Our new Indie Games subforum is now open for business in G&T. Go and check it out, you might land a code for a free game. If you're developing an indie game and want to post about it, follow these directions. If you don't, he'll break your legs! Hahaha! Seriously though.
Our rules have been updated and given their own forum. Go and look at them! They are nice, and there may be new ones that you didn't know about! Hooray for rules! Hooray for The System! Hooray for Conforming!

We're pimps and killers, but in a philanthropic way. [Dollhouse, Whedon spoilers]

15859606163

Posts

  • DagrabbitDagrabbit Registered User
    I just watched the most recent episode of Dollhouse. I haven't watched any prior to this, but I'm familiar with the concept. I think if you buy into the premise, it's probably a pretty nice show since it has a complex continuing plotline, but I think the average viewer is bound to be pretty turned off. It seems like a really, really niche show, and I can't really see if ever appealing to wide audience.

    For me, I can't really get past two things. One, all the damn rape all the time, and two, how completely evil all the non-Doll, non-crazy people with conspiracy theories on their wall are. I get it, they Doll's gave their consent, whatever that means when they're essentially a completely blank, childlike person afterwards, but it still comes across as rape. The fact that they act like children when not being raped just makes the whole thing more disgusting.

    Even if you believe that the Dolls aren't being raped on a regular basis, the Dollhouse apparently has no qualms forcing Conspiracy Guy to be raped ("keep having sex with me or they'll make me kill you"), and torturing people if they go against the Dollhouse. Apparently the Attic is sufficiently torturous that the security guy would rather die than go there. And he never gave consent to nothing. Topher, the other lab chick, and the head woman are evil sons of bitches, but the show seems to want me to empathize with them, despite all the raping, killing, and torturing they order, condone, or do directly.

    I have other problems with the show too, but I don't want to troll the thread, but I thought it might be good to have the perspective of someone who doesn't watch the show, gave it a try after it got "good", and still thinks it's a bad show. It's not Fox's fault if the show gets cancelled. It's a very niche show with a hard to buy into premise. It was never going to be very popular.

  • QuidQuid The Fifth Horseman Registered User regular
    Completely evil? The guy they put in the attic wasn't some innocent trying to take them down, he was trying to help the government control them. The house itself is apparently working towards the greater good using the end to justify the means. And yes, while what they're doing to a lot of the dolls are wrong, as has been demonstrated some people genuinely want to do this and others are terrible people.

    So no, not completely evil. Definitely on the darker end of the gray scale, definitely wrong, not completely evil.

    If that woman's cleavedge made one more person pick the game up off the shelf, it was a net positive for microprose. And to be blunt, if taking her top off could have increased sales enough to get a sequel, I'd endorse it 100000% because I like playing great games.
  • noir_bloodnoir_blood Registered User regular
    Quid wrote: »
    The house itself is apparently working towards the greater good using the end to justify the means.

    Do we really know this? Because ignoring the fact that ones opinion of 'greater good' can be widly different from another's, how does pimping out the dolls, which they do, help?

    Spoiler:
  • DagrabbitDagrabbit Registered User
    Quid wrote: »
    Completely evil? The guy they put in the attic wasn't some innocent trying to take them down, he was trying to help the government control them. The house itself is apparently working towards the greater good using the end to justify the means. And yes, while what they're doing to a lot of the dolls are wrong, as has been demonstrated some people genuinely want to do this and others are terrible people.

    So no, not completely evil. Definitely on the darker end of the gray scale, definitely wrong, not completely evil.

    I don't see it that way, but again, I've only seen one episode. I don't want to tear down the show in a thread for fans of the show, just offer an outsider's perspective on why the show will have a difficult time succeeding. Unfortunately, I didn't like the show, so I won't be watching any more episodes to gain enough Dollhouse knowledge to discuss the point in much depth.

  • mcdermottmcdermott Registered User regular
    Quid wrote: »
    So no, not completely evil. Definitely on the darker end of the gray scale, definitely wrong, not completely evil.

