Our new Indie Games subforum is now open for business in G&T. Go and check it out, you might land a code for a free game. If you're developing an indie game and want to post about it, follow these directions. If you don't, he'll break your legs! Hahaha! Seriously though.
Our rules have been updated and given their own forum. Go and look at them! They are nice, and there may be new ones that you didn't know about! Hooray for rules! Hooray for The System! Hooray for Conforming!

Sigil, City of [Phalla] - Game Over

1202122232426»

Posts

  • Rawkking GoodguyRawkking Goodguy Registered User regular
    the only thing that irritates me about arivia's ghost posting was how difficult it was to get people thinking about it

    it seemed like every time someone started nosing into it and trying to get a discussion going someone who was convinced arivia was being a goose would make a loud, boisterous statement about how we should pay no attention to her

    that made it a lot harder to get to the truth than anything arivia did

    I know, wasn't it hilarious in retrospect? :D

  • I needed a name to post.I needed a name to post. seeing exactly how things really areRegistered User regular
    you are like the guiltiest of that :bz

    mr. blockrivsfromallgames

    WHIBKqW.jpg
  • Rawkking GoodguyRawkking Goodguy Registered User regular
    yeeeeeeeeeeep

  • InfidelInfidel Too easy. PiltoverRegistered User regular
    the only thing that irritates me about arivia's ghost posting was how difficult it was to get people thinking about it

    it seemed like every time someone started nosing into it and trying to get a discussion going someone who was convinced arivia was being a goose would make a loud, boisterous statement about how we should pay no attention to her

    that made it a lot harder to get to the truth than anything arivia did

    This is why you call people on Bad:Logic or LOL GAME THEORY.

    I am loud and obnoxious so that they have no such advantage over me, and then I beat their heads in with something sensible.

    TwitchTV channel: OrokosPA check.php?c=OrokosPA
    Play D&D 4e? :: Check out Orokos and upload your Character Builder sheet! :: Orokos Dice Roller
    The PhalLounge :: Chat board for Critical Failures IRC! :: #CriticalFailures and #mafia on irc.slashnet.org
  • AriviaArivia Registered User
    you are like the guiltiest of that :bz

    mr. blockrivsfromallgames

    so great

    huntresssig.jpg
  • REG RyskREG Rysk Lord Rageface Rageington Registered User regular
    B:L wrote:
    B:L wrote:
    @Drez, don't worry about the Stever's Law thing. I saw you get snippy with me and i figured that for once I just wasn't going to argue with you, it just wouldn't have been worth my effort at that point. We're all good darlin.

    Stever's Law now refers to anyone trying to rebrand a "rule" that had failed miserably before, and then proceeds to fail miserably with it again because it was a stupid "rule" in the first place.

    So Stever's Law raging is now applicable to "B:L is Never Evil"? :3

    IT HAS NEVER FAILED

    Besides, it's not a law. It's the way of the universe.

    OH FUCK BURNAGE IS EVIL THRALLVIG

  • AriviaArivia Registered User
    REG Rysk wrote:
    B:L wrote:
    B:L wrote:
    @Drez, don't worry about the Stever's Law thing. I saw you get snippy with me and i figured that for once I just wasn't going to argue with you, it just wouldn't have been worth my effort at that point. We're all good darlin.

    Stever's Law now refers to anyone trying to rebrand a "rule" that had failed miserably before, and then proceeds to fail miserably with it again because it was a stupid "rule" in the first place.

    So Stever's Law raging is now applicable to "B:L is Never Evil"? :3

    IT HAS NEVER FAILED

    Besides, it's not a law. It's the way of the universe.

    OH FUCK BURNAGE IS EVIL THRALLVIG

    You say this like it's a surprise.

    huntresssig.jpg
  • WildcatWildcat Registered User regular
    Arivia wrote:
    REG Rysk wrote:
    B:L wrote:
    B:L wrote:
    @Drez, don't worry about the Stever's Law thing. I saw you get snippy with me and i figured that for once I just wasn't going to argue with you, it just wouldn't have been worth my effort at that point. We're all good darlin.

    Stever's Law now refers to anyone trying to rebrand a "rule" that had failed miserably before, and then proceeds to fail miserably with it again because it was a stupid "rule" in the first place.

    So Stever's Law raging is now applicable to "B:L is Never Evil"? :3

    IT HAS NEVER FAILED

    Besides, it's not a law. It's the way of the universe.

    OH FUCK BURNAGE IS EVIL THRALLVIG

    You say this like it's a surprise.
    Like a velvet fist in an iron glove.

