Don't like the snow? You can make a bookmark with the following text instead of a url: javascript:snowStorm.toggleSnow(). Clicking it will toggle the snow on and off.
Our new Indie Games subforum is now open for business in G&T. Go and check it out, you might land a code for a free game. If you're developing an indie game and want to post about it, follow these directions. If you don't, he'll break your legs! Hahaha! Seriously though.
Our rules have been updated and given their own forum. Go and look at them! They are nice, and there may be new ones that you didn't know about! Hooray for rules! Hooray for The System! Hooray for Conforming!

The G*T D&D M:tg collusion thread.

1356722

Posts

  • mrflippymrflippy Registered User regular
    edited June 2005
    Goumindong wrote:
    Goumindong wrote:
    "

    IRT: Ad-Hominem. We already have "logical fallacy" No need to get into specifics.

    Eh, I just figured we needed more direct damage cards.

    We have two, and a multiplier. but lets make derail another.


    Flame (as fireball)
    Zing(as lightning bolt)
    Derail (target player takes 1-2 damage for every land tapped)
    Multi-post(duplicate last instant or sorcery played[kicker: Tripple last instant/sorc][kicker2: quadruple last instant/sorc])

    That should be enough, and then lots of forumers.

    Not sure that'll be enough, considering I think we're making a core set (350 cards, if I recall), not an expansion (though expansions are still, what, 165?)
    We could make a forumer with "Tap: Deals 1 damage to target creature or player" abilities or something.

  • GoumindongGoumindong Registered User regular
    edited June 2005
    mrflippy wrote:
    We could make a forumer with "Tap: Deals 1 damage to target creature or player" abilities or something.

    Tynic or Salvation

    edit: also there is a message for flippy on the top of page 2

    wbBv3fj.png
  • InsanityIncInsanityInc Registered User
    edited June 2005
    Goumindong wrote:
    Goumindong wrote:
    Goumindong wrote:
    "

    IRT: Ad-Hominem. We already have "logical fallacy" No need to get into specifics.

    Eh, I just figured we needed more direct damage cards.

    We have two, and a multiplier. but lets make derail another.


    Flame (as fireball)
    Zing(as lightning bolt)
    Derail (target player takes 1-2 damage for every land tapped)
    Multi-post(duplicate last instant or sorcery played[kicker: Tripple last instant/sorc][kicker2: quadruple last instant/sorc])

    That should be enough, and then lots of forumers.

    Not sure that'll be enough, considering I think we're making a core set (350 cards, if I recall), not an expansion (though expansions are still, what, 165?)

    We have lots of creature removal though.

    Maybe another 1 or 2 DD cards, but i think we shouldnt be ultra specific, espeicaly with logical fallacies. There are just too many.

    As for the EV thread, i think its covered well enough by Global Warming.

    edit: most full sets dont have more than 2-4 direct damage per color, even red.

    revised had what? Lightning Bolt, Fireball and what else?

    Disintegrate, Lightning Bolt, Fireball, Earthquake and a few creatures that did stuff like that.

    Martman wrote:
    Poldy wrote:
    Would you be pissed if your children did not love you, because they thought they were the ones being rational?
    Not if I hid from my children and beat them occasionally.
  • GoumindongGoumindong Registered User regular
    edited June 2005
    We are on par then :)

    edit: but "Multi-Post" will have to be called "M-M-M-M-Multi-Post!"

    wbBv3fj.png
  • InsanityIncInsanityInc Registered User
    edited June 2005
    ElJeffe!

    I could use a copy of his old avatar, though. This one is somehwat lacking.

    Martman wrote:
    Poldy wrote:
    Would you be pissed if your children did not love you, because they thought they were the ones being rational?
    Not if I hid from my children and beat them occasionally.
  • mrflippymrflippy Registered User regular
    edited June 2005
    Goumindong wrote:
    edit: also there is a message for flippy on the top of page 2
    Religious Thread has been changed.

  • InsanityIncInsanityInc Registered User
    edited June 2005
    Martman wrote:
    Poldy wrote:
    Would you be pissed if your children did not love you, because they thought they were the ones being rational?
    Not if I hid from my children and beat them occasionally.
  • InsanityIncInsanityInc Registered User
    edited June 2005
    And finally

    Rediculous

    Martman wrote:
    Poldy wrote:
    Would you be pissed if your children did not love you, because they thought they were the ones being rational?
    Not if I hid from my children and beat them occasionally.
  • GoumindongGoumindong Registered User regular
    edited June 2005
    And finally

    Rediculous

    "Fixed" should be doing that effect (change target, even it target is not valid)

    Maybe Rediculous will be a damage dealing card?

