[Phalla] Kill Doctor Lucky in Phalla Mansion - Good Night, Doctor Lucky (Game Over)

shalmelo · October 2009

So. Oaklore and ShadowThomas...

What are your motivations?

That's right, I'm calling you both out publicly. We're a tight-knit little party here, everybody's friends now. Spill.

Gumpy · October 2009

Romantic Undead wrote: »

Gumpy wrote: »

Danish hating revenge motive?

!Romantic Undead

And now you have revealed your true colors. You clearly do not have the Revenge PM in its entirety.

Cannot read posts directly above his own

Futher things of interest

1: our group was in contact with Dogbone. He never mentioned Romantic or boogey.
2: Boogey claims to have been a close ally of Dogbones, this is extremely suspect, and god-damn if Dogbone had told us it would have saved Boogeys life. We know him to be a conspirater.
3: Romantic claims to be Dogbones partner, but we know for a fact that Dogbone never mentioned Boogey to him.

What does #3 mean? If I was someone's partner, I could kinda understand if I wasn't brought up in conversation with people not in the immediate group, but for me to have no idea what people are working with me?

Hurm

also good call Shal

ShadowThomas · October 2009

shalmelo wrote: »

So. Oaklore and ShadowThomas...

What are your motivations?

That's right, I'm calling you both out publicly. We're a tight-knit little party here, everybody's friends now. Spill.

REVENGE!

Jerk took the last bear claw.

Gumpy · October 2009

Eh

Good enough for me

!Oaklore

oaklore · October 2009

If someone else is Occult, PM me to confirm.

From what I gather, I might be the last.

oaklore · October 2009

Serious though? Why am I being called out? Defensively, and thanks for this, I need to now.

Lest WE LOSE. But now I get punched repeatedly. :rotate:

Now everyone knows mine, and I'm probly the last, but everyone else isn't out. So lets have it, ya? We're all friends, ya?

Gumpy · October 2009

What do we know about Tehsloth?

Houn · October 2009

Gumpy wrote: »

What do we know about Tehsloth?

Why should we be answering to a Bodyguard?

Gumpy · October 2009

Houn wrote: »

Gumpy wrote: »

What do we know about Tehsloth?

Why should we be answering to a Bodyguard?

THE EQUATION, AS TOLD BY SOMEONE WHO IS NOT DUMB:

I am a mafia member, all of you are equally valid targets

I am not a mafia member, I care about who is what so I can select which targets have the higher chances of being a mafia member and dealing with them

To conclude this lesson, if I was a mafia member it wouldn't matter at all if I knew what your motivations were, since each one of you is an equal threat to my person due to the random nature of the cards being dealt out, and things such as your position and what you are doing in the thread are the things I would need to be concerned with, all information that is freely available.

If I was not a mafia member, then I need to know who people are so I can improve my accuracy when it comes to fighting mafia members

By asking in the thread, I make this information available to the remaining conspirators.

By this stage in the game, I suspect the mafia members have got themselves at least one cover identity, and am suspicious about all current high profile suspects going "Revenge lol"

Houn · October 2009

The entire argument is nullified by the following statement:

Mafia Mind Games.

Here's a better equation:

Romantic Undead wrote: »

Gumpy and boogedyboo where the only non-confirmed individuals in the room when the now dead dogbone and Toxic Toys tried to kill Dr. Lucky. The attacked Lucky with ridiculous numbers, that should have far overwhelmed the amount of remaining bodyguards, yet the attack failed anyways, which means that someone in the room has to have been a bodyguard.

The only still-living people in the room that weren't in on the plot were Gumpy and boogedyboo.

One of them is a bodyguard.

Boogedy is dead (thanks for that, Gumpy). So, Algebra time: (Gumpy + Boogedyboo) - Boogedyboo = X

!Vote for X.

Gumpy · October 2009

Houn wrote: »

The entire argument is nullified by the following statement:

Mafia Mind Games.

This is the most retarded thing you have said all day

"Can't get the village information it needs

Mafia could be playing mind games with us"

Houn · October 2009

What more information do you need aside from "Attack got blocked, here's the list of potential blockers"?

Gumpy · October 2009

Houn wrote: »

What more information do you need aside from "Attack got blocked, here's the list of potential blockers"?

Information that would actually get a bodyguard kill

or even if I follow your logic through, as dumb as it is

Information that would net us a possible second bodyguard

Man you are pushing quite hard to keep things muddled Houn

Houn · October 2009

Hey, if you want to give an alternate answer to the question of why the attacks failed, I'm all ears. You haven't even addressed the question yet.

Gumpy · October 2009

Why did Boogeys attack fail

it was like, strength 3

That means there are three bodyguards left

Houn · October 2009

I'm referring to Toxic and Dogbone's attacks, both while you and Boogedy were in the room, as R_U pointed out. B's dead. So... yeah. How you doin', Gumpy?

Gumpy · October 2009

Dogbones

Died

That night

Thus his attack did not go off

Because attacking doctor lucky is the last thing that happens

Houn · October 2009

Mr.B wrote:

Q: Does the mafia eviction action come during the "eviction vote" phase or the "action phase"?
A: The bodyguards' eviction action occurs in the Action Phase.

