› ›
Our new Indie Games subforum is now open for business in G&T. Go and check it out, you might land a code for a free game. If you're developing an indie game and want to post about it, follow these directions. If you don't, he'll break your legs! Hahaha! Seriously though.
Our rules have been updated and given their own forum. Go and look at them! They are nice, and there may be new ones that you didn't know about! Hooray for rules! Hooray for The System! Hooray for Conforming!

Breaking News from CNN

1…34689…27

Posts

  • Fuzzy Cumulonimbus CloudFuzzy Cumulonimbus Cloud Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    hahahaha south pa oh man
    Spoiler:

    3FMmC.jpg
    · Agree Awesome
  • autono-wally, erotibot300autono-wally, erotibot300 love machine Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Jigrah wrote: »
    Fuzzy Cumulonimbus Cloud wrote: »
    Artreus wrote: »
    I would like to point out that not everyone against gay marriage is all hatefully hating on gays. A lot of them really just don't know better. Some of them are just following what their parents taught them, that "marriage" is "a man and a woman."

    I'm not saying it is right or defending it at all. I'm just saying that saying they all hate gays is wrong.
    If the idea you spout has the same effect, then motive is pointless.

    Do you seriously believe this?

    Motive is key behind my whole ethical beliefs.

    In the end, what counts is what happens, not WHY it happens

    sc.jpgsc.jpg
    · Agree Awesome
  • Fuzzy Cumulonimbus CloudFuzzy Cumulonimbus Cloud Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    The Far Side wrote: »
    Fuzzy Cumulonimbus Cloud wrote: »
    Man, you can't have a kantian ethical framework and then argue against gay marriage.
    i have been coming to learn that anything worth knowing about philosophy has come from kant

    oops
    Are you in college now TFS? Good for you.

    3FMmC.jpg
    · Agree Awesome
  • TheidarTheidar Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Fuzzy Cumulonimbus Cloud wrote: »
    hahahaha south pa oh man
    Spoiler:

    No need to PM, Berks County specifically.

    I also lived in York, PA for a couple years.

    Gamertag: Theidar
    Wii Friend Code: 0072 4984 2399 2126
    PSN ID : Theidar
    Facebook
    Behold the annhilation of the extraterrestrial and the rise of the machines.
    Hail Satan!
    WISHLIST
    · Agree Awesome
  • The Far SideThe Far Side __BANNED USERS regular
    edited May 2009
    Fuzzy Cumulonimbus Cloud wrote: »
    The Far Side wrote: »
    Fuzzy Cumulonimbus Cloud wrote: »
    Man, you can't have a kantian ethical framework and then argue against gay marriage.
    i have been coming to learn that anything worth knowing about philosophy has come from kant

    oops
    Are you in college now TFS? Good for you.
    Well like in 3 months. I have been accepted and am registering for my classes and everything :3

    (also since i'll be eleven-hundred miles away from home i can finally start HRT)

    33aqfwk.jpg
    · Agree Awesome
  • Fuzzy Cumulonimbus CloudFuzzy Cumulonimbus Cloud Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    good for you!

    3FMmC.jpg
    · Agree Awesome
  • JigrahJigrah Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    autono-wally, erotibot300 wrote: »
    Jigrah wrote: »
    Fuzzy Cumulonimbus Cloud wrote: »
    Artreus wrote: »
    I would like to point out that not everyone against gay marriage is all hatefully hating on gays. A lot of them really just don't know better. Some of them are just following what their parents taught them, that "marriage" is "a man and a woman."

    I'm not saying it is right or defending it at all. I'm just saying that saying they all hate gays is wrong.
    If the idea you spout has the same effect, then motive is pointless.

    Do you seriously believe this?

    Motive is key behind my whole ethical beliefs.

    In the end, what counts is what happens, not WHY it happens

    In the long run were all dead. Outcome is second to motivation.

    Spoiler:
    · Agree Awesome
  • Fuzzy Cumulonimbus CloudFuzzy Cumulonimbus Cloud Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    you horrible abomination upon god

    <3

    3FMmC.jpg
    · Agree Awesome
  • The Far SideThe Far Side __BANNED USERS regular
    edited May 2009
    hella good for me, bro

    hella

    33aqfwk.jpg
    · Agree Awesome
  • ArtreusArtreus AloneRegistered User regular
    edited May 2009
    autono-wally, erotibot300 wrote: »
    Jigrah wrote: »
    Fuzzy Cumulonimbus Cloud wrote: »
    Artreus wrote: »
    I would like to point out that not everyone against gay marriage is all hatefully hating on gays. A lot of them really just don't know better. Some of them are just following what their parents taught them, that "marriage" is "a man and a woman."

