Our new Indie Games subforum is now open for business in G&T. Go and check it out, you might land a code for a free game. If you're developing an indie game and want to post about it, follow these directions. If you don't, he'll break your legs! Hahaha! Seriously though.
Our rules have been updated and given their own forum. Go and look at them! They are nice, and there may be new ones that you didn't know about! Hooray for rules! Hooray for The System! Hooray for Conforming!

Why do geeks look like geeks?

SuckafishSuckafish Registered User regular
I know there are exceptions to every rule, but why do the majority of geeky people (programmers, engineers, etc.) look like geeks? For example, take a look at:

http://www.usd.edu/csci/acm/contest/progcon97/progcon_awards.html

If this group of people were to get out more, exercise, and participate in sport, would they start to look less like the stereotypical geek and more like other human beings?

Do you think geeky appearance drives somebody towards geeky activities, or the activities transform their appearance?

Suckafish on
«13456789

Posts

  • AldoAldo Registered User regular
    There's geeks everywhere, you've got geeks in sports, geeks in cars, geeks in books, classical music, computers, music, guns, mathematics and everything else you can think of.

    Now, a geek doesn't pay as much attention to how s/he looks, because s/he considers other things to be more important. It also helps that the people who s/he cares about usually aren't bothered by how they look.

    GW2 tag: Aldo.6019
    Free MMO Überlist
    Elendil wrote: »
    said Aldo hazily, before clop-clop-clopping out of the room
  • GoodOmensGoodOmens Registered User regular
    It's a combination of three things:

    1. As you said, geeky activities don't exactly lend themselves to physical fitness. Therefore, geeks are going to tend to be either skinny or overweight.

    2. Those with a lack of natural physical proclivity tend to avoid physical activities (in the same way as natural atheletes tend toward athletic activity), so it's sort of a feedback loop.

    3. There is a certain group expectation of appearance. Metalheads look like metalheads, jocks look like jocks, geeks look like geeks.

    steam_sig.png
    IOS Game Center ID: Isotope-X
  • JansonJanson Registered User regular
    Um...

    I see people with short hair, long hair, glasses, no glasses, thin and weedy, tall and buff, well-fitting branded clothes, no-brand clothes...

    sharasugar_80.png sharanomsugar_80.png
  • redxredx Dublin, CARegistered User regular
    now... I'm not going to click on that link... but ProgCon97 sure doesn't sound like an accurate sampling of the engineering population.


    now... excluding the children, like kusu and choco, who don't really have time or money to work on not being ugly. Like most of the grown folk here, really are not that hidious.

    RedX is taking a stab a moving out west, and will be near San Francisco from May 14 till June 29.
    Click here for a horrible H/A thread with details.
  • DiscGraceDiscGrace Registered User
    Well, first off, those are high schoolers. I'm fairly sure it's been shown statistically that only 1 in 9 high schoolers is not awkward one way or another.

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • JinniganJinnigan Registered User
    Some of those guys look like they're in reasonable shape.

    whatifihadnofriendsshortenedsiggy2.jpg
  • LeitnerLeitner Registered User regular
    Those guys look more like nerds to me.

    I'd say that a lot of it is a self perpetuating cycle. The physically unfit are going to stay to activities where they can more easily excel, due to the lack of physical fitness these tend to be sedentary and thusly they stay unfit and don't participate in sport.

    You find an overwhelming number of people who don’t fit the stereotype though. It’s like saying why are athletes so ripped?

  • SuckafishSuckafish Registered User regular
    Janson wrote:
    Um...

    I see people with short hair, long hair, glasses, no glasses, thin and weedy, tall and buff, well-fitting branded clothes, no-brand clothes...

    I'm not criticizing the group, but you can't tell me that other than a couple of exceptions those kids stand out as being rather nerdy in appearance. I'm a programmer myself, and depending on the light would fit in amongst them, but it is still plain to me that as a whole they would never be confused with members of the school soccer team.

  • redxredx Dublin, CARegistered User regular
    DiscGrace wrote:
    Well, first off, those are high schoolers. I'm fairly sure it's been shown statistically that only 1 in 9 high schoolers is not awkward one way or another.

    me? that's at me right?

    Like, that's why I said childern. Most of them look pretty horible, and haven't figured out approprate dress or hair fasion.

