Our new Indie Games subforum is now open for business in G&T. Go and check it out, you might land a code for a free game. If you're developing an indie game and want to post about it, follow these directions. If you don't, he'll break your legs! Hahaha! Seriously though.
Our rules have been updated and given their own forum. Go and look at them! They are nice, and there may be new ones that you didn't know about! Hooray for rules! Hooray for The System! Hooray for Conforming!
Just caught the first episode and it seemed pretty good (on Global, as I don't have NBC being a crazy Canadian). Premise is a cop after being convicted for a crime he didn't commit spends 11 years in prison before being found to be innocent and let out. He's given a large settlement of money, and his job back as a detective.
Except while in prison he is beaten constantly and becomes slightly fucked up as a result.
The first detective scene was sort of bad, but it went uphill after that. It seems they are trying to make a House like cop show, with an eccentric protagonist. And the show succeeds at that.
The scene with
Spoiler:
Charlie catching the man his ex-wife married for changing lanes was pretty gold
Spoiler:
as was the scene where he tells the man to flush the weed
The part at the end:
Spoiler:
where he was in front of the web of names who contributed to framing him (I think...) with the music playing was awesome
And his partner Dani
Spoiler:
Rehab is mentioned multiple times... and she freaks out when she gets the coke on her, but alcohol is also connected to her. Which one is it?
So did anyone else like it? I'm probably going to add it to the list of TV shows I'll try to watch, along with Heroes and House.
FeralWho needs a medical license when you've got style?Registered Userregular
Does he come out of it with HIV and hepatitis C from being anally raped? Because he's a little too pretty to be a top.
Sorry, I'm having a little bit of trouble wrapping my brain how the concept of "wrongful prisonment turned an ordinary fellow into a likable curmudgeon! Oh, he doesn't know what e-mail is... how cute!" could be anything but depressing.
I guess I'm just anal about this sort of thing (no pun intended).
I am comforted by Richard Dawkins’ theory of memes. Those are mental units: thoughts, ideas, gestures, notions, songs, beliefs, rhymes, ideals, teachings, sayings, phrases, clichés that move from mind to mind as genes move from body to body. After a lifetime of writing, teaching, broadcasting and telling too many jokes, I will leave behind more memes than many. They will all also eventually die, but so it goes. - Roger Ebert, I Do Not Fear Death
Does he come out of it with HIV and hepatitis C from being anally raped? Because he's a little too pretty to be a top.
Sorry, I'm having a little bit of trouble wrapping my brain how the concept of "wrongful prisonment turned an ordinary fellow into a likable curmudgeon! Oh, he doesn't know what e-mail is... how cute!" could be anything but depressing.
The character isn't like House in his worldview, only in the eccentricity of his character. He's sort of zen-obsessed, (constantly twisting himself to see things positively, or non-painfully) and he reacts in ways that you wouldn't originally expect.
He was too busy spending time time being beaten (for being a cop) and recovering while in prison to be raped.
The technology stuff is sometimes played well, most of the time though its fucking dumb.
Does he come out of it with HIV and hepatitis C from being anally raped? Because he's a little too pretty to be a top.
Sorry, I'm having a little bit of trouble wrapping my brain how the concept of "wrongful prisonment turned an ordinary fellow into a likable curmudgeon! Oh, he doesn't know what e-mail is... how cute!" could be anything but depressing.
The character isn't like House in his worldview, only in the eccentricity of his character. He's sort of zen-obsessed, (constantly twisting himself to see things positively, or non-painfully) and he reacts in ways that you wouldn't originally expect.
Okay, that makes a little more sense then. I think I ran a little too far with the House comparison.
I am comforted by Richard Dawkins’ theory of memes. Those are mental units: thoughts, ideas, gestures, notions, songs, beliefs, rhymes, ideals, teachings, sayings, phrases, clichés that move from mind to mind as genes move from body to body. After a lifetime of writing, teaching, broadcasting and telling too many jokes, I will leave behind more memes than many. They will all also eventually die, but so it goes. - Roger Ebert, I Do Not Fear Death
Well, it's pretty generic. It's not particularly bad, or good I suppose. All these shows kind of blend together and well, it gets kind of boring after a bit. There's already CSIinserteverycityhere, Monk, Psych, Law and Order, etc etc that does this kind of stuff. I tried watching this, but the acting and the dialogue weren't all that great. The music and cinematography were pretty good though. Maybe I'll try watching next week's episode if I remember to.
