Our new Indie Games subforum is now open for business in G&T. Go and check it out, you might land a code for a free game. If you're developing an indie game and want to post about it, follow these directions. If you don't, he'll break your legs! Hahaha! Seriously though.
Our rules have been updated and given their own forum. Go and look at them! They are nice, and there may be new ones that you didn't know about! Hooray for rules! Hooray for The System! Hooray for Conforming!

Awesome: '[Primary] Threads, Romney Unstoppable? Newton's Law disagrees!' by Kana

KanaKana Registered User regular
  Seruko likes this Post written by Kana
about a year ago
"Internet Crush"
Rolling Stone wrote:
The nation is still recovering from a crushing recession that sent unemployment hovering above nine percent for two straight years. The president, mindful of soaring deficits, is pushing bold action to shore up the nation’s balance sheet. Cloaking himself in the language of class warfare, he calls on a hostile Congress to end wasteful tax breaks for the rich. “We’re going to close the unproductive tax loopholes that allow some of the truly wealthy to avoid paying their fair share,” he thunders to a crowd in Georgia. Such tax loopholes, he adds, “sometimes made it possible for millionaires to pay nothing, while a bus driver was paying 10 percent of his salary — and that’s crazy.”

Preacherlike, the president draws the crowd into a call-and-response. “Do you think the millionaire ought to pay more in taxes than the bus driver,” he demands, “or less?”

The crowd, sounding every bit like the protesters from Occupy Wall Street, roars back: “MORE!”

The year was 1985. The president was Ronald Wilson Reagan.

Even the tea party was complaining about bailouts for the banks and nothing for normal Americans, up until the movement got subsumed right into the standard Republican talking points. Now the tea party's convinced rich people need more tax cuts, and don't seem to have noticed they've been herded into supporting what they opposed only a few years ago.

Posts

  • HenroidHenroid Baba Booey to y'all Tyler, TX (where hope comes to die!)Registered User regular
    That Rolling Stone quote is supreme. :^:

    "Ultima Online Pre-Trammel is the perfect example of why libertarians are full of shit." - @Ludious
    PA Lets Play Archive - Twitter - Blog
  • HenroidHenroid Baba Booey to y'all Tyler, TX (where hope comes to die!)Registered User regular
    I showed that quoted bit of the article to a friend and he tells me, "To be fair, Reagan wasn't re-elected after that speech." Fucker. XD

    "Ultima Online Pre-Trammel is the perfect example of why libertarians are full of shit." - @Ludious
    PA Lets Play Archive - Twitter - Blog
  • KanaKana Registered User regular
    Henroid wrote:
    I showed that quoted bit of the article to a friend and he tells me, "To be fair, Reagan wasn't re-elected after that speech." Fucker. XD

    Uh, yeah he was. Unless there's another president in between Reagan and Bush Uno that I've forgotten about.

    Kana on
  • Hahnsoo1Hahnsoo1 Registered User regular
    Kana wrote:
    Henroid wrote:
    I showed that quoted bit of the article to a friend and he tells me, "To be fair, Reagan wasn't re-elected after that speech." Fucker. XD

    Uh, yeah he was. Unless there's another president in between Reagan and Bush Uno that I've forgotten about.
    If the year was 1985, then it would be into his second term already, right?

    Steam ID: Hahnsoo, Steam Name currently: Hahnsopolis | PSN: Hahnsoo | Monster Hunter Tri: Hahnsoo, E8HJCA
  • ToxTox I kill threads Let Piggy Chimp decideRegistered User regular
    Hahnsoo1 wrote:
    Kana wrote:
    Henroid wrote:
    I showed that quoted bit of the article to a friend and he tells me, "To be fair, Reagan wasn't re-elected after that speech." Fucker. XD

    Uh, yeah he was. Unless there's another president in between Reagan and Bush Uno that I've forgotten about.
    If the year was 1985, then it would be into his second term already, right?

    Ding ding! 1985 would have been when he started his second term. This was probably part of the speech he gave at his re-inauguration.

    3h5Wc.png
    Secret Satans! Post | D&D Wishlist | General Wishlist
    Dilige, et quod vis fac
  • Salvation122Salvation122 Registered User regular
    Tox wrote:
    Hahnsoo1 wrote:
    Kana wrote:
    Henroid wrote:
    I showed that quoted bit of the article to a friend and he tells me, "To be fair, Reagan wasn't re-elected after that speech." Fucker. XD

    Uh, yeah he was. Unless there's another president in between Reagan and Bush Uno that I've forgotten about.
    If the year was 1985, then it would be into his second term already, right?

    Ding ding! 1985 would have been when he started his second term. This was probably part of the speech he gave at his re-inauguration.

    Not unless he gave the inaugural address in a high school gymnasium

    1320673-1.png
    sig.png
  • HenroidHenroid Baba Booey to y'all Tyler, TX (where hope comes to die!)Registered User regular
    The joke is that presidents can only serve two terms... Goddamn it, Kana.

    "Ultima Online Pre-Trammel is the perfect example of why libertarians are full of shit." - @Ludious
    PA Lets Play Archive - Twitter - Blog
Sign In or Register to comment.