Only beautiful people should be allowed to cosplay
Sorry.
It's ok for beautiful people to do it, but if the rest of us do it, it's sad and creepy.
The same goes for "walking around in public during daylight hours". Can't stand uggos gumming up the pavement when I'm walking around being gorgeous.
I know, right? High five, fellow beautiful person!
(everyone else turn away, the sheer beauty of our hands slapping together may reduce you to insta-tears, much like Zoolander's "Magnum" look did in the documentary film, Zoolander.)
actually I am just going to go full retard heteronormative.
Only Beautiful Girls are allowed to do it.
Uggos can cosplay as things that require covering their head like a mascot or animal.
No, their bodies must also be covered unless they are toned and pleasingly proportioned. No one wants to see a roll of fish belly white flab poking out from between the tunic and short shorts of an anime outfit.
So we get stiff once in a while. So we have a little fun. What’s wrong with that? This is a free country, isn’t it? I can take my panda any place I want to. And if I wanna buy it a drink, that’s my business.
0
Options
KageraImitating the worst people. Since 2004Registered Userregular
Three months after a jury sided with "Girls Gone Wild" in 2010, the judge in that case, John J. Riley, ordered a new trial, ruling that the verdict didn't reflect the weight of evidence. He wrote that it was clear in the video that Favazza was an "unwilling participant," saying she is seen mouthing the word "no" as her shirt is pulled down.
Wait, so if the judge doesn't like the decision the jury gives he can just say, "NOPE! New trial!" and dismiss the judgment the jury made?
So we get stiff once in a while. So we have a little fun. What’s wrong with that? This is a free country, isn’t it? I can take my panda any place I want to. And if I wanna buy it a drink, that’s my business.
0
Options
KageraImitating the worst people. Since 2004Registered Userregular
Three months after a jury sided with "Girls Gone Wild" in 2010, the judge in that case, John J. Riley, ordered a new trial, ruling that the verdict didn't reflect the weight of evidence. He wrote that it was clear in the video that Favazza was an "unwilling participant," saying she is seen mouthing the word "no" as her shirt is pulled down.
Wait, so if the judge doesn't like the decision the jury gives he can just say, "NOPE! New trial!" and dismiss the judgment the jury made?
Three months after a jury sided with "Girls Gone Wild" in 2010, the judge in that case, John J. Riley, ordered a new trial, ruling that the verdict didn't reflect the weight of evidence. He wrote that it was clear in the video that Favazza was an "unwilling participant," saying she is seen mouthing the word "no" as her shirt is pulled down.
Wait, so if the judge doesn't like the decision the jury gives he can just say, "NOPE! New trial!" and dismiss the judgment the jury made?
WTF is the point of a jury trial then?!
It can be ruled a miss trial for a lot of really random reasons. Which this in legal terms was probably, "The evidence was presented in a proper fashion so that the crime the accused was tried for was not correct."
0
Options
KageraImitating the worst people. Since 2004Registered Userregular
Three months after a jury sided with "Girls Gone Wild" in 2010, the judge in that case, John J. Riley, ordered a new trial, ruling that the verdict didn't reflect the weight of evidence. He wrote that it was clear in the video that Favazza was an "unwilling participant," saying she is seen mouthing the word "no" as her shirt is pulled down.
Wait, so if the judge doesn't like the decision the jury gives he can just say, "NOPE! New trial!" and dismiss the judgment the jury made?
WTF is the point of a jury trial then?!
It can be ruled a miss trial for a lot of really random reasons. Which this in legal terms was probably, "The evidence was presented in a proper fashion so that the crime the accused was tried for was not correct."
It's a civil trial and the judge ruled that "the verdict didn't reflect the weight of the evidence."
Basically, he thought the jury should have sided against the company because of the evidence and sine they didn't, ordered a new trial.
I know a judge can also overturn a verdict if he finds the judgement too harsh.
Three months after a jury sided with "Girls Gone Wild" in 2010, the judge in that case, John J. Riley, ordered a new trial, ruling that the verdict didn't reflect the weight of evidence. He wrote that it was clear in the video that Favazza was an "unwilling participant," saying she is seen mouthing the word "no" as her shirt is pulled down.
Wait, so if the judge doesn't like the decision the jury gives he can just say, "NOPE! New trial!" and dismiss the judgment the jury made?
WTF is the point of a jury trial then?!
It can be ruled a miss trial for a lot of really random reasons. Which this in legal terms was probably, "The evidence was presented in a proper fashion so that the crime the accused was tried for was not correct."
It's a civil trial and the judge ruled that "the verdict didn't reflect the weight of the evidence."
Basically, he thought the jury should have sided against the company because of the evidence and sine they didn't, ordered a new trial.
So we get stiff once in a while. So we have a little fun. What’s wrong with that? This is a free country, isn’t it? I can take my panda any place I want to. And if I wanna buy it a drink, that’s my business.
0
Options
Deebaseron my way to work in a suit and a tieAhhhh...come on fucking guyRegistered Userregular
Three months after a jury sided with "Girls Gone Wild" in 2010, the judge in that case, John J. Riley, ordered a new trial, ruling that the verdict didn't reflect the weight of evidence. He wrote that it was clear in the video that Favazza was an "unwilling participant," saying she is seen mouthing the word "no" as her shirt is pulled down.
