Our new Indie Games subforum is now open for business in G&T. Go and check it out, you might land a code for a free game. If you're developing an indie game and want to post about it, follow these directions. If you don't, he'll break your legs! Hahaha! Seriously though.
Our rules have been updated and given their own forum. Go and look at them! They are nice, and there may be new ones that you didn't know about! Hooray for rules! Hooray for The System! Hooray for Conforming!

Architecture is boss (images)

135678

Posts

  • ascotascot Registered User
    edited May 2009
    lvmh.gif

    The LVMH building isn't that exciting I guess, though the ugly buildings either side make it look better. The interesting thing is what happens if there is a fire. There's a system that creates a waterfall inside the building that runs down the glass, preventing the fire from spreading to the other floors...only it kinda...uh...ruins the building in the process....

  • ascotascot Registered User
    edited May 2009
    05_02_05_a_toronto_cad.jpg

    I kinda love architecture. It's an expensive hobby though, and there's an awful lot to learn if you want to be "into architecture".

  • DislexicDislexic Registered User
    edited May 2009
    @ OP: I always loved the architecture in WH40K

    batsig.jpg
  • edited May 2009
    ascot wrote: »
    05_02_05_a_toronto_cad.jpg

    I kinda love architecture. It's an expensive hobby though, and there's an awful lot to learn if you want to be "into architecture".

    The neighbours are so so so so so angry about that. It definitely looks neat and is apparently nice to go to school in but the people who live around it are very very pissed off about it and I think that is understandable.

    I actually work for an architect. 95% of architects do just usual buildings and then there are a couple Gehrys and Liebeskinds who built these horrible monstrosities that inspire people to become architects and then they lose little bits of their souls every time they have to design an outhouse.

    chevy.jpgsteve.jpgmartin.jpg
  • vrstvrst Registered User
    edited May 2009
    ascot wrote: »
    05_02_05_a_toronto_cad.jpg

    I kinda love architecture. It's an expensive hobby though, and there's an awful lot to learn if you want to be "into architecture".

    This is brilliant as well.

  • PhonehandPhonehand Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    what about the architect from the matrix m i rite

    pmdunk.jpg
  • DislexicDislexic Registered User
    edited May 2009
    JoeUser wrote: »
    Denver International Airport:

    denverair_lrg_mtwh.gif

    I hated that airport, especially that design

    batsig.jpg
  • vrstvrst Registered User
    edited May 2009
    Phonehand wrote: »
    what about the architect from the matrix m i rite


    lol ergo ergo wut

  • DruhimDruhim Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited May 2009
    vrst wrote: »
    ascot wrote: »
    05_02_05_a_toronto_cad.jpg

    I kinda love architecture. It's an expensive hobby though, and there's an awful lot to learn if you want to be "into architecture".

    This is brilliant as well.
    god you have terrible fucking taste

    belruelotterav-1.jpg
  • vrstvrst Registered User
    edited May 2009
    Druhim wrote: »
    vrst wrote: »
    ascot wrote: »
    05_02_05_a_toronto_cad.jpg

    I kinda love architecture. It's an expensive hobby though, and there's an awful lot to learn if you want to be "into architecture".

    This is brilliant as well.
    god you have terrible fucking taste

    How's that brown wooden cabinet coming along, Dru? Does it fit well into your living room? Put some glass figurines in it, hm?

  • MrMonroeMrMonroe Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    MrMonroe wrote: »
    Brutalism!

    ahhh, Hampshire College
    Spoiler:
    Not pictured: manure farms.

    also not pictured are the apartments they built in the swamp

    herblanc.jpg

  • edited May 2009
    MrMonroe wrote: »
    MrMonroe wrote: »
    Brutalism!

    ahhh, Hampshire College
    Spoiler:
    Not pictured: manure farms.

    also not pictured are the apartments they built in the swamp

    herblanc.jpg

    "We're going to have all this knocked through and made into one big-"
    "HE KILLED THE BEST MAN"
    "bloody hell"

    chevy.jpgsteve.jpgmartin.jpg
  • PhonehandPhonehand Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    god why do we have to have differing aesthetic tastes

    this is just awful

    pmdunk.jpg
  • vrstvrst Registered User
    edited May 2009
    Phonehand wrote: »
    god why do we have to have differing aesthetic tastes

    this is just awful

    Because some people are educated and have taste

    and other people are common and like ugly things

  • ascotascot Registered User
    edited May 2009
    You can appreciate a building for the sheer holy crap!-ness of it. Doesn't mean you'd want to live in it or even live opposite it. Also, I'm pretty pleased that this isn't just a Dubai thread. Yet.