    RedX is taking a stab a moving out west, and will be near San Francisco from May 14 till June 29.
    Click here for a horrible H/A thread with details.
  • JinniganJinnigan Registered User
    Suckafish wrote:
    Janson wrote:
    Um...

    I see people with short hair, long hair, glasses, no glasses, thin and weedy, tall and buff, well-fitting branded clothes, no-brand clothes...

    I'm not criticizing the group, but you can't tell me that other than a couple of exceptions those kids stand out as being rather nerdy in appearance. I'm a programmer myself, and depending on the light would fit in amongst them, but it is still plain to me that as a whole they would never be confused with members of the school soccer team.

    so you are asking the retarded question of "Why don't people who excel in [computer?] programming look like athletes"?

    whatifihadnofriendsshortenedsiggy2.jpg
  • DiscGraceDiscGrace Registered User
    redx wrote:
    DiscGrace wrote:
    Well, first off, those are high schoolers. I'm fairly sure it's been shown statistically that only 1 in 9 high schoolers is not awkward one way or another.

    me? that's at me right?

    Like, that's why I said childern. Most of them look pretty horible, and haven't figured out approprate dress or hair fasion.

    Actually it was at the OP. Give the kids three or four years to lose the baby fat/grow out the perm/get their braces off. Geesh, they're fourteen - just about when mother nature decrees that they are the ugliest they will ever be in their lives. I hang out with a lot of adult geeks and most of them are at least moderately attractive, and aside from being geeky, a lot of them participate in one or more sports or other athletic activities.

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • Suckafish wrote:
    I know there are exceptions to every rule, but why do the majority of geeky people (programmers, engineers, etc.) look like geeks? For example, take a look at:

    http://www.usd.edu/csci/acm/contest/progcon97/progcon_awards.html

    If this group of people were to get out more, exercise, and participate in sport, would they start to look less like the stereotypical geek and more like other human beings?

    Do you think geeky appearance drives somebody towards geeky activities, or the activities transform their appearance?
    Die in a fire, prick. Also, I'm willing to bet I dress better than you. Maybe if you'd quit playing football for two minutes you could figure out how to color-coordinate, or how to select and arrange furniture for a room to make it look classy, or how to fucking use conditioner.

    Oh wait, are those generalisations I just made absofuckinglutely retarded and based solely in absurd stereotypes? Well I guess that makes them as valid as yours.

    DAMM
    Drunks Against Mad Mothers
  • SuckafishSuckafish Registered User regular
    Jinnigan wrote:
    Suckafish wrote:
    Janson wrote:
    Um...

    I see people with short hair, long hair, glasses, no glasses, thin and weedy, tall and buff, well-fitting branded clothes, no-brand clothes...

    I'm not criticizing the group, but you can't tell me that other than a couple of exceptions those kids stand out as being rather nerdy in appearance. I'm a programmer myself, and depending on the light would fit in amongst them, but it is still plain to me that as a whole they would never be confused with members of the school soccer team.

    so you are asking the retarded question of "Why don't people who excel in [computer?] programming look like athletes"?

    I'm asking why do people that excel at computer programming tend to look more like the stereotypical geek than any other members of society. I work at a large computer technology firm, and 3/4 or more of my fellow employees could likely be pegged as working in the industry at first glance.

  • JinniganJinnigan Registered User
    DiscGrace wrote:
    redx wrote:
    DiscGrace wrote:
    Well, first off, those are high schoolers. I'm fairly sure it's been shown statistically that only 1 in 9 high schoolers is not awkward one way or another.

    me? that's at me right?

    Like, that's why I said childern. Most of them look pretty horible, and haven't figured out approprate dress or hair fasion.

    Actually it was at the OP. Give the kids three or four years to lose the baby fat/grow out the perm/get their braces off. Geesh, they're fourteen - just about when mother nature decrees that they are the ugliest they will ever be in their lives. I hang out with a lot of adult geeks and most of them are at least moderately attractive, and aside from being geeky, a lot of them participate in one or more sports or other athletic activities.
    if i were a devil's advocate i would say that "birds of a feather flock together" and that perhaps you simply have not met these "true geeks."

    whatifihadnofriendsshortenedsiggy2.jpg
  • TankHammerTankHammer Extreme Ghostbuster Registered User regular
    I used to look a lot geekier before college. Once I got out and developed an active social life I started paying attention to what I ate, changed my hairstyle (I just cropped it short before, now it's wavy), started paying attention to my wardrobe and after a while the changes were astounding. I would have a better chance of beating Battletoads blindfolded than landing a date pre-highschool. Post-college I find myself getting flirted with and checked-out by ladies all the time (half the time other people have to bring it to my attention, as I am still naive as hell).

