No more Loli for you!

Der Waffle Mous

Hirocon wrote:

DarkPrimus wrote:

Æthelred wrote:

Does this include illegalising (that should be a word) looking at these images, as well as producing them? Because I'm sure if I GIS any anime ever I will be guilty of it.

"I'd like to report someone illegally viewing child pornography."

"How do you know it was child pornography, sir?"

"I saw it on his monitor."

"Okay sir, we're going to have to arrest you too."

But you'll never get convicted, because nobody can look at the evidence without becoming a pedophile.

It's like the ring, except even more retarded.

Andrew_Jay

So, what happens with ultrasounds?

Senjutsu

Andrew_Jay wrote:

So, what happens with ultrasounds?

Incredible death.

Psycho Internet Hawk

Cartoon children are being forced into porn against their will.

Please, won't someone think of the cartoon children?

mcdermott

Psycho Internet Hawk wrote:

Cartoon children are being forced into porn against their will.

Please, won't someone think of the cartoon children?

You mean other than during masturbation?

Probably not.

Lanz

remember when McCain was on his little bill crusade to make sites, blogs and forums report every last detail of any child porn posted on them, and to not delete the records or they'd be fined and all the measures to keep sex offenders off anything on the internet remotely resembling communicating with another human being?

yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeah...

redx

Lanz wrote:

remember when McCain was on his little bill crusade to make sites, blogs and forums report every last detail of any child porn posted on them, and to not delete the records or they'd be fined and all the measures to keep sex offenders off anything on the internet remotely resembling communicating with another human being?

yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeah...

yeah it is a revision of the same thing.

the article wrote:

Instead of specifying that all commercial Web sites and personal blogs must report illegal images, the requirement has been narrowed. Now, anyone offering a "service which provides to users thereof the ability to send or receive wire or electronic communications" must comply.

I kinda hope the author is being ironc using the word narrowed.

Loren Michael

Goooooo CENSORSHIP!

It's how we'll save democracy!

Psycho Internet Hawk

redx wrote:

Lanz wrote:

remember when McCain was on his little bill crusade to make sites, blogs and forums report every last detail of any child porn posted on them, and to not delete the records or they'd be fined and all the measures to keep sex offenders off anything on the internet remotely resembling communicating with another human being?

yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeah...

yeah it is a revision of the same thing.

the article wrote:

Instead of specifying that all commercial Web sites and personal blogs must report illegal images, the requirement has been narrowed. Now, anyone offering a "service which provides to users thereof the ability to send or receive wire or electronic communications" must comply.

I kinda hope the author is being ironc using the word narrowed.

It's about time we stopped people from sending pictures of naked cartoon children via telagram.

Thanatos

They really may as well just ban GIS outright if they're going to do this.

His Corkiness

Thanatos wrote:

They really may as well just ban GIS outright if they're going to do this.

Does anyone really even use GIS for porn? Sure, you may find what you're looking for, but is it really worth the collateral damage?

Invisible

Thanatos wrote:

They really may as well just ban GIS outright if they're going to do this.

They'd be better off banning Cartoon Network. I've seen more naked kids on it than I ever have online.

Loren Michael

His Corkiness wrote:

Thanatos wrote:

They really may as well just ban GIS outright if they're going to do this.

Does anyone really even use GIS for porn? Sure, you may find what you're looking for, but is it really worth the collateral damage?

It's gateway porn. through it, you find means of getting a much safer, harder, consistent porngasm.

Elki

dragonsama wrote:

What images must be reported? Illegal images of minors, which includes clothed teens in "lascivious" poses, according to the Justice Department. Obscene "cartoons" and "drawings" also qualify. (18 USC 1466A)

Lascivious poses? Seriously? Like an image would be legal, but could become illegal with a little hip action? I'm not sure how I feel about this. On one hand, it's beyond retarded. On the other hand, everybody using MySpace will go to jail.

Dilemmas, dilemmas.

siliconenhanced

I'm sure 4chan's admin staff must be freaking out about now.

Not to mention 420chan, fchan, and the list goes on.

Woo imageboards.

Yar

It used to be my part of my job to review porn found in the possession of suspicious ppl to determine if it was normal porn or go-to-jail porn.

Janin

siliconenhanced wrote:

I'm sure 4chan's admin staff must be freaking out about now.

Not to mention 420chan, fchan, and the list goes on.

Woo imageboards.

420's been dead for a while, hasn't it? fchan's got bigger problems than this bill - I can't even imagine McCain's reaction if he were to discover "furry". 4chan's been through this all before several times - mods get pissed off at users posting jailbait, ban anybody posting it or requesting it for a few weeks, then forget about it and everthing goes back to normal. If nothing else, users will move to that other site (which I won't mention, because I like my account thank you).

I would be more concerned about children's TV programs or cartoons. Want to show kids in pajamas? That might arouse the weirdos - better ban it! Swimsuites? B&. As with every other bill like this, the creeps continue to live on Usenet and IRC, while innocent third parties are the only ones affected.

Incenjucar

I'm pretty sure that, when furry becomes widely recognized, there will be rioting.

Couscous

Incenjucar wrote:

I'm pretty sure that, when furry becomes widely recognized, there will be rioting.

That will be nothing compared to what happens when they discover furry dickgirls.

Incenjucar

titmouse wrote:

Incenjucar wrote:

I'm pretty sure that, when furry becomes widely recognized, there will be rioting.

That will be nothing compared to what happens when they discover furry dickgirls.

That will come out all on its own, considering how many genres (All of them with women) have dickgirls and herms and such.

I don't know that most people actually comprehend how common it is for people to have uncertain sexual organs, much less the notion that it's desirable. Heck. Are there even that many bi characters on TV?

Crimson King

Incenjucar wrote:

titmouse wrote:

Incenjucar wrote:

I'm pretty sure that, when furry becomes widely recognized, there will be rioting.

That will be nothing compared to what happens when they discover furry dickgirls.

That will come out all on its own, considering how many genres (All of them with women) have dickgirls and herms and such.

I don't know that most people actually comprehend how common it is for people to have uncertain sexual organs, much less the notion that it's desirable. Heck. Are there even that many bi characters on TV?

However, while it's illegal to sex animals, it's certainly not illegal to sex hermaphrodites. So at least they can't ban dickgirls.

Also, everyone is horrified at the thought of pedophilia (with good reason), but not so much with bestiality. Furries are more amusing then terrifying. So I don't think the public reaction would be as strong.

player321

I really don't get this

Dance Commander

Sometimes, I see women at college and I pretend they're actually sixteen year olds who developed early. Maybe the government can make that illegal, instead. It would be easier to enforce.

electricitylikesme

Why does it always seem to come around to us depending on the supreme court to smack the other two institutions up when it comes to American politics?

I mean, when we learned about your form of government, I got the distinct impression that the idea was all 3 of those things were supposed to be rational institutions, not one overseeing two retards.

BigJoeM

Political grandstanding

In the US we require someone to be affected by a law and bring a case in order to have it overturned.

If no one is arrested the law stays on the books and whoever proposed it gets free brownie points and if it is overturned they get even more by complaining about "activist judges"

No body wants to be a test case so crap like this happens all the time.

siliconenhanced

titmouse wrote:

Incenjucar wrote:

I'm pretty sure that, when furry becomes widely recognized, there will be rioting.

That will be nothing compared to what happens when they discover furry dickgirls.

I wouldn't want to be in the room when babyfur becomes common knowledge among Congress.

redx

we'd probably invade Japan if "ero guro" ever came into the lime light.