    Eidt: it can still tap The Cat.

    wbBv3fj.png
  • InsanityIncInsanityInc Registered User
    edited June 2005
    Goumindong wrote:
    And finally

    Rediculous

    "Fixed" should be doing that effect (change target, even it target is not valid)

    Maybe Rediculous will be a damage dealing card?

    Eidt: it can still tap The Cat.

    I wanted to make rediculous something similar to ridiculous, but couldn't think of much.

    Martman wrote:
    Poldy wrote:
    Would you be pissed if your children did not love you, because they thought they were the ones being rational?
    Not if I hid from my children and beat them occasionally.
  • InsanityIncInsanityInc Registered User
    edited June 2005
    Just changed Rediculous to an X DD spell.

    Martman wrote:
    Poldy wrote:
    Would you be pissed if your children did not love you, because they thought they were the ones being rational?
    Not if I hid from my children and beat them occasionally.
  • GoumindongGoumindong Registered User regular
    edited June 2005
    Awesome.

    new Card idea...

    Link?

    1,R

    Enchant Creature: Target creature cannot be tapped for any reason, unless his owner destroyes a thread.

    (alternate, cannot be tapped for any reason)

    wbBv3fj.png
  • InsanityIncInsanityInc Registered User
    edited June 2005
    Ok, I changed Rediculous again because I realized that the second ability became pointless considering the main ability. Here's a link again.

    Rediculous

    Martman wrote:
    Poldy wrote:
    Would you be pissed if your children did not love you, because they thought they were the ones being rational?
    Not if I hid from my children and beat them occasionally.
  • InsanityIncInsanityInc Registered User
    edited June 2005
    Goumindong wrote:
    Awesome.

    new Card idea...

    Link?

    1,R

    Enchant Creature: Target creature cannot be tapped for any reason, unless his owner destroyes a thread.

    (alternate, cannot be tapped for any reason)

    The wording would be "Enchanted creature cannot use any activated ability or attack unless its controller sacrifices a thread".

    Martman wrote:
    Poldy wrote:
    Would you be pissed if your children did not love you, because they thought they were the ones being rational?
    Not if I hid from my children and beat them occasionally.
  • Salvation122Salvation122 Registered User regular
    edited June 2005
    ElJeffe!

    I could use a copy of his old avatar, though. This one is somehwat lacking.
    You can find the baby seal one easily enough; I already sent him a PM for the crazy mexican one. Rules-wise, I'd give him First Strike, the exact same Lock/Jail abilities as Cat without the double-summoning sickness issue, and maybe something along the lines of "Must block Liberals if able." Liberals would include Nexus, Thanatos, Richy, Bernouli, and MSG, for starters.

    Of course, that leaves precious little room for flavor text.

    Edit: The rules I had written up for him were:
    RRRRR, 4/5.
    Conservative: Must block Liberal creatures if able.
    [RRR], T: Lock Thread. Target D&D thread is sent to the graveyard.
    [RR], T: Jail target red creature. Creature is tapped for the next two turns.

    sig.png
  • thumperthumper Registered User
    edited June 2005
    kakos wrote:
    Someone needs to make an Elisha Cuthbert card. It has the following abilities:
    While Elisha Cuthbert is in play, thumper does not untap during the untap phase.
    0: Tap thumper.

    EDIT: Please don't kill me thumps. I still <3 you.

    On the contrary, I'm kinda flattered :oops: :P

  • Salvation122Salvation122 Registered User regular
    edited June 2005
    thumper wrote:
    kakos wrote:
    Someone needs to make an Elisha Cuthbert card. It has the following abilities:
    While Elisha Cuthbert is in play, thumper does not untap during the untap phase.
    0: Tap thumper.

    EDIT: Please don't kill me thumps. I still <3 you.

    On the contrary, I'm kinda flattered :oops: :P
    Hey.

    Hey you.

    PM me a larger image of your avatar. Doesn't need to be exactly square, and doesn't need to be huge - figure 500x400-ish as ideal, and then I can crop it down as needed.

    sig.png
  • GoumindongGoumindong Registered User regular
    edited June 2005
    ElJeffe!