  • CrossBusterCrossBuster Registered User
    edited May 2009
    The new federal building in San Francisco

    14mayn_CA1.650.jpg

    It was designed by Jawas.

    sandcrawler.jpg

    penguins.png
  • vrstvrst Registered User
    edited May 2009
    ascot wrote: »
    You can appreciate a building for the sheer holy crap!-ness of it. Doesn't mean you'd want to live in it or even live opposite it. Also, I'm pretty pleased that this isn't just a Dubai thread. Yet.

    All the stuff in Dubai is so fucking repulsive and garish, it actually makes me throw up.

  • PhonehandPhonehand Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    vrst wrote: »
    Phonehand wrote: »
    god why do we have to have differing aesthetic tastes

    this is just awful

    Because some people are educated and have taste

    and other people are common and like ugly things

    just because something has weird shapes and lots of color doesn't make it good

    none of those things employ the slightest amount of theory

    pmdunk.jpg
  • vrstvrst Registered User
    edited May 2009
    Phonehand wrote: »
    vrst wrote: »
    Phonehand wrote: »
    god why do we have to have differing aesthetic tastes

    this is just awful

    Because some people are educated and have taste

    and other people are common and like ugly things

    just because something has weird shapes and lots of color doesn't make it good

    none of those things employ the slightest amount of theory

    I agree with you on all accounts

  • AneurhythmiaAneurhythmia Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Dislexic wrote: »
    JoeUser wrote: »
    Denver International Airport:

    denverair_lrg_mtwh.gif

    I hated that airport, especially that design

    The ominous sky is so appropriate for it, though. God, that place is fucking weird.

    HlDUfm7.png
  • beefbeef Registered User
    edited May 2009
    Dislexic wrote: »
    JoeUser wrote: »
    Denver International Airport:

    dia

    I hated that airport, especially that design

    The ominous sky is so appropriate for it, though. God, that place is fucking weird.

    Complete with conspiracy theories!

    http://www.anomalies-unlimited.com/Denver_Airport.html

  • DruhimDruhim Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited May 2009
    vrst wrote: »
    ascot wrote: »
    You can appreciate a building for the sheer holy crap!-ness of it. Doesn't mean you'd want to live in it or even live opposite it. Also, I'm pretty pleased that this isn't just a Dubai thread. Yet.

    All the stuff in Dubai is so fucking repulsive and garish, it actually makes me throw up.
    I'm frankly amazed you can say that after some of the crap you think is good.

    belruelotterav-1.jpg
  • ascotascot Registered User
    edited May 2009
    Phonehand wrote: »
    just because something has weird shapes and lots of color doesn't make it good

    none of those things employ the slightest amount of theory

    Oh definitely.
    Also, if you compare the old Georgian architecture in my city
    property-graphics-_1092510a.jpg

    with the new stuff
    oneparkwest1.jpg

    I really love the look of the georgian quarter waaay more. it has a whole "feel" to it.

  • fshavlakfshavlak Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Not a huge fan of gehry. I like cool buildings, but only when there aren't obvious functional sacrifices made for aesthetics.

    I love churches and cathedrals. I visited Paris (well, technically there on business) last spring and I don't think I walked by a single church without at least poking my head in. Lots of cool stuff there.

    Also, growing up in saint louis we had the new cathedral: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/87/Cathedral_Basilica_of_St._Louis.JPG

    Largest mosaic collection anywhere in the world. It's a byzantine building, though I think the gothic buildings are cooler, I still dig the new cathedral.

  • AneurhythmiaAneurhythmia Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    beef wrote: »

    Yeah, I considered posting that. I don't really buy into conspiracy theories, but that building is strange enough to earn them, I suppose.
    fshavlak wrote: »
    Not a huge fan of gehry. I like cool buildings, but only when there aren't obvious functional sacrifices made for aesthetics.
    Except that the point of them is that we make a lot of assumptions about "obvious" functionalities that aren't necessarily true.

