Our new Indie Games subforum is now open for business in G&T. Go and check it out, you might land a code for a free game. If you're developing an indie game and want to post about it,
follow these directions. If you don't, he'll break your legs! Hahaha! Seriously though.
Our rules have been updated and given
their own forum. Go and look at them! They are nice, and there may be new ones that you didn't know about! Hooray for rules! Hooray for The System! Hooray for Conforming!
Questions/Discussion/Tutorials Thread
Posts
Now that you can't really tell what they are you shouldn't have a problem of thinking you know what it looks like and just drawing what you see. I dunno if that helps, but when I'm doing a life drawing I get my guidelines out then look at little sections like this and just pick away at it.
I was actually going to do an example of this too. Another way to beat out the logical part of your brain is to draw the image upside down
there are many types of cilents to get....here is one.
http://bittorrent.com/download.html
bittorent is gods way of saying Sharing is caring, now leave that download window open all day asswipe so other people can get it too.
it's charming sometimes, while infuriating at the same time.
WetbackMcMoneyfingers. Or a Mexi-Jew. - awesome!
Thank you for all you're help, Bombadier, DMAC, Tynic, Happy Killmore, Tripwire, Neo, Needoptic, Criminal Savant, and Angel of Bacon. If I missed anybody, I'm terribly sorry.
So, for $89.99 CAD (about $72.34 US) I can get this tablet:
http://tinyurl.com/6svd4
Which has some of the following general features:
∙ Handwriting recognition & image editing capabilities.
∙ Professional painting, animation & web design tool.
∙ Write, highlight, sketch in Net Meeting & Chat.
∙ Pressure Sensitive Tablet.
∙ Compatible with MAC/PC. USB ready. Art Dabbler Software included.
∙ Dimensions: 5" x 3.75" (12.7cm x 9.52cm)
Is this worth the cash or not?
The Wacom tablet is king in the land of tablets.
Save up and get a 6x8 graphire 3, ask for help buying it as a christmas preasent:
http://www.tigerdirect.ca/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=636380&Tab=13&NoMapp=0
or, for only 30 bucks more than you're spending right now you could get a 4x5 graphire 3, but I'd go with the 6 x 8 and beg my parents for money if I were in your shoes:
http://www.tigerdirect.ca/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=636374&CatId=140
also available if you can swing it is the intuous series (which is a little better) a 6x8:
http://www.tigerdirect.ca/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=686289&CatId=140
and, the size I have, a 9x12:
http://www.tigerdirect.ca/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=1059139&CatId=140
or, holy hell, the size ape has, a 12x12, but this is only an intuous 2, the rest are on to version 3:
http://www.tigerdirect.ca/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=709390&CatId=140
I used to use pens all the time, but they're so restricting when it comes to natural variations in line weight. Honestly, if you're going to be inking comics and cartoons, learn how to properly handle a brush stroke and make it do what you want it to when it comes to inking line art.
Then save up 50 bucks and go buy yourself a couple Windsor-Newton Series 7 brushes (sizes 1 and 2) and a bunch of waterproof drawing ink.
That's my suggestion.
I.E. Do you just use lines or do you flesh it out? do you make circles/ovals or do you just use lines?
EDIT: It's not good to draw from life without understanding how things work? Like folds and such?
EDIT: DJ to the rescue!
So you kinda learn naturally?
Is it more like luck or is there some kind of skill involved?
no drugs were used in the making of this art
Flickr | Facebook | Classifieds | GigPosters | Twitter | Blog
... widdle ... them?
whittle, possibly. :lol: Great mental image, though.
no drugs were used in the making of this art
heh, they never taught us how to spell that word in sk00l.
Flickr | Facebook | Classifieds | GigPosters | Twitter | Blog
Ok, so ISO is supposed to be the digital equivalent of film speeds right?
I was wondering what types of lighting warrant which ISO.
My digital camera can do 50, 100, 200, and 400 ISO. Sometimes my pictures look really 'noisy.' There are a lot of pixels that are off-color randomly.
Also, with a Canon digital camera, do they magically look better if you open them with Canon's software? I only open them in Photoshop so I was wondering.
(My camera is a Canon Powershot S1 IS. It is 3.2 megapixels.)
