So yeah, I'm in a new job where I get to work with tons of smart people and bounce ideas around. My old job was only me and one other guy really.
I went through the same thing last year. Went from working either alone or with one other person to being on a team of ten in a company with thirty developers.
It took a while to get used to the idea of bouncing an idea off someone else instead of just hitting Google, but my code output had improved considerably
The one about the fucking space hairdresser and the cowboy. He's got a tinfoil pal and a pedal bin
So yeah, I'm in a new job where I get to work with tons of smart people and bounce ideas around. My old job was only me and one other guy really.
I went through the same thing last year. Went from working either alone or with one other person to being on a team of ten in a company with thirty developers.
It took a while to get used to the idea of bouncing an idea off someone else instead of just hitting Google, but my code output had improved considerably
Google is for "How do I...?", coworkers for "Should I...?"
LuvTheMonkeyHigh Sierra SerenadeRegistered Userregular
So I decided to mess around with Angular this weekend - pretty cool framework! Easy to get validation etc off the ground. I have run into a bug in my little demo
Click the load SO button
Add 2 more groups of inputs with the plus button, and enter whatever you want in the text boxes but leave 1 on each line empty to show the validations
Remove the middle group of inputs, observe the validations for last group disappear
Add another group of inputs, observe the validations for the now middle group reappear, but linked to the new last group of inputs instead
All of the dynamic name attributes seem to be changing properly. If I had to guess, it'd be due to my use of the array.splice() method to remove the deleted element, but I'm not sure.
Man, people not familiar with bit ops and 2s complement aren't going to get this.
I'd not seen this used anywhere before so I had to go read about it a bit. That's a pretty nifty little trick!
I think my favorite thing about Chen's TONT blog is that some of the neckbeards that it has attracted have noooooooooooo clue what a "joke" is or even what a clever little trick is. It is an entirely foreign concept to some of these folks. Meet David, everyone...
I rarely comment on these forums, but this just made me scream...well maybe not verbally, but in my head I am. This is atrocious. Readability is to be admired as well as convenience. I neither find this experimental syntax readable nor convenient nor obvious. Parenthesis do clarify intent, and it is readable, obvious, and not a burden on the compiler or developer. If you have to explain your new operators away in a manner that isn't obvious at first glance, it is likely a bad choice. If this is a c++ proposal, I would veto it. (x+1) and (x-1) aren't too hard to write. It only 'helps' in cases of x+1 or x-1. What about x+2 or x-3? Whoops, still need those parens again. This seems like a solution to a problem nobody thinks exists. Are there people out there actually asking for this syntax? really?
[By the same logic, we are missing a ++ operator that increments by 2. At least this operator can be stacked: -~-~x is (x+2). -Raymond]
While there isn't a ++ operator that pre-increments by 2, we do have += . Your stacked example is another reason for not supporting this. It doesn't look well and isn't obvious. I would have to count the tadpoles to understand what is being done. I'd hate to see the tadpole syntax behind (x+1000). Granted I am using an absurd and extreme example, it begs the question: Would there be an upper limit to how many times the operator could be stacked? I haven't yet tried on the VS2015RC yet.
[While there isn't a -~ operator that adds 2, we do have (x+2). So I don't see why the "doesn't generalize beyond 1" argument is so special about -~ when it also applies to ++. -Raymond]
Then there are the people who do understand what Chen did, and they try to go the trolololol route...
This is crazy. Not only because when these tadpoles grow up, your code will literally start JMPing all over the place, but they will also eat all your source flies.
