Zmoves are special moves pokemon can do when holding a z crystal and other special conditions are met. They are super combo moves you can do once per battle I believe. Also your trainer does a funny dance.
Coworker is going to be alone on christmas and is sad about it. My attempts to make her happier have failed, so instead I'm going to pretend she doesn't exist. I call it the Trump maneuver.
I would like some money because these are artisanal nuggets of wisdom philistine.
Pakistan isn't a huge country in population size overall. Especially compared to its neighbors. But it has two of the most populated "proper" cities in the world. That was fun to learn today.
0
Options
VariableMouth CongressStroke Me Lady FameRegistered Userregular
watching a bunch of desus and mero on viceland. they're great.
During the Empire, Rome had a population high of 1.6 Million
By the time of the fall of the west, it was less than 500,000
Within a century of that it was maybe 50,000, despite reconquest into the Byzantine Empire. It was not until the 1940s that Rome reached its Imperial highpoint once again.
life's a game that you're bound to lose / like using a hammer to pound in screws
fuck up once and you break your thumb / if you're happy at all then you're god damn dumb
that's right we're on a fucked up cruise / God is dead but at least we have booze
bad things happen, no one knows why / the sun burns out and everyone dies
Even though I am not a huge fan of cities the action and demography of urbanization does interest me. There are all sorts of cycles with it but overall through history, especially the 20th and 21st centuries, a real push on a population level to increase urbanization.
Of course the base economic reasons are pretty obvious. Centralization of production and so on.
But then when you think about it, a lot of modern urbanization was about the industrial revolution and industrial work. As we move towards automation and needing fewer people to keep a city running will there be a possible reversing of the current course? As there will be less need for the centralization of a work force as a major driver for populations collecting into a single space.
Even though I am not a huge fan of cities the action and demography of urbanization does interest me. There are all sorts of cycles with it but overall through history, especially the 20th and 21st centuries, a real push on a population level to increase urbanization.
Of course the base economic reasons are pretty obvious. Centralization of production and so on.
But then when you think about it, a lot of modern urbanization was about the industrial revolution and industrial work. As we move towards automation and needing fewer people to keep a city running will there be a possible reversing of the current course? As there will be less need for the centralization of a work force as a major driver for populations collecting into a single space.
I just read the other day that the trend is projected to continue
I guess today about half of the world's population lives in cities -- projected to increase to 70% by 2050
Posts
pleasepaypreacher.net
By the time of the fall of the west, it was less than 500,000
Within a century of that it was maybe 50,000, despite reconquest into the Byzantine Empire. It was not until the 1940s that Rome reached its Imperial highpoint once again.
if that's your phone. . .
how did you take the picture.
what kind of wizardry is this.
<_<
>_>
are you a cop?
because I just got this for $320
g o t t e m
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f9bo95dWpVQ
*sips coffee*
Are you in the office right now?
The last two days the Coast Guard captain has stopped by my cube area to see if people were really here.
Most of the office is gone though.
what even is an office, when you think about it
skippy are you wearing pants
Do I?
Do I dare?
I try to keep at least two Apple products on me at all times
aren't we all wearing pants, in some sense
the pants of the universe
but also I kinda want to work on my resume
hmm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KH0qKZ5f1ao
...no
no it's cobbler
fuck up once and you break your thumb / if you're happy at all then you're god damn dumb
that's right we're on a fucked up cruise / God is dead but at least we have booze
bad things happen, no one knows why / the sun burns out and everyone dies
Of course the base economic reasons are pretty obvious. Centralization of production and so on.
But then when you think about it, a lot of modern urbanization was about the industrial revolution and industrial work. As we move towards automation and needing fewer people to keep a city running will there be a possible reversing of the current course? As there will be less need for the centralization of a work force as a major driver for populations collecting into a single space.
kojima sure loves his pime taradoxes
oh man this sounds exactly like the kind of conversation chat loves
buckle up boiz
https://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/cmwov/hey_reddit_what_tattoos_do_you_have/c0tpyls/
or cake is pie made without lasagna ingredients
I assume this measurement in in feet
I just read the other day that the trend is projected to continue
I guess today about half of the world's population lives in cities -- projected to increase to 70% by 2050
http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2015/10/19/70-world-population-be-cities-2050-un-study.html
I wonder if that's the case in more developed countries though