Our new Indie Games subforum is now open for business in G&T. Go and check it out, you might land a code for a free game. If you're developing an indie game and want to post about it,
follow these directions. If you don't, he'll break your legs! Hahaha! Seriously though.
Our rules have been updated and given
their own forum. Go and look at them! They are nice, and there may be new ones that you didn't know about! Hooray for rules! Hooray for The System! Hooray for Conforming!
Legend of the Seeker: Look upon me book continuity, and despair.
Posts
I had a friend who listed Fountainhead as one of her favorite books, so I decided to subject myself to some Ayn Rand and see what it was all about.
As I scanned through chapter after chapter, I couldn't shake the feeling that I'd somehow read this book before......
and then it hit me
Fuck yoooooou terry goodkind you unoriginal twat
Ayn Rand had some good ideas and some original ideas.
Unfortunately her good ideas weren't original and her original ideas weren't very good.
Stack Exchange | http://www.mpdevblog.blogspot.com
I only read two and a half books of the series, but I found them to be pretty painful overall. Goodkind has some odd ideas about good and evil, and the power (and uses) of sex, to say nothing about the way in which he views hate as a useful tool. Torture of the S&M variety was also a big component in the first few books.
One of the things that really stood out to me was how emotional Goodkind tried to make the story. It's very melodramatic and incredibly depressing. There's very little joy or humor (at least, intentional humor) in these books. Instead, the story tends to focus on the characters pining for one another and turning their grief into righteous anger and hate in order to smite their foes.
Goodkind also isn't a very original author. Book 2, in particular, read like an abridged version of Jordan's Wheel of Time series. Change a few of the names, and a lot of the plot elements read like they were outright plagiarized.
Stack Exchange | http://www.mpdevblog.blogspot.com
Because 9% think it's too high, and shouldn't be cut! 9% of respondents could not fully
get their arms around the question. There should be another box you can check for, "I
have utterly no idea what you're talking about. Please, God, don't ask for my input."
Oh my god. Which book is this? I hope it was after I stopped reading, I'd expect myself to remember something this ridiculous.
PA D3 Battletags Form
PA D3 Battletags List
The sheer unbridled idiocy of this is only matched by the its moral bankruptcy, complete lack of insight, and misguided, deluded self-righteousness.
He is rationalizing and playing out a fantasy of killing anti-war protesters.
Terry Goodkind is a disgusting human being.
These...these are not supposed to be serious I hope?
Yes, yes they are.
But what do you expect from a guy who looks like this?
I want to hit him right in the teeth.
Hey, I look like that.
Except fatter, shaggier, and jollier. I could be a young Santa, if Santa had a yeard like that. What could he be? Judging by the expression and the shirt, just some wannabe biker who hangs around at the bar. Except he's not looking to pick fights, he's looking to lecture people on their lack of moral clarity.
although not by stone carving
Steam - Talon Valdez : Xbox Live & LoL - Talonious Monk
First and foremost, they weren't war protesters, they were acting as human shields in defense of an army of brutish rapists. Terry Goodkind wasn't living out some fantasy where he could just go on a hippie killing spree (although that does just sound wonderful), he was talking about how those who use innocence and naivate as a shield because they don't think killing is justified in any manner (even in defense), better fucking grow up because these people aren't gonna play by your rules.
It would be like a group of Jews forming a human barrier in order to protect a group of SS stormtroopers from being gunned down by a platoon of allied soldiers.
You're essentially the worst person I've ever seen write something on the internet.
Well, the nazis would have no problem shooting though the misguided Jews to kill the allies. What would you do pray tell?
That's a really stupid thing to say and you should refrain from commenting unless you have some piece of empirical or constructive insight on what I'm saying.
This is definitely something new.
http://sandstormreviews.blogspot.com/2006/08/goodkind-parodies.html#rr
Wow. Always fun with mentally stable characters.
Spare Scrolls for trade
I have never picked up a Goodkind book and after reading that I still feel I should demand an apology.
yes
is..is that a real sword of truth quote? I read the first book and that seems startlingly familiar
Yep, it's in the first book.
Ok. Naked Empire was terrible and Terry Goodkind is the king of strawmen.
Indeed.
The problem with the analogy isn't that they're killing civilians. It's that, to continue the metaphor, you wouldn't get Jews out willingly to protect the SS. There might have been Jews that went along selfishly with the Nazi party's demands, hiding the truth of their ancestry and selling out their fellows for permission to survive, but that sort of craven self-preservation is exactly the sort of thing that would cause them to rebel against the "human shield" notion. They would have to be coerced, so the scene still doesn't play out like that. And you would therefore theoretically (he's a complete sociopath, to judge by his actions--Wizard's Fifth Rule) have Richard using his preternatural skill with a sword, y'know, avoid killing the innocent civilians.
This book's timing means that scene was plainly a Take That against the pre-Iraq War notion that some US civilians might try to go to Iraq and stand on buildings as human shields.
Also, the whole tone is off. It'd be one thing if Richard killing the unarmed protesters was treated as a tragedy, a necessary evil that he loathed doing but couldn't prevent. Instead, the atmosphere is "fuck yeah, get those worthless hippies."
holy shit an actual, honest to goodness fan of Wizard's First Rule
The first one wasn't so bad. They get terribly worse though.
"There is not a man of us who does not at times need a helping hand to be stretched out to him, and then shame upon him who will not stretch out the helping hand to his brother."
I've read maybe a collective three paragraphs from the entire series and I can safely say that, from a person who is not a talented writer or a good book critic, this is an affront to literature.