Minimalist [Chat]

CommunistCow

Echo wrote: »

japan wrote: »

Whether or not they have access to the security area, if we're putting "does not want to be porn-scanned" into the "suspicious behaviour" category, it seems like it would be poor judgement to just let them wander around.

Poor judgment: "We're confiscating your liquids in case they're explosive. Now we're throwing them all here in this bin behind me."

Protip: You can carry more than 3oz of saline solution because its for "medical purposes" or something. I read an article a few days ago where a journalist went through security many times to see what he could get away with. At one point he brought TWO full sized saline solution bottles and when the security guy asked him why he had two he responded with "one for each eye". He was let through with them.
o_O

Doc

Wow, so I suspect my work is going to kick me out today instead of waiting the 2 weeks I gave them.

Interesting turn of events.

Evil_Reaver

Timothy Leary Come Check Out This Theory wrote: »

Regina Fong wrote: »

CommunistCow wrote: »

Regina Fong wrote: »

I don't get the hate for TSA employees honestly. The ones I've dealt with were way more decent to me than the typical airline employee has ever been.

Says the white male or so I'm assuming.

On the other hand I did shut down security at Gatwick for about 45+ minutes because the friken x-ray people can't tell the difference between a cd player+batteries+curly headphone cord and a bomb.

Oh right I forgot, the experiences of white men are irrelevant.

I get where you're coming from, but when the matter is "why do TSA employees have a bad reputation" then ethnicity is a factor.

I'm sure the TSA employees are nice people in real life, but I'm really getting tired of being pulled out of line for "special treatment" every time I need to travel.

SORRY I'M BROWN MR. TSA AGENT

japan

Daxon wrote: »

japan wrote: »

Daxon wrote: »

japan wrote: »

In the EU they are very keen on the idea of refusing to let anyone that refuses to go through the porn scanner on to their flight, and providing no option to be searched instead.

Which is a bit odd, because I don't seriously believe that they won't search someone that refuses to go through the scanner, given that they're treating that refusal as suspicious. Then the problem becomes, if you've searched them anyway and know they're not a threat, why not let them on the flight?

They won't bother searching someone and just deny them entry to the security area?

Whether or not they have access to the security area, if we're putting "does not want to be porn-scanned" into the "suspicious behaviour" category, it seems like it would be poor judgement to just let them wander around.

Just because they've denied the pornoscanner does not give the security people permission to bodily search the person as long as they don't wish to/try to attempt to enter the security area. This is incredibly important, just as a civil rights thing.

Refusing to be porno scanned would only ever come up in the context of trying to enter the security area. I don't understand what you're getting at here.

JustinSane07

Need one more for LoL.

CommunistCow

Evil_Reaver wrote: »

Timothy Leary Come Check Out This Theory wrote: »

Regina Fong wrote: »

CommunistCow wrote: »

Regina Fong wrote: »

I don't get the hate for TSA employees honestly. The ones I've dealt with were way more decent to me than the typical airline employee has ever been.

Says the white male or so I'm assuming.

On the other hand I did shut down security at Gatwick for about 45+ minutes because the friken x-ray people can't tell the difference between a cd player+batteries+curly headphone cord and a bomb.

Oh right I forgot, the experiences of white men are irrelevant.

I get where you're coming from, but when the matter is "why do TSA employees have a bad reputation" then ethnicity is a factor.

I'm sure the TSA employees are nice people in real life, but I'm really getting tired of being pulled out of line for "special treatment" every time I need to travel.

SORRY I'M BROWN MR. TSA AGENT

Try dressing as nicely as possible. Dress shirt, slacks, etc. That might help cut down on the groping.

Preacher

Man I think some people are overvauling their bodies. Porno scanned indeed, god knows the horror a TSA agent will see in a day.

Abdhyius

Silas Brown wrote: »

Arivia wrote: »

Mmm I would show my tits to every roommate.

:?

dogg you live in Alaska there'd be no-one around to flash but like moose or elk or whatever

Abdhyius

CommunistCow wrote: »

Echo wrote: »

japan wrote: »

Whether or not they have access to the security area, if we're putting "does not want to be porn-scanned" into the "suspicious behaviour" category, it seems like it would be poor judgement to just let them wander around.

Poor judgment: "We're confiscating your liquids in case they're explosive. Now we're throwing them all here in this bin behind me."

Protip: You can carry more than 3oz of saline solution because its for "medical purposes" or something. I read an article a few days ago where a journalist went through security many times to see what he could get away with. At one point he brought TWO full sized saline solution bottles and when the security guy asked him why he had two he responded with "one for each eye". He was let through with them.
o_O

ahahahahahaha

Nocturne

Preacher wrote: »

Man I think some people are overvauling their bodies. Porno scanned indeed, god knows the horror a TSA agent will see in a day.

