Our new Indie Games subforum is now open for business in G&T. Go and check it out, you might land a code for a free game. If you're developing an indie game and want to post about it, follow these directions. If you don't, he'll break your legs! Hahaha! Seriously though.
Our rules have been updated and given their own forum. Go and look at them! They are nice, and there may be new ones that you didn't know about! Hooray for rules! Hooray for The System! Hooray for Conforming!

Sarah Palin LOL

1333436383967

Posts

  • JoeUserJoeUser Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    So is it time to register lolbidens.com?

    PSN: JoeUser80 Steam
  • DeaconBluesDeaconBlues __BANNED USERS
    edited July 2009
    Hunter wrote: »
    Hunter wrote: »
    I'm just judging him by his own terms!

    Cite where he used said terms

    Are you asking me to cite a campaign speech where he bemoans the jobs lost under Bush?

    Because that would be, like... laughably easy to produce.

    Then do it. Show where he blames Bush personally and not policies put forward by the Bush administration.

    What's the difference, exactly? I'm not saying Obama's personal character flaws are to blame here.

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • NikolaiNikolai SSSSSSSSSSS Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
  • The Far SideThe Far Side __BANNED USERS regular
    edited July 2009
    Nixon created the EPA

    then bombed Cambodia

    33aqfwk.jpg
  • CalliusCallius Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Hunter wrote: »
    Remember, 9-11 happened after Bush was in office about 8 months and it was Clinton's fault.

    Obama is in office 6 months and the whole economic downturn is his fault. Also, if the terrorists attack tomorrow it would be his fault too.
    Can't we just blame 9-11 on Reagan's foreign policy and call it a day?

    tonksigblack.png
  • KovakKovak did a lot of drugs married cher?Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Fandy I don't know much about Nixon

    but i do know he was one of the most liberal presidents to head the drug wars

    he was focusing on rehab and prevention rather than supply side war

    easily one of the more liberal approaches to gettin yo drug war on

  • JoeUserJoeUser Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Nixon created the EPA

    then bombed Cambodia

    He also scored us some giant pandas!

    PSN: JoeUser80 Steam
  • Clint EastwoodClint Eastwood Speak No Evil. Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    This is all Andrew Jackson's fault god damnit.

    n95ewsr3ulmn.jpg
  • CalliusCallius Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    I love the fact that the EPA are the villains in GhostBusters.

    tonksigblack.png
  • ButtersButters A glass of some milks Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Callius wrote: »
    Hunter wrote: »
    Remember, 9-11 happened after Bush was in office about 8 months and it was Clinton's fault.

    Obama is in office 6 months and the whole economic downturn is his fault. Also, if the terrorists attack tomorrow it would be his fault too.
    Can't we just blame 9-11 on Reagan's foreign policy and call it a day?

    No because that doesn't cover the fact that it was completely preventable.

    League of Legends: Lamby Cakes | XBox Live: Jon Butters
  • WeaverWeaver Hail CascadiaRegistered User regular
    edited July 2009
    I'm pretty sure that the job loss is due to stupid things like company stocks being devalued across the board due to something as simple as a report stating that unemployment is at a new high.

    Seriously, that report came out, so fucking stocks went down so companies layed more people off upping the unemployment rate even more. God damned gut-feeling economy.

    ProfessionalandCommander_zps6c326307.jpg
  • The Far SideThe Far Side __BANNED USERS regular
    edited July 2009
    Callius wrote: »
    I love the fact that the EPA are the villains in GhostBusters.
    what's that? a film in the 1980s had anti-regulation undertones???

    33aqfwk.jpg
  • CalliusCallius Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Butters wrote: »
    No because that doesn't cover the fact that it was completely preventable.
    Well, yeah, but...*


    *This post brought to you by the letters T, F, and S

    tonksigblack.png
  • DeaconBluesDeaconBlues __BANNED USERS
    edited July 2009
    Hunter wrote: »
    Dislexic wrote: »
    Hell, Obama hasn't even been in office SIX MONTHS

    you expect an economy that's completely in the toilet to be turned around in that time span?

    Remember, 9-11 happened after Bush was in office about 8 months and it was Clinton's fault.

    Obama is in office 6 months and the whole economic downturn is his fault. Also, if the terrorists attack tomorrow it would be his fault too.

    But Obama himself was the one who was all "we need this plan passed THIS WEEK or we'll suffer UNRECOVERABLE ECONOMIC DAMAGE".

    Guess we could have taken a few months to plan things out after all!

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • DislexicDislexic Registered User
    edited July 2009
    Hunter wrote: »
    Hunter wrote: »
    I'm just judging him by his own terms!

    Cite where he used said terms

    Are you asking me to cite a campaign speech where he bemoans the jobs lost under Bush?

    Because that would be, like... laughably easy to produce.

    Then do it. Show where he blames Bush personally and not policies put forward by the Bush administration.

    What's the difference, exactly? I'm not saying Obama's personal character flaws are to blame here.

