Our new Indie Games subforum is now open for business in G&T. Go and check it out, you might land a code for a free game. If you're developing an indie game and want to post about it, follow these directions. If you don't, he'll break your legs! Hahaha! Seriously though.
Our rules have been updated and given their own forum. Go and look at them! They are nice, and there may be new ones that you didn't know about! Hooray for rules! Hooray for The System! Hooray for Conforming!

260 words, short thing

Mustachio JonesMustachio Jones Registered User regular
Tell, me, denizens of the Block, what say ye?
Spoiler:

I think the opening is kind of weak and the ending is a copout.

This is not art. At least, not in the traditional sense. Where is the subject? Where is the meaning? The message is hollow; fake. It is phony. My cohort agrees too, apparently. With a whip, the belt to his bathrobe is no longer biting its own tail. The brisk air of the art museum gnaws at his unmasked being, but his idea, his message, throws him into a berserker rage. His stance is steady and his aim is true. And so he grasps his member, throbbing with inspiration. Like a brush, he makes broad strokes up there on his bastion, standing on a marble bench. He is assassinating the false. The paint flows from the brush at a furious rate. Like a Pollock, the paint splatters and drips on the framed piece of wall. This was not art. The fellow art patrons gasp and yell for security to assist this ruffian out of the gallery. In the wake of the insults, his demeanor remains the same; his face is consumed by a wild grimace. With a sputtering finale, the can runs dry. He holsters the smoking gun and his eyes fall on the whole of his creation. He turns away from his work, amazed at the interest he has drawn. The mouths of the crowd collectively hang agape as he stands triumphantly on his throne, the paint still dripping. "Friends! My dear friends! I have done an art!" I think that was the point when the nightstick took out his knees, but I don't remember. The damage has been done.[/CODE][CODE] This is not art. At least, not in the traditional sense. Where is the subject? Where is the meaning? The message is hollow; fake. It is phony.
My cohort agrees too, apparently. With a whip, the belt to his bathrobe is no longer biting its own tail. The brisk air of the art museum gnaws at his unmasked being, but his idea, his message, throws him into a berserker rage.
His stance is steady and his aim is true. And so he grasps his member, throbbing with inspiration. Like a brush, he makes broad strokes up there on his bastion, standing on a marble bench. He is assassinating the false. The paint flows from the brush at a furious rate. Like a Pollock, the paint splatters and drips on the framed piece of wall. This was not art.
The fellow art patrons gasp and yell for security to assist this ruffian out of the gallery. In the wake of the insults, his demeanor remains the same; his face is consumed by a wild grimace. With a sputtering finale, the can runs dry. He holsters the smoking gun and his eyes fall on the whole of his creation.
He turns away from his work, amazed at the interest he has drawn. The mouths of the crowd collectively hang agape as he stands triumphantly on his throne, the paint still dripping.
"Friends! My dear friends! I have done an art!"
I think that was the point when the nightstick took out his knees, but I don't remember. The damage has been done.[/CODE]

Mustachio Jones on

Posts

  • c4tchc4tch Registered User
    reading it i only wish i had more... something... to grasp onto - maybe either more metaphor or more explicit knowledge that it is indeed his "member" that is making an art. Also opening with "this is not art" passes a judgment you don't allow your readers to make for themselves.

    other than that, i like it.

    League of Legends: firecane
  • OfficiousGOfficiousG Registered User
    Too easy, too obvious.

    I don't like the word "ruffian"; sounds like you're attempting to sound fancy.

    Probably should be "The damage had been done."

    labsigbig.jpg
  • AryaLeingoldAryaLeingold Registered User
    wait what...
    Spoiler:

    Also, I want to understand why you said:
    the belt to his bathrobe is no longer biting its own tail
    because bathrobes don't use buckles, they tie, in a knot. So this image doesn't register or make sense when I read it.