Thanks for any help.
Edit: It's best to use the lowest ISO possible as long as you can keep the 1/60 exposure length unless your subject is still or you have a tripod.
From what I've learned each ISO setting down requires twice as much light, so twice the exposure length. Each stop or fstop up lets in half the amount of light too (lower is best but remember how it will affect your depth of field).
Adjusting the Fstop is a much better solution though, so if you can, do that...save my reccomendation for when that fails.
Kodak FAQ about film speeds for anyone else interested:
http://www.kodak.com/global/en/service/faqs/faq0010.shtml
Working on a web site for my mom, it's going to have an image background with PNGs with transparencies overlayed. For whatever reason, NONE of my graphics programs are exporting the PNGs properly...they all still export with a matte behind them. Using PNG-24...tried in Photoshop, Image Ready and Fireworks.
Using Dreamweaver to make the page, but I don't think it's a Dreamweaver issue because whenever I preview it from any other web editing program it still has the damn matte. But if I save them FROM the webpage and open them up in Photoshop or something, it does maintain a transparency.
And yes, I have previewed it in several browsers, I know PNGs don't work with everything. Something I'm missing? Some stupid Windows or browser setting or something that's jacking up my PNGs? Thanks.
It's weird because when I put it into Dreamweaver or just straight view it in a browser, it has a matte...but if I SAVE the PNG from the browser and open in PS or something, it has the transparency. >_O
Thanks for the links though man
I'm not sure how you define good.... but all that i've ever done was through my own studies. Never went to school for it.
Then again - my stuff pales in comparison to the pro's like chewie and Dmac.
I'm just wondering if anyone else has an opinion on this idea of making yourself feel like your work could be critisized at any moment, making you focus more, notice more mistakes, etc.
And by the way, another thought comes to mind. When people say 'practice, practice, practice' when somone asks how they get better at art, you obviously consider they mean study anatomy and whatnot. Would you say aynalising and disecting questions about things like 'why can't I draw well in this way' and finding a logical solution why (like I just think I have) is an even bigger form of study you have to do to be a good artist? I mean, I was pretty pretty terrible a year ago, focusing entirley on 'how to draw things' sort of books, but now I'm always really thinking about ideas like this and usually improve after I just sit down for an hour and really think hard about things. I'm probably rambling now and seeing as I'm outta Lucozade for the week my brain not function too well at making legible conversation, so I'll just stop here
When people say practice, practice, practice, I think of doing whatever you're doing with references. Different poses. Many times. Until you know every which way of it until you could make it into a Transformer or mess with it like a rubix cube.
My question was: Is there something worth buying that will draw a pretty thin white line over almost anything permanent and be it's color. I was hoping to hear something non-permanent, but now I think it wouldn't really matter. Now thinking of it, I'm thinking would a thin white-out type pen work well? I'm basically thinking of something thin where I could apply fine touch ups with precision on perhaps inks and possibly pencils.
Flickr | Facebook | Classifieds | GigPosters | Twitter | Blog
Not exactly to fix, but add highlights. I could try scratching, but I don't know how well it will work with Prismacolors as they tend to bleed within the paper. I'll try it out when I have the time later on various papers. I would expect that bristol paper would be the easist to scratch off, but i'm sure it will make the glossy smooth paper look ugly and fuzzy.
Edit: Like how white charcoal is to black charcoal. Except most white colored pencils are pretty weak and show over half of what is under it.
Flickr | Facebook | Classifieds | GigPosters | Twitter | Blog
p.s. i tryed google, no luck.
Let me sum up, no there is too much - 3.7 mb
Penny Arcade guys - 2.6 mb
What was the windows program Gabe used to capture, in video, his amazing session drawing a comic, and when did he post about it?
I thought I had the file somewhere, but can't find it...
Thanks.
Found the link to the movie file. inking.swf
still doesn't tell me when or how it was made, but it's a start.
thanks! that helped a lot.
http://www.techsmith.com/spotlight/mkrahulik.asp
a bit costly for our "corporate" needs though. Anyone can suggest something cheaper?
I am looking for much better materials then I have now for drawing so any other inking, or obscure medium would be useful.