    No, you're calling him a hypocrite president with no justification.

    batsig.jpg
  • MrMonroeMrMonroe Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Callius wrote: »
    Hunter wrote: »
    Remember, 9-11 happened after Bush was in office about 8 months and it was Clinton's fault.

    Obama is in office 6 months and the whole economic downturn is his fault. Also, if the terrorists attack tomorrow it would be his fault too.
    Can't we just blame 9-11 on Reagan's foreign policy and call it a day?

    and Carter

    don't forget Carter

  • The Far SideThe Far Side __BANNED USERS regular
    edited July 2009
    Callius wrote: »
    Butters wrote: »
    No because that doesn't cover the fact that it was completely preventable.
    Well, yeah, but...*


    *This post brought to you by the letters T, F, and S
    :mrgreen:

    33aqfwk.jpg
  • FandyienFandyien But Otto, what about us? Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Kovak wrote: »
    Fandy I don't know much about Nixon

    but i do know he was one of the most liberal presidents to head the drug wars

    he was focusing on rehab and prevention rather than supply side war

    easily one of the more liberal approaches to gettin yo drug war on

    I can dig that.

    I also recall one of my favorite HST articles from when he was on the McGovern campaign, about how much he loathed Nixon but felt like he'd be a great guy to drink a beer and watch some football with

    reposig.jpg
  • Lord DaveLord Dave Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Hunter wrote: »
    Dislexic wrote: »
    Hell, Obama hasn't even been in office SIX MONTHS

    you expect an economy that's completely in the toilet to be turned around in that time span?

    Remember, 9-11 happened after Bush was in office about 8 months and it was Clinton's fault.

    Obama is in office 6 months and the whole economic downturn is his fault. Also, if the terrorists attack tomorrow it would be his fault too.

    I might be a level 5 hypocrite, but you're a level 9 hypocrite.

    Denny's is for winners.
    mkc.pngmkc.pngmkc.pngmontykevin.png
  • Clint EastwoodClint Eastwood Speak No Evil. Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Hunter wrote: »
    Dislexic wrote: »
    Hell, Obama hasn't even been in office SIX MONTHS

    you expect an economy that's completely in the toilet to be turned around in that time span?

    Remember, 9-11 happened after Bush was in office about 8 months and it was Clinton's fault.

    Obama is in office 6 months and the whole economic downturn is his fault. Also, if the terrorists attack tomorrow it would be his fault too.

    But Obama himself was the one who was all "we need this plan passed THIS WEEK or we'll suffer UNRECOVERABLE ECONOMIC DAMAGE".

    Guess we could have taken a few months to plan things out after all!
    Yeah, that would have been nice.

    n95ewsr3ulmn.jpg
  • CalliusCallius Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    But Obama himself was the one who was all "we need this plan passed THIS WEEK or we'll suffer UNRECOVERABLE ECONOMIC DAMAGE".

    Guess we could have taken a few months to plan things out after all!
    yeah, I do agree that the stimulus bullshit shoulda' gotten more review.

    Then again, the stimulus bullshit that was passed under Bush's watch was WAAAAAY worse.

    tonksigblack.png
  • FandyienFandyien But Otto, what about us? Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Also wasn't Kissinger the predominant engineer behind our atrocities in Cambodia

    reposig.jpg
  • The Far SideThe Far Side __BANNED USERS regular
    edited July 2009
  • ButtersButters A glass of some milks Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    I don't blame too much of what's currently taking place with our economy on Obama but I'm sure I'll blame our heavily stifled recovery on him.

    That is if we have one within his first term as president.

    League of Legends: Lamby Cakes | XBox Live: Jon Butters
  • CalliusCallius Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Fandyien wrote: »
    I can dig that.

    I also recall one of my favorite HST articles from when he was on the McGovern campaign, about how much he loathed Nixon but felt like he'd be a great guy to drink a beer and watch some football with
    HST and Nixon actually got along pretty well.

    HST almost slipped him some LSD aboard Airforce One, if I recall correctly.

    tonksigblack.png
  • FandyienFandyien But Otto, what about us? Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    That would've been fabulous

    reposig.jpg
  • HunterHunter Chemist with a heart of Au Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Hunter wrote: »
    Hunter wrote: »
    I'm just judging him by his own terms!

    Cite where he used said terms

    Are you asking me to cite a campaign speech where he bemoans the jobs lost under Bush?

    Because that would be, like... laughably easy to produce.

    Then do it. Show where he blames Bush personally and not policies put forward by the Bush administration.

    What's the difference, exactly? I'm not saying Obama's personal character flaws are to blame here.

    Then why point out the difference in job losses? The job losses under the 6 month old Obama administration are related more to the previous 8 years of Bush policy more then the 6 months of Obama policy, so why even say it unless to provoke a "TEH OBAMAZ LOSTED TEH JORBS MOER TEHN BUSH!".

    You also went into blame congress mode because it shifted left in 2006. What about the 6 years of Bush whitehouse and right wing congress before that? Perhaps that may have shaped the current economic woes we face? Keep on keeping on brother.

