Our new Indie Games subforum is now open for business in G&T. Go and check it out, you might land a code for a free game. If you're developing an indie game and want to post about it,
follow these directions. If you don't, he'll break your legs! Hahaha! Seriously though.
Our rules have been updated and given
their own forum. Go and look at them! They are nice, and there may be new ones that you didn't know about! Hooray for rules! Hooray for The System! Hooray for Conforming!
Video Game Industry Thread: Master Chief -- script delivery boy
Posts
Counterpoint: Why buy good old games when you can just as easily pirate them? Seriously, why do you think Good Old Games Dot Fucking Com recently completely rebranded themselves? Because good old games don't fucking sell.
Everytime someone mentions Deus Ex, someone somewhere will reinstall it. But they don't buy it. They download it for free.
Lol with that kind of money you'd be better off just developing an entirely new platform for gaming. What games out there comes even remotely close to say, 30 million dollars to develop (NOT advertise)? It's not Hollywood.
The Golden Rule of the Penny-Arcade forums. We are the exception that proves the rule.
...I will agree that GOG probably changed its name/focus because old games don't sell all that well, but I think it's less a matter of piracy and more a matter of (drumroll) most people not being us, and not bothering with playing old games at all.
i buy things off gog all the time, especially things that are an arse to make work on newer OSes
they get a tail from old games just fine...
they didnt rebrand because people always pirated, they rebranded because of competition with heavy discounts from steam
Yeah, sometimes I get the echo chamber effect here and I forgot that the rest of humanity, as a general rule, are all shitcocks.
You mean where they try to make games that will be release-day purchases for large numbers of people, rather than more niche titles that will rely heavily on a tail to make profit?
DD is nothing without convenience and value-added content.
my imaginary games company are SO HAPPY
also id pay a shitload more
Personally, I would love it if they somehow facilitated mobile/console ports of the old games they provide.
Game devs are already overpayed.
fwiw i think anybody earning under 80k a year is underpaid
And then after a decade, you can give another studio 50 million dollars to actually finish the game.
Yeah, we're just rolling in the dough over here.
You might want to do some research on the actual salaries of the games industry - I'm not saying that I'm living in poverty, but with the experience/education/skills I have and the hours I work, I could make significantly more money elsewhere. I guarantee you that it's true more often than not.
As someone who writes software for a living, I can tell you I make 30-40% more than your average physics/graphics programmer at most game studios, and I write software that's infinitely easier to write and debug.
Allforce for Goose of the Year 2012.
Because it's hard work to be this goosey.
Steam: Elvenshae // PSN: Elvenshae // WotC: Elvenshae
To be fair - by and large, I enjoy my job a lot more than I would elsewhere. The only industries where I think I'd feel the same amount of passion and job satisfaction would be television or film. And yeah, there's something to be said for actually enjoying getting up and going to work - but I'm certainly not going to suggest that we're not, as a rule, paid less than we're probably worth. It's not any one company, though, it's industry wide.
Certainly costs as much.
Because I don't know how you can look at something like a videogame programmer (who specializes in probably one of the toughest forms of the discipline), consider the pay and job security, and think they're overpaid.
except they don't. It was not financially successful in its old incarnation. It struggled continuously. Their most successful product was Beyond Good and Evil, a game less than eight years old.
A huge effort to secure the rights of old games, spend time and money bringing them up to spec to run on current systems, package in all those extra goodies you talked about, and then sell them for rock bottom prices because while they are good games, they're also old games.
Not to mention, as time goes on, the list of 'old games' adds to its pantheon currently new games. The problems with DOSboxing things and all that jazz evaporate the more up to date you get. Good Old Games is one day, in twenty years, going to be a list of games that includes Crysis. It is not just a niche market (essentially a repository for people late to the party) but it is becoming ever more redundant with the onset of digital distribution outlets.
In ten years, I won't need a GOG.com to buy Half Life 2. It will be on my Steam account forever. Ready to download at a moment's notice.
Good Old Games was misrepresenting itself. It wasn't old games. It was 'these very specific games from 1982-2003'. It wasn't a genre unto itself. It was a mixtape for an era.
Well, you hope so anyway.
Nothing is guaranteed in the world of Digital Distribution.
Relax, it was a gag.
It's a little easier to justify when your background's in humanities, but even then - I've had opportunities come up where I'd be making a good 35-45% more than I'm making now to do significantly less work. If I were older, or if I had kids, that would've been very difficult to turn down, even if I know I wouldn't get half as much job satisfaction.
Then I am extremely underpaid. :rotate:
Then again, being a financial consultant in this economy is a terrible career path. D:
Nintendo Network ID - Brainiac_8
PSN - Brainiac_8
Add me!
You'll have it forever...or whenever they decide that your rental period is up, whichever comes first.
Nintendo Network ID - Brainiac_8
PSN - Brainiac_8
Add me!
In the Steam terms and conditions there is a consumer clause that means we're guaranteed permanent, DRM free copies of all of our games if Steam, as a service, ever ceases to exist. This is legally binding, if you still don't trust Valve, of all people.
Copyright math.
Well hell, that's easy..."Steam as a service continues to exist, but it now costs $200 a month to maintain your subscription. You can't pay that? What a shame."
Nintendo Network ID: unclesporky
I've had more gripes about Valve than most folks and while I would never rule out something like that as distant eventuality, Valve has also never made a move that even slightly suggests to me they would pull a move like that.
And even if they did do something like that 10 years from now, that would be around ten years longer than I manage to keep track of physical copies of games I buy so I'd still come out way, way ahead.
Valve genuinely works hard to earn trust and does a good job of it; being cautious of what Valve might do 10 years down the road is just far more cynicism than is reasonable.
Changing the terms of service would require a new terms and conditions agreement. Each time this agreement is updated, you are - as a consumer - allowed to void the new agreement and 'cash in' the old one. This happened with some LOTRO subscribers who had the lifetime subscription that paid for the service forever. When it became F2P they got some cash money because their deal no longer had any value.
It's a market geared towards children and teenagers with a price point that is already fairly high for luxury purposes for it's market but needs to be increased to remain viable.
That or profits need to be readjusted and salaries need to be drastically cut. Especially at the top of the board.