    The social element is a big factor, as is self-motivation. I'm still a huge dork and I wear the badge with pride but when I tell people they don't go "Yeah, I know, don't talk to me." instead it's more like "Oh really? That's neat."

    4icmw.jpg TankHammer | 2zivq6q.jpg JoeJRicc
  • redxredx Dublin, CARegistered User regular
    Jinnigan wrote:
    DiscGrace wrote:
    redx wrote:
    DiscGrace wrote:
    Well, first off, those are high schoolers. I'm fairly sure it's been shown statistically that only 1 in 9 high schoolers is not awkward one way or another.

    me? that's at me right?

    Like, that's why I said childern. Most of them look pretty horible, and haven't figured out approprate dress or hair fasion.

    Actually it was at the OP. Give the kids three or four years to lose the baby fat/grow out the perm/get their braces off. Geesh, they're fourteen - just about when mother nature decrees that they are the ugliest they will ever be in their lives. I hang out with a lot of adult geeks and most of them are at least moderately attractive, and aside from being geeky, a lot of them participate in one or more sports or other athletic activities.
    if i were a devil's advocate i would say that "birds of a feather flock together" and that perhaps you simply have not met these "true geeks."

    yeah, we don't get out much.

    RedX is taking a stab a moving out west, and will be near San Francisco from May 14 till June 29.
    Click here for a horrible H/A thread with details.
  • SuckafishSuckafish Registered User regular
    Suckafish wrote:
    I know there are exceptions to every rule, but why do the majority of geeky people (programmers, engineers, etc.) look like geeks? For example, take a look at:

    http://www.usd.edu/csci/acm/contest/progcon97/progcon_awards.html

    If this group of people were to get out more, exercise, and participate in sport, would they start to look less like the stereotypical geek and more like other human beings?

    Do you think geeky appearance drives somebody towards geeky activities, or the activities transform their appearance?
    Die in a fire, prick. Also, I'm willing to bet I dress better than you. Maybe if you'd quit playing football for two minutes you could figure out how to color-coordinate, or how to select and arrange furniture for a room to make it look classy, or how to fucking use conditioner.

    Oh wait, are those generalisations I just made absofuckinglutely retarded and based solely in absurd stereotypes? Well I guess that makes them as valid as yours.

    Touched a sensitive spot, eh? So there is no truth to it then? I am in no way painting every member of the group with the same brush, but the stereotype does exist for a reason.

  • DiscGraceDiscGrace Registered User
    Jinnigan wrote:
    DiscGrace wrote:
    redx wrote:
    DiscGrace wrote:
    Well, first off, those are high schoolers. I'm fairly sure it's been shown statistically that only 1 in 9 high schoolers is not awkward one way or another.

    me? that's at me right?

    Like, that's why I said childern. Most of them look pretty horible, and haven't figured out approprate dress or hair fasion.

    Actually it was at the OP. Give the kids three or four years to lose the baby fat/grow out the perm/get their braces off. Geesh, they're fourteen - just about when mother nature decrees that they are the ugliest they will ever be in their lives. I hang out with a lot of adult geeks and most of them are at least moderately attractive, and aside from being geeky, a lot of them participate in one or more sports or other athletic activities.
    if i were a devil's advocate i would say that "birds of a feather flock together" and that perhaps you simply have not met these "true geeks."

    Oh, I lived on the honors floor of the residential program for sceince majors dorm in college. There were a few "true geeks" whose rooms smelled like feet and who holed up playing D&D with each other in all their spare time. But the vast majority of these people were pretty social, normal looking, who liked to all go to the movies or play sports or eat dinner or even go drinking together. Two or three of the guys played football in high school. Several of each gender were very attractive. Enough so that I had sex with one of the guys, anyway. :P

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • Suckafish wrote:
    Suckafish wrote:
    I know there are exceptions to every rule, but why do the majority of geeky people (programmers, engineers, etc.) look like geeks? For example, take a look at:

    http://www.usd.edu/csci/acm/contest/progcon97/progcon_awards.html

    If this group of people were to get out more, exercise, and participate in sport, would they start to look less like the stereotypical geek and more like other human beings?