    Regardless of whether you agree with dagrabbit or not, he has a point that most TV viewers (in the kinds of numbers network shows like to see) like a little less gray, particularly of the darker sort, with their shows. Hence the reason shows like The Shield or Dexter do better on cable. There are exceptions, like 24, but I don't think Dollhouse is necessarily one of them. Especially since I think the only reason 24 gets around this is with liberal doses of "America! Fuck yeah!"

  • QuidQuid The Fifth Horseman Registered User regular
    noir_blood wrote: »
    Quid wrote: »
    The house itself is apparently working towards the greater good using the end to justify the means.

    Do we really know this? Because ignoring the fact that ones opinion of 'greater good' can be widly different from another's, how does pimping out the dolls, which they do, help?
    Cash monies. And DeWitt seems absolutely certain they're working towards the betterment of humanity.

    If that woman's cleavedge made one more person pick the game up off the shelf, it was a net positive for microprose. And to be blunt, if taking her top off could have increased sales enough to get a sequel, I'd endorse it 100000% because I like playing great games.
  • QuidQuid The Fifth Horseman Registered User regular
    mcdermott wrote: »
    Quid wrote: »
    So no, not completely evil. Definitely on the darker end of the gray scale, definitely wrong, not completely evil.

    Regardless of whether you agree with dagrabbit or not, he has a point that most TV viewers (in the kinds of numbers network shows like to see) like a little less gray, particularly of the darker sort, with their shows. Hence the reason shows like The Shield or Dexter do better on cable. There are exceptions, like 24, but I don't think Dollhouse is necessarily one of them. Especially since I think the only reason 24 gets around this is with liberal doses of "America! Fuck yeah!"
    Why do you want to make me sad McDermott?

    If that woman's cleavedge made one more person pick the game up off the shelf, it was a net positive for microprose. And to be blunt, if taking her top off could have increased sales enough to get a sequel, I'd endorse it 100000% because I like playing great games.
  • shrykeshryke Registered User regular
    24 gets around morally gray by NOT being morally gray. 24 is just "The Ends justify the means" + "America! Fuck Ya!". Jack is always right and everything he does is in service to America, so it's ok.

  • DagrabbitDagrabbit Registered User
    mcdermott wrote: »
    Quid wrote: »
    So no, not completely evil. Definitely on the darker end of the gray scale, definitely wrong, not completely evil.

    Regardless of whether you agree with dagrabbit or not, he has a point that most TV viewers (in the kinds of numbers network shows like to see) like a little less gray, particularly of the darker sort, with their shows. Hence the reason shows like The Shield or Dexter do better on cable. There are exceptions, like 24, but I don't think Dollhouse is necessarily one of them. Especially since I think the only reason 24 gets around this is with liberal doses of "America! Fuck yeah!"

    My problem is that, based on one episode, I don't see gray, just bad. I believe you guys that it gets more gray if you have more context, but someone just checking out the show might not see it that way.

  • DarkWarriorDarkWarrior __BANNED USERS
    No, they are thoroughly vile people, you just have to understand you're watching a show about vile people doing vile things.

    And the doctor is either the spy or is doing Alpha. She survived his attack for one and the scarring is an easy way to throw people off any connection between them.

    ...it's in the shape of a giant c**k.
  • shrykeshryke Registered User regular
    They aren't thoroughly vile, they just aren't what you'd expect.

    These are people doing morally questionable things for a variety of reasons. Everything from fear, to belief in the cause, to "it's just a job", to "I just don' give a sit" to god knows what else.

    I've heard this same kind of complaint before and it just seems like people don't actually want grey or interesting. They want a clear line on who's the good guys so I can root for them.

  • DarkWarriorDarkWarrior __BANNED USERS
    There is no cause, they're doing it for cash/power. What righteous cause made them send a guy not on contract up to some place after wiping his mind clear?