Well it would be "writing by hand" the same way non-generated code is hand-written
The source is actually released though and looks only to be a few thousand pages long each - I think that's the printouts of all of the missions together
Well it would be "writing by hand" the same way non-generated code is hand-written
The source is actually released though and looks only to be a few thousand pages long each - I think that's the printouts of all of the missions together
haha someone wrote a virtual AGC for interpreting the apollo code. That's cool.
not a doctor, not a lawyer, examples I use may not be fully researched so don't take out of context plz, don't @ me
Convincing someone that I trust "ntpdc -c loopinfo" (or "ntpq -p" for modern form) for the time offset value more than their perl script that "simultaneously" runs "date" on the two systems took way longer than it should have.
a5ehren on
0
Options
GnomeTankWhat the what?Portland, OregonRegistered Userregular
I would have never had the conversation. I would have said "atomic clock" and then walked away. If someone can't understand why an atomic clock is better than their perl script, than having the conversation is pointless, and it's better to just do the right thing and let them complain later.
They were trying to convince me that ntpd was broken, which would obviously be kind of a big deal since we use the reference implementation from ntp.org.
Then they told me what they did to "prove" it and I basically said lolnope because ntpd was telling me the offset was 30 microseconds and sync was good and his script was saying 5-30ms.
I had to start talking about Linux kernel scheduler timeslices to get them to go away. I even got to use "non-deterministic" properly!
I'm putting together a little learning group for beginner web devs and rails. I'd like to put together a portable Linux dev environment for them, since they are largely Windows users with moderate power user knowledge.
Does anyone have any recommendations? I'm thinking some combination of Vagrant, Git and Atom, but I'm not sure whether I should have them develop in Windows in the Vagrant folder or do things actually in Linux, which would require them to learn something else on top of web dev. Any other configurations or suggestions are welcome!
Well if it's beginner I'd say just stick with Windows at first and if they like the group enough then you can slowly migrate them to Linux. I'm doing web development in Windows and it's not that bad. I'm not actually sure why people give me shit about it all the time actually.
Is anyone here familiar with Browserify, and possibly specifically using gulp-browserify? I have two bundles... a.js and b.js. I want to specify a.js as an external for b.js, but when I do that, b.js still cannot actually use anything from a.js unless I a.js sets globals on the window object. I am clearly doing something wrong.
I dual OS installed Ubuntu on my home desktop, and now whenever it boots up I just choose the Windows 7 loader. If I want to mess around with Rails, I boot into Linux and have fun. You could do something similar for them. Ubuntu isn't that hard to use.
I'm putting together a little learning group for beginner web devs and rails. I'd like to put together a portable Linux dev environment for them, since they are largely Windows users with moderate power user knowledge.
Does anyone have any recommendations? I'm thinking some combination of Vagrant, Git and Atom, but I'm not sure whether I should have them develop in Windows in the Vagrant folder or do things actually in Linux, which would require them to learn something else on top of web dev. Any other configurations or suggestions are welcome!
I text-edit and such in Windows in the Vagrant folder and use the Vagrant box to run command-line tools. Seems natural, and it's often easier to get web-dev utilities configured right in Linux.
Well if it's beginner I'd say just stick with Windows at first and if they like the group enough then you can slowly migrate them to Linux. I'm doing web development in Windows and it's not that bad. I'm not actually sure why people give me shit about it all the time actually.
But how are you supposed to use vim or emacs and get your programmer cred up on Windoze?!?!?!
Well if it's beginner I'd say just stick with Windows at first and if they like the group enough then you can slowly migrate them to Linux. I'm doing web development in Windows and it's not that bad. I'm not actually sure why people give me shit about it all the time actually.
But how are you supposed to use vim or emacs and get your programmer cred up on Windoze?!?!?!
Is anyone here familiar with Browserify, and possibly specifically using gulp-browserify? I have two bundles... a.js and b.js. I want to specify a.js as an external for b.js, but when I do that, b.js still cannot actually use anything from a.js unless I a.js sets globals on the window object. I am clearly doing something wrong.
I don't know much but this is what I have in my gulpfile.js file:
Is anyone here familiar with Browserify, and possibly specifically using gulp-browserify? I have two bundles... a.js and b.js. I want to specify a.js as an external for b.js, but when I do that, b.js still cannot actually use anything from a.js unless I a.js sets globals on the window object. I am clearly doing something wrong.