Q: What's the order of operations in the Action Phase?
A: Movement Cards come after Weapon Cards and other attacks (and thus Failure Cards), but further clarification is denied.

I don't see any confirmation of what order attack go off in; only that they are all in the same phase.

Gumpy · October 2009

Hmm yes the fact that bodyguards directly took him out would have no affect on if the doctors body was guarded from him that turn

Hmm yes

Houn · October 2009

Could be. Could not be. We don't know the action order. I'm leaning toward "simultaneous" actions myself. So, the question for everyone is:

How sure are you of the action order? Is it wise to let Gumpy live another day, or more prudent to axe him now?

Gumpy · October 2009

!ShadowThomas

Leaving me with little choice here >: {

Gumpy · October 2009

Houn wrote: »

Could be. Could not be. We don't know the action order. I'm leaning toward "simultaneous" actions myself. So, the question for everyone is:

How sure are you of the action order? Is it wise to let Gumpy live another day, or more prudent to axe him now?

You have gone from 100% sure I am evil to asking the village to back you up

What I am saying is both logical and sound

Houn · October 2009

Gumpy wrote: »

!ShadowThomas

Leaving me with little choice here >: {

I see the logic. :lol:

Gumpy · October 2009

Houn wrote: »

Gumpy wrote: »

!ShadowThomas

Leaving me with little choice here >: {

I see the logic. :lol:

Gumpy wrote: »

By this stage in the game, I suspect the mafia members have got themselves at least one cover identity, and am suspicious about all current high profile suspects going "Revenge lol"

Houn · October 2009

And what motive are you, Sir? I don't believe you've ever stated one publicly.

Gumpy · October 2009

...

Do you even read what I post

Ps there is a exchange between me and RU on the very last page on this very subject

Houn · October 2009

Was that the one where R_U stated you failed the PM Citation Test? That one? That inspires my faith in you, sir.

Gumpy · October 2009

Houn wrote: »

Was that the one where R_U stated you failed the PM Citation Test? That one? That inspires my faith in you, sir.

Yes the one where I give R_U the test and he gave a different answer to the one in the PM, even if Rawking argues its a simply a matter of semantics

The ability to read is a glorious thing

Romantic Undead · October 2009

Gumpy, you're the one who argued semantics. I said that I hated Danishes, which is a perfectly acceptable interpretation of the PM, yet you countered by saying "The PM doesn't say HATE, only strong dislike" like that makes a lick of difference.

Furthermore, you were not revealed to me as being revenge motivated, but greed motivated. Are you now claiming to be revenge, in opposition of what was told me by my revenge network, who all died as conspirators?

Gumpy · October 2009

Romantic Undead wrote: »

Gumpy, you're the one who argued semantics. I said that I hated Danishes, which is a perfectly acceptable interpretation of the PM, yet you countered by saying "The PM doesn't say HATE, only strong dislike" like that makes a lick of difference.

Furthermore, you were not revealed to me as being revenge motivated, but greed motivated. Are you now claiming to be revenge, in opposition of what was told me by my revenge network, who all died as conspirators?

Yes

I am claiming to be revenge

Gumpy · October 2009

Hey, RU

Guess what's coming for you tonight

Spoiler:

TehSloth · October 2009

Haven't I already stated what I thought was an entirely logical reason for RU pretty much being a definite conspirator?

Spoiler:

Role shenanigans aside, I think we're going in a decidedly useless direction here.

Houn · October 2009

TehSloth wrote: »

Haven't I already stated what I thought was an entirely logical reason for RU pretty much being a definite conspirator?

Spoiler:

He attacked me for 5, which I believe only conspirators with the ability to discard cards to get a bonus for attacks can do

Role shenanigans aside, I think we're going in a decidedly useless direction here.

A few quickies:

1. How do you know it was for 5?
2. Some cards can hit for at least 4 if in certain rooms; did anyone see a card that hits for 5?

*edit* Reviewing the Money Board, the Wrench Card is a W3, but becomes 5 if used in the garage. So there at least IS the possibility of a 5. I'd guess it's pretty rare, though.

Rawkking Goodguy · October 2009

Yeah, and I hit Ebfan with the coat rack, which becomes a 5 in the foyer.

Really depends on what weapon he used.

TehSloth · October 2009

well, there goes my theory, I thought the best ones were 2s that got upgraded to 4s....

Houn · October 2009

It wasn't a bad theory. Well, ok, it was. But I think that what we've all learned from this experience is that you should always vote for Gumpy.

:lol:

Gumpy · October 2009

We don't learn that till the results are published

Houn · October 2009

Actually, it's a little something I learned in space.

Romantic Undead · October 2009

Gumpy wrote: »

Hey, RU

Guess what's coming for you tonight

Spoiler:

Think you have what it takes, robot?

Gumpy · October 2009

I'd just like one of my strong critics to attempt to compile all the evidence there is on me being a "Bodyguard" into a single post

See exactly what comes up

Penny Arcade

[Phalla] Kill Doctor Lucky in Phalla Mansion - Good Night, Doctor Lucky (Game Over)

Posts