    ...it's in the shape of a giant c**k.
  • shrykeshryke Registered User regular
    There is no cause, they're doing it for cash/power. What righteous cause made them send a guy not on contract up to some place after wiping his mind clear?

    You mean Dominic?

    To protect the Dollhouse and it's mission. Whatever that mission is, DeWitt believes in it. And there's no point killing Dominic, when you can basically place him in cold storage and achieve the same effect but with more options in the future.

  • DarkWarriorDarkWarrior __BANNED USERS
    Nah sorry, theres nothing redeemable in what they're doing. They annually sell Echo out for some computer geek to violate based on his pathetic fantasies.

    If they were creating super agents to go all Alias on stuff sure but they're not, they by and large just pimp out the dolls. Theres no grand mission there, just earning money.

    ...it's in the shape of a giant c**k.
  • mcdermottmcdermott Registered User regular
    There is no cause, they're doing it for cash/power. What righteous cause made them send a guy not on contract up to some place after wiping his mind clear?

    How do we know this?

    How do we know that the contract for employment at the Dollhouse doesn't allow them to put him up in the Attic for something like this? Granted, any such "contract" wouldn't be enforceable (just like the Dolls' contracts wouldn't be) in the legal system, but I'm sure somebody in a position that high signs something.

    Hell, I'm sure all of them do.

    And while it may not mention the Attic specifically, and may simply say "to be dealt with as the Dollhouse sees fit," you can bet your ass that a guy like Dominic that continues to work there knows exactly what that means.


    Lastly, assuming that the there is some higher purpose of the Dollhouse, then the "righteous cause" that made them send Dominic to the Attic was not having this power fall into the hands of the government instead.

  • DarkWarriorDarkWarrior __BANNED USERS
    They could've wiped his memory of the events, tweaked him to be an active but unwitting NSA counter spy for the Dollhouse. They chose to punish him and turn him into a zombie.

    They're dicks.

    ...it's in the shape of a giant c**k.
  • BamaBama Registered User regular
    If they were creating super agents to go all Alias on stuff sure but they're not
    They have helped the government by supplying a specialist at least once. There was also the hostage negotiator... but we don't talk about that episode.
    Theres no grand mission there, just earning money.
    And researching/refining the technology, plus whatever else that money may be funding.

    "Despite all the bitching, if Diablo 3 sucks, I will eat my own cock. Counter-claim: If Diablo 3 does not suck, I will have a list of whiners who need to eat cocks." - Zen Vulgarity
  • mcdermottmcdermott Registered User regular
    They could've wiped his memory of the events, tweaked him to be an active but unwitting NSA counter spy for the Dollhouse. They chose to punish him and turn him into a zombie.

    They're dicks.

    And?

    Or can you simply not understand the appeal of a show about people that aren't particularly nice or good?

  • BamaBama Registered User regular
    They could've wiped his memory of the events, tweaked him to be an active but unwitting NSA counter spy for the Dollhouse. They chose to punish him and turn him into a zombie.
    How are those two things different? DeWitt also said that they would effectively be doing the former.

    "Despite all the bitching, if Diablo 3 sucks, I will eat my own cock. Counter-claim: If Diablo 3 does not suck, I will have a list of whiners who need to eat cocks." - Zen Vulgarity
  • shrykeshryke Registered User regular
    Nah sorry, theres nothing redeemable in what they're doing. They annually sell Echo out for some computer geek to violate based on his pathetic fantasies.

    If they were creating super agents to go all Alias on stuff sure but they're not, they by and large just pimp out the dolls. Theres no grand mission there, just earning money.

    Earning money for a purpose. You seem to be assuming the Dollhouse is it. Which is pretty stupid considering the show has told us on multiple occasions that there is more to it then we see.

    The Mole is sending Ballard to find the Dollhouse's purpose for fuck's sake.

  • DarkWarriorDarkWarrior __BANNED USERS
    Did I ever say that?

    I'm just saying they're assholes. I'm not saying I don't like the show, I'm just saying they're not out to do some greater good and if they are, only saving the entire planet would justify having a sex slave farm and murder factory.