    Do you think geeky appearance drives somebody towards geeky activities, or the activities transform their appearance?
    Die in a fire, prick. Also, I'm willing to bet I dress better than you. Maybe if you'd quit playing football for two minutes you could figure out how to color-coordinate, or how to select and arrange furniture for a room to make it look classy, or how to fucking use conditioner.

    Oh wait, are those generalisations I just made absofuckinglutely retarded and based solely in absurd stereotypes? Well I guess that makes them as valid as yours.

    Touched a sensitive spot, eh? So there is no truth to it then? I am in no way painting every member of the group with the same brush, but the stereotype does exist for a reason.
    You mean like the retarded-jock stereotype?

    DAMM
    Drunks Against Mad Mothers
  • SuckafishSuckafish Registered User regular
    You mean like the retarded-jock stereotype?

    Absolutely, we can discuss that here too if you like, though I think the reason why the average jock is less book-smart than the average computer programmer is obvious. Again, I don't agree that all jocks are dumb, far from it, but I'm sure that kids that struggle in the classroom are more likely to strive to excel in sports.

  • JinniganJinnigan Registered User
    Suckafish, what level of education are you at?

    whatifihadnofriendsshortenedsiggy2.jpg
  • Suckafish wrote:
    You mean like the retarded-jock stereotype?

    Absolutely, we can discuss that here too if you like, though I think the reason why the average jock is less intelligent than the average computer programmer is obvious. Again, I don't agree that all jocks are dumb, far from it, but I'm sure that kids that struggle in the classroom are more likely to strive to excel in sports.
    I don't think the average jock is less intelligent than the average programmer. I think they have different skillsets and that neither one is more likely than the other to know anything about how to properly put together an outfit or arrange an apartment.

    DAMM
    Drunks Against Mad Mothers
  • redxredx Dublin, CARegistered User regular
    Suckafish wrote:
    You mean like the retarded-jock stereotype?

    Absolutely, we can discuss that here too if you like, though I think the reason why the average jock is less intelligent than the average computer programmer is obvious. Again, I don't agree that all jocks are dumb, far from it, but I'm sure that kids that struggle in the classroom are more likely to strive to excel in sports.
    I don't think the average jock is less intelligent than the average programmer. I think they have different skillsets and that neither one is more likely than the other to know anything about how to properly put together an outfit or arrange an apartment.
    a jock might be slightly more likely to have a girlfriend to do that for him.

    or mabey a closeted frat brother.

    RedX is taking a stab a moving out west, and will be near San Francisco from May 14 till June 29.
    Click here for a horrible H/A thread with details.
  • Katchem_ashKatchem_ash __BANNED USERS
    This is the worst, no, stupidest thread ever.

    I am a Business Analyst and I do work with Programmers. None are as geeky as you describe. I was a programmer and I don't find any people in the pictures as nerdy as you make them out to be. They all look normal to me.

    Hell compared to what your interpretations of what "Cool" people look like I rather hang around with those in the pics than your "Cool" people.

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • MalkorMalkor Registered User regular
    redx wrote:
    Suckafish wrote:
    You mean like the retarded-jock stereotype?

    Absolutely, we can discuss that here too if you like, though I think the reason why the average jock is less intelligent than the average computer programmer is obvious. Again, I don't agree that all jocks are dumb, far from it, but I'm sure that kids that struggle in the classroom are more likely to strive to excel in sports.
    I don't think the average jock is less intelligent than the average programmer. I think they have different skillsets and that neither one is more likely than the other to know anything about how to properly put together an outfit or arrange an apartment.
    a jock might be slightly more likely to have a girlfriend to do that for him.

    or mabey a closeted frat brother.

    I learned how to dress nice from a frat brother that was out. But a jock might be of the mindset that its easy to get a girlfriend and then would actually try instead of giving up quickly. Its funny, but the geekiest kid in my frat got the hottest girls because he was always on and didn't think he'd ever fail. Fuck that guy and his 4.0

    steam_sig.png
    If faith is just a silent tribute, mine is just a desperate act.
  • SuckafishSuckafish Registered User regular
    Jinnigan wrote:
    Suckafish, what level of education are you at?

    Computer science major, and have worked three years full time as a programmer. The idea for this topic came to me when I was looking at a wall at work designated to some of the top achievers in the company.