    I'm not saying it is right or defending it at all. I'm just saying that saying they all hate gays is wrong.
    If the idea you spout has the same effect, then motive is pointless.

    Do you seriously believe this?

    Motive is key behind my whole ethical beliefs.

    In the end, what counts is what happens, not WHY it happens

    Actually, yeah, for the end result and effect for a lot of people, it is what happens. But I still think motive plays some small part somewhere.

    I mean you can't rightly say "they are all hateful bigots."

    Maybe they are just ignorant!

    Teach them or something, I don't know.

    edit: Also, thats cute, teefs.

    d9eqysX.jpg
    http://atlanticus.tumblr.com/
    · Agree Awesome
  • Fuzzy Cumulonimbus CloudFuzzy Cumulonimbus Cloud Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    York isn't so bad I guess.

    3FMmC.jpg
    · Agree Awesome
  • ZodiakZodiak Registered User
    edited May 2009
    The majority voted (twice) to uphold traditional marriage here in California -- in the same years they voted for Gore and Obama. Many people besides Republicans oppose gay marriage.

    Today's decision was a victory for democracy. Votes matter.

    The far-left needs to "move on". The issue has been beat into the ground here in California. The people have spoken, the courts have spoken -- you lost.

    · Agree Awesome
  • autono-wally, erotibot300autono-wally, erotibot300 love machine Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Jigrah wrote: »
    In the long run were all dead. Outcome is second to motivation.

    Any finite amount of time is meaningless compared to infinity, that's why you compare it to a shorter time frame!
    Motivation is not meaningless at all, but it's ultimatively only there to explain the act

    sc.jpgsc.jpg
    · Agree Awesome
  • KetBraKetBra shut up and jamRegistered User regular
    edited May 2009
    You going to UBC, tfs?

    That's a pretty good school.

    yA895.png
    · Agree Awesome
  • Fuzzy Cumulonimbus CloudFuzzy Cumulonimbus Cloud Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Zodiak wrote: »
    The majority voted (twice) to uphold traditional marriage here in California -- in the same years they voted for Gore and Obama. Many people besides Republicans oppose gay marriage.

    Today's decision was a victory for democracy. Votes matter.

    The far-left needs to "move on". The issue has been beat into the ground here in California. The people have spoken, the courts have spoken -- you lost.
    In one state.

    3FMmC.jpg
    · Agree Awesome
  • The Far SideThe Far Side __BANNED USERS regular
    edited May 2009
    Fuzzy Cumulonimbus Cloud wrote: »
    Zodiak wrote: »
    The majority voted (twice) to uphold traditional marriage here in California -- in the same years they voted for Gore and Obama. Many people besides Republicans oppose gay marriage.

    Today's decision was a victory for democracy. Votes matter.

    The far-left needs to "move on". The issue has been beat into the ground here in California. The people have spoken, the courts have spoken -- you lost.
    In one state.
    lol the far-left

    there is no organised 'far-left' in america

    33aqfwk.jpg
    · Agree Awesome
  • KetBraKetBra shut up and jamRegistered User regular
    edited May 2009
    I don't think direct democracy applies to minority rights, Zodiak.

    yA895.png
    · Agree Awesome
  • The Far SideThe Far Side __BANNED USERS regular
    edited May 2009
    leaving civil rights up to a vote is a terrible idea

    by a simple majority in this case! what the hell, california

    33aqfwk.jpg
    · Agree Awesome
  • LockoutLockout Registered User
    edited May 2009
    Zodiak wrote: »
    The majority voted (twice) to uphold traditional marriage here in California -- in the same years they voted for Gore and Obama. Many people besides Republicans oppose gay marriage.

    Today's decision was a victory for democracy. Votes matter.

    The far-left needs to "move on". The issue has been beat into the ground here in California. The people have spoken, the courts have spoken -- you lost.

    tyranny of the majority

    · Agree Awesome
  • Fuzzy Cumulonimbus CloudFuzzy Cumulonimbus Cloud Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    CorpseRT wrote: »
    I don't think direct democracy applies to minority rights, Zodiak.
    why the fuck aren't they the majority rights

    3FMmC.jpg
    · Agree Awesome
  • Fuzzy Cumulonimbus CloudFuzzy Cumulonimbus Cloud Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    also
    Iowa

    3FMmC.jpg
    · Agree Awesome
  • FaricazyFaricazy Registered User
    edited May 2009
    Zodiak wrote: »
    The majority voted (twice) to uphold traditional marriage here in California -- in the same years they voted for Gore and Obama. Many people besides Republicans oppose gay marriage.