    I mean, we don't think the Government is a nice establishment do we?

    ...it's in the shape of a giant c**k.
  • DevoutlyApatheticDevoutlyApathetic I've Done Worse Registered User regular
    They could've wiped his memory of the events, tweaked him to be an active but unwitting NSA counter spy for the Dollhouse. They chose to punish him and turn him into a zombie.

    They're dicks.

    They ARE criminals. They have to rely on the fact that people are scared shitless of fucking with the Dollhouse, even their own employees. To let such a huge betrayal go with no punishment would destroy that.

    That's not nice, but nobody there is unaware of how illegal what they're doing is.

    "When you run into an asshole in the morning, you ran into an asshole. When you run into assholes all day, you're the asshole."

    Borderlands 2 PA Xbox Metatag - Bazillion Guns
  • shrykeshryke Registered User regular
    Did I ever say that?

    I'm just saying they're assholes. I'm not saying I don't like the show, I'm just saying they're not out to do some greater good and if they are, only saving the entire planet would justify having a sex slave farm and murder factory.

    I mean, we don't think the Government is a nice establishment do we?

    DeWitt certainly believes that whatever their purpose is justifies what they are doing.

    And, yeah, I think you'll find many people DO think the government is a nice establishment. I'm a fan of roads personally.

  • BamaBama Registered User regular
    What makes the dollhouse a sex slave farm and not a brothel? Or is there not a difference to you?

    "Despite all the bitching, if Diablo 3 sucks, I will eat my own cock. Counter-claim: If Diablo 3 does not suck, I will have a list of whiners who need to eat cocks." - Zen Vulgarity
  • mcdermottmcdermott Registered User regular
    Bama wrote: »
    They could've wiped his memory of the events, tweaked him to be an active but unwitting NSA counter spy for the Dollhouse. They chose to punish him and turn him into a zombie.
    How are those two things different? DeWitt also said that they would effectively be doing the former.
    Well, his point is that there's no reason they can't let him "live" as an active day-to-day in the meantime, rather than punishing him by storing him in the Attic. In this case the Attic is obviously used as a punishment, and a horrible one at that.

    Though, at the same time, then you get into questions regarding the nature of existence...because really, if his consciousness is pretty much gone either way is there really even a difference?

  • mcdermottmcdermott Registered User regular
    Bama wrote: »
    What makes the dollhouse a sex slave farm and not a brothel? Or is there not a difference to you?

    The ability to withdraw consent.

    In areas where brothels are run in a legal or quasi-legal fashion, prostitutes are free to leave at any point. In this case, the Dollhouse creates an arrangement where that's not possible. Same way you can't sign yourself into slavery, legally, even for limited durations.

    Well, except when it's to the government, through the military. Because apparently that's okay.

  • shrykeshryke Registered User regular
    I'd say it's more a murder and necrophilia establishment. They basically kill these people and then fill their corpses with a fake person and farm said corpse out to the highest bidder.

  • DarkWarriorDarkWarrior __BANNED USERS
    And they can be placed into not very safe sexual situations if the need arises apparently.

    Now they've wiped his consciousness its arguable he can ever exist again anyway though thats getting into a deep off topic discussion. If they can download his mind into another body then is it still really him or just data now? hmm.

    ...it's in the shape of a giant c**k.
  • BamaBama Registered User regular
    mcdermott wrote: »
    Bama wrote: »
    They could've wiped his memory of the events, tweaked him to be an active but unwitting NSA counter spy for the Dollhouse. They chose to punish him and turn him into a zombie.
    How are those two things different? DeWitt also said that they would effectively be doing the former.
    Well, his point is that there's no reason they can't let him "live" as an active day-to-day in the meantime, rather than punishing him by storing him in the Attic. In this case the Attic is obviously used as a punishment, and a horrible one at that.

