF SAINT DAVID

132049khiqrxi2.png

Here is a picture of Davo and BORIS having a just wonderful time together.
Spoiler:

Anyway, there's just been an election don't y'know. Some dreadful oiks (Gordon Something? And that Clegg fellow, went to Westminster I believe, terribly second rate at Latin so I'm told) were thoroughly defeated by the wonderful David Cameron. Unfortunately, some terrible skullduggery has resulted in the blossoming of a beautiful romance...

David-Cameron-Nick-Clegg-006.jpg

"Darling you look simply LOVELY this morning... but you looked fantastic last night".

The closet in which the government has been lurking has been found to be surprisingly full of DAMNED LIBERAL DEMOCRATS and not as many Etonians as expected(this is disappointing); however, the important jobs went to old boys (cheers cheers).

All this nonsense aside.

Use this thread to cast aspersions upon the political judgement of your peers; complain about the Daily Mail, rage against the Grauniad dictionary-raping machine, laugh as the independent is controlled by its shadowy Russian overlords and cry a little as the Telegraph mourns another piece of England lost to the ravening hordes of Polish Plumbers.

Discuss, sirs!

Useful stuff:

Live coverage:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/election2010/liveevent/

Youtube videos of the leaders' debates:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u0QsSoV0SRo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rqis1mkS2CE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S7h9BbTYkgk


COALITION DEAL

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/election_2010/8677933.stm

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politi...10/8677088.stm

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/may/12/coalition-government-explained


And to finish, a quotation from PantsB:

It should be noted that exit polls suck. They've been completely wrong the last 4-5 elections in the US

:o

surrealitycheck on
WSc4j.png
«13456764

Posts

  • BethrynBethryn Registered User regular
    First Person To Post system wins again.

    Boris has the best of fashion senses.

  • DarkWarriorDarkWarrior __BANNED USERS
    Such a Toff thread.

    ...it's in the shape of a giant c**k.
  • NuzakNuzak Registered User regular
    this thread could use more fags

    NgSWV.png
  • Bad-BeatBad-Beat Registered User regular
    [British Politics] Whether Scotland wants it or not.

  • DarkWarriorDarkWarrior __BANNED USERS
    Proposed threat title change coming to the floor!

    "The politics of failure have failed, time to make them work again!"

    ...it's in the shape of a giant c**k.
  • RobmanRobman Registered User regular
    And faggots

    A nice steaming bowl of faggots and gravy, yum

    EDIT fix your fucking country plx, I have some money in pounds that I'd like to get at a favourable rate

  • surrealitychecksurrealitycheck Registered User regular
    This isn't how the feudal system WORKS, chaps! Work! Build! Die at 40!

    WSc4j.png
  • Bad-BeatBad-Beat Registered User regular
    David to Nick: Put the kettle on, love.

  • XagarathXagarath Registered User regular
    Xagarath wrote: »
    I am deeply suspicious of the Great Repeal Bill in the coalition agreement.
    Yes, there's some legislation badly in need of repeal.
    The Human Rights Act, however, is not among that legislation.

    Actually, it really is. The problem with the Human Rights Act (in fact, with the European Convention on Human Rights, which it reflects) is not that the principle is bad, but the legislation is. Many of the articles are entirely sensible & right, but the definitions are so badly written that they are being extended to pretty much anything the plaintiff can get away with.
    Having studied pretty much all the high-profile cases where it's actually been invoked, you're entirely mistaken. That's simply how the less reasonable bits of the media like to paint it. Unelss you actually have some solid examples of the law being invoked wrongly with success?
    More to the point, the key articles were already enshrined in the British legal and judicial systems (fair trial, life, reterospectivity, etc). Also, it may have passed notice, but Britain wasn't exactly a morass of rights abuse pre-1998, certainly not compared to some areas of the EU or prospective EU (Turkey) which the 1990's / 2000's political obsession with Human Rights was concerned with. It has essentially enshrined protection for people who did not need it, and opened up the law to exploitation by the unscrupulous.
    Actually, the fair trial provisions were much, much weaker, and the binding of other public bodies besides the court similarly so. I really don't think you've done your research properly.
    (I specialised in HR at University)
    Another serious point which is increasingly becoming a problem is the argument by some activists that the HRA / ECHR binds us into not having dealings with any countries which do not conform to the standards in HRA / ECHR. This is, frankly, unworkable. You've probably heard of organisation bringing lawsuits to argue we shouldn't work with Afghanistan, Pakistan etc for these reasons, and may well agree. You probably wouldn't be quite so happy that the logical extension to their argument is that legally we should cut government aid to pretty much all of Africa as well.
    Theoretical arguments yet to be tested in court are no basis for repealing anything.