Wait, so if the judge doesn't like the decision the jury gives he can just say, "NOPE! New trial!" and dismiss the judgment the jury made?
WTF is the point of a jury trial then?!
It can be ruled a miss trial for a lot of really random reasons. Which this in legal terms was probably, "The evidence was presented in a proper fashion so that the crime the accused was tried for was not correct."
It's a civil trial and the judge ruled that "the verdict didn't reflect the weight of the evidence."
Basically, he thought the jury should have sided against the company because of the evidence and sine they didn't, ordered a new trial.
There is probably more going on than jury verdicts mean diddly squat. Damn it we need SIG.
0
Options
KageraImitating the worst people. Since 2004Registered Userregular
Three months after a jury sided with "Girls Gone Wild" in 2010, the judge in that case, John J. Riley, ordered a new trial, ruling that the verdict didn't reflect the weight of evidence. He wrote that it was clear in the video that Favazza was an "unwilling participant," saying she is seen mouthing the word "no" as her shirt is pulled down.
Wait, so if the judge doesn't like the decision the jury gives he can just say, "NOPE! New trial!" and dismiss the judgment the jury made?
WTF is the point of a jury trial then?!
It can be ruled a miss trial for a lot of really random reasons. Which this in legal terms was probably, "The evidence was presented in a proper fashion so that the crime the accused was tried for was not correct."
It's a civil trial and the judge ruled that "the verdict didn't reflect the weight of the evidence."
Basically, he thought the jury should have sided against the company because of the evidence and sine they didn't, ordered a new trial.
There is probably more going on than jury verdicts mean diddly squat. Damn it we need SIG.
So we get stiff once in a while. So we have a little fun. What’s wrong with that? This is a free country, isn’t it? I can take my panda any place I want to. And if I wanna buy it a drink, that’s my business.
0
Options
Nova_CI have the needThe need for speedRegistered Userregular
So my lair in Minecraft is well underway. Need to finish the outer walls and then do some interior decorating.
Posts
I disabled mine and it still does it so... might as well enable it I guess. oh well.
Also there's always a WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP OF GLASTONCHESHIREBURGSTONBRINK like once a month
For some reason I'm always surprised when politicians, even male ones, aren't homely or straight up frightening in appearance. :P
Edit: It is a very good make up job though.
minibutt
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f7oqU2w6ObM
Also this one is better:
Clearly we need to establish a Ministry of Beauty.
I know, right? High five, fellow beautiful person!
(everyone else turn away, the sheer beauty of our hands slapping together may reduce you to insta-tears, much like Zoolander's "Magnum" look did in the documentary film, Zoolander.)
For proof...
No, their bodies must also be covered unless they are toned and pleasingly proportioned. No one wants to see a roll of fish belly white flab poking out from between the tunic and short shorts of an anime outfit.
Choose Your Own Chat 1 Choose Your Own Chat 2 Choose Your Own Chat 3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HVahMibxfYI
I was thinking of establishing separate towns and cities for them. They can live and relax among their own kind, breeding new, ugly children.
Choose Your Own Chat 1 Choose Your Own Chat 2 Choose Your Own Chat 3
Uglybastard-On-Sea.
Beardsleytown.
Choose Your Own Chat 1 Choose Your Own Chat 2 Choose Your Own Chat 3
apparently we all hate Pam
no the pilot clearly established that we all hate pam
THUS IT IS SO
Oh, my son
How quickly life strips away our earlier certainties
MY FIERY FANDOM BASED ON ONE EPISODE CLEARLY GIVES ME A DEEPER LOVE AND UNDERSTANDING OF ARCHER THAN YOU WITH YOUR BITTERNESS AND YOUR YEARS
I AM THE COLLEGE FRESHMAN OF ARCHER AND MY IDEALISM CANNOT BE QUASHED
Camden
http://www.vevo.com/watch/of-monsters-and-men/little-talks/USUV71102089#/watch/of-monsters-and-men/little-talks/USUV71102089
You decide.
Interesting part of this...
Wait, so if the judge doesn't like the decision the jury gives he can just say, "NOPE! New trial!" and dismiss the judgment the jury made?
WTF is the point of a jury trial then?!
Someone flip the sig switch!
It can be ruled a miss trial for a lot of really random reasons. Which this in legal terms was probably, "The evidence was presented in a proper fashion so that the crime the accused was tried for was not correct."
I know a judge can also overturn a verdict if he finds the judgement too harsh.
Law and order taught me that.
It's a civil trial and the judge ruled that "the verdict didn't reflect the weight of the evidence."
Basically, he thought the jury should have sided against the company because of the evidence and sine they didn't, ordered a new trial.
How do I instgram?
There is probably more going on than jury verdicts mean diddly squat. Damn it we need SIG.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f7oqU2w6ObM[/quote]
I weep for the female deer men spraypaint then rape because of this woman.
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Can_a_judge_overturn_the_decision_of_a_jury
http://www.scribd.com/doc/40941622/Order-Granting-New-Trial-11-1-10-2
http://router7.selfip.net/map/#/185/64/154/-2/0/0
Cocksplosion is still my favorite word.
there were totes girls running around in furry boots with fishnet stockings and cat ears and etc
just like the good ol days
(some of them should have not been wearing it)
(just like the good ol days)