    Though, at the same time, then you get into questions regarding the nature of existence...because really, if his consciousness is pretty much gone either way is there really even a difference?
    That last part is what I was getting at. I also don't see the attic as being punishment - just storage. One of the main features of the show is emergent personalities in the dolls, so I assume sometimes it's just easier/safer to zombify someone.

    "Despite all the bitching, if Diablo 3 sucks, I will eat my own cock. Counter-claim: If Diablo 3 does not suck, I will have a list of whiners who need to eat cocks." - Zen Vulgarity
  • David_TDavid_T Registered User regular
    shryke wrote: »
    I'd say it's more a murder and necrophilia establishment. They basically kill these people and then fill their corpses with a fake person and farm said corpse out to the highest bidder.

    And then after five years, Jesus!

    So really, is five years of necrophilia worth one day of Jesus? Next, on Fox.

    steam_sig.png
    occasionallywearsahat.com, my rambly ramblings of ramble
  • BamaBama Registered User regular
    mcdermott wrote: »
    Bama wrote: »
    What makes the dollhouse a sex slave farm and not a brothel? Or is there not a difference to you?

    The ability to withdraw consent.
    Fair enough, though I think it's at least a little muddier since the "original" isn't having to do any of these things. They've contracted out their bodies while they chill out on a hard drive. How different is it from donating hair to a wigmaker? Granted, there aren't many instances where you give part of your body to someone and get it back (possibly in a contaminated state) later.

    "Despite all the bitching, if Diablo 3 sucks, I will eat my own cock. Counter-claim: If Diablo 3 does not suck, I will have a list of whiners who need to eat cocks." - Zen Vulgarity
  • noir_bloodnoir_blood Registered User regular
    I'm more curious as to why Dollhouse needs to hire from the outside. Couldn't the dolls just be programmed for all the positions? Well, maybe not Topher's, but all the security/doctor ones?

    And I can't believe I'm saying this, but I'm actually starting to like Topher. Yes, in the grand scheme of things, he is someone that enables rape, etc. but something about his mannerisms, which grated on me at first has made me start to come around.

    I'm actually hoping that he's the mole.

    Spoiler:
  • mcdermottmcdermott Registered User regular
    noir_blood wrote: »
    I'm more curious as to why Dollhouse needs to hire from the outside. Couldn't the dolls just be programmed for all the positions? Well, maybe not Topher's, but all the security/doctor ones?

    The technology doesn't seem nearly stable enough for that. I'm surprised they're even comfortable sending out "sleeper" dolls.

  • DevoutlyApatheticDevoutlyApathetic I've Done Worse Registered User regular
    Dolls seems to be a somewhat valuable commodity. Though, increasingly, it sounds like they can make anybody a doll. So a little inconsistency there...

    "When you run into an asshole in the morning, you ran into an asshole. When you run into assholes all day, you're the asshole."

    Borderlands 2 PA Xbox Metatag - Bazillion Guns
  • PonyPony Registered User regular
    To be honest, Dollhouse seems to be developing into exactly the kind of science fiction I find fascinating.

    Some of the best sci fi is essentially a series of metaphors and allegories, utilizing futuristic technology, aliens, etc. in order to explore real social issues and philosophical concepts in a fictionalized context.

    However, that's not really what Dollhouse is doing, it's doing the other thing good sci fi can do really well: present us with theoretical realities where technologies or other discoveries/innovations have led us to moral and ethical quandaries that we might not otherwise even consider possible.

    The kind of operation Dollhouse is running, as shown in the show thus far, isn't really directly comparable to things we are already familiar with (brothels, slave rings, secret societies of assassins, whatever) because the nature of the technology involved and what it is capable of letting people do calls upon the viewer to really look hard at their ethical reasoning behind why they might look at it the way they do.

    And I think you have good sci fi when it is causing you to ask these questions and have these discussions.

  • mcdermottmcdermott Registered User regular
    Dolls seems to be a somewhat valuable commodity. Though, increasingly, it sounds like they can make anybody a doll. So a little inconsistency there...