    Today's decision was a victory for democracy. Votes matter.

    The far-left needs to "move on". The issue has been beat into the ground here in California. The people have spoken, the courts have spoken -- you lost.
    U S A

    U S A

    · Agree Awesome
  • ArtreusArtreus AloneRegistered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Zodiak wrote: »
    The majority voted (twice) to uphold traditional marriage here in California -- in the same years they voted for Coolidge and Hoover. Many people besides Republicans oppose bi-racial marriage.

    Today's decision was a victory for democracy. Votes matter.

    The far-left needs to "move on". The issue has been beat into the ground here in California. The people have spoken, the courts have spoken -- you lost.

    d9eqysX.jpg
    http://atlanticus.tumblr.com/
    · Agree Awesome
  • The Far SideThe Far Side __BANNED USERS regular
    edited May 2009
    seriously 'far-left'

    christ even the 'communist party' in the US is just a bunch of fucking social-democrats

    33aqfwk.jpg
    · Agree Awesome
  • KetBraKetBra shut up and jamRegistered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Damn activist judges.

    yA895.png
    · Agree Awesome
  • AMP'dAMP'd Registered User
    edited May 2009
    So when is Deacon going to be up ins?

    His avatar is so delightfully incongruous

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    · Agree Awesome
  • autono-wally, erotibot300autono-wally, erotibot300 love machine Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    yeah seriously, human rights should NOT EVER be a thing decided against by a majority

    sc.jpgsc.jpg
    · Agree Awesome
  • The Far SideThe Far Side __BANNED USERS regular
    edited May 2009
    im mad

    mad about the political spectrum in the united states

    33aqfwk.jpg
    · Agree Awesome
  • WimbleWimble Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    what about the far out party

    4SMZq.jpg
    · Agree Awesome
  • AMP'dAMP'd Registered User
    edited May 2009
    The Far Side wrote: »
    im mad

    mad about the political spectrum in the united states

    you mad?

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    · Agree Awesome
  • FaricazyFaricazy Registered User
    edited May 2009
    i think the state should evenly distribute property amongst its citizens and also citizens should be gay married for a while and straight married for a while and alternate like that

    · Agree Awesome
  • The Far SideThe Far Side __BANNED USERS regular
    edited May 2009
    Faricazy wrote: »
    i think the state should evenly distribute property amongst its citizens and also citizens should be gay married for a while and straight married for a while and alternate like that
    down for this

    33aqfwk.jpg
    · Agree Awesome
  • RialeRiale Registered User
    edited May 2009
    Wimble wrote: »
    what about the far out party

    ron paul '12

    33c9nxz.gif
    Steam | XBL: Elazual | Last.fm
    · Agree Awesome
  • Fuzzy Cumulonimbus CloudFuzzy Cumulonimbus Cloud Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    ru paul '12

    3FMmC.jpg
    · Agree Awesome
  • Fuzzy Cumulonimbus CloudFuzzy Cumulonimbus Cloud Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    425rupaulobama121608.jpg

    3FMmC.jpg
    · Agree Awesome
  • RialeRiale Registered User
    edited May 2009
    Ron and Ru: The Pauls for You

    33c9nxz.gif
    Steam | XBL: Elazual | Last.fm
    · Agree Awesome
  • The Far SideThe Far Side __BANNED USERS regular
    edited May 2009
    man is there like an equal to HRC in canada

    i need to knowwww

    33aqfwk.jpg
    · Agree Awesome
  • FaricazyFaricazy Registered User
    edited May 2009
    in the next presidential race, the candidates should field football teams

    SUPERBOWL SUNDAY

    WINNER TAKES ALL

    · Agree Awesome
  • ArtreusArtreus AloneRegistered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Faricazy wrote: »
    i think the state should evenly distribute property amongst its citizens and also citizens should be gay married for a while and straight married for a while and alternate like that

    :|

    d9eqysX.jpg
    http://atlanticus.tumblr.com/
    · Agree Awesome
  • autono-wally, erotibot300autono-wally, erotibot300 love machine Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    the next presidential race is oil wrestling, as per the gay agenda

    sc.jpgsc.jpg
    · Agree Awesome
1…34689…27
Sign In or Register to comment.
› ›