First episode of Life was good. It felt a little forced but the quality was higher than the majority of television so it wasn't annoying me too much. And I can see how they might need to scramble to make sure people are on the same page since it is the first episode. I'm looking forward to seeing how it develops.
I liked it, Michael Cudlitz as the kid's convict father was a nice touch, as was Adam Arkin. Damian Lewis was outstanding as is the character Crews himself, but his female partner's story wasn't really believable or that interesting. Same goes with her acting.
I don't really think he's a genius, I just think he's a guy trying to be a detective all the while trying to figure why he got set up and by who. I liked the first episode, hope to see more.
I don't really think he's a genius, I just think he's a guy trying to be a detective all the while trying to figure why he got set up and by who. I liked the first episode, hope to see more.
Well, the setup of the show reminds me of the basic setup of The Pretender - you have the case of the day, but you also have an overarching plot that runs though all the episodes. And when the two intersect, it's always fun.
Hopefully it keeps the level of intelligence the pretender had. As both shows have a very strong lead. I'll have to see more before making any more judgements.
I liked it quite a bit. The zen references were rather well done.
For those reasons I think it's doomed
I don't think it was received very well (which kind of surprised me) but maybe it can stick around and get a foothold. There's been 14 episodes shot so we'll know we have that much.
I liked it quite a bit. The zen references were rather well done.
For those reasons I think it's doomed
I don't think it was received very well (which kind of surprised me) but maybe it can stick around and get a foothold. There's been 14 episodes shot so we'll know we have that much.
I hope it sticks around. I mean take House for example, it started off with low ratings but over time gained it's audience (almost every single person in the world) and now it is huge. So who knows what will happen.
I think what really made me appreciate them is his partner telling him to shut up. Having a character reflect my feelings about what he was saying was just the right amount of meta.
Hopefully it keeps the level of intelligence the pretender had. As both shows have a very strong lead. I'll have to see more before making any more judgements.
You know what's funny? While watching the episode, I kept thinking that Michael Weiss would make a much better lead.
Hopefully it keeps the level of intelligence the pretender had. As both shows have a very strong lead. I'll have to see more before making any more judgements.
You know what's funny? While watching the episode, I kept thinking that Michael Weiss would make a much better lead.
I rather enjoyed the first episode of this show, but I wonder if they are going to continue with this "interview the other characters" bit beyond the first episode. I would wager not....but it seemed to be a major part of the first episode.
I rather enjoyed the first episode of this show, but I wonder if they are going to continue with this "interview the other characters" bit beyond the first episode. I would wager not....but it seemed to be a major part of the first episode.
It looks like they are, and in doing so, they can introduce other players and more detail about the case. It's actually very well done.
Hopefully it keeps the level of intelligence the pretender had. As both shows have a very strong lead. I'll have to see more before making any more judgements.
You know what's funny? While watching the episode, I kept thinking that Michael Weiss would make a much better lead.
No he wouldn't sadly, he did a cop film once I had the displeasure of watching. Outside of the Pretender he really lacks the ability to act. I don't know how or why, but that is the way things are.
I rather enjoyed the first episode of this show, but I wonder if they are going to continue with this "interview the other characters" bit beyond the first episode. I would wager not....but it seemed to be a major part of the first episode.
It looks like they are, and in doing so, they can introduce other players and more detail about the case. It's actually very well done.
I agree. It seems they are showing some tv special about his case throughout the season. I like it because it gives you a taste of what may happen next.
The only thing I was pissed about last night's show was the scene with his old partner's wife.
I wish it would have went like this:
"No one would ride with my husband for 4 years."
"That sucks. I spent 12 years in jail for a crime I didn't commit. I think I win."
That scene in the garage was tense. I was ready for some shit to go down.
The only thing I was pissed about last night's show was the scene with his old partner's wife.