    Well, I think the organization demands, for the most part, that the dolls enter the agreement more-or-less consensually. Sierra seems to be the only exception, and we're still not sure of exactly how that went down (though certainly coercion was involved, as it usually is).

    So they probably have a limited supply of people they run across who are in positions where they'd agree to the terms.

  • DarkWarriorDarkWarrior __BANNED USERS
    What would your core hiring policy be though?

    People without family, ties and who don't live in the immediate area and attended a large university where people might recognise her.

    Its decisions like that, that make the concept of the Dollhouse remaining largely an urban myth hard to swallow.

    ...it's in the shape of a giant c**k.
  • DevoutlyApatheticDevoutlyApathetic I've Done Worse Registered User regular
    mcdermott wrote: »
    Dolls seems to be a somewhat valuable commodity. Though, increasingly, it sounds like they can make anybody a doll. So a little inconsistency there...

    Well, I think the organization demands, for the most part, that the dolls enter the agreement more-or-less consensually. Sierra seems to be the only exception, and we're still not sure of exactly how that went down (though certainly coercion was involved, as it usually is).

    So they probably have a limited supply of people they run across who are in positions where they'd agree to the terms.

    It would make some sense if people could more easily be imprinted with their own personality, slightly modified, than with a series of completely different personalities. Hell, that might even explain the whole "sleeper" doll thing. They're less malleable dolls so they have limited uses.

    At the end though it's probably just practical economics issues. Sitting down in that chair for the first time would require a shitload of a pay check.

    "When you run into an asshole in the morning, you ran into an asshole. When you run into assholes all day, you're the asshole."

    Borderlands 2 PA Xbox Metatag - Bazillion Guns
  • noir_bloodnoir_blood Registered User regular
    From Joss's Q&A at Harvard;
    - Whedon spoke candidly about his problems with the first few episodes of Dollhouse. He admitted that he has made episodes that have nothing to say, for which he is ashamed. He singled out the fifth episode, "True Believer", as one that fails to explore the motivations for why people join cults and how these reasons connect with why people end up in the Dollhouse. Ultimately, he said, though there's nothing wrong with making television that is merely diverting, it's not something he's interested in doing.

    - He also addressed one of my biggest random questions about Dollhouse when an audience member asked whether we will be seeing actives with some of the less cool-sounding code words in the military alphabet, such as "Golf" or "Hotel." Whedon explained he had written an entire bit all about the active Golf, but it got cut, meaning we won't see Golf or Hotel on Dollhouse this season. Or, as he put it, we won't be seeing them on Dollhouse, period.

    - Indeed, he was generally highly pessimistic about the show's prospects for a second season, all but acting as though the show had already been canceled (which, for the record, it hasn't yet, at least not officially). He didn't give any specific reason for his opinion, although one might guess lackluster ratings and bitter experience are contributing factors. This means he won't even be entertaining the notion of a Dollhouse musical episode, although he did say that, if he could hire Actives from the Dollhouse, they would be of the all-singing, all-dancing variety.

    - Whedon explained that Dollhouse is not a feminist show, as to make it explicitly adhere to any set system of belief would make it didactic instead of dramatic. When an audience member asked whether he saw it as troublesome that all the actives were unfailingly young and gorgeous, he acknowledged this to an extent, mentioning that early drafts of the show had involved actives of all shapes and sizes to reflect the fact that people's fantasies don't always adhere to Hollywood's conception of attractiveness, and the beautifying of the Dollhouse was one of the realities of dealing with Fox. There had been an entire early subplot about an active named Tango who was an older woman, but sadly all of that had to go when the show's direction changed.

    Aww, poor Joss. Fox broke him. Again.

    Should make the Dollhouse Paleyfest interesting.

    Spoiler:
  • DarkWarriorDarkWarrior __BANNED USERS
    It also requires the house keeps their word and actually releases you after 5 years. We've yet to see a freed Doll aren't we?

    ...it's in the shape of a giant c**k.
This discussion has been closed.