  • DeaconBluesDeaconBlues __BANNED USERS
    edited July 2009
    Callius wrote: »
    But Obama himself was the one who was all "we need this plan passed THIS WEEK or we'll suffer UNRECOVERABLE ECONOMIC DAMAGE".

    Guess we could have taken a few months to plan things out after all!
    yeah, I do agree that the stimulus bullshit shoulda' gotten more review.

    Then again, the stimulus bullshit that was passed under Bush's watch was WAAAAAY worse.

    I guess you're grading how good it is based on how much it costs?

    I mean, what's another trillion among friends, taxes aren't going up so it's all good.

    Urgh.

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • ButtersButters A glass of some milks Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Callius wrote: »
    But Obama himself was the one who was all "we need this plan passed THIS WEEK or we'll suffer UNRECOVERABLE ECONOMIC DAMAGE".

    Guess we could have taken a few months to plan things out after all!
    yeah, I do agree that the stimulus bullshit shoulda' gotten more review.

    Then again, the stimulus bullshit that was passed under Bush's watch was WAAAAAY worse.

    You mean the one the Democratic congress voted on without reading?

    League of Legends: Lamby Cakes | XBox Live: Jon Butters
  • WeaverWeaver Hail CascadiaRegistered User regular
    edited July 2009
  • MrMonroeMrMonroe Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Callius wrote: »
    But Obama himself was the one who was all "we need this plan passed THIS WEEK or we'll suffer UNRECOVERABLE ECONOMIC DAMAGE".

    Guess we could have taken a few months to plan things out after all!
    yeah, I do agree that the stimulus bullshit shoulda' gotten more review.

    Then again, the stimulus bullshit that was passed under Bush's watch was WAAAAAY worse.

    and was actually Socialism!

  • Clint EastwoodClint Eastwood Speak No Evil. Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Basically, every elected official sucks.

    Especially Harry Reid

    n95ewsr3ulmn.jpg
  • risumonrisumon Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    JoeUser wrote: »
    This is ... something.

    Palin's Plan
    It was 1962. Richard Nixon had had enough. Enough of being called "Tricky Dick, the man no one would buy a used car from." Enough of the elitist derision that had come his way since the Hiss case. He had had enough of the liberal media who consistently held him to a higher standard than his Democratic opponents and poked fun at his lack of sophistication - he being the son of a grocer. So Nixon blew. He announced the end of his career in seeking elective office; "You won't have Dick Nixon to kick around anymore because, gentlemen, this is my last press conference." Six years later he was inaugurated as President of the United States.
    And this:
    In fact, resignation as Governor was necessary to preserve any prospect that Palin could be nominated and elected in 2012 or beyond.
    Nixon was shrewd as fuck

    Palin not so much, though.

    That's just what she wants to think.

    You are falling for her trap.

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • HunterHunter Chemist with a heart of Au Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Butters wrote: »
    I don't blame too much of what's currently taking place with our economy on Obama but I'm sure I'll blame our heavily stifled recovery on him.

    That is if we have one within his first term as president.

    What about the first round of stimulus under the Bush administration that basically got swallowed up by banks and didn't accomplish jack or shit?

    Obama's stimulus hasn't done shit either, I agree, but it's not like he's alone holding the Stimulus Didn't Do Dick card.

  • DeaconBluesDeaconBlues __BANNED USERS
    edited July 2009
    Hunter wrote: »
    Then why point out the difference in job losses? The job losses under the 6 month old Obama administration are related more to the previous 8 years of Bush policy more then the 6 months of Obama policy

    cite, please!

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • NikolaiNikolai SSSSSSSSSSS Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
  • HunterHunter Chemist with a heart of Au Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Callius wrote: »
    But Obama himself was the one who was all "we need this plan passed THIS WEEK or we'll suffer UNRECOVERABLE ECONOMIC DAMAGE".

    Guess we could have taken a few months to plan things out after all!
    yeah, I do agree that the stimulus bullshit shoulda' gotten more review.

    Then again, the stimulus bullshit that was passed under Bush's watch was WAAAAAY worse.

    I guess you're grading how good it is based on how much it costs?

    I mean, what's another trillion among friends, taxes aren't going up so it's all good.

    Urgh.

    What was the surplus Bush had going into his first term again?

  • DeaconBluesDeaconBlues __BANNED USERS
    edited July 2009
    You guys know what would the perfect thing to do right now?

    Implement a giant healthcare system!

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • FandyienFandyien But Otto, what about us? Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Would nixon take bong rips

    reposig.jpg
  • DislexicDislexic Registered User
    edited July 2009
    Hunter wrote: »
    Then why point out the difference in job losses? The job losses under the 6 month old Obama administration are related more to the previous 8 years of Bush policy more then the 6 months of Obama policy

    cite, please!

    wow you're such an ass

    I mean, goddamn

    batsig.jpg
This discussion has been closed.