    I'm afraid you need something a bit more substantial than the wild claims above. Try doing your own research into HR law isnetad of just believing the media.

  • DarkWarriorDarkWarrior __BANNED USERS
    Robman wrote: »
    And faggots

    A nice steaming bowl of faggots and gravy, yum

    EDIT fix your fucking country plx, I have some money in pounds that I'd like to get at a favourable rate

    If we fix our country your rate will only get worse, we have a really awesome exchange rate OUT, just fucks anyone coming in.

    ...it's in the shape of a giant c**k.
  • surrealitychecksurrealitycheck Registered User regular
    There. Damnable democracy.

    WSc4j.png
  • Bad-BeatBad-Beat Registered User regular
    awww yeah. Rocking the establishment.

  • RobmanRobman Registered User regular
    Robman wrote: »
    And faggots

    A nice steaming bowl of faggots and gravy, yum

    EDIT fix your fucking country plx, I have some money in pounds that I'd like to get at a favourable rate

    If we fix our country your rate will only get worse, we have a really awesome exchange rate OUT, just fucks anyone coming in.

    Re-read that post more carefully. I bolded the important bit.

  • NuzakNuzak Registered User regular
    Robman wrote: »
    And faggots

    A nice steaming bowl of faggots and gravy, yum

    EDIT fix your fucking country plx, I have some money in pounds that I'd like to get at a favourable rate

    the canadian is making demands while the queen is still activated, and seeking targets

    most unwise

    NgSWV.png
  • Anarchy Rules!Anarchy Rules! Registered User regular
    Eric Pickles' wife produced a wonderful comment regarding his performance on Question Time:
    "You looked a bit slimmer after your diet. On the other hand, you were crap"

  • RobmanRobman Registered User regular
    Nuzak wrote: »
    Robman wrote: »
    And faggots

    A nice steaming bowl of faggots and gravy, yum

    EDIT fix your fucking country plx, I have some money in pounds that I'd like to get at a favourable rate

    the canadian is making demands while the queen is still activated, and seeking targets

    most unwise

    That's ok, we'll just have our governor-general speak french and eat some more raw seal meat to make you pale-skinned nannies swoon in nausea again. Besides if she really starts kicking up trouble we can just release a pack of well groomed Corgis to distract her.

  • Saint MadnessSaint Madness Registered User
    Nuzak wrote: »
    this thread could use more fags

    Reporting.

  • GrimReaperGrimReaper Registered User regular
    WHO'S WHO: KEY CABINET POSTS
    PM: David Cameron
    Deputy PM: Nick Clegg
    Foreign Sec: William Hague
    Chancellor: George Osborne
    Business/banking: Vince Cable
    Defence: Liam Fox
    Health: Andrew Lansley
    Energy/Climate: Chris Huhne
    Justice Sec: Ken Clarke
    Home Sec: Theresa May
    Education: Michael Gove
    Chief Sec to Treasury: David Laws
    Scottish Sec: Danny Alexander
    Communities Sec: Eric Pickles
    Culture/Olympics: Jeremy Hunt
    Work and Pensions: Iain Duncan Smith
    Tory chair: Baroness Warsi

    PSN | Steam
    ---
    I've got a spare copy of Portal, if anyone wants it message me.
  • Saint MadnessSaint Madness Registered User
    Iain Duncan Smith?

    oh dear.

    On the other hand I enjoyed watching Warsi steamroll Griffin on QT.

  • GrimReaperGrimReaper Registered User regular
    Iain Duncan Smith?

    oh dear.

    On the other hand I enjoyed watching Warsi steamroll Griffin on QT.

    No, it's Ian and Duncan Smith.

    PSN | Steam
    ---
    I've got a spare copy of Portal, if anyone wants it message me.
  • DarkWarriorDarkWarrior __BANNED USERS
    Iain Duncan Smith?

    oh dear.

    On the other hand I enjoyed watching Warsi steamroll Griffin on QT.

    Oh, thats who that was?

    She was a pain in the ass.

    ...it's in the shape of a giant c**k.
  • Saint MadnessSaint Madness Registered User
    Also Michael Gove looks like a 12 year old from the chin up.

  • DemiurgeDemiurge Registered User regular
    England, allow your expats to vote at home always and forever, love, Niels.