Seriously. Next time I fly I'm going to be looking around at all the other people in line with me and trying not to vomit.

japan

Preacher wrote: »

Man I think some people are overvauling their bodies. Porno scanned indeed, god knows the horror a TSA agent will see in a day.

I'm not getting naked in front of any cameras unless I'm getting paid.

Silas Brown

Abdhyius wrote: »

Silas Brown wrote: »

Arivia wrote: »

Mmm I would show my tits to every roommate.

:?

dogg you live in Alaska there'd be no-one around to flash but like moose or elk or whatever

It's more hilarious than you think.

matt has a problem

CommunistCow wrote: »

Evil_Reaver wrote: »

Timothy Leary Come Check Out This Theory wrote: »

Regina Fong wrote: »

CommunistCow wrote: »

Regina Fong wrote: »

I don't get the hate for TSA employees honestly. The ones I've dealt with were way more decent to me than the typical airline employee has ever been.

Says the white male or so I'm assuming.

On the other hand I did shut down security at Gatwick for about 45+ minutes because the friken x-ray people can't tell the difference between a cd player+batteries+curly headphone cord and a bomb.

Oh right I forgot, the experiences of white men are irrelevant.

I get where you're coming from, but when the matter is "why do TSA employees have a bad reputation" then ethnicity is a factor.

I'm sure the TSA employees are nice people in real life, but I'm really getting tired of being pulled out of line for "special treatment" every time I need to travel.

SORRY I'M BROWN MR. TSA AGENT

Try dressing as nicely as possible. Dress shirt, slacks, etc. That might help cut down on the groping.

Or wear a kilt and go commando.

Evil_Reaver

CommunistCow wrote: »

Evil_Reaver wrote: »

Timothy Leary Come Check Out This Theory wrote: »

Regina Fong wrote: »

CommunistCow wrote: »

Regina Fong wrote: »

I don't get the hate for TSA employees honestly. The ones I've dealt with were way more decent to me than the typical airline employee has ever been.

Says the white male or so I'm assuming.

On the other hand I did shut down security at Gatwick for about 45+ minutes because the friken x-ray people can't tell the difference between a cd player+batteries+curly headphone cord and a bomb.

Oh right I forgot, the experiences of white men are irrelevant.

I get where you're coming from, but when the matter is "why do TSA employees have a bad reputation" then ethnicity is a factor.

I'm sure the TSA employees are nice people in real life, but I'm really getting tired of being pulled out of line for "special treatment" every time I need to travel.

SORRY I'M BROWN MR. TSA AGENT

Try dressing as nicely as possible. Dress shirt, slacks, etc. That might help cut down on the groping.

I've tried everything, broski.

Every flipping time I go in an airport I get pulled out of line for the porno scanner when EVERYONE else gets to go through the metal detector.

Echo

CommunistCow wrote: »

Protip: You can carry more than 3oz of saline solution because its for "medical purposes" or something. I read an article a few days ago where a journalist went through security many times to see what he could get away with. At one point he brought TWO full sized saline solution bottles and when the security guy asked him why he had two he responded with "one for each eye". He was let through with them.
o_O

TSA gets the quality of employees they pay for.

Daxon

japan wrote: »

Daxon wrote: »

japan wrote: »

Daxon wrote: »

japan wrote: »

In the EU they are very keen on the idea of refusing to let anyone that refuses to go through the porn scanner on to their flight, and providing no option to be searched instead.

Which is a bit odd, because I don't seriously believe that they won't search someone that refuses to go through the scanner, given that they're treating that refusal as suspicious. Then the problem becomes, if you've searched them anyway and know they're not a threat, why not let them on the flight?

They won't bother searching someone and just deny them entry to the security area?

Whether or not they have access to the security area, if we're putting "does not want to be porn-scanned" into the "suspicious behaviour" category, it seems like it would be poor judgement to just let them wander around.

Just because they've denied the pornoscanner does not give the security people permission to bodily search the person as long as they don't wish to/try to attempt to enter the security area. This is incredibly important, just as a civil rights thing.

Refusing to be porno scanned would only ever come up in the context of trying to enter the security area. I don't understand what you're getting at here.

If you refuse the pornoscan, are then told that if you do not concede to the scan you won't be allowed into the area and then continue to refuse that does not give the guard a right to then pat you down despite the fact that you just recently tried to get into the area.

Abdhyius

the point isn't to prevent attacks

the point is to make it seem like it's safe

the liquid ban is great for that because it's highly visible

Doc

/i kind of want to sew an outline of a giant dick made out of tinfoil inside some pants.