    HlDUfm7.png
  • WeretacoWeretaco Cubicle Gangster Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    The Vancouver public library is pretty neat looking

    vancouverpubliclibraryv.jpg

    Unofficial PA IRC chat: #paforums at irc.slashnet.org
  • vrstvrst Registered User
    edited May 2009
    beef wrote: »

    Yeah, I considered posting that. I don't really buy into conspiracy theories, but that building is strange enough to earn them, I suppose.
    fshavlak wrote: »
    Not a huge fan of gehry. I like cool buildings, but only when there aren't obvious functional sacrifices made for aesthetics.
    Except that the point of them is that we make a lot of assumptions about "obvious" functionalities that aren't necessarily true.

    Thank you.

    Also, I don't even get "functional" point in architecture. If we would go for something as theoretical and abstract as "function", all buildings would be concrete blocks.

    And even on a lower level, I much prefer aesthetics over function. A lot of old houses, for instance, have all kinds of funky corners and odd shaped walls which aren't functional, but it would be oh so nice to live in them.

    This also holds for other design areas: I recently bought a coffee table worth about a month salary for me, and it is not nearly as functional as a cardboard box. But it makes me much happier than a cardboard box, because I thoroughly enjoy its aesthetics every time I'm in the living room.

    Bottom line: rethink "functionality"

  • DruhimDruhim Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited May 2009
    Weretaco wrote: »
    The Vancouver public library is pretty neat looking

    vancouverpubliclibraryv.jpg
    see, that's a good looking building
    although I can't help but think of Civ3

    belruelotterav-1.jpg
  • JoonJoon Registered User
    edited May 2009
    geisel-library2.jpg

    Geisel Library at UCSD.

    bartsig.png
  • SnowbeatSnowbeat The thing to remember is that everyone is humanRegistered User regular
    edited May 2009
    just wanted to say as a casual fan of good architecture that vrst has terrible taste and is an idiot

  • AMP'dAMP'd Registered User
    edited May 2009
    JoeUser wrote: »
    Denver International Airport:

    denverair_lrg_mtwh.gif

    Mwah, mwah

    I love this thread

    villa_savoie_il435.jpg
    Spoiler:

    I'll be back to post more beautiful things soon

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • KazhiimKazhiim __BANNED USERS
    edited May 2009
    frank gehry is a hack

    you look at his buildings and go "WHOAAA THAT SHIT MUST BE CRAAAZY ON THE INSIDE" but the facade is just this retarded ass frame for what are largely pretty basic rectangular volumes

    and the facade sucks ass anyway

    lost_sig2.png
  • Airking850Airking850 Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    AMP'd wrote: »
    Spoiler:

    Face wearing a jaunty hat on the right side of the building

  • ascotascot Registered User
    edited May 2009
    hallgrimskirkja, reykjavik

    800px-hallgrimskirkja.jpeg

  • AMP'dAMP'd Registered User
    edited May 2009
    If you don't like this building, you probably have no soul

    Guggenheim_museum_exterior.jpg

    451px-Guggenheim-interior-2.JPG

    NYC_Guggenheim-1.jpg

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • ascotascot Registered User
    edited May 2009
    It's nice! Though I do love the Tate Modern's building. Though, not so much the new planned extension.

  • PhonehandPhonehand Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    AMP'd wrote: »
    If you don't like this building, you probably have no soul

    Guggenheim_museum_exterior.jpg

    451px-Guggenheim-interior-2.JPG

    NYC_Guggenheim-1.jpg

    have you seen cremaster

    this is relevant

    pmdunk.jpg
  • AneurhythmiaAneurhythmia Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Kazhiim wrote: »
    frank gehry is a hack

    you look at his buildings and go "WHOAAA THAT SHIT MUST BE CRAAAZY ON THE INSIDE" but the facade is just this retarded ass frame for what are largely pretty basic rectangular volumes

    and the facade sucks ass anyway

    I think his buildings can be pretty damn hit-or-miss, but none of the ones I've been in or seen the interior of I would say are "pretty basic rectangular volumes."

    HlDUfm7.png
  • AMP'dAMP'd Registered User
    edited May 2009
    Phonehand wrote: »
    have you seen cremaster

    this is relevant

    Nope

    But now I want to

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • PhonehandPhonehand Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    ascot wrote: »
    It's nice! Though I do love the Tate Modern's building. Though, not so much the new planned extension.

    really? it's so

    eh

    though the turbine hall is such a great space

    pmdunk.jpg
Sign In or Register to comment.