  • JaysonFourJaysonFour Fighting Boatrower-Kitteh Registered User regular
    The funny thing is, I might have tried to blow the lid off the ghost-posting if I'd managed to stay alive into Day 3. If you haven't figured it out by now, well... I was the one who tagged both Arivia and Taya with the Curse powers. If she really was dead, she wouldn't have followed the post restrictions to the letter.

    Even a crappy phalla player like me can come close to the truth sometimes, huh? I'd really like to know who had the bright idea of killing me Day 2, though.

    I think I'm getting better at this, I really am.

    sig.gif
  • DrezDrez Registered User regular
    Infidel wrote:
    the only thing that irritates me about arivia's ghost posting was how difficult it was to get people thinking about it

    it seemed like every time someone started nosing into it and trying to get a discussion going someone who was convinced arivia was being a goose would make a loud, boisterous statement about how we should pay no attention to her

    that made it a lot harder to get to the truth than anything arivia did

    This is why you call people on Bad:Logic or LOL GAME THEORY.

    I am loud and obnoxious so that they have no such advantage over me, and then I beat their heads in with something sensible.

    In all honesty, I did die way before the end of the game and while I was confused and initially angry with Arivia I did not pursue my "talk to a mod" course of action because I did think it was much more likely that Arivia was alive and fucking with everyone than just dead and trolling.

    I just don't think it's correct that believing Arivia was dead was a logically invalid train of thought. I don't think it's bad to point out what you think is bad logic either, Infidel, for the record.

    steam_sig.png
  • LanglyLangly Registered User regular
    JaysonFour wrote:
    The funny thing is, I might have tried to blow the lid off the ghost-posting if I'd managed to stay alive into Day 3. If you haven't figured it out by now, well... I was the one who tagged both Arivia and Taya with the Curse powers. If she really was dead, she wouldn't have followed the post restrictions to the letter.

    Even a crappy phalla player like me can come close to the truth sometimes, huh? I'd really like to know who had the bright idea of killing me Day 2, though.

    I think I'm getting better at this, I really am.

    I don't know if you read through the devil boards, but i said pretty much the exact thing "whoever gave the PR will know arivia is still alive, this will blow the whole thing up aghhhhh"

    but I didn't know it was you, so it was pretty lucky you got killed.

  • REG RyskREG Rysk Lord Rageface Rageington Registered User regular
    It was a reference to B:L having the role of Burnage as a Thrallvig in AdventFalls Phalla All-Stars

  • stever777stever777 AFK most Saturdays Registered User regular
    edited November 2011
    Man, EPIC argument over the last few pages!

    Drez, don't worry about the Stever's Law thing. I saw you get snippy with me and i figured that for once I just wasn't going to argue with you, it just wouldn't have been worth my effort at that point. We're all good darlin.

    Are you & I all good, Ahava?
    BTW, I gave you Morridor’s Box.
    Happy Halloween!

    B:L wrote:
    Stever's Law now refers to anyone trying to rebrand a "rule" that had failed miserably before, and then proceeds to fail miserably with it again because it was a stupid "rule" in the first place.

    D'oh. <img class=" title=":cry:" class="bbcode_smiley" />
    But, I have learned my lesson.
    I will NEVER bring it up again.
    (Wonder if I can come up with another that will stick?)

    stever777 on
  • DarianDarian Registered User regular
    stever777 wrote:
    (Wonder if I can come up with another that will stick?)

    You'll need to learn some Game Theory, first.

  • vagrant_windsvagrant_winds Registered User regular
    I hope the /popcorn of this thread never ends.

    // PSN: vagrant_winds // 3DS: 4682-8868-5037 //
    // Steam, LoL, & WiiU: VWinds // Livestream //
  • SpoitSpoit *twitch twitch* Registered User regular
    stever's lawl

    camo_sig2.png
  • stever777stever777 AFK most Saturdays Registered User regular
    edited November 2011
    Darian wrote:
    stever777 wrote:
    (Wonder if I can come up with another that will stick?)

    You'll need to learn some Game Theory, first.

    Ouch, I think. :?
    But, I've already designed many horrible, unplayable games of my own!

    stever777 on
  • stever777stever777 AFK most Saturdays Registered User regular
    Got one!
    B:L is Never Always Evil, or is that Kime?
    I'll get back to you.

  • AriviaArivia Registered User
    Game Theory is God, and Orange Soda died for our sins.

    huntresssig.jpg
  • stever777stever777 AFK most Saturdays Registered User regular
Sign In or Register to comment.