maybe removing the colon was the right thing to do afterall
If true, this changes the situation completely. Instead an entire medical team being responsible for unnecesary major surgery with lifelong consequences, it's a delayed diagnosis. They're nearly at opposite ends of the malpractice spectrum. If true, the situation is likely downgraded "Oh shit huge case" status to "get a guy with a law degree to file some paperwork" status. Not every civil law situation needs to be a big production. sometimes it's as simple as having a guy send a letter to an insurance company.
I never said it had to be a big production. I said contact an attorney and find out the best method of recourse. Yes, it was delayed diagnosis, but it is a simple diagnosis to test for, a very common diagnosis, and one that potentially could have left him with a fully working and healthy colon. You never remove a body part if there are other options available, and Munkus' doctors, from all evidence I've been presented with so far, performed with what appears to be gross negligence.
So he should contact an attorney and find out what the best method of recourse would be. As I said a bunch of times before.
maybe removing the colon was the right thing to do afterall
If true, this changes the situation completely. Instead an entire medical team being responsible for unnecesary major surgery with lifelong consequences, it's a delayed diagnosis. They're nearly at opposite ends of the malpractice spectrum. If true, the situation is likely downgraded "Oh shit huge case" status to "get a guy with a law degree to file some paperwork" status. Not every civil law situation needs to be a big production. sometimes it's as simple as having a guy send a letter to an insurance company.
I never said it had to be a big production. I said contact an attorney and find out the best method of recourse. Yes, it was delayed diagnosis, but it is a simple diagnosis to test for, a very common diagnosis, and one that potentially could have left him with a fully working and healthy colon. You never remove a body part if there are other options available, and Munkus' doctors, from all evidence I've been presented with so far, performed with what appears to be gross negligence.
So he should contact an attorney and find out what the best method of recourse would be. As I said a bunch of times before.
He hasn't said anything more, so he's probably already talking to one.
Now...is there any way to shit on a colon thread?
MKR on
0
Options
GrathI'm a much happier person these daysRegistered User, ClubPAregular
edited July 2007
I'm sure his doctors have probably already spoken with whoever handles potential lawsuits about this.
WOOOOO WELCOME TO THE CLUB!!!!
Haha hey man, in all seriousness, if you need food advice, ask me. I've been eating gluten free since I was 10, and I eat like a mother fucking king.
I don't give a shit if you don't think anyone you know has it
you fucking spread the fucking word
this shouldn't fucking happen
Gee, I know someone with symptoms like you describe in your other celiac thread. What was your original wrong diagnosis, Munkus? It wasn't Crohn's or ulcerative colitis, was it?
maybe removing the colon was the right thing to do afterall
If true, this changes the situation completely. Instead an entire medical team being responsible for unnecesary major surgery with lifelong consequences, it's a delayed diagnosis. They're nearly at opposite ends of the malpractice spectrum. If true, the situation is likely downgraded "Oh shit huge case" status to "get a guy with a law degree to file some paperwork" status. Not every civil law situation needs to be a big production. sometimes it's as simple as having a guy send a letter to an insurance company.
I never said it had to be a big production. I said contact an attorney and find out the best method of recourse. Yes, it was delayed diagnosis, but it is a simple diagnosis to test for, a very common diagnosis, and one that potentially could have left him with a fully working and healthy colon. You never remove a body part if there are other options available, and Munkus' doctors, from all evidence I've been presented with so far, performed with what appears to be gross negligence.
So he should contact an attorney and find out what the best method of recourse would be. As I said a bunch of times before.
Contacting an attorney is always a good idea when you believe you may have legal recourse. Many don't charge, or charge very little, for consultations. Suing over the colon (which you specifically mentioned) would have to be a big deal because of the scope of the issue. It would also be irresponsible if the colectomy was a reasonable course of action. A delayed diagnosis can, depending on the effects of the delay, be a much smaller deal.
People like taking negligence beyond the scope of the "reasonable man", and often win anyway. This sort of thing is despicable.
maybe removing the colon was the right thing to do afterall
If true, this changes the situation completely. Instead an entire medical team being responsible for unnecesary major surgery with lifelong consequences, it's a delayed diagnosis. They're nearly at opposite ends of the malpractice spectrum. If true, the situation is likely downgraded "Oh shit huge case" status to "get a guy with a law degree to file some paperwork" status. Not every civil law situation needs to be a big production. sometimes it's as simple as having a guy send a letter to an insurance company.
