Also one really stupid decision Noire made that really killed any desire I had to replay it. You can't skip any cutscenes or dialogue at all. I have no idea why especially since you'll probably fuck cases up and have to redo them, and so you are locked in to their wonderful dialogue everytime. SO OBNOXIOUS!
I sat down to tune my best commander deck for an event tomorrow night and discovered not only had I already made the tune-ups I was thinking about, I must have been angry when I did so because the deck is aggressive as fuck.
Feral on
every person who doesn't like an acquired taste always seems to think everyone who likes it is faking it. it should be an official fallacy.
Haven't been especially thrilled with the latest season of Who so far.
But the intro to A Good Man Goes to War has made up for it entirely.
I really liked the Gaiman episode but yeah, this season has underwhelmed me! I am not fully whelmed.
it's like, the Moffat episodes have been fun but they've all had the same rush-rush-rush tone and the character moments I enjoy feel like they've gotten lost in the shuffle. And the pirate episode and the clones two-parter just did nothing for me at all.
I sat down to tune my best commander deck for an event tomorrow night and discovered not only had I already made the tune-ups I was thinking about, I must have been angry when I did so because the deck is aggressive as fuck.
ahahaha
I am picturing you at your desk, glaring at a coworker, willing him to go to the graveyard
Jacobkosh on
0
Options
BobCescaIs a girlBirmingham, UKRegistered Userregular
I sat down to tune my best commander deck for an event tomorrow night and discovered not only had I already made the tune-ups I was thinking about, I must have been angry when I did so because the deck is aggressive as fuck.
All the Jackal Pups? All the Jackal Pups.
All the Jackal Pups? All the Jackal Pups.
a lot of people are like "Saint's Row is back to what GTA should be"
I don't know that I agree with that. GTAIV had problems but it also had some stuff that I really loved, and I hear that the two expansions kind of minimized some of the sucky stuff and doubled down on the good stuff.
I guess I'm cool with two competing series of sandbox crime games that have different levels of what we jokingly call realism.
GTA4 took a turn into semi-serious territory which was not traditionally what GTA was really about
I think Rockstar's more serious games are very fun and i like them very much, but to test it out with an already established game series was a bit of an oversight as to what exactly kept people playing it.
I liked that they attempted to be less silly, (even though they still have a pretty hard time not being silly).
Yeah, it's like: San Andreas was a fantastic game, I loved it very much. But there was a point past which I was starting to cringe at the wild shift in tone between the main story, which wants you to be - if not invested in your dude's plot, at least entertained by it - and then starting a mission and have someone tell you "Hey take me to the Vagina Burger on top of Titty Hill"
Maybe it's me, maybe I'm getting old and calcified, but more and more that stuff was making me go "...really? Really?"
What bugged me about San Andreas was the way the story progressed and the consequent interaction with Sweet. Basically you start off as a gangbanger, and then when released from Los Santos you have an adventure that teaches you there's more to life than the hood...and then Sweet comes in, drags you back to focusing on the Hood and berates you for leaving. Now, there is a grain of truth in that it's usually important to never forget where you came from, but why didn't CJ tell him about how the reason he couldn't go back and fix the hood was basically because Sweet was being held as leverage, first by Tenpenney then Toreno, and now he has these connections and money to really make a difference?
I think that's what bugs me about Sweet in the final quarter of the game: Nobody calls him out on being unreasonable.
RMS Oceanic on
0
Options
AriviaI Like A ChallengeEarth-1Registered Userregular
Haven't been especially thrilled with the latest season of Who so far.
But the intro to A Good Man Goes to War has made up for it entirely.
I really liked the Gaiman episode but yeah, this season has underwhelmed me! I am not fully whelmed.
it's like, the Moffat episodes have been fun but they've all had the same rush-rush-rush tone and the character moments I enjoy feel like they've gotten lost in the shuffle. And the pirate episode and the clones two-parter just did nothing for me at all.
Oh shit Gaiman wrote the one about the Tardis? That makes a lot of sense actually.
Also I agree on the other two. Pirate episode was boring and clones episode was a bit better but still predictable in everything but who exactly was going to die.
I sat down to tune my best commander deck for an event tomorrow night and discovered not only had I already made the tune-ups I was thinking about, I must have been angry when I did so because the deck is aggressive as fuck.
ahahaha
I am picturing you at your desk, glaring at a coworker, willing him to go to the graveyard
Feral on
every person who doesn't like an acquired taste always seems to think everyone who likes it is faking it. it should be an official fallacy.