I wish it would have went like this:
"No one would ride with my husband for 4 years."
"That sucks. I spent 12 years in jail for a crime I didn't commit. I think I win."
But her point was that yes, he was falsely imprisoned, but he was also compensated. Her family was put through hell, and they got nothing for it. I'm not saying she's right, but I do understand how she was viewing it.
Yeah, but she's seeing the end result of what happened IE he got out and got a lot of money for it. If he didn't get out he'd still be in jail for the rest of his life while his partner would have just had a tough spot for some time.
The lead detective removed the daughter from the police report, saying that she was at a sleepover.
Whether or not his partner was part of the scheme or played like a patsy has become muddier.
Some more points to be made about the lead detective (who we're going to get to see meet Charlie next week):
His behavior reminds me of the Swift Boat Vets, who were so adamant even in the face of evidence contradicting them. This leads me to believe that he has to believe in Charlie's guilt for his own sake.
In that light, it would explain why he had issues with alcohol at the end of the case, and why he took retirement when it was all over - the cognitive dissonance was tearing him apart. And with Charlie exonerated, it's come back to haunt him.
Posts
Sorry, I'm having a little bit of trouble wrapping my brain how the concept of "wrongful prisonment turned an ordinary fellow into a likable curmudgeon! Oh, he doesn't know what e-mail is... how cute!" could be anything but depressing.
I guess I'm just anal about this sort of thing (no pun intended).
But loveablely so.
The character isn't like House in his worldview, only in the eccentricity of his character. He's sort of zen-obsessed, (constantly twisting himself to see things positively, or non-painfully) and he reacts in ways that you wouldn't originally expect.
He was too busy spending time time being beaten (for being a cop) and recovering while in prison to be raped.
The technology stuff is sometimes played well, most of the time though its fucking dumb.
Okay, that makes a little more sense then. I think I ran a little too far with the House comparison.
This is exactly what I said to myself when I first saw the commercials for it.
I believe it starts next wednesday here after House.
"Maybe it's insecure."
3DS: 2852-6809-9411
Well, the setup of the show reminds me of the basic setup of The Pretender - you have the case of the day, but you also have an overarching plot that runs though all the episodes. And when the two intersect, it's always fun.
Yeah, he pretty much makes the whole show.
For those reasons I think it's doomed
I don't think it was received very well (which kind of surprised me) but maybe it can stick around and get a foothold. There's been 14 episodes shot so we'll know we have that much.
I hope it sticks around. I mean take House for example, it started off with low ratings but over time gained it's audience (almost every single person in the world) and now it is huge. So who knows what will happen.
I think what really made me appreciate them is his partner telling him to shut up. Having a character reflect my feelings about what he was saying was just the right amount of meta.
I am really, really interested to see where this show is going.
Librarians harbor a terrible secret. Find it.
"You want to drive the tractor, don't you?"
"I kinda do."
You know what's funny? While watching the episode, I kept thinking that Michael Weiss would make a much better lead.
pssh
Enjoyed it, especially the car subplot.
It looks like they are, and in doing so, they can introduce other players and more detail about the case. It's actually very well done.
No he wouldn't sadly, he did a cop film once I had the displeasure of watching. Outside of the Pretender he really lacks the ability to act. I don't know how or why, but that is the way things are.
I agree. It seems they are showing some tv special about his case throughout the season. I like it because it gives you a taste of what may happen next.
The only thing I was pissed about last night's show was the scene with his old partner's wife.
I wish it would have went like this:
"No one would ride with my husband for 4 years."
"That sucks. I spent 12 years in jail for a crime I didn't commit. I think I win."
That scene in the garage was tense. I was ready for some shit to go down.
But her point was that yes, he was falsely imprisoned, but he was also compensated. Her family was put through hell, and they got nothing for it. I'm not saying she's right, but I do understand how she was viewing it.
- The lead detective removed the daughter from the police report, saying that she was at a sleepover.
- Whether or not his partner was part of the scheme or played like a patsy has become muddier.
Some more points to be made about the lead detective (who we're going to get to see meet Charlie next week):What do you think?