    I have to agree with what many people here said, that it mostly has to do with diet and activity level. I like what GoodOmens said too, that there may be a group expectation of appearance.

  • mcdermottmcdermott Registered User regular
    Suckafish wrote:
    You mean like the retarded-jock stereotype?

    Absolutely, we can discuss that here too if you like, though I think the reason why the average jock is less intelligent than the average computer programmer is obvious. Again, I don't agree that all jocks are dumb, far from it, but I'm sure that kids that struggle in the classroom are more likely to strive to excel in sports.

    Um. No.

    The average jock is of average intelligence...no dumber or smarter than most people. Or are you simply confusing intelligence for education? Jocks will tend to achieve educationally at least what society expects of its members or possibly more (assuming no other socioeconomic factors)...in other words, enough to pass school and function in the world. Since they don't enjoy scholastics, do you really think they should achieve more? Or would you expect instead they'd focus on what they enjoy?

    I think a lot of geeks mistake not being able to achieve scholastically with not caring. Because geeks value education and scholastics more, they can't imagine forgoing them for sports if one had the ability, so they just assume the jock must have found it impossible. Geeks also, because they enjoy things that lean to the scholastic, tend to greatly overestimate the "average" level of intelligence and/or education.

    People will do what is required of them, and beyond that they will do what they enjoy. Whether that's learning some C++ or working on their swing.

    Also, all terms such as jock and geek should be assumed to have quotes around them by default. I just get annoyed by having to quote them each time. These fucking stereotypes and classifications can go beyond the stupid pretty quickly. Seriously, is it "trot out stupid high-school stereotypes day," or something? I missed the memo.

  • JinniganJinnigan Registered User
    NEW QUESTION OF EQUAL CALIBER:

    Do smart and pretty girls exist? Or are you ugly by default if you are smart?

    whatifihadnofriendsshortenedsiggy2.jpg
  • MalkorMalkor Registered User regular
    Jinnigan wrote:
    NEW QUESTION OF EQUAL CALIBER:

    Do smart and pretty girls exist? Or are you ugly by default if you are smart?

    Most of the ones I've met don't brag about thei IQs.

    steam_sig.png
    If faith is just a silent tribute, mine is just a desperate act.
  • redxredx Dublin, CARegistered User regular
    Jinnigan wrote:
    NEW QUESTION OF EQUAL CALIBER:

    Do smart and pretty girls exist? Or are you ugly by default if you are smart?

    Unless Gilmore girls lied to me, they exist.

    RedX is taking a stab a moving out west, and will be near San Francisco from May 14 till June 29.
    Click here for a horrible H/A thread with details.
  • JinniganJinnigan Registered User
    Malkor wrote:
    Jinnigan wrote:
    NEW QUESTION OF EQUAL CALIBER:

    Do smart and pretty girls exist? Or are you ugly by default if you are smart?

    Most of the ones I've met don't brag about their IQs.
    I think anyone who does that, male or female, is subject to suspicion.

    whatifihadnofriendsshortenedsiggy2.jpg
  • bombardierbombardier Super Moderator, Moderator mod
    The source images are pretty bad for discussion since they're 10 years old.

  • SuckafishSuckafish Registered User regular
    Jinnigan wrote:
    NEW QUESTION OF EQUAL CALIBER:

    Do smart and pretty girls exist? Or are you ugly by default if you are smart?

    It obviously depends on whether the smart girl has let her hair down and taken off her glasses. Until then, ugly by default. Duh.

  • mcdermottmcdermott Registered User regular
    bombardier wrote:
    The source images are pretty bad for discussion since they're 10 years old.

    Yeah, I was thinking that too...but figured it went without saying.

    Now that you've said it, I feel it's for the best that it was said. I mean, for 1997 I think some of those guys might actually be pretty stylish. Especially Texas in 1997.

  • SuckafishSuckafish Registered User regular
    mcdermott wrote:
    bombardier wrote:
    The source images are pretty bad for discussion since they're 10 years old.

    Yeah, I was thinking that too...but figured it went without saying.

    Now that you've said it, I feel it's for the best that it was said. I mean, for 1997 I think some of those guys might actually be pretty stylish. Especially Texas in 1997.