    I could use a copy of his old avatar, though. This one is somehwat lacking.
    You can find the baby seal one easily enough; I already sent him a PM for the crazy mexican one. Rules-wise, I'd give him First Strike, the exact same Lock/Jail abilities as Cat without the double-summoning sickness issue, and maybe something along the lines of "Must block Liberals if able." Liberals would include Nexus, Thanatos, Richy, Bernouli, and MSG, for starters.

    Of course, that leaves precious little room for flavor text.

    Edit: The rules I had written up for him were:
    RRRRR, 4/5.
    Conservative: Must block Liberal creatures if able.
    [RRR], T: Lock Thread. Target D&D thread is sent to the graveyard.
    [RR], T: Jail target red creature. Creature is tapped for the next two turns.

    How about

    Conservative: must block liberal forumers if able.
    RRRT, Lock thread(dont need any more text, its convention. Locked threads go to graveyard)

    RRT, target forumer doesnt untap during next untap phase.

    wbBv3fj.png
  • RichyRichy Registered User regular
    edited June 2005
    I wouldn't cound MSG as a liberal. Mainly because I feel somewhat offended being put in a category with him.

    I'd put him in a "concentrated stupid" category, along with such people as CtotheYrus and that guy who couldn't stop talking about his circumcision.

    RichyFlag.gifsig.gif
  • InsanityIncInsanityInc Registered User
    edited June 2005
    New X damage to everything sorcery:

    Creationism

    Martman wrote:
    Poldy wrote:
    Would you be pissed if your children did not love you, because they thought they were the ones being rational?
    Not if I hid from my children and beat them occasionally.
  • GoumindongGoumindong Registered User regular
    edited June 2005
    Goumindong wrote:
    Awesome.

    new Card idea...

    Link?

    1,R

    Enchant Creature: Target creature cannot be tapped for any reason, unless his owner destroyes a thread.

    (alternate, cannot be tapped for any reason)

    The wording would be "Enchanted creature cannot use any activated ability or attack unless its controller sacrifices a thread".

    works for me.

    wbBv3fj.png
  • GoumindongGoumindong Registered User regular
    edited June 2005
    New X damage to everything sorcery:

    Creationism

    Isnt that the same as rediculous?

    How about we make it..

    "All Creatures and players Lose x Life from mind numbing stupidity"?

    But make it X,R,R,R.

    because you cant prevent loss of life.

    wbBv3fj.png
  • RichyRichy Registered User regular
    edited June 2005
    New X damage to everything sorcery:

    Creationism

    Not to get off-topic, but Adam didn't create Eve. God did. I'm no creationist, but that's a pretty blatant mistake.

    RichyFlag.gifsig.gif
  • InsanityIncInsanityInc Registered User
    edited June 2005
    Goumindong wrote:
    New X damage to everything sorcery:

    Creationism

    Isnt that the same as rediculous?

    How about we make it..

    "All Creatures and players Lose x Life from mind numbing stupidity"?

    But make it X,R,R,R.

    because you cant prevent loss of life.

    I changed rediculous again actually, you must have missed that post. Take another look at it.

    Martman wrote:
    Poldy wrote:
    Would you be pissed if your children did not love you, because they thought they were the ones being rational?
    Not if I hid from my children and beat them occasionally.
  • InsanityIncInsanityInc Registered User
    edited June 2005
    Richy wrote:
    New X damage to everything sorcery:

    Creationism

    Not to get off-topic, but Adam didn't create Eve. God did. I'm no creationist, but that's a pretty blatant mistake.

    That might be part of the joke.

    Just maybe.

    Martman wrote:
    Poldy wrote:
    Would you be pissed if your children did not love you, because they thought they were the ones being rational?
    Not if I hid from my children and beat them occasionally.
  • GoumindongGoumindong Registered User regular
    edited June 2005
    Ok, red is great now. I still think the change to creationism is warranted, but it works either way.

    Ill add it, but richy is right, you need to change the "adam created" to "god created"

    wbBv3fj.png
  • InsanityIncInsanityInc Registered User
    edited June 2005
    Alright, I updated the flavor text.

    Martman wrote:
    Poldy wrote:
    Would you be pissed if your children did not love you, because they thought they were the ones being rational?
    Not if I hid from my children and beat them occasionally.
  • gibsgibs Registered User regular
    edited June 2005
    Also, maybe make it Intelligent Design instead of Creationism. At least we can all agree on it then. :P

    How about a "Clueless Noob" card? Something to do with instant locking of threads...? I'm no Magic player but I'm sure you guys can figure out something.

