Our new Indie Games subforum is now open for business in G&T. Go and check it out, you might land a code for a free game. If you're developing an indie game and want to post about it, follow these directions. If you don't, he'll break your legs! Hahaha! Seriously though.
Our rules have been updated and given their own forum. Go and look at them! They are nice, and there may be new ones that you didn't know about! Hooray for rules! Hooray for The System! Hooray for Conforming!

The Wussification of Modern Society

1789101113»

Posts

  • ege02ege02 __BANNED USERS
    Scalfin wrote: »
    Weren't you the one who recommended getting big friends?

    That wasn't me.

    You fail.

    Medopine wrote: »
    Fuck that woman going "oh god oh no!!"

    It's nature, bitch
  • shrykeshryke Registered User regular
    ege02 wrote: »
    ege02 wrote: »
    Informing authority figures is not a sign of strength, it's a sign of weakness.
    Only in your bizarre world view.

    It is a sign of maturity, and of strong ethics.

    Stop being a retard. You have to look at it from a bully's perspective.


    So, from yours?

  • QuidQuid The Fifth Horseman Registered User regular
    I'm sorry you're weren't big enough of a person to ignore small slights and think it's important to be revered in high school ege.

    You've continued to lower the bar.

    If that woman's cleavedge made one more person pick the game up off the shelf, it was a net positive for microprose. And to be blunt, if taking her top off could have increased sales enough to get a sequel, I'd endorse it 100000% because I like playing great games.
  • ege02 wrote: »
    Informing authority figures is not a sign of strength, it's a sign of weakness. It may be the most rational course of action in certain extreme situations, but it should be avoided otherwise. Let people deal with their own problems and learn from them.

    This is crazy-talk. If informing authority figures actually will adequately resolve a problem there's nothing wrong with that course of action at all. I'm concerned with what people are expected to do when that will either not solve any problems or will imbiggen the existing problem or create more problems of its own. Which seems to be most of the time.

    DAMM
    Drunks Against Mad Mothers
  • ege02ege02 __BANNED USERS
    Quid wrote: »
    I'm sorry you're weren't big enough of a person to ignore small slights and think it's important to be revered in high school ege.

    You've continued to lower the bar.

    Please tell me why you insist on making every conversation personal.

    Please.

    Are you going to continue trolling, or shall we move on to more mature avenues of discussion?

    Medopine wrote: »
    Fuck that woman going "oh god oh no!!"

    It's nature, bitch
  • deadonthestreetdeadonthestreet Registered User regular
    ege02 wrote: »
    ege02 wrote: »
    Informing authority figures is not a sign of strength, it's a sign of weakness.
    Only in your bizarre world view.

    It is a sign of maturity, and of strong ethics.

    Stop being a retard. You have to look at it from a bully's perspective.
    Because punching a bully or calling him a shitstick is going to get him to leave you alone.

    Right.

  • ege02ege02 __BANNED USERS
    ege02 wrote: »
    ege02 wrote: »
    Informing authority figures is not a sign of strength, it's a sign of weakness.
    Only in your bizarre world view.

    It is a sign of maturity, and of strong ethics.

    Stop being a retard. You have to look at it from a bully's perspective.
    Because punching a bully or calling him a shitstick is going to get him to leave you alone.

    Right.

    I never said anything about violence or verbal sparring. Nice try though.

    Medopine wrote: »
    Fuck that woman going "oh god oh no!!"

    It's nature, bitch
  • ege02ege02 __BANNED USERS
    ege02 wrote: »
    Informing authority figures is not a sign of strength, it's a sign of weakness. It may be the most rational course of action in certain extreme situations, but it should be avoided otherwise. Let people deal with their own problems and learn from them.

    This is crazy-talk. If informing authority figures actually will adequately resolve a problem there's nothing wrong with that course of action at all. I'm concerned with what people are expected to do when that will either not solve any problems or will imbiggen the existing problem or create more problems of its own. Which seems to be most of the time.

    I agree. And what me and Fuzzy are saying is that a lot of the time, informing the authority figure proves to be only a temporary solution, so it does not "adequately resolve the problem". Most of the time it makes things worse, and you agree.

    Wait, if we agree, why are you calling my talk "crazy"?

    Medopine wrote: »
    Fuck that woman going "oh god oh no!!"

    It's nature, bitch
  • ege02 wrote: »
    ege02 wrote: »
    Informing authority figures is not a sign of strength, it's a sign of weakness. It may be the most rational course of action in certain extreme situations, but it should be avoided otherwise. Let people deal with their own problems and learn from them.

    This is crazy-talk. If informing authority figures actually will adequately resolve a problem there's nothing wrong with that course of action at all. I'm concerned with what people are expected to do when that will either not solve any problems or will imbiggen the existing problem or create more problems of its own. Which seems to be most of the time.

    I agree. And what me and Fuzzy are saying is that a lot of the time, informing the authority figure proves to be only a temporary solution, so it does not "adequately resolve the problem". Most of the time it makes things worse, and you agree.

    Wait, if we agree, why are you calling my talk "crazy"?

    Sign of weakness? Are you aware that you're not talking about lions and tigers?

    DAMM
    Drunks Against Mad Mothers
  • WashWash Registered User regular
    Scalfin wrote: »
    Have you thought that maybe that person had a reason for cutting down the tree? I'm pretty sure the law allows you to remove a tree on another's property in it endangers you or your belongings, which would explain why the authorities wouldn't intervene.
    In such cases, the one "taking advantage" of you feels he is actually using an "'uncivilized' response when nice solutions and authorities fail," and so he doesn't "care about the moral highground when someone intends to push [him] around and take advantage of [his] nature and the system, [he] just care about taking care of [him]self."