I think nowadays you're supposed to just use browserify directly in gulp, like:
var browserify = require('browserify');
... in your gulp task ...
var bundler = browserify();
bundler.require('this');
bundler.add('that');
return bundler.bundle().pipe(gulp.dest('blah'))
As far as multiple bundles, I guess you're doing this?
in the first bundle you .require('a') so that it can referenced externally
in the second bundle you .require('b') and .external('a') so that it looks for 'a' externally
I only use browserify via javascript so I can't comment on command-line or config file setup sorry.
Is anyone here familiar with Browserify, and possibly specifically using gulp-browserify? I have two bundles... a.js and b.js. I want to specify a.js as an external for b.js, but when I do that, b.js still cannot actually use anything from a.js unless I a.js sets globals on the window object. I am clearly doing something wrong.
I think nowadays you're supposed to just use browserify directly in gulp, like:
var browserify = require('browserify');
... in your gulp task ...
var bundler = browserify();
bundler.require('this');
bundler.add('that');
return bundler.bundle().pipe(gulp.dest('blah'))
As far as multiple bundles, I guess you're doing this?
in the first bundle you .require('a') so that it can referenced externally
in the second bundle you .require('b') and .external('a') so that it looks for 'a' externally
I only use browserify via javascript so I can't comment on command-line or config file setup sorry.
Na, separate bundles being built so that page specific js can go in its own bundle but reference stuff from another bundle without literally duplicating all of the js as would normally happen.
HOW THINGS CURRENTLY ARE WORKING BUT REALLY CAN'T BE CORRECT
stripped down gulpfile.js as things are currently working, but hacky.
var gulp = require('gulp');
var browserify = require('browserify');
var transform = require('vinyl-transform');
var source = require('vinyl-source-stream');
var buffer = require('vinyl-buffer');
var watchify = require('watchify');
var uglify = require('gulp-uglify');
gulp.task('browserify', function() {
// refer to https://github.com/greypants/gulp-starter/blob/master/gulp/tasks/browserify.js
// to improve this further to handle shared dependencies and dev vs prod stuff
var browserifyThis = function(config, plugins) {
var b = browserify(config);
var bundle = function () {
console.log('bundling');
return b
.bundle()
.pipe(source(config.outputName))
.pipe(buffer())
.pipe(uglify())
.pipe(gulp.dest(jsOutputDir));
}
/* this seems to force all bower components into each browserified module... oops
b.plugin('browserify-bower', {
require: ['medium-editor', ],
// external: {
//exclude: ['modernizr','markdown']
// exclude: ['comp1', 'comp2']
// }
});
*/
// this does the above, but allows for per bundle plugins
if(plugins) {
for(var i=0; i<plugins.length; i++) {
b.plugin(plugins[i].name, plugins[i].conf);
}
}
if(config.external){ b.external(config.external) };
if(config.require){ b.require(config.require) };
b = watchify(b);
b.on('update', bundle);
bundle();
};
var editorConfig = {
entries: [
jsSourceDir + 'editor.js',
],
cache: {},
packageCache: {},
fullPaths: true,
outputName: './editor.js',
}
var editorPlugins = [
{name: 'browserify-bower',
conf: {
require: ['medium-editor', ]
}
},
];
browserifyThis(editorConfig, editorPlugins);
var createRecipeConfig = {
entries: [
jsSourceDir + 'create_recipe.js',
],
cache: {},
packageCache: {},
fullPaths: true,
outputName: 'create_recipe.js',
external: ['./editor.js',],
};
browserifyThis(createRecipeConfig, null);
});
editor.js
var markdown = require('markdown');
var toMarkdown = require('to-markdown');
var medium = require('medium-editor');
/* hack to make these work. Without them then I cannot access anything here even with editor.js specified as an external, with our without require()ing it */
window.MediumEditor = medium;
window.markdown = markdown.markdown;
window.toMarkdown = toMarkdown;
create_recipe.js
//var editor = require('./editor.js'); // if I include this, then editor.js actually blows up in the require which browserify puts into it
