Our new Indie Games subforum is now open for business in G&T. Go and check it out, you might land a code for a free game. If you're developing an indie game and want to post about it,
follow these directions. If you don't, he'll break your legs! Hahaha! Seriously though.
Our rules have been updated and given
their own forum. Go and look at them! They are nice, and there may be new ones that you didn't know about! Hooray for rules! Hooray for The System! Hooray for Conforming!
Posts
I'm mostly just using Chrome at the moment
If you can't decide just use each of them for 3-5 days then switch, if one feels comfortable just stick with it.
Well there are a few things you can do. First add some block lists into IE with Spybot SD's Immunization feature & Spyware Blaster. Both are free programs that do this.
*Next give this ad blocker a try, its supposed to use some of the same block lists as Firefox's Adblock plus.
http://simple-adblock.com/
*If you're using IE9 make sure you install the beta version.
Lastly just for fun here is a Pipeline hack for IE to speed up loading: http://enhanceie.com/dl/fixHTTPMax.reg
Here's a link to the actual page: http://enhanceie.com/ie/tweaks.asp
Wow. It looks like MS is finally taking the challenge from other browsers seriously. It actually feels and looks like a modern browser, and not something left over from 2002. It's still not enough to move me away from Opera, but I'll actually keep it on my taskbar now, and use it on the odd occassion when I need a different browser.
Also, the tab grouping thing is just about my favorite tab management system so far. I just drag thumbnails around between groups. Chrome and Opera have a 1Dish approach to tab organization. I think Mozilla is onto something with the lots-of-squares-on-a-2D-table approach.
Blog | Twitter | Free games | Unmaintained backloggery
I would easily recommend Chrome.
Flash now comes installed in it, so there is no separate update utility or program needed for that. And we all need to keep flash up-to-date 100% of the time whether we like it or not due to security.
You can turn off plugins and scripts for websites and enable it only for those sites you allow.
The interface functions the best. The menu for selecting tools and options is the most straight forward. There's no need for a separate bar to search using search engines or places like Wikipedia and Amazon. The way it shows the full url without a permanent status bar. And I think it looks the best by far especially on Windows 7 or Vista.
It's the fastest or at least the same speed as the other fast browsers.
It opens pages in separate processes so if a script or plugin crashes in one it doesn't affect anything else.
The name sounds dumb at first, but Chrome is a technical term for a web browser's interface. Type about:config into Firefox and search using the term chrome to see. Therefore the name Google Chrome makes a lot of sense although it's not creative.
I'm not really seeing how this is a big plus for Chrome. It's not like updating Flash is a pain in the ass normally.
Same with Opera.
These are all things Opera can do so I'm not sure why they count in Chrome's favor.
Probably the main reason I use Opera is its speed; I guess this is all subjective or whatever because everyone likes to claim their browser is the fastest, so I just suggest people use all of them and decide which they like. In any case, between Opera and Chrome I see no appreciable difference.
That's nice, yeah. Although I can't remember the last time my browser crashed. Well, Firefox crashes all the time, but it's Firefox.
I suppose you win this round.
Neither. Speed dial is awesome and Firefox is lame for not snapping that up (in the default install). I dislike tab stacking; I always end up piling things on top of each other by accident.
In FF4, when you click a button, all the browser chrome disappears and little thumbnails of every open tab appear. You can drag them near each other to automatically group them, or you can drag them from group to group, or drag them out of a group. Everything is all tiled and pretty and magical. When you click a tab thumbnail, the chrome reappears, and only tabs from that group are in your main browser tabs.
It's great if you need to work on several completely unrelated things at the same time. I regularly keep 50 tabs open, and right now I've got groups for general goofing off; Linear Algebra reference/Unity documentation; a bunch of stuff related to a desktop I'm building; and several tabs open to various used game sites looking for the cheapest prices on various titles.
People have tried to argue that I don't really need that many tabs open, that I could live without them. This is true. I could also use dialup, or a machine with less RAM. But if it's handy and convenient, why not?
Blog | Twitter | Free games | Unmaintained backloggery
But I'd also like to point out that hovering over a tab stack in Opera will bring up a group of thumbnails that functions, more or less, identically to what you described from Firefox. You can grab the thumbnails and drag them to other groups and out of the group. Really, it functions like some kind of cross between the new taskbar in Windows 7 and what you described in Firefox.
I would put forth that it does not function more or less identically. The intended function of tab stacks is the same, but I see the way it currently functions as flawed.
Blog | Twitter | Free games | Unmaintained backloggery
The only reason Firefox is big and Opera isn't is because Opera wasn't free for a long time.
Eh? I thought it has always been free; albeit ad-supported.
edit: something feels wrong about that sentence, in the grammatical sense, but I can't put my finger on it. Did I screw up the tenses or something?