    "A man thinks that by mouthing hard words he understands hard things." ~ Herman Melville
  • Mustachio JonesMustachio Jones Registered User regular
    OfficiousG wrote: »
    I don't like the word "ruffian"; sounds like you're attempting to sound fancy.

    I probably should slap some quotes around "assisting the ruffian", because I was getting at the fact that those are the patrons' cries, rather than the narrator's. I'm doing a bit too much assuming here, it looks like. The patrons are snooty, uptight upper citizens; the robed man is pissing all over a framed piece of wall. In an earlier draft I think I had something alluding to the color, but it seems that didn't make into this cut.


    I fought with the metaphor with the belt for a bit, it started as "Midgard serpentine" but that's way too easy to stumble over, as well as a bit convoluted.

    I'm going to try and double the wordcount tonight. I think that more should clear up some things, as well as the obligatory editing.

  • ElJeffeElJeffe Super Moderator, Moderator, ClubPA mod
    I would kill the clunky belt metaphor. It's too self-conscious, and doesn't flow. "With a whip, the belt to his bathrobe falls away" or something is better for this.

    I got your use of ruffian as referring to what the patronage would be thinking, and I didn't mind it at all.

    I think overall, you're tripping over your metaphors and colorful turns of phrase too much, and they obscure your point. Simplify some of your language, and the metaphors will stand out better, and have more impact. As it is, the piece reads like a Where's Waldo mural, with relevant points hidden amongst fancy verbiage.

    Riley: "You're a marsupial!"
    Maddie: "I am not!"
    Riley: "You're a marsupial!"
    Maddie: "I am a placental mammal!"
  • Mr_AnonymousMr_Anonymous Registered User
    On the belt sentence, I'd also change the word "whip" to something else. Reading it, it took me a while to realise there wasn't an actual physical whip there - "with a whip" as in brandishing one. I'd change it to "With a fumble/jerk" (no pun intended heh) or "with a flourish" or something along those lines. With so few words it wasn't clear to me what you meant.

    EDIT: "With a whipping motion" would work, and keep the word, if it's important to you.

    2nd EDIT: Who let this guy into an art museum wearing a bathrobe?? :D

  • elaine1015elaine1015 __BANNED USERS
    other than that, i like it.

  • ducknerdducknerd Registered User regular
    I read this as the beginning of a story, not a story in and of itself. The "death of art/loss of value of expression in the face of its popularity" theme was pretty much done to death in the 20th century, so IMO to make this (admittedly entertaining) piece worthwhile you'll have to embed it in something with a more original point. The idea of using this sort of obscuring language to create a comic delay really intrigues me; maybe that's something that could be worked into the larger story.

  • lunasealunasea Registered User
    Why would you hide the most intense aspect of the piece, the sheer exhilaration of taking brush to fine art, behind extraneous language and metaphor? Show us what he's doing, how the paint drips painfully down each painting and deflowers an eye, perverts a perfect juxtaposition of fruit and table. Kill us with details. Also, rewrite the last line. I thought it was awkward and that took the funniness out of it. Otherwise, though, good job!

  • _J__J_ Pedant Registered User regular
    ElJeffe wrote: »
    I think overall, you're tripping over your metaphors and colorful turns of phrase too much, and they obscure your point. Simplify some of your language, and the metaphors will stand out better, and have more impact. As it is, the piece reads like a Where's Waldo mural, with relevant points hidden amongst fancy verbiage.

    Agreed.

    Wydrion wrote: »
    ...Or you can sit around in the thread calling _J_ a cocksucker, you know, whatever's more constructive.
  • Mustachio JonesMustachio Jones Registered User regular
    I've been meaning to tear this thing apart since, well, I posted it but school and life have prevented me from doing anything but whine, really.

  • tsevenhuysentsevenhuysen Registered User
    I agree with what everyone else has said. It's a bit too obscured by the language you're using.

    Also, I'd be careful with the "pissing on the wall" idea, because I, like others, assumed he was masturbating.

Sign In or Register to comment.