    DQ0uv.png 5E984.png
  • Saint MadnessSaint Madness Registered User
    David-Cameron-and-Nick-Cl-005.jpg

    I eagerly await the forthcoming slash-fiction.

  • GrimReaperGrimReaper Registered User regular
    David-Cameron-and-Nick-Cl-005.jpg

    I eagerly await the forthcoming slash-fiction.

    Note the power gesture of Cameron with his hand on Cleggs back, essentially saying "i'm in charge here".

    Also, what the fuck with the security guards? I'm sure they're probably ex-army or something, but lard almighty. It's 10 Downing Street, they should be fit ex-army types not balding 50 year olds.

    PSN | Steam
    ---
    I've got a spare copy of Portal, if anyone wants it message me.
  • DarkWarriorDarkWarrior __BANNED USERS
    Im surprised they're allowed to have exposed tatoos.

    ...it's in the shape of a giant c**k.
  • Anarchy Rules!Anarchy Rules! Registered User regular
    They look less like guards, more like porters who are just there to open doors.

  • DanWeinoDanWeino Registered User regular
    Tattoos are cool though, Cameron and Clegg are the anti-cool. Therefore the world is balanced... but only in that hallway.


    steam_sig.png
  • TlexTlex Registered User regular
    Yes, the guards are the guys with machine guns who are often(always?) outside. You can see one of them in the background.

  • Bad-BeatBad-Beat Registered User regular
    The door has to be opened from the inside. No external handle. So those are just the porter guys to open it.

    There is a policeman on the door. I'm sure he knows what he's doing.

    Also, I hope David and Nick aren't one of those couples that do everything together. You know the ones.

  • Anarchy Rules!Anarchy Rules! Registered User regular
    Cameron and Clegg have travelled back from the future to look after their younger selves. I am willing to bet money one of those guards will take a bullet for them.

  • DarkWarriorDarkWarrior __BANNED USERS
    So say Cameron was to have an unfortunate accident with a meatclever and his neck while shaving, would Clegg become the PM?

    ...it's in the shape of a giant c**k.
  • KalkinoKalkino Buttons Londres Registered User regular
    David-Cameron-and-Nick-Cl-005.jpg

    I eagerly await the forthcoming slash-fiction.

    You glorious bastard.

    Freedom for the Northern Isles!
  • TlexTlex Registered User regular
    So, how will Cameron's rise to dictator pan out?

    13th May: Clegg assasinated.

    14th May: Emergency powers enacted to deal with the 'unprecedented financial and political challenges that the country is set to face'.

    15th May: ???

    16th May: Bow to God Emperor Cameron, Lord and Savior of the Empire.

  • DarkWarriorDarkWarrior __BANNED USERS
    Tlex wrote: »
    So, how will Cameron's rise to dictator pan out?

    13th May: Clegg assasinated.

    14th May: Emergency powers enacted to deal with the 'unprecedented financial and political challenges that the country is set to face'.

    15th May: ???

    16th May: Profit

    ...it's in the shape of a giant c**k.
  • KalkinoKalkino Buttons Londres Registered User regular
    Seriously though, all power to the Coalition and a restoration of Gladstonian Britain.

    Also, the HRA - I have yet to see a detailed legal argument, as opposed to an opinion piece in a newspaper or on TV, that raises convincing argument against it. Can anyone give me a link to some academic articles on the pros or cons of the HRA? I ideally would like a detailed, reasoned argument with reference to examples

    Freedom for the Northern Isles!
  • ColdredColdred Registered User
    Apparently GIS shows some interesting results for: "david cameron side profile".

    sig1-1.jpg
  • Bad-BeatBad-Beat Registered User regular
    Although it doesn't really make a whole lot of difference they've changed the total needed for a vote of 'no confidence'.

    (it's now harder, if you hadn't already guessed)

    Old: 50% of MPs + 1 extra MP
    New: 55% of MPs

  • KalkinoKalkino Buttons Londres Registered User regular
    Coldred wrote: »
    Apparently GIS shows some interesting results for: "david cameron side profile".

    Yes, that first result is, well, interesting

    Freedom for the Northern Isles!
  • ColdredColdred Registered User
    Bad-Beat wrote: »
    Although it doesn't really make a whole lot of difference they've changed the total needed for a vote of 'no confidence'.

    (it's now harder, if you hadn't already guessed)

    Old: 50% of MPs + 1 extra MP
    New: 55% of MPs

    306 (no. of Tory seats) / 650 *100 = 47%. Interesting, eh?

    sig1-1.jpg
This discussion has been closed.