Our new Indie Games subforum is now open for business in G&T. Go and check it out, you might land a code for a free game. If you're developing an indie game and want to post about it,
follow these directions. If you don't, he'll break your legs! Hahaha! Seriously though.
Our rules have been updated and given
their own forum. Go and look at them! They are nice, and there may be new ones that you didn't know about! Hooray for rules! Hooray for The System! Hooray for Conforming!
Rain? Snow? Try $5.5b in debt [US POSTAL SERVICE]
Posts
You know someone is off the fucking deep end when TheNomadicCircle says something rational in response.
Keep government involved insofar as they are needed to ensure the "last mile" to remote citizenry, cause I think that's a valuable government function and wouldn't exist if profit were the only motive. Let it operate at a loss under certain caps and condidtions if necessary, but open it up to competition and, unfortunately, allow more prudent decisions on finances like employment, benefits, and prices.
It's really the typical GOP strategy with regards to a lot of government services - burden them with rules no private business would follow, then demand they operate "like a business," and complain when they "fail."
Except it actually is. Over the course of the next few decades the post office will likely need to shed jobs, shutter offices, and raise postage gradually in order to meet with changing demographics and the impact of declining mail volume, but that's more an issue of reality not being static and not a commentary on the idea of a postal service. Which is why this whole bloody argument is so insane. The post office works. Stop Congress from fucking with them in order to make them fail and they'll continue to work. Maybe not perfectly, but then what does? It isn't an issue of lavishing rural residents with such unparalleled luxuries as universal postal service or the internet apparently making physical objects gauche. They're all red herrings. It really does just come down to letting the post office run itself like the business it is legally supposed to be.
Having 3,143 separate service schedules (at a minimum) that you need to keep track of for everything rather than, you know, one, doesn't strike me as reducing administrative overhead. Particularly if those schedules, and therefore employees, are subject to change every year or every election depending on the whims of voters that you would have to manage to track as well.
It isn't an issue of poverty it's an issue of ensuring minimum standards of living, infrastructure, and access to economic opportunities for the citizens of a developed nation. We're talking about a basic service. If you want to inveigh against agricultural subsidies I'll be right there with you, but ensuring that people in the hinterland can communicate, access information, or otherwise improve themselves in spite of the physical distance to the intelligentsia...that's just simply something that government should provide.
Congress slammed the cost cutting move insisting the Post Office should "modernize". Fact-immune individuals everywhere agree.
Yes it's the Post Office's fault
Yep, sure shows why "government can't run a business", especially when the government deliberately sabotages said business to prove government can't run a business.
Hmm, you know. Those $5.5 billion are almost the same they are in debt. Isn't that weird.
Borderlands 2 PA Xbox Metatag - Bazillion Guns
So they don't receive tax money AND they are actually profitable and able to maintain themselves in a market where they have legitimate and competent competitors. The reason they are in the "red" is because (as others have stated) the mandate that they have to pre-fund health care funds for retired individuals. Anyone can look at that and see "well... that's... just going to grow at an unmanageable exponential rate".
I, as a small business owner, look at things like pensions and guaranteed retirement benefits that are paid fully by the employer and have to say "this stuff is just unmanageable". So the fact that the USPS is fairly free of government oversite and tax dollars, yet at the same time is being hamstrung by the government is really frustrating.
The only other qualm I have is the guaranteed monopoly of first-class mail they have. But at the end of the day I think they would still be competitive with UPS/FedEx/DHL even if you removed that. And the instances of that monopoly actually being "enforced" are extremely rare currently.
Listen to our podcast, read our articles, tell us how much you hate it and how to make it better
It seems like the problem isn't so much the cost or the whatever, is that the system is inefficient. It seems from a lay-observer that they deliver to major hubs along the way and then to minor hubs. Where this is okay it's got a long wait time.
It seems like the best way is from every major city you delivery to hubs along your path to other major hubs. So this way I could've paid $5 and my package could've been there in 5 days.
Expensive in general? Or relatively expensive?
How much would it have cost to get the same package to its destination by going with UPS, FedEx or hiring a private courier? Or driving there yourself?
This neo-feudalism would be more tolerable if our betters had fancy titles.
No the problem is that the government is forcing them to prefund pensions
That's the entirety of the problem
Just FYI, UPS, FedEx, DHL and so on generally contract out the Post Office for the last mile because it isn't profitable.
Because 9% think it's too high, and shouldn't be cut! 9% of respondents could not fully
get their arms around the question. There should be another box you can check for, "I
have utterly no idea what you're talking about. Please, God, don't ask for my input."
That's usually for residential though right? Driving in to neighborhoods is where the line on the graph dips pretty severely.
But in more dense urban areas they do it themselves? Unless the USPS is driving in FedEx and UPS trucks (not sarcastic, I actually don't know if this is the case).
But hey, guess what. Delivering things is not trivial and is not cheap. That's just the reality of it
Listen to our podcast, read our articles, tell us how much you hate it and how to make it better
1 way? Probably $10. $20 round trip in a fuel efficient car.
4.5 gallons, times 30, 135 is two hours of drive time, if it's all highway. At what rate do you value your time? A courier will make you bleed if you saw the cost.
