Is it so hard to see a dive I mean for fuck sakes. What is wrong with these referees. He was jumping before the goalie even made contact. Just ridiculous.
Who the fuck calls a red card on a dive that obvious, honestly.
Don't they show these things in slow-motion where you live? He was definately hit (although he made it appear worse then it was)
They do, and the dude fucking reached for the sky before any contact was even made. It was a total bullshit call, and it's fucking terrible officiating
Who the fuck calls a red card on a dive that obvious, honestly.
Don't they show these things in slow-motion where you live? He was definately hit (although he made it appear worse then it was)
he was NEVER touched
NEVER
The slow-motion changed my mind from "good decision" to "wow what a fucking dive". That man must have an Italian father.
Topia on
0
Options
BarcardiAll the WizardsUnder A Rock: AfganistanRegistered Userregular
edited June 2010
Question on red cards during the world cup, does that mean hes done for the next couple of games as well? Or am i thinking of a tally of 5 yellow cards?
It's not a foul to be touched in the box, it is supposed to be a fucking contact sport not basketball. They need instant replays and a fourth official watching and telling the ref he took a dive before they make such critical calls.
It's not a foul to be touched in the box, it is supposed to be a fucking contact sport not basketball. They need instant replays and a fourth official watching and telling the ref he took a dive before they make such critical calls.
His foot was caught.
Therefore foul
Therefore penalty
and because of the situation therefore Red Card.
There seriously can't be any arguments against this can there? Yes its harsh, but thats the damn rules.
Posts
Books? I though Sheffield burned all their books after they were thought to be teaching "southern ways"
oh no! Red card for the keeper daaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaang
Shit.
We kept the picture books BB, so many colours and pretty drawings.
you poor bastards.
not much use playing without a goalie
Origin: theRealElMucho
Don't they show these things in slow-motion where you live? He was definately hit (although he made it appear worse then it was)
he was NEVER touched
NEVER
They do, and the dude fucking reached for the sky before any contact was even made. It was a total bullshit call, and it's fucking terrible officiating
The slow-motion changed my mind from "good decision" to "wow what a fucking dive". That man must have an Italian father.
It's not a foul to be touched in the box, it is supposed to be a fucking contact sport not basketball. They need instant replays and a fourth official watching and telling the ref he took a dive before they make such critical calls.
Origin: theRealElMucho
So depressing.
they are, and who knows with this world cup..
BBBRRRPPPPPPPPAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAPPPPPPPPPPPPPPFFFFFFFFFFBBBB!!!!!!!
His foot was caught.
Therefore foul
Therefore penalty
and because of the situation therefore Red Card.
There seriously can't be any arguments against this can there? Yes its harsh, but thats the damn rules.
haha
man i hope they ban those horns now that south africa is dunzo
lost another bet, though (cavani to score)