Our new Indie Games subforum is now open for business in G&T. Go and check it out, you might land a code for a free game. If you're developing an indie game and want to post about it,
follow these directions. If you don't, he'll break your legs! Hahaha! Seriously though.
Our rules have been updated and given
their own forum. Go and look at them! They are nice, and there may be new ones that you didn't know about! Hooray for rules! Hooray for The System! Hooray for Conforming!
Posts
[chat] wasn't born yesterday, quizzy
I think most people in the conversation had it ending up on other parts of the person's body, including bits without tastebuds, to be a perfectly acceptable way for things to go down. It's mostly the kleenex scenario people seem to dislike with vehemence.
No, the sentence you used in quotes would be correct as is. Saying fish would imply that individual organisms were evolving fins over the course of an epoch.
The peoples united under the Russian Empire spoke a staggering array of languages and covered an otherwise unprecedented geographic area.
Use it wisely.
Seriously though, it's basically blood plasma with some mucus mixed in. If you can't handle man juice, well, let me tell you, cooch-phlegm-sauce is probably worse so count your blessings. Maybe just stick to missionary if you can't handle the finishing the deed.
generally this is only the case in scientific texts
in everyday usage it is permissible to use "fish" to refer to both groups and individuals. note that many analogous plurals like "sheep" do not change in form when referring to a group of groups, which is part of the precedent for it.
of course getting pissy is lame. i'd also agree that 'expecting' it is lame, if you're using it with the connotation that someone is kind of rudely entitled, and they'll be pissy with people who don't meet that.
but i don't think there's anything at all wrong with 'expecting' to find a partner who digs it. if a girl doesn't swallow or tolerate semen in her mouth or whatever is the value approaching 'too gross'... then that is ok! she is still a nice person, and she will make someone very happy someday, i'm sure.
but it is something that i find sexually gratifying enough that i'd probably seek a partner who enjoyed that sort of thing. i 'expect' my partner to swallow sometimes in the sense that i expect myself to pursue a person who possesses that trait.
I mean it's still better than Mountain Dew.
I personally choose to phrase everything in iambic pentameter, to include Miranda rights.
I'll send you my Pigeot instead.
Like CCGs? Check my CCG's Thread in CF and help me playtest it!
what the hell europe
Enabler.
Anus.
Same as physics. It just sounds nicer.
economics physics etc
Well the makeup of semen is more... favorable for ingestion. Cooch-plegm-sauce basically tastes like you're eating a really wet runny nose, because, well, that's basically what it is.
Listen I was young. I needed the poke balls.
it seems like there's only the complaint of one of the other patients' families, so far, and no response from the hospital or whatever yet
but if true that is so terrible
I dunno, I think vagina is generally a perfectly appealing flavor. Flavors? I guess they all taste different. Maybe it's like alcohol and it's just a learned reaction to like it, but I think blowin' dames is its own reward.
Anything is better mountain dew.
It's the shortened form of mathematics.
Why would you not include the s?
it reverberates in an open way
it's a word that lends itself to echoing
Normally I would say this is a badly structured introduction. By that I mean don't be so explicit that you're giving an introduction and don't set up a controversy that you are examining, tell us the conclusion you've come to and use the paper to say how you got there. It comes across as a bit muddled and you're telling instead of showing too much. Don't tell us what you're going to tell us, or say "I'm going to examine X and conclude Y" or "this book is about puppies." Say "in the framework of X, Y" or "Puppies". Something vaguely like :(The possibility of deep, irresolvable disagreement over ethical matters is toxic to our ability to claim knowledge in the realm of ethics. Consequently this motivates us to look for a conception of ethics on which our basis access to ethical truth is not subject to unlimited disagreement.) is stronger, clearer and more direct. You can then say something along the line of "Setiya perusasively argues against two of the three broad possible views of the epistemology of ethics: the empirical model and pure coherence. However, reductive epistemology can be salvaged from his objections such that it satisfies..." etc.
It may be that philosophy has a different standard though since the argument is the thing.
QEDMF xbl: PantsB G+
i never found semen that offensive
i've never gagged over manjam
but there have been cooches whose fragrance or fluids were downright horrific
just saying as a guy whose had experience on both sides of that fence
meh
that before sex a vagina looks like a beautiful thing
then after sex it looks like a bulldog dribbling mayonnaise
also mrmr if you're just investigating the consequences, surely its "affect" in line 1
beef curtains
The first time someone came in my mouth I literally spit it out before I knew what I was doing it tasted so foul--it was like biting into a rotten piece of fruit. 'Favorable for ingestion' my ass.
lets introduce the past form of spit into american english
dat clarification
i spat it out
it will halp everybody npnp
also the delightful form shat
No problem! Doesn't it taste like a that tiny bit of snot that lands on your lips that you forgot to wipe away after a pretty viscous sneeze when you've had a cold?