I never said it had to be a big production. I said contact an attorney and find out the best method of recourse. Yes, it was delayed diagnosis, but it is a simple diagnosis to test for, a very common diagnosis, and one that potentially could have left him with a fully working and healthy colon. You never remove a body part if there are other options available, and Munkus' doctors, from all evidence I've been presented with so far, performed with what appears to be gross negligence.
So he should contact an attorney and find out what the best method of recourse would be. As I said a bunch of times before.
Contacting an attorney is always a good idea when you believe you may have legal recourse. Many don't charge, or charge very little, for consultations. Suing over the colon (which you specifically mentioned) would have to be a big deal because of the scope of the issue. It would also be irresponsible if the colectomy was a reasonable course of action. A delayed diagnosis can, depending on the effects of the delay, be a much smaller deal.
People like taking negligence beyond the scope of the "reasonable man", and often win anyway. This sort of thing is despicable.
What would you consider reasonable compensation for a misdiagnosis that will require him to walk around with a bag in his ass for the rest of his life?
maybe removing the colon was the right thing to do afterall
If true, this changes the situation completely. Instead an entire medical team being responsible for unnecesary major surgery with lifelong consequences, it's a delayed diagnosis. They're nearly at opposite ends of the malpractice spectrum. If true, the situation is likely downgraded "Oh shit huge case" status to "get a guy with a law degree to file some paperwork" status. Not every civil law situation needs to be a big production. sometimes it's as simple as having a guy send a letter to an insurance company.
I never said it had to be a big production. I said contact an attorney and find out the best method of recourse. Yes, it was delayed diagnosis, but it is a simple diagnosis to test for, a very common diagnosis, and one that potentially could have left him with a fully working and healthy colon. You never remove a body part if there are other options available, and Munkus' doctors, from all evidence I've been presented with so far, performed with what appears to be gross negligence.
So he should contact an attorney and find out what the best method of recourse would be. As I said a bunch of times before.
He hasn't said anything more, so he's probably already talking to one.
The good news is that maybe removing the colon was the right thing to do afterall, and having celiac's on top of it may be the reason I have had problems since then.
The good news is that maybe removing the colon was the right thing to do afterall, and having celiac's on top of it may be the reason I have had problems since then.
Posts
"The chilis this guy ate are killing me"
Bionic Woman actually looks pretty good
From the Makers of "Rainbow Six"
Eat Terrorists.
Shit Lightning.
Bionic Colon.
And a good name for a rock band.
due to posts made in this thread it has been decided that rankenphile is indeed the winner of the forum today.
I never said it had to be a big production. I said contact an attorney and find out the best method of recourse. Yes, it was delayed diagnosis, but it is a simple diagnosis to test for, a very common diagnosis, and one that potentially could have left him with a fully working and healthy colon. You never remove a body part if there are other options available, and Munkus' doctors, from all evidence I've been presented with so far, performed with what appears to be gross negligence.
So he should contact an attorney and find out what the best method of recourse would be. As I said a bunch of times before.
He hasn't said anything more, so he's probably already talking to one.
Now...is there any way to shit on a colon thread?
Haha hey man, in all seriousness, if you need food advice, ask me. I've been eating gluten free since I was 10, and I eat like a mother fucking king.
No, it is actually kinda hard to diagnose.
Have fun never tasting wheat again without getting an upset stomach, though. Things made out of wheat are delicious.
Do you know who Munkus is man?
Read the thread again.
The whole thread.
Including the parts about him not having a fucking ass
rock on
Gee, I know someone with symptoms like you describe in your other celiac thread. What was your original wrong diagnosis, Munkus? It wasn't Crohn's or ulcerative colitis, was it?
Contacting an attorney is always a good idea when you believe you may have legal recourse. Many don't charge, or charge very little, for consultations. Suing over the colon (which you specifically mentioned) would have to be a big deal because of the scope of the issue. It would also be irresponsible if the colectomy was a reasonable course of action. A delayed diagnosis can, depending on the effects of the delay, be a much smaller deal.
People like taking negligence beyond the scope of the "reasonable man", and often win anyway. This sort of thing is despicable.
There are certain videos, but they are likely to get you shot.
What would you consider reasonable compensation for a misdiagnosis that will require him to walk around with a bag in his ass for the rest of his life?
Operator, get me Jack McCoy!
Hahahahaha, wow.
Yeah gluten's a bitch.
The word wheatard totally saved this.
Excellent, excellent word.
Man what's a colostomy bag like, dude? Do you still get chicks?
h5
Munkus is not a lawyer or a doctor.
Are you?
what are you in a frat or something