TL DR

japan wrote: »

Timothy Leary Come Check Out This Theory wrote: »

Every Nocturne once in awhile in my posts I Feral scatter the Hakkekage names of Organichu people who I think are likely to Timothy Leary Come Check Out This Theory ego-search

Nobody ever refers to you by your full name. That would be madness.

Well maybe they should.

CommunistCow

matthasaproblem wrote: »

Or wear a kilt and go commando.

Someone on reddit said they were going to tape a dildo to their leg next time they go to the airport. That should be an interesting conversation with TSA.

japan

Metallized mylar underwear.

Or a literal tinfoil hat.

Arivia

Styrofoam Sammich wrote: »

Arivia wrote: »

Mmm I would show my tits to every roommate.

You're just a doll aren't you?

Yep!

Tranny Barbie, now with pack-in detachable dick!

Nocturne

matthasaproblem wrote: »

CommunistCow wrote: »

Evil_Reaver wrote: »

Timothy Leary Come Check Out This Theory wrote: »

Regina Fong wrote: »

CommunistCow wrote: »

Regina Fong wrote: »

I don't get the hate for TSA employees honestly. The ones I've dealt with were way more decent to me than the typical airline employee has ever been.

Says the white male or so I'm assuming.

On the other hand I did shut down security at Gatwick for about 45+ minutes because the friken x-ray people can't tell the difference between a cd player+batteries+curly headphone cord and a bomb.

Oh right I forgot, the experiences of white men are irrelevant.

I get where you're coming from, but when the matter is "why do TSA employees have a bad reputation" then ethnicity is a factor.

I'm sure the TSA employees are nice people in real life, but I'm really getting tired of being pulled out of line for "special treatment" every time I need to travel.

SORRY I'M BROWN MR. TSA AGENT

Try dressing as nicely as possible. Dress shirt, slacks, etc. That might help cut down on the groping.

Or wear a kilt and go commando.

This makes me wonder what would happen if you had a giant fake dong running down the leg of your pants while they were doing this search.

JustinSane07

Hey. Hey you homos. Enough with getting naked for airport employees. I need one more for a LoL game.

Preacher

Doc wrote: »

/i kind of want to sew an outline of a giant dick made out of tinfoil inside some pants.

Well now we all know everything isn't giant on you Doc. So thanks for that, pee wee.

Abdhyius

Daxon wrote: »

japan wrote: »

Daxon wrote: »

japan wrote: »

Daxon wrote: »

japan wrote: »

In the EU they are very keen on the idea of refusing to let anyone that refuses to go through the porn scanner on to their flight, and providing no option to be searched instead.

Which is a bit odd, because I don't seriously believe that they won't search someone that refuses to go through the scanner, given that they're treating that refusal as suspicious. Then the problem becomes, if you've searched them anyway and know they're not a threat, why not let them on the flight?

They won't bother searching someone and just deny them entry to the security area?

Whether or not they have access to the security area, if we're putting "does not want to be porn-scanned" into the "suspicious behaviour" category, it seems like it would be poor judgement to just let them wander around.

Just because they've denied the pornoscanner does not give the security people permission to bodily search the person as long as they don't wish to/try to attempt to enter the security area. This is incredibly important, just as a civil rights thing.

Refusing to be porno scanned would only ever come up in the context of trying to enter the security area. I don't understand what you're getting at here.

If you refuse the pornoscan, are then told that if you do not concede to the scan you won't be allowed into the area and then continue to refuse that does not give the guard a right to then pat you down despite the fact that you just recently tried to get into the area.

if you don't want to get pat down you're free to like, leave and drive home

Echo

Doc wrote: »

/i kind of want to sew an outline of a giant dick made out of tinfoil inside some pants.

I've been wondering how metal shows up on the backscatter scanner. Like, if you can send a cheery little message with tinfoil letters glued to your stomach.

japan

Daxon wrote: »

If you refuse the pornoscan, are then told that if you do not concede to the scan you won't be allowed into the area and then continue to refuse that does not give the guard a right to then pat you down despite the fact that you just recently tried to get into the area.

That doesn't make any sense.

Abdhyius

Nocturne wrote: »

matthasaproblem wrote: »

CommunistCow wrote: »

Evil_Reaver wrote: »

Timothy Leary Come Check Out This Theory wrote: »

Regina Fong wrote: »

CommunistCow wrote: »

Regina Fong wrote: »

I don't get the hate for TSA employees honestly. The ones I've dealt with were way more decent to me than the typical airline employee has ever been.

Says the white male or so I'm assuming.

