Our new Indie Games subforum is now open for business in G&T. Go and check it out, you might land a code for a free game. If you're developing an indie game and want to post about it, follow these directions. If you don't, he'll break your legs! Hahaha! Seriously though.
Our rules have been updated and given their own forum. Go and look at them! They are nice, and there may be new ones that you didn't know about! Hooray for rules! Hooray for The System! Hooray for Conforming!
I'm torn on this one. The premise here is pretty rote - gay guy fools around with other guy who then doesn't want to admit that he's gay (or bi), gay guy is sad. To your credit, you do about as much with this basic premise as can probably be done in a piece this short, and the writing is beautiful, but nothing really goes anywhere.
Also, the writing is, at times, too beautiful for a first-person piece. A lot of the time, especially in the beginning, the imagery and verbiage do not sound like something that would come out of a young guy's mouth. Other times - the second to last paragraph is a good example - everything flows naturally and the effect is spot-on. I would probably decide if you want the flexibility with prose that a third-person piece grants you, or if you want the intimate and more conversational style of first-person. Because for me, the two are in contrast right now. (Generally, I find your style more suited to third person, but that's not to say you can't do excellent things with first person.)
In the end, I'd probably put this in the Great Piece, But Not Suited For Stand-Alone category. It reads, to me, more like an excerpt from a longer piece.
Riley: "You're a marsupial!"
Maddie: "I am not!"
Riley: "You're a marsupial!"
Maddie: "I am a placental mammal!"
Rough, I honestly thought I was being super clever and original with the premise. Guess I need to consume more media!
And I get you about the unrealistic prose. This is the first first-person piece I've done in ages and it looks like too many of the third-person tricks seeped over. Tried to sell it with the "poet" line, but I'd probably be better served getting a handle on simpler voices.
Posts
Also, the writing is, at times, too beautiful for a first-person piece. A lot of the time, especially in the beginning, the imagery and verbiage do not sound like something that would come out of a young guy's mouth. Other times - the second to last paragraph is a good example - everything flows naturally and the effect is spot-on. I would probably decide if you want the flexibility with prose that a third-person piece grants you, or if you want the intimate and more conversational style of first-person. Because for me, the two are in contrast right now. (Generally, I find your style more suited to third person, but that's not to say you can't do excellent things with first person.)
In the end, I'd probably put this in the Great Piece, But Not Suited For Stand-Alone category. It reads, to me, more like an excerpt from a longer piece.
Maddie: "I am not!"
Riley: "You're a marsupial!"
Maddie: "I am a placental mammal!"
And I get you about the unrealistic prose. This is the first first-person piece I've done in ages and it looks like too many of the third-person tricks seeped over. Tried to sell it with the "poet" line, but I'd probably be better served getting a handle on simpler voices.