    There's always a reason for an action. I doubt anyone would cut down their neighbors tree on an impulse. And even impulse is a reason. So alright, let's say they decide they want to park their car underneath a branch of my tree. He could park the car elsewhere, but he doesn't want to, so he feels his stuff is endangered and decides to cut down the branch and/or the whole tree. Maybe it's not a car, it's a garbage can. Maybe he wants to put up a satellite dish and my tree is blocking it.

    These are great reasons for him, but it's my tree. Unless he can properly pay me back for whatever he's doing to my tree, he's wronged me. If the neighbor wants the tree down because of damages or inconveniences he could avoid with effort, why should I consent to the removal of my tree? If removing the tree is the only solution, he still requires my consent because it's my tree.

    But this is where it turns into a matter of perspective. I'm sure to the neighbor I'm the bully because I'm preventing him from doing whatever because I won't get rid of my tree. To me, he's the bully because he's using the system and more to try and get me to get rid of my tree. I can't begrudge the guy for trying to better his situation, and he can't begrudge me for the same reason. Regardless, I'm still going to do everything in my power to keep him from taking my trees if I don't want him to, because they're mine.

    annakarinasig1.jpg
  • ege02ege02 __BANNED USERS
    ege02 wrote: »
    ege02 wrote: »
    Informing authority figures is not a sign of strength, it's a sign of weakness. It may be the most rational course of action in certain extreme situations, but it should be avoided otherwise. Let people deal with their own problems and learn from them.

    This is crazy-talk. If informing authority figures actually will adequately resolve a problem there's nothing wrong with that course of action at all. I'm concerned with what people are expected to do when that will either not solve any problems or will imbiggen the existing problem or create more problems of its own. Which seems to be most of the time.

    I agree. And what me and Fuzzy are saying is that a lot of the time, informing the authority figure proves to be only a temporary solution, so it does not "adequately resolve the problem". Most of the time it makes things worse, and you agree.

    Wait, if we agree, why are you calling my talk "crazy"?

    Sign of weakness? Are you aware that you're not talking about lions and tigers?

    The bully mentality is more animalistic than human.

    So my point stands.

    Medopine wrote: »
    Fuck that woman going "oh god oh no!!"

    It's nature, bitch
  • TubeTube Administrator, ClubPA, SolidSaints Tube admin
    ege02 wrote: »
    ege02 wrote: »
    ege02 wrote: »
    Informing authority figures is not a sign of strength, it's a sign of weakness. It may be the most rational course of action in certain extreme situations, but it should be avoided otherwise. Let people deal with their own problems and learn from them.

    This is crazy-talk. If informing authority figures actually will adequately resolve a problem there's nothing wrong with that course of action at all. I'm concerned with what people are expected to do when that will either not solve any problems or will imbiggen the existing problem or create more problems of its own. Which seems to be most of the time.

    I agree. And what me and Fuzzy are saying is that a lot of the time, informing the authority figure proves to be only a temporary solution, so it does not "adequately resolve the problem". Most of the time it makes things worse, and you agree.

    Wait, if we agree, why are you calling my talk "crazy"?

    Sign of weakness? Are you aware that you're not talking about lions and tigers?

    The bully mentality is more animalistic than human.

    So my point stands.

    No, it isn't, even vaguely. You just live in some mysterious fantasy cloud world where everything is written in italics.

    If you'd like an anime thread, please PM me to discuss it. Include pics/video of your favorites.
  • AzioAzio Registered User regular
    So you let the guy take the trees? I'm sorry, I find something really wrong with that. If I was offended enough to go through the trouble of taking every civilized action to stop him from taking my trees and still did not feel satisfied with the results, why should I stop? Mr Neighbor wronged me, not the other way around, and I shouldn't have to take that shit. You mentioned escalation, and you're quite right, if this guy knew he got away with taking my trees he might get the idea that he could mess with me some more, and worse. Aside from him destroying my property, he's now a bigger threat than ever as he knows he can get away with destroying my property. That to me is reason enough to prevent him from doing it the first time, and there is nothing wrong with defending yourself or your property.

    As far as punching Mr Neighbor out, there are other "uncivilized" responses when nice solutions and the authorities fail. I might not beat him up, but he owes me for the cost of the trees. If no negotiation or authority will have him compensate me for my losses, maybe I take it out of him another way. There are sneaky ways to get justice, and yes they aren't all ethical. But honestly, I don't care about the moral highground when someone intends to push me around and take advantage of my nature and the system, I just care about taking care of myself.
    It's called turning the other fucking cheek and it's something I, you and everyone else on this increasingly crowded rock have to learn and get used to.
    ege02 wrote:
    Informing authority figures is not a sign of strength, it's a sign of weakness.
    Choosing nonviolence over violence is a sign of maturity, ethics, and capacity for rational thought.

  • ElJeffeElJeffe Super Moderator, Moderator, ClubPA mod
    Man, the stupid here has really metastasized.

    Time to irradiate this fucker.

    Riley: "You're a marsupial!"
    Maddie: "I am not!"
    Riley: "You're a marsupial!"
    Maddie: "I am a placental mammal!"
  • ElkiElki Super Moderator, Moderator, ClubPA mod
    ElJeffe wrote: »
    Man, the stupid here has really metastasized.

    Time to irradiate this fucker.

    I don't think you put the necessary emphasis on how stupid this stupid is. It's quite stupid. Words can't illustrate how stupid it is, only severe beatings would get the point across. If I only had the time and money.

This discussion has been closed.