Modernizr.addTest('contenteditable', 'contentEditable' in document.documentElement); // this line will end up in a cental js bundle
var descriptionElement = document.getElementById('id_0-description_markdown');
var descriptionEditor = document.getElementById('description-editor'),
descriptionContainer = descriptionEditor.parentNode,
descriptionPlaceholderText = 'Please add a description of the recipe';
var directionsElement = document.getElementById('id_0-directions_markdown'),
directionsEditor = document.getElementById('directions-editor'),
directionsPlaceholderText = 'Cooking directions for this recipe';
function initEditor(sourceEditable, targetInput, placeholderText) {
// https://github.com/daviferreira/medium-editor
var editor = new MediumEditor(sourceEditable, {
buttons: ['bold', 'italic', 'underline', 'quote', 'unorderedlist', 'orderedlist', 'indent', 'outdent'],
placeholder: {
text: placeholderText,
},
updateOnEmptySelection: true,
staticToolbar: true,
toolbarAlign: 'right',
//stickyToolbar: true,
});
// if the target input already has a value, copy it into the editor
if(targetInput.value) {
sourceEditable.innerHTML = markdown.toHTML(targetInput.value);
$(sourceEditable).click();
}
};
if(Modernizr.contenteditable) {
initEditor(descriptionEditor, descriptionElement, 'Please add a description of the recipe');
initEditor(directionsEditor, directionsElement, directionsPlaceholderText);
$(descriptionElement).hide(); // add classes to these
$(directionsElement).hide();
$('.editor').show();
$('.editor-container').show();
$('#recipe-form').submit(function (e) {
e.preventDefault();
var descriptionText = descriptionEditor.innerHTML; //article.textContent || article.innerText;
var descriptionMarkdown = toMarkdown(descriptionText);
var directionsText = directionsEditor.innerHTML; //article.textContent || article.innerText;
var directionsMarkdown = toMarkdown(directionsText);
descriptionElement.value = descriptionMarkdown;
directionsElement.value = directionsMarkdown;
this.submit();
});
}
HOW I FEEL LIKE THINGS SHOULD BE, BUT JUST DOES NOT WORK
gulpfile.js unchanged, create_recipe.js also unchanged, except possibly adding that require('./editor.js') back in and accessing markdown, MediumEditor, etc. as editor.markdown, editor.MediumEditor, and so on.
editor.js
var markdown = require('markdown');
var toMarkdown = require('to-markdown');
var medium = require('medium-editor');
// gone are the window.foo assignments.
I downloaded that PDF and get b9d7023623779e4ab5421b9d16273ad4cbee711ffbbca82630935b1378d055ae from the first and CB87B533965ED4CE11FB1E2057B3D7BDE6E4A8EC85E58FFFB8945FAF5864E6EE from the second.
So, uhhhhh. Is there something wrong with that file?
I uploaded a random JPG from my computer and got the same hash from both sites.
Posts
I went through the same thing last year. Went from working either alone or with one other person to being on a team of ten in a company with thirty developers.
It took a while to get used to the idea of bouncing an idea off someone else instead of just hitting Google, but my code output had improved considerably
Google is for "How do I...?", coworkers for "Should I...?"
3DS: 0473-8507-2652
Switch: SW-5185-4991-5118
PSN: AbEntropy
All of the dynamic name attributes seem to be changing properly. If I had to guess, it'd be due to my use of the array.splice() method to remove the deleted element, but I'm not sure.
Tadpole operators
Hah!
I think my favorite thing about Chen's TONT blog is that some of the neckbeards that it has attracted have noooooooooooo clue what a "joke" is or even what a clever little trick is. It is an entirely foreign concept to some of these folks. Meet David, everyone...
And since David still didn't get it, he dove in for a second try...
Then there are the people who do understand what Chen did, and they try to go the trolololol route...
heeheehee
Legends of Runeterra: MNCdover #moc
Switch ID: MNC Dover SW-1154-3107-1051
Steam ID
Twitch Page
Fairly positive it was assembly and a little bit of something else.