    Bad example I know, but I was in high school in '97 and the average guy in that link would not be considered stylish (before people ream me up the bum I wasn't stylish either) :D

    mcdermott, to reply to your earlier post, yes I meant book-smart when I said intelliigence - my bad. I'm not sure if you think that all that differentiates the top scholastic achievers from the average kid is how much they care, but if that is your stance I strongly disagree.

  • Katchem_ashKatchem_ash __BANNED USERS
    Suckafish wrote:
    Jinnigan wrote:
    NEW QUESTION OF EQUAL CALIBER:

    Do smart and pretty girls exist? Or are you ugly by default if you are smart?

    It obviously depends on whether the smart girl has let her hair down and taken off her glasses. Until then, ugly by default. Duh.

    Yeah, thats what I expected.

    Without noteing the expected sarcasm, what is your point? To make them look cool? What will that do? Aside from similing that everyone is cool according to your own dictation of what cool is, there is not benefit for anyone to meet anyone elses expectations. If they want to look like geek, they feel happy and like the enviorment, what right do you have that they aren't cool?

    I would much rather date the hair in a pony tail, glasses wearing girl that i can have a converstation with than the air head bombshell.

    Seriously it seems your more geeky than anyone else.

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • JinniganJinnigan Registered User
    Suckafish wrote:
    Jinnigan wrote:
    NEW QUESTION OF EQUAL CALIBER:

    Do smart and pretty girls exist? Or are you ugly by default if you are smart?

    It obviously depends on whether the smart girl has let her hair down and taken off her glasses. Until then, ugly by default. Duh.

    Yeah, thats what I expected.

    Without noteing the expected sarcasm, what is your point? To make them look cool? What will that do? Aside from similing that everyone is cool according to your own dictation of what cool is, there is not benefit for anyone to meet anyone elses expectations. If they want to look like geek, they feel happy and like the enviorment, what right do you have that they aren't cool?

    I would much rather date the hair in a pony tail, glasses wearing girl that i can have a converstation with than the air head bombshell.

    Seriously it seems you're more geeky than anyone else.
    My actual point was that I would love to date the glasses-wearing bombshell.

    whatifihadnofriendsshortenedsiggy2.jpg
  • Katchem_ashKatchem_ash __BANNED USERS
    Jinnigan wrote:
    Suckafish wrote:
    Jinnigan wrote:
    NEW QUESTION OF EQUAL CALIBER:

    Do smart and pretty girls exist? Or are you ugly by default if you are smart?

    It obviously depends on whether the smart girl has let her hair down and taken off her glasses. Until then, ugly by default. Duh.

    Yeah, thats what I expected.

    Without noteing the expected sarcasm, what is your point? To make them look cool? What will that do? Aside from similing that everyone is cool according to your own dictation of what cool is, there is not benefit for anyone to meet anyone elses expectations. If they want to look like geek, they feel happy and like the enviorment, what right do you have that they aren't cool?

    I would much rather date the hair in a pony tail, glasses wearing girl that i can have a converstation with than the air head bombshell.

    Seriously it seems you're more geeky than anyone else.
    My actual point was that I would love to date the glasses-wearing bombshell.

    Sorry I was quoting Suckafish rather than your question. Sorry about that.

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • VeeveeVeevee Registered User regular
    Jinnigan wrote:
    NEW QUESTION OF EQUAL CALIBER:

    Do smart and pretty girls exist? Or are you ugly by default if you are smart?

    Well, according to the Girls Next Door episode I watched last night, theres a third chance of getting a double major, a third chance at average intelligence and a third chance of being an idiot.

    Also, suckonafish, maybe the reason your co-workers look like they work in the industry is because, and this may be a shock, they actually work in the industry. Now, if you wanted to know why your co-workers choose to look that way, you may have to actually ask them as I doubt we are your co-workers.

  • VariableVariable Stroke Me Lady Fame Registered User regular
    veevee hits on a pwerful point.

    geeks look and act like geeks. jocks look and act like jocks.

    ya know why? because they are.

    I'm very much into technology and computer, but I'm not a geek. The reason is... people don't call me one. They don't call me one because I'm into other things as well, though none as much so. They don't call me that because I don't dress like a geek...

    this entire thread is about whether people who fit stereotypes fit stereotypes. It's a ridiculous question.

    "He who makes a beast of himself gets rid of the pain of being a man" - Dr. Johnson
    Sig%20-%20Reggie%20Watts.png
Sign In or Register to comment.