Our new Indie Games subforum is now open for business in G&T. Go and check it out, you might land a code for a free game. If you're developing an indie game and want to post about it, follow these directions. If you don't, he'll break your legs! Hahaha! Seriously though.
Our rules have been updated and given their own forum. Go and look at them! They are nice, and there may be new ones that you didn't know about! Hooray for rules! Hooray for The System! Hooray for Conforming!

The Limits of Well-Intentioned Nagging

HamurabiHamurabi Registered User regular
Spoiler:

The above quote tree is from the SE thread on the first episode of season 2 of PATV. While it's not a great discussion in itself, it does bring up what I feel is a worthwhile question:

When are you justified in nagging people you care about (your friends, relatives, co-workers, people who draw webcomics that you like, etc.) to do something that will objectively (or at least, I don't think you could make a very cogent argument against doing) improve their lives? Is it annoying and offputting to bring up your buddy's tobacco habit one in awhile and urge him to quit? Is it beyond the pale to see someone buying loads of Arizona tea and mention that it's basically just sugar water?

How justified are people in suggesting (politely) that the people they care about help themselves?

Hamurabi on
network_sig2.png

Posts

  • surrealitychecksurrealitycheck Registered User regular
    My rule is - bring it up once, see how they react. If they don't mind, or agree, you talk to them about a way of actually achieving what they say they want (whether it's stopping smoking or getting in shape or whatever).

    But if they're annoyed, I drop it - it's not worth losing a friend / annoying them over it. You never get somebody to do what you want by annoying them in any worthwhile sense - change in behaviour comes from them actually agreeing with you and believing that what you say is true.

    WSc4j.png
  • durandal4532durandal4532 Registered User regular
    Behavior alteration is incredibly difficult and follows strange rules. I think establishing boundaries and working within them helps, though. Like "do you mind if I bug you about working out MWF?" or something.

    But habits die hard, and like usually with a lot of angry flailing.

  • Eat it You Nasty Pig.Eat it You Nasty Pig. tell homeland security 'we are the bomb'Registered User regular
    You're justified in "nagging" people (in the sense of attempting to offer good faith advice) until they tell you to quit it.

    hope? change? busproject.org
    my unofficial autobio will be accompanied with tips on how to smile
    cause I've found that when they don't see you frown, they never know that you're a threat
    and they don't sweat you when you came around
  • AridholAridhol Registered User regular
    You're justified in "nagging" people (in the sense of attempting to offer good faith advice) until they tell you to quit it.

  • OptyOpty Registered User regular
    Bringing it up once or twice when it's contextually relevant (like when someone's doing the thing you're trying to offer advice against doing, such as chain smoking or pigging out) is fine, but bringing it up every time it's relevant or times when it's not relevant (like say when commenting about a PATV episode where there's no mention of eating or exercise habits) will piss them off pretty quick and they'll most likely push back and even possibly do whatever you're objecting about even more out of anger. The important thing is they have to want to change first and foremost and you nagging all the time or at the wrong times won't get them there any faster.

  • HamurabiHamurabi Registered User regular
    Opty wrote: »
    ...(like say when commenting about a PATV episode where there's no mention of eating or exercise habits)...

    So I should've waited until they hit an episode in season 2 about personal health? Alternatively, I missed the boat when people were talking about that episode where they showcased the treadmill with a PC in front of it running WoW, and now I can't comment on it anymore?

    network_sig2.png
  • FeralFeral Who needs a medical license when you've got style? Registered User regular
    Hamurabi wrote: »
    When are you justified in nagging people you care about (your friends, relatives, co-workers, people who draw webcomics that you like, etc.) to do something that will objectively (or at least, I don't think you could make a very cogent argument against doing) improve their lives? Is it annoying and offputting to bring up your buddy's tobacco habit one in awhile and urge him to quit? Is it beyond the pale to see someone buying loads of Arizona tea and mention that it's basically just sugar water?

    How justified are people in suggesting (politely) that the people they care about help themselves?

    This is one of the things that separates close friends from acquaintances in my world.

    People who have bad habits have certainly heard how their habits are bad before. Smokers, for instance, have a whole world of messages telling them to quit. it's printed on every pack they buy.

    If you're a stranger, or somebody who only barely knows them, then your voice is just going to join that cacophony.

    But if you're a friend, somebody they already trust, then you're in a privileged position to give them advice.

    On top of that, some vices aren't as clear-cut as smoking. What if we're talking about a person in an abusive relationship? Or a bad job? Maybe you don't see the whole picture, maybe you're only seeing one facet of the situation.

    Even then, if you're a close friend, you have to be frugal with constructive criticism or else you risk damaging your friendship and rendering the person even more closed-off to your message.

    Also, if this devolves into yet another fitness thread so help me god I will shank somebody.

    I am comforted by Richard Dawkins’ theory of memes. Those are mental units: thoughts, ideas, gestures, notions, songs, beliefs, rhymes, ideals, teachings, sayings, phrases, clichés that move from mind to mind as genes move from body to body. After a lifetime of writing, teaching, broadcasting and telling too many jokes, I will leave behind more memes than many. They will all also eventually die, but so it goes. - Roger Ebert, I Do Not Fear Death
  • TheOrangeTheOrange Registered User regular
    What if there is a third party getting involved?

    What if you went with a friend that had to take his 4 year old with him, its cool, you're old buddies. Now the kid asks for an icecream, I mean, the next showing of Toy Story 3 is in 35 minutes, there is time to kill. Now that friend start shouting at his kid unreasonably, I mean, you are withen you rights to say 'NO' to your kid, but why make him feel like shit about it?

    Now, whats the aproperite thing for YOU to do? Should I defend the kid infront of the kid? That could enforce the kid's perciption that he is wronged and in turn could damage their relationship. Should I talk to him when the kid is busy?

    I feel situations where advice would be a direct offense against someone's skill are the most hard to navigate, such as telling a girl friend to let you teach her how to park in a crowded parking lot. Or telling a father how to raise his kids.

  • FeralFeral Who needs a medical license when you've got style? Registered User regular
    Parents aren't immune to criticism simply by virtue of being parents.

    But, again, if it's not a close friend of yours, you're really not in the best position to criticize them.

    I am comforted by Richard Dawkins’ theory of memes. Those are mental units: thoughts, ideas, gestures, notions, songs, beliefs, rhymes, ideals, teachings, sayings, phrases, clichés that move from mind to mind as genes move from body to body. After a lifetime of writing, teaching, broadcasting and telling too many jokes, I will leave behind more memes than many. They will all also eventually die, but so it goes. - Roger Ebert, I Do Not Fear Death
Sign In or Register to comment.