On the other hand I did shut down security at Gatwick for about 45+ minutes because the friken x-ray people can't tell the difference between a cd player+batteries+curly headphone cord and a bomb.

Oh right I forgot, the experiences of white men are irrelevant.

I get where you're coming from, but when the matter is "why do TSA employees have a bad reputation" then ethnicity is a factor.

I'm sure the TSA employees are nice people in real life, but I'm really getting tired of being pulled out of line for "special treatment" every time I need to travel.

SORRY I'M BROWN MR. TSA AGENT

Try dressing as nicely as possible. Dress shirt, slacks, etc. That might help cut down on the groping.

Or wear a kilt and go commando.

This makes me wonder what would happen if you had a giant fake dong running down the leg of your pants while they were doing this search.

They ram it up your ass in the back room.

Nocturne

Abdhyius wrote: »

Daxon wrote: »

japan wrote: »

Daxon wrote: »

japan wrote: »

Daxon wrote: »

japan wrote: »

In the EU they are very keen on the idea of refusing to let anyone that refuses to go through the porn scanner on to their flight, and providing no option to be searched instead.

Which is a bit odd, because I don't seriously believe that they won't search someone that refuses to go through the scanner, given that they're treating that refusal as suspicious. Then the problem becomes, if you've searched them anyway and know they're not a threat, why not let them on the flight?

They won't bother searching someone and just deny them entry to the security area?

Whether or not they have access to the security area, if we're putting "does not want to be porn-scanned" into the "suspicious behaviour" category, it seems like it would be poor judgement to just let them wander around.

Just because they've denied the pornoscanner does not give the security people permission to bodily search the person as long as they don't wish to/try to attempt to enter the security area. This is incredibly important, just as a civil rights thing.

Refusing to be porno scanned would only ever come up in the context of trying to enter the security area. I don't understand what you're getting at here.

If you refuse the pornoscan, are then told that if you do not concede to the scan you won't be allowed into the area and then continue to refuse that does not give the guard a right to then pat you down despite the fact that you just recently tried to get into the area.

if you don't want to get pat down you're free to like, leave and drive home

I can't believe you two have still not realized the communication problem here.

Regina Fong

Timothy Leary Come Check Out This Theory wrote: »

Regina Fong wrote: »

CommunistCow wrote: »

Regina Fong wrote: »

I don't get the hate for TSA employees honestly. The ones I've dealt with were way more decent to me than the typical airline employee has ever been.

Says the white male or so I'm assuming.

On the other hand I did shut down security at Gatwick for about 45+ minutes because the friken x-ray people can't tell the difference between a cd player+batteries+curly headphone cord and a bomb.

Oh right I forgot, the experiences of white men are irrelevant.

I get where you're coming from, but when the matter is "why do TSA employees have a bad reputation" then ethnicity is a factor.

I wonder how much of this is affected by preconceived notions of unfair victimization.

Because I said the TSA has always treated me decently, not that I've never been held up, pulled out for a random extra search and so forth.

Because I have.

I just know that's part of their job. It doesn't make me a victim.

Wash

Arivia wrote: »

Styrofoam Sammich wrote: »

Arivia wrote: »

Mmm I would show my tits to every roommate.

You're just a doll aren't you?

Yep!

Tranny Barbie, now with pack-in detachable dick!

Tranny Barbie's dream house comes with a sex dungeon, doesn't it

RiemannLives

Anyone on who does JQuery based web development?

Cokebotle

Good morning [chat]. How are things Stateside?

Echo

RiemannLives wrote: »

Anyone on who does JQuery based web development?

I've been meaning to take a stab at that.

So... no.

Nocturne

Regina Fong wrote: »

I wonder how much of this is affected by preconceived notions of unfair victimization.

Because I said the TSA has always treated me decently, not that I've never been held up, pulled out for a random extra search and so forth.

Because I have.

I just know that's part of their job. It doesn't make me a victim.

Same here, and I look like a super harmless white boy.

CommunistCow

RiemannLives wrote: »

Anyone on who does JQuery based web development?

I kinda know jersey based RESTful webserivces, but thats not helpful. :mrgreen:

Jakarrd

Cokebotle wrote: »

Good morning [chat]. How are things Stateside?

Screwed as always.

CommunistCow

Cokebotle wrote: »

Good morning [chat]. How are things Stateside?

TSA-rape-tastic.

Preacher

Nocturne wrote: »

Regina Fong wrote: »

I wonder how much of this is affected by preconceived notions of unfair victimization.

Because I said the TSA has always treated me decently, not that I've never been held up, pulled out for a random extra search and so forth.

Because I have.

I just know that's part of their job. It doesn't make me a victim.

Same here, and I look like a super harmless white boy.

"Dear Penthouse forum..."