Those were probably mathematical equations and proof of concepts for the AGC's creation more than anything.
I doubt they'd hand write assembly. If it's anything, it's the printed assembly.
The source is actually released though and looks only to be a few thousand pages long each - I think that's the printouts of all of the missions together
haha someone wrote a virtual AGC for interpreting the apollo code. That's cool.
Then they told me what they did to "prove" it and I basically said lolnope because ntpd was telling me the offset was 30 microseconds and sync was good and his script was saying 5-30ms.
I had to start talking about Linux kernel scheduler timeslices to get them to go away. I even got to use "non-deterministic" properly!
Does anyone have any recommendations? I'm thinking some combination of Vagrant, Git and Atom, but I'm not sure whether I should have them develop in Windows in the Vagrant folder or do things actually in Linux, which would require them to learn something else on top of web dev. Any other configurations or suggestions are welcome!
I text-edit and such in Windows in the Vagrant folder and use the Vagrant box to run command-line tools. Seems natural, and it's often easier to get web-dev utilities configured right in Linux.
http://arstechnica.com/business/2015/05/how-to-mine-bitcoin-on-a-55-year-old-ibm-1401-mainframe/
But how are you supposed to use vim or emacs and get your programmer cred up on Windoze?!?!?!
Why do you have to be different mcrypt?
Real title:
"How to mine bitcoins, but not actually mine bitcoins, I'm actually trying to implement SHA on a decimal based architecture."
I don't know much but this is what I have in my gulpfile.js file:
gulp.task('browserify', function() { return browserify('./app/app.js') .transform(babelify, { stage: 0 }) .bundle() .pipe(plumber(plumberErrorHandler)) .pipe(envify()) .pipe(source('bundle.js')) .pipe(buffer()) //.pipe(uglify()) .pipe(gulp.dest('./public/js')) });I think nowadays you're supposed to just use browserify directly in gulp, like:
var browserify = require('browserify'); ... in your gulp task ... var bundler = browserify(); bundler.require('this'); bundler.add('that'); return bundler.bundle().pipe(gulp.dest('blah'))As far as multiple bundles, I guess you're doing this?
I only use browserify via javascript so I can't comment on command-line or config file setup sorry.
http://i-tools.org/hash/exec <- this one matches .NET's sha1/sha256 for file hashing
http://onlinemd5.com/ <- this one matches what the instructor for certification is getting.
What the fuck is going on.
Might be a subtle bug in the implementation of one of the tools if you have a file that is spitting out different hashes for each.
Na, separate bundles being built so that page specific js can go in its own bundle but reference stuff from another bundle without literally duplicating all of the js as would normally happen.
HOW THINGS CURRENTLY ARE WORKING BUT REALLY CAN'T BE CORRECT
var gulp = require('gulp'); var browserify = require('browserify'); var transform = require('vinyl-transform'); var source = require('vinyl-source-stream'); var buffer = require('vinyl-buffer'); var watchify = require('watchify'); var uglify = require('gulp-uglify'); gulp.task('browserify', function() { // refer to https://github.com/greypants/gulp-starter/blob/master/gulp/tasks/browserify.js // to improve this further to handle shared dependencies and dev vs prod stuff var browserifyThis = function(config, plugins) { var b = browserify(config); var bundle = function () { console.log('bundling'); return b .bundle() .pipe(source(config.outputName)) .pipe(buffer()) .pipe(uglify()) .pipe(gulp.dest(jsOutputDir)); } /* this seems to force all bower components into each browserified module... oops b.plugin('browserify-bower', { require: ['medium-editor', ], // external: { //exclude: ['modernizr','markdown'] // exclude: ['comp1', 'comp2'] // } }); */ // this does the above, but allows for per bundle plugins if(plugins) { for(var i=0; i<plugins.length; i++) { b.plugin(plugins[i].name, plugins[i].conf); } } if(config.external){ b.external(config.external) }; if(config.require){ b.require(config.require) }; b = watchify(b); b.on('update', bundle); bundle(); }; var editorConfig = { entries: [ jsSourceDir + 'editor.js', ], cache: {}, packageCache: {}, fullPaths: true, outputName: './editor.js', } var editorPlugins = [ {name: 'browserify-bower', conf: { require: ['medium-editor', ] } }, ]; browserifyThis(editorConfig, editorPlugins); var createRecipeConfig = { entries: [ jsSourceDir + 'create_recipe.js', ], cache: {}, packageCache: {}, fullPaths: true, outputName: 'create_recipe.js', external: ['./editor.js',], }; browserifyThis(createRecipeConfig, null); });editor.js
var markdown = require('markdown'); var toMarkdown = require('to-markdown'); var medium = require('medium-editor'); /* hack to make these work. Without them then I cannot access anything here even with editor.js specified as an external, with our without require()ing it */ window.MediumEditor = medium; window.markdown = markdown.markdown; window.toMarkdown = toMarkdown;create_recipe.js
//var editor = require('./editor.js'); // if I include this, then editor.js actually blows up in the require which browserify puts into it Modernizr.addTest('contenteditable', 'contentEditable' in document.documentElement); // this line will end up in a cental js bundle var descriptionElement = document.getElementById('id_0-description_markdown'); var descriptionEditor = document.getElementById('description-editor'), descriptionContainer = descriptionEditor.parentNode, descriptionPlaceholderText = 'Please add a description of the recipe'; var directionsElement = document.getElementById('id_0-directions_markdown'), directionsEditor = document.getElementById('directions-editor'), directionsPlaceholderText = 'Cooking directions for this recipe'; function initEditor(sourceEditable, targetInput, placeholderText) { // https://github.com/daviferreira/medium-editor var editor = new MediumEditor(sourceEditable, { buttons: ['bold', 'italic', 'underline', 'quote', 'unorderedlist', 'orderedlist', 'indent', 'outdent'], placeholder: { text: placeholderText, }, updateOnEmptySelection: true, staticToolbar: true, toolbarAlign: 'right', //stickyToolbar: true, }); // if the target input already has a value, copy it into the editor if(targetInput.value) { sourceEditable.innerHTML = markdown.toHTML(targetInput.value); $(sourceEditable).click(); } }; if(Modernizr.contenteditable) { initEditor(descriptionEditor, descriptionElement, 'Please add a description of the recipe'); initEditor(directionsEditor, directionsElement, directionsPlaceholderText); $(descriptionElement).hide(); // add classes to these $(directionsElement).hide(); $('.editor').show(); $('.editor-container').show(); $('#recipe-form').submit(function (e) { e.preventDefault(); var descriptionText = descriptionEditor.innerHTML; //article.textContent || article.innerText; var descriptionMarkdown = toMarkdown(descriptionText); var directionsText = directionsEditor.innerHTML; //article.textContent || article.innerText; var directionsMarkdown = toMarkdown(directionsText); descriptionElement.value = descriptionMarkdown; directionsElement.value = directionsMarkdown; this.submit(); }); }HOW I FEEL LIKE THINGS SHOULD BE, BUT JUST DOES NOT WORK
editor.js
var markdown = require('markdown'); var toMarkdown = require('to-markdown'); var medium = require('medium-editor'); // gone are the window.foo assignments.I get the same hash using SHA 256 and a direct input test string for both?
8A6B86B23F1F6DC49F8FFB2AD6825201E4F535E3 which matches .NET
On the other I'm getting:
22259F4F54C63D41A025B1A498BC6C28DADA42C5 which is apparently what the proctor is getting
byte[] fileBytes = File.ReadAllBytes(Thefile.FullName); SHA1 sha = SHA1.Create(); string hex = BitConverter.ToString(Hash.ByteToHex(sha.ComputeHash(fileBytes))); return hex.Replace("-", "");That's all my code, it used to work.
No idea what's changed.
So, uhhhhh. Is there something wrong with that file?
I uploaded a random JPG from my computer and got the same hash from both sites.