Bogey, I'll conditionally trade you my first rounder for Vick, but I want to see which player is available before I do it (i.e. the trade would have to happen during the first round).
I think playing as a running back was a terrible idea. Or the Steelers' can't block. One of the two. I just keep running face first into defenders in the gaps. No running room at all. 109 yards through 3 games.
I think playing as a running back was a terrible idea. Or the Steelers' can't block. One of the two. I just keep running face first into defenders in the gaps. No running room at all. 109 yards through 3 games.
I think the Steelers o-line is supposed to be bad this year... But that does sound harsh.
Sounds like that league will already be go for an expansion in a couple of years.
You'd have to restructure the team framework to fit 12 teams in (or every team would be starting a few scrubs).
I know nothing about fantasy football (well, a little, but very little), but I imagine if you properly equalize points for WRs, RBs, and QBs, then you could conceivably have as many as 16 teams and still be competitive. Yeah, there'll definitely be some non-star names on the rosters, and especially on the bench (unless you do something weird like let everybody be drafted twice?), but it could still be competitive, I'd like to think.
Again, I'd like to remind everybody just how little I know about fantasy football. Very, very little. Thank you.
Sounds like that league will already be go for an expansion in a couple of years.
You'd have to restructure the team framework to fit 12 teams in (or every team would be starting a few scrubs).
I know nothing about fantasy football (well, a little, but very little), but I imagine if you properly equalize points for WRs, RBs, and QBs, then you could conceivably have as many as 16 teams and still be competitive. Yeah, there'll definitely be some non-star names on the rosters, and especially on the bench (unless you do something weird like let everybody be drafted twice?), but it could still be competitive, I'd like to think.
Again, I'd like to remind everybody just how little I know about fantasy football. Very, very little. Thank you.
That is all.
Possibly yes, but there are people that wring their hands about stupid shit like QBs being OP (which is never the case). In general, RBs are OP because scoring systems gimp QBs, gimp WRs and almost all scoring systems reward sheer production over efficiency.
0
Options
zucchinirobotheropretty much amazingRegistered Userregular
Tip #1 - saving all of your money until the end never really works out. You just end up spending extra money on scrubs (or even worse, having money left over).
0
Options
mrt144King of the NumbernamesRegistered Userregular
Tip #1 - saving all of your money until the end never really works out. You just end up spending extra money on scrubs (or even worse, having money left over).
Tip#2 - Don't blow all your money on the #1 at each position. You will have the most schizo team of frustration.
0
Options
zucchinirobotheropretty much amazingRegistered Userregular
I've sat through one and understand how they work pretty well, I've just never participated. It should be interesting.
Posts
Tarvaris, Bale.
JordynNolz.com <- All my blogs (Shepard, Wasted, J'onn, DCAU) are here now!
want Dropbox? use my referral! | steam
it's called what it's called
I think the Steelers o-line is supposed to be bad this year... But that does sound harsh.
i sent you that pm as soon as i read that post and then i see you give away all the spots.
pretty sure i brought it up more then anyone.
ps. i hate you
So it's safe to assume you're...
8-)
...angry?
:evil:
there may still be a spot open
patience young padawan
Watch now she's gonna be the SB halftime show.
Superstar mode still sucks
You'd have to restructure the team framework to fit 12 teams in (or every team would be starting a few scrubs).
started a franchise with the lions.
simmed 4-12.
best sucks.
yup. its stupid.
I know nothing about fantasy football (well, a little, but very little), but I imagine if you properly equalize points for WRs, RBs, and QBs, then you could conceivably have as many as 16 teams and still be competitive. Yeah, there'll definitely be some non-star names on the rosters, and especially on the bench (unless you do something weird like let everybody be drafted twice?), but it could still be competitive, I'd like to think.
Again, I'd like to remind everybody just how little I know about fantasy football. Very, very little. Thank you.
That is all.
Listen.
That Madden game is wrong.
Where the Lions are going - they don't need a running game.
19-0 BABY!
Put the team on yo back
big men grabbing each other and touching balls, right?
This is the football thread, nerd
get out of here with that comic book bullshit
The scenarios were some of my favorite things
And now they have five, and they all are really long.
I'll be joining tomorrow night. I need to do some game trade ins to reduce the price first.
Significant overlap between the two!
Possibly yes, but there are people that wring their hands about stupid shit like QBs being OP (which is never the case). In general, RBs are OP because scoring systems gimp QBs, gimp WRs and almost all scoring systems reward sheer production over efficiency.
want Dropbox? use my referral! | steam
my blissful ignorance will result in greatness
Tip #1 - saving all of your money until the end never really works out. You just end up spending extra money on scrubs (or even worse, having money left over).
Tip#2 - Don't blow all your money on the #1 at each position. You will have the most schizo team of frustration.
want Dropbox? use my referral! | steam