I sat down to tune my best commander deck for an event tomorrow night and discovered not only had I already made the tune-ups I was thinking about, I must have been angry when I did so because the deck is aggressive as fuck.
All the Jackal Pups? All the Jackal Pups.
All the Jackal Pups? All the Jackal Pups.
In commander?
More like
trolololol
Feral on
every person who doesn't like an acquired taste always seems to think everyone who likes it is faking it. it should be an official fallacy.
the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
0
Options
BobCescaIs a girlBirmingham, UKRegistered Userregular
edited June 2011
...and now goodbye, for I am off to work.
BobCesca on
0
Options
JacobkoshGamble a stamp.I can show you how to be a real man!Moderatormod
What bugged me about San Andreas was the way the story progressed and the consequent interaction with Sweet. Basically you start off as a gangbanger, and then when released from Los Santos you have an adventure that teaches you there's more to life than the hood...and then Sweet comes in, drags you back to focusing on the Hood and berates you for leaving. Now, there is a grain of truth in that it's usually important to never forget where you came from, but why didn't CJ tell him about how the reason he couldn't go back and fix the hood was basically because Sweet was being held as leverage, first by Tenpenney then Toreno, and now he has these connections and money to really make a difference?
I think that's what bugs me about Sweet in the final quarter of the game: Nobody calls him out on being unreasonable.
You're completely right. Sweet is a dickbag and every time he made a speech about "keeping it real" I kind of wished I could shoot him.
I think Rockstar couldn't quite figure out what they wanted to do with the story or why your guy, who has become a jet-packing playboy millionaire over the course of the game, should suddenly start caring again about taking over shitty ghetto turf and brawling with kids in different color bandannas, so they threw Sweet in to basically berate you into doing it.
Jacobkosh on
0
Options
ElldrenIs a woman dammitceterum censeoRegistered Userregular
Only one way to play aggressively. Goblins. And then more goblins. Then pile goblins on top of those goblins, set them on fire, and launch them with a catapult made of goblins.
Posts
I forget how, but I did it often enough
hi
Looks like I will have to use my detective work to find it.
walk around until your controller vibrates
takin mah CPA exam soon!!
I turned that off!
I turned that off!
But the intro to A Good Man Goes to War has made up for it entirely.
On the black screen
the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
I really liked the Gaiman episode but yeah, this season has underwhelmed me! I am not fully whelmed.
it's like, the Moffat episodes have been fun but they've all had the same rush-rush-rush tone and the character moments I enjoy feel like they've gotten lost in the shuffle. And the pirate episode and the clones two-parter just did nothing for me at all.
my top score is 124000
ahahaha
I am picturing you at your desk, glaring at a coworker, willing him to go to the graveyard
hello!
All the Jackal Pups? All the Jackal Pups.
All the Jackal Pups? All the Jackal Pups.
What bugged me about San Andreas was the way the story progressed and the consequent interaction with Sweet. Basically you start off as a gangbanger, and then when released from Los Santos you have an adventure that teaches you there's more to life than the hood...and then Sweet comes in, drags you back to focusing on the Hood and berates you for leaving. Now, there is a grain of truth in that it's usually important to never forget where you came from, but why didn't CJ tell him about how the reason he couldn't go back and fix the hood was basically because Sweet was being held as leverage, first by Tenpenney then Toreno, and now he has these connections and money to really make a difference?
I think that's what bugs me about Sweet in the final quarter of the game: Nobody calls him out on being unreasonable.
Thpoilerth.
this is neat as hell but I bet I'd be so much better if I were like 15 again
Oh shit Gaiman wrote the one about the Tardis? That makes a lot of sense actually.
Also I agree on the other two. Pirate episode was boring and clones episode was a bit better but still predictable in everything but who exactly was going to die.
the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
if I pass Reg with a 90 or so the first time I'll send you some liquor
Reg is the section that focuses on tax
In commander?
More like
trolololol
the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
You're completely right. Sweet is a dickbag and every time he made a speech about "keeping it real" I kind of wished I could shoot him.
I think Rockstar couldn't quite figure out what they wanted to do with the story or why your guy, who has become a jet-packing playboy millionaire over the course of the game, should suddenly start caring again about taking over shitty ghetto turf and brawling with kids in different color bandannas, so they threw Sweet in to basically berate you into doing it.
cinders is still not around :x
make sure he knows I am looking for him
ok
is that an infinite damage loop
not quite
You could still theoretically block it
Pretty much.
Actually I cut that combo out of this deck because it's not reliable enough. :P It takes too many support cards to pull out.
the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
No
The stack is empty plenty of times in there