Woah woah slow down. You gave me such a blanket statement back for what I said. You told me Opera is better based on my statement "the interface functions the best." What I listed afterwards was not meant to be an exhaustive list. But besides that point, Opera doesn't have a single bar for urls and search engine/special site functionality thats what I count in Chrome's favor. The second is that Opera has an ever-present status bar at the bottom of it. Another is that when you load a page it shows progresses on individual elements. I'm not sure why it would need to do this since it's so fast anyways. Those interface things including an even more straight-forward menu is what I counted in Chrome's favor.
You may not have been speaking about me, but I don't have a "my browser" mentality, so if another browser is faster I want to know about it. But I've not seen tests that show Opera is faster in average areas or anything. I just haven't come across them. I run very standard stable hardware and on Vista and Windows 7, Opera (not the current version) ran noticeably slower than Chrome, both from clean installs and after a couple weeks of use. If I'm being told this isn't common it looks like I have to check up on this.
Yea, it doesn't ever crash anyways. I guess the more useful point for me to make is that you can move tabs out to a new window and back very easily. You can move it out with your mouse, set a couple windows side by side for example, and then put them back as tabs if you want. You can run a regular browsing session and an icognito window session at the same time. According to Frem, Opera has a ton of easy functionality in this regard too. It sounds much less my style, and probably for normal users. I have about 7 tabs open at most.
I hope people will refrain from making statements like Opera use in Russia is 50%, especially when it's not true.
Your grammar isn't wrong it's just a little wonky sounding, I can't remember the official phrase for that.
Opera had a banner ad in their free version that was absent if you paid for a pro version.
Browser speed tests are pretty dumb these days but typically Chrome and Opera are basically tied for first and everything else loses. Just from personal experience I find them basically identical; Chrome seems to have a snappier UI but Opera seems to load pages faster. Like I said before I have a feeling its mostly subjective, but I think the clear message is that Firefox is slow.
Opera did the whole "windowed browsing" thing before most browsers we use today even existed. It has had windowed browsing before tabbed browsing was invented (by Opera).
Looks like about 50% to me for '06 to '08. I should have specified that IE doesn't count because it's not like anyone downloads IE because they like it. 50% of people who care used Opera. In Russia. If we want to update it for the past year, it looks like Opera's at about 30%. It's also the number one browser in Ukraine for 2010 it looks like. Also when I use keyboard shortcuts in Opera like CTRL + I it puts in the italics forum code but Chrome doesn't do that, so that's annoying.
I'm gonna try what someone else mentioned and open flash stuff (youtube) in Chrome. That's about the only issue I have with Opera: I leave a lot of youtube tabs open, it eventually slows down and (very shortly after slowing down) crashes.
Not restarting my browser or computer in general, or closing tabs when I'm done with them, doesn't help.
To my point about Flash and this is mostly a tangent... For those that don't like having to look at extra programs that upgrade themselves then having it preinstalled in Chrome is a nicety.
Also, when suggesting safer browsers to people instead of IE I think it's a great thing because people tend to ignore the adobe updater. Some people keep clicking cancel whenever that Adobe loader thing comes up on their desktop even though they've been told what it is and to update it. I've helped a handful of people with their computers making them more secure and I've seen half of them ignore it still, so I'm thinking with the general population, which tends to have no computer person looking over their shoulder about these things, it's a really good thing.
Edit... I understand what you're saying, but this is browser usage so people who are dumb still have to be included.
Steam | Live
It has stupid OPERA services it bothers me about when I close it.
It makes it a lot harder to "open link on background tab".
It's so bad.
I think Chrome does that too, but I know what you mean!
I run both it and Opera in parallel, with Opera locked-down tightly - no cookies, javascript or plugins, unless I say so - and fire up Chrome whenever I'd rather not add a site-specific exception.
In other news, I hear Firefox has now surpassed IE's market share here in Europe. At one time, I'd have be glad to hear it, but now I'm just left asking "why Firefox, of all things?"
Middle click. So hard.
or:
Browser "Wars": Much Ado About Nothing
Robots Will Be Our Superiors (Blog)
http://michaelhermes.com
The crazy amount of extensions and customizability make up for that. Chrome's got extensions too, but I hear it's much more annoying to write them, so I don't see it catching up that quickly.
:?:
The adblocker works like a charm man, thanks. Was my only beef with IE8, honestly.
Selling my 16GB Wifi iPad 1. UK people only, £150. PM me.
Are they still using that weird shiny black skin? I've been using the Opera 9 lookalike skin since, well, Opera 9. Since it updates itself it preserves the settings and skin, so I don't know what the standard skin looks like now.
Everything below it is just the thin border. All status information when browsing shows up in the address bar. If I need the menu functions, I just press the alt key. And the red button is my bookmarks. I could potentially make it even more minimalist, but then I'd start losing functionality.