Borderlands 2 PA Xbox Metatag - Bazillion Guns
Does that not seem like a deal to you? For the same price as the trip in a fuel efficient car, you saved yourself all the time the trip to take it there and come home would take. Instead you get to play some Skyrim now instead of driving all that way to drop off 2 lbs of stuff.
Not the same price. That's just the price of gas. Additional "costs"
- Time you waste
- Wear and tear on car
- Increased chance of injury from driving
- Buying food from gas station or restaurant instead of eating at home for cheaper (bit of a stretch, but lots of little things like this are possible)
Listen to our podcast, read our articles, tell us how much you hate it and how to make it better
Is the purpose of the USPS to generate revenue?
http://troublethinking.wordpress.com (Updated Wed) http://twitter.com/#!/Durandal4532
Apparently it is according to the GOP, and to prove that they can't congress put an anchor around their neck, it still took a few years to slow them down though. Seriously right now in 2011 we need the post office, and congress is fucking them.
I'd write my congressman again about it, but it's Paul Ryan, a congressman who loves the people so much that he a had a private meeting with hand selected students at my college in a locked room (with cameras present, to prove college students love him), and when it ended everyone was cleared from the hallway to make a clean path for him to the parking lot
Goddamnit
Beyond some tiny funding for handling overseas voters, the Postal office doesn't get any tax money. So in essence, yes, they need to at least bring in their operating costs in revenue so as to continue paying their expenses.
WOW BOWEN! YOU SHOULD GET ON THE HORN IMMEDIATELY AND TELL EVERYONE THAT WE COULD BE EVEN MORE EFFICIENT! OBVIOUSLY NO ONE AT USPS HAS EVER CONSIDERED THE POSSIBILITY AND THEY STILL USE PIGEONS TO CARRY MAIL!
Do I need to even begin to tell you that the logistics between the USPS and UPS is fundamentally different based on what they carry?
Well it's the fact that they CAN be. And their competitors also can be.
If at the end of the day we say "ok. this is required for the nation. AND it's impossible for it to even break even". Then, ok.
But it's not. It's something that can pay for itself, and generate profit to put back in to research to make things more efficient or offer new services to consumers.
imo anyway
Listen to our podcast, read our articles, tell us how much you hate it and how to make it better
Nah it's pretty much math, let them raise their prices slightly and eliminate their pension requirement and they could see profit margins that make most private businesses weep (if that was their goal)
Okay, that and the lack of funding thing make this make more sense. But the solutions I've heard are all based around cutting it down to the bone or shutting it down.
As though suddenly being the only country in the world with no postal service is just you know whatever.
http://troublethinking.wordpress.com (Updated Wed) http://twitter.com/#!/Durandal4532
CRAZY MOTHERFUCKING IDEA THAT MAYBE THEIR LOGISTICS WORK BETTER THAN THE USPS BECAUSE THEY'RE NOT THE ONES GOING IN DEBT. LOOK I CAN PUT THINGS IN CAPS TOO.
http://troublethinking.wordpress.com (Updated Wed) http://twitter.com/#!/Durandal4532
Those "solutions" come from crazy-town then
Like I said earlier, I like smaller government. But the USPS is pretty inoffensive even to the most conservative. It doesn't use taxpayer money for pete's sake. It has some mandates by the gvmnt and has a monopoly on first-class mail. Aside from that it does it's thing, and does a decent job at it. And UPS/FedEx/etc. do their thing and do a decent job at it.
Heavy opinion time. I absolutely hate pension/post-employment health benefits provided by an employer. Anyone who's ever had to look at the "books" or do any type of business planning immediately goes "oh fuck that shit". There are some rare cases where you want to slap the golden handcuffs on some high-value employee or potential employee. But at the end of the day you just can't offer pay and health benefits to people who you aren't even employing anymore. Investments with matching (401k etc..), stock options, and things like that are great ways to offer things to help your employees out.
And that is the sticking point here, not only is that stuff provided by USPS they have to PRE-FUND all of it. Which is balls.
Listen to our podcast, read our articles, tell us how much you hate it and how to make it better
The issue in the private business of the USPS is that it has government mandated prices and government mandated accounting practices.
It is clearly a failure of private business.
Borderlands 2 PA Xbox Metatag - Bazillion Guns
They have to fully fund the pensions of all existing workers. Like, they don't have to put aside an amount that will accrue enough to fund those future pensions. They have to have it all in an account now, all of it.
The mafia couldn't come up with a better way to kill a business.
From le-wikipedia. You can go to the USPS and do a ctrl+f and type in 'pension' to find it. It has links to other things to further outline specifics.
"The Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act of 2006 required the Postal Service to fund, within 10 years, the pensions for all employees for 75 years. "
Listen to our podcast, read our articles, tell us how much you hate it and how to make it better
Nope. You're being an ignorant goose.
1. They're in debt almost the exact same amount that congress forced them to prefund their future liabilities.
2. They handle way more volume than UPS and FedEx combined. This volume doesn't lead to reaping benefits of economy to scale because you're adding more complexity with each delivery vector. You don't even acknowledge that there is a fundamental difference in the line of business that USPS and UPS engage in. It makes you look like an idiot.
Consider this