  • InsanityIncInsanityInc Registered User
    edited June 2005
    I updated ElJeffe as well.

    Martman wrote:
    Poldy wrote:
    Would you be pissed if your children did not love you, because they thought they were the ones being rational?
    Not if I hid from my children and beat them occasionally.
  • GoumindongGoumindong Registered User regular
    edited June 2005
    SE++ gets forum newb.

    wbBv3fj.png
  • mrflippymrflippy Registered User regular
    edited June 2005
    New X damage to everything sorcery:

    Creationism
    Aside from being a bit insulting, I think it's running rather close to bringing forum arguments into the cards.

  • GoumindongGoumindong Registered User regular
    edited June 2005
    mrflippy wrote:
    New X damage to everything sorcery:

    Creationism
    Aside from being a bit insulting, I think it's running rather close to bringing forum arguments into the cards.

    We have never argued the validity of strict creationism. I think we all agreed it was pretty dumb.

    There isnt even a talmudic arguement for strict creationism.

    edit: creationism has to change...



    Until the end of your next turn, All threads are "religious threads"

    wbBv3fj.png
  • thumperthumper Registered User
    edited June 2005
    thumper wrote:
    kakos wrote:
    Someone needs to make an Elisha Cuthbert card. It has the following abilities:
    While Elisha Cuthbert is in play, thumper does not untap during the untap phase.
    0: Tap thumper.

    EDIT: Please don't kill me thumps. I still <3 you.

    On the contrary, I'm kinda flattered :oops: :P
    Hey.

    Hey you.

    PM me a larger image of your avatar. Doesn't need to be exactly square, and doesn't need to be huge - figure 500x400-ish as ideal, and then I can crop it down as needed.

    Okay, hold on while I find one.

  • InsanityIncInsanityInc Registered User
    edited June 2005
    Changed creationism, then.

    It's an enchantment, though. Figured it would work better with ElJeffe that way.

    Martman wrote:
    Poldy wrote:
    Would you be pissed if your children did not love you, because they thought they were the ones being rational?
    Not if I hid from my children and beat them occasionally.
  • Salvation122Salvation122 Registered User regular
    edited June 2005
    Richy wrote:
    I wouldn't cound MSG as a liberal. Mainly because I feel somewhat offended being put in a category with him.

    I'd put him in a "concentrated stupid" category, along with such people as CtotheYrus and that guy who couldn't stop talking about his circumcision.
    I was thinking of making him "Creature - Liberal Troll." I'd change Harry to Conservative Troll.

    sig.png
  • thumperthumper Registered User
    edited June 2005
    mrflippy wrote:
    New X damage to everything sorcery:

    Creationism
    Aside from being a bit insulting, I think it's running rather close to bringing forum arguments into the cards.

    That didn't stop you from making the Elisha card ;) :P

    Hey, this is probably going to sound stupid but like... how exactly do I make traditional-looking cards? Like from the Revised/3rd Edition era? I played around with the set editor and it looks like they've changed the look of the cards and, well, I'd like to make an old-style card like most people have made.

  • DynagripDynagrip destroy everything you touch Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited June 2005
    did redx make ElJeffe's card, 'cause it's all misspelled to shit.

    gusinrepose.png
  • mrflippymrflippy Registered User regular
    edited June 2005
    thumper wrote:
    mrflippy wrote:
    New X damage to everything sorcery:

    Creationism
    Aside from being a bit insulting, I think it's running rather close to bringing forum arguments into the cards.

    That didn't stop you from making the Elisha card ;) :P

    Hey, this is probably going to sound stupid but like... how exactly do I make traditional-looking cards? Like from the Revised/3rd Edition era? I played around with the set editor and it looks like they've changed the look of the cards and, well, I'd like to make an old-style card like most people have made.
    Edit->Set Options->Graphics->Card Style->Old Style Cards, small

  • thumperthumper Registered User
    edited June 2005
    Salvation:

    Is this good enough?

    Large avatar link

  • Salvation122Salvation122 Registered User regular
    edited June 2005
    That'll do nicely. I'll whip it up tomorrow afternoon. (Dibs, you homps. Dibs I say!)

    sig.png
Sign In or Register to comment.