Our new Indie Games subforum is now open for business in G&T. Go and check it out, you might land a code for a free game. If you're developing an indie game and want to post about it,
follow these directions. If you don't, he'll break your legs! Hahaha! Seriously though.
Our rules have been updated and given
their own forum. Go and look at them! They are nice, and there may be new ones that you didn't know about! Hooray for rules! Hooray for The System! Hooray for Conforming!
[Game of the Decade] RESULTS IN OP
Posts
edit: note that there can be other theories
Let me tell you about video games. Let me tell you about Homestuck
Not true, naturally all this is correct with movies or literature, you need that anchor, but being an interactive medium, not all this is required.
We have what we need from the protagonist. He is Gordon Freeman, a scientist, and person adapt at combat. He is connected to the various characters because of the previous game, and the exploits of the previous game frame him in this second one (messianic figure, savior, etc.) . You as the player are left to fill everything else out through the length of the game. It also helps that Gordon himself is a pawn both mechanically and narratively.
I have the partner book 'Raising the Bar' at home, and Gabe Newell actually goes into some length about this in there. May have to bring that into this when I get home, but this was the jist of his idea. They remove the layers of the protagonist so the player becomes it. They provide enough anchor so there can be narrative surrounding the protagonist, but leave the rest out for immersive value.
you're using the term 'interactive' pretty loosely there. in an experience so scripted as that of half life 2's, it is indeed just as correct as it is with movies and literature
again, if we were talking some giant open world where your actions as a player had consequence over the experience that played out, i might agree
There doesn't need to be an open game world, just the perception of one.
you'd have to be half-blind and missing a 'W' key to ever get the idea half-life 2 has an open world
Hi5. Bsjezz, for the record I think the points you're dropping are correct.
That's basic level stuff. The idea is that you and the story are all set within a wider world. When you first step out from the train, and then the train station at the beginning of the game, right up to the assault on the Citadel, everything there is to give the perception of being in a larger world. These individual areas are boxed and separated, but the idea is there. That's what all narrative FPS's attempt to do. Half-Life 2 is generally regarded as doing this successfully
Basic game design 101 ITT
And in this case both theories have their merits.
However i've extensively read Raising The Bar, and whilst i remember the section you're talking about, I remember reading it and thinking that it didn't in any way help. No amount of explanation why i SHOULD feel attached could MAKE me feel that.
It's especially pronounced in Episode 2, there's a bit where that other scientist guy is shouting at you over the intercom that he needs to know if you're alive (it's near the end of the game) and of course, you don't respond. It feels very robotic and pointless.
Well yeah, I think there are many instances where the developer team actively poke fun at Gordon's muteness. Alyx comments on it a few times, people say things like 'a man of few words eh?', and the scene you mentioned. It's just some meta-humor.
we've come too far as gamers to not instantly need to understand not the limits of the world as a place, but the limits of our ability as gamers. as soon as i set foot in a game i will seek to know whether it's one where i am either the creator of the experience, the storyteller (see the sims, fallout 3) or one in which i'm going to be told a story (uncharted 2, half-life 2). no matter what valve wants to do with 'immersion' they've still created a game where they have to accept ultimate authorial control, and any player immersion is only ever going to be in the shadow of their own scripting
this is why i think newell's arguments are flawed - and why the game was so flat and uninteresting to me and a lot of other players. they put immersion before their responsibility as storytellers
Ok, but you have to look at it in the scope of a narrative game. No, Half-Life is not a sandbox game, but that is not a bad thing. Gabe Newell is speaking within the confines of a linear, narrative experience, this is presumed.
I can understand why people don't like Half-Life and might prefer something like Grand Theft Auto, they're obviously providing two different experiences. But don't knock Half-Life for the experience it is delivering just because it is different and is made with a different intention in mind.
no no no, don't misunderstand me, i love narrative games. uncharted: drakes fortune was my game of the decade, and that was scripted beyond compare. but the key difference is that it had a central character with emotions, a distinct voice, flaws; a central character who developed as the plot did. it was also very much immersive, as much as a narrative game can be, because the excellently presented traditional cinematic context gave the gameplay sections real weight and importance
I guess my argument boils down to how I was able to become engrossed in the story, because of minor similarities between myself and the protagonist's back story. If your life was dissimilar to mine (pretty likely), you probably wouldn't get as much out of it as I did.
I think the problem people have is that they feel that the intention hasn't translated into an idea that works for them. If i think of my favourite linear first and third person shooters, I always felt i was playing as someone within the narrative who actively changed things. Half Life 2 always felt like things simply happened to me and all i was doing was not dying. Like it could be any person, that this person has no motivation to do this as he has no connection to the characters.
If that was their intention, then maybe they were making a game that I could never like. Even in Zelda you get Yes/No choices from time to time.
No, I don't, because that would be pretty fucking stupid.
I mean, the only thing you took from ME was the cover system? Which wasn't even very important to begin with?
Well, there are a couple more than 2... And almost all of those games below were released at one time or another.
They were also involved in IWD and PST.
In my opinion, the only reason it should make it on there is the custom maps like DotA (fuck, DotA is so popular it has its own game now). The gameplay of Warcraft 3 was boring as fuck. Woohoo, four races, perfectly balanced? Oh right, thats because every race is 95% the same.
Wow, you really suck at math:
They were also involved in IWD and PST.[/QUOTE]
Okay, I realise that this doesn't disprove your point, but you really can't use MDK 1 or 2 (Not made by Bioware), or Star Wars The Old Republic (Not out when Mass Effect came out), or Sonic (Not PC), or Dragon Age (Also not out).
EDIT: Okay, you can have MDK 2. Not really a PC classic tho, i'd argue. I mean it was good, but not Neverwinter Nights good.
That aside, Half-Life 2's story has been built up so much that any possible explanation of who or what the G-Man is will undoubtedly be disappointing. I say this as someone who was for the most part impressed by Valve's scene direction and dialogue. I do think there's a lot to like about the characters and the action, and facial animation had come a long way at the time. But I'd put money down that the big reveal about the G-Man will either be lame, confusing, or nonexistent.
Unless he's killed by Adrian Shephard all of a sudden. I would fucking cheer.
I write for these people. Just reviewed: Drox Operative
I didn't care for RE4, BTW.
3DS FC: 2148-9166-6811; Pokémon White 2 FC: 0304-9556-1797 Free flawless Japanese Dittos for trade.
After all, it's really just a short puzzle/adventure Half-Life addon. I wouldn't say it has much in the way of replayability. Though yes, it started the whole cake thing.
I wouldn't be terribly surprised if Gordon was G-Man. After all
Holy shit I think you're right!
That aside, it was a fun and very well designed puzzle game, but I beat it once and haven't been back since.
I write for these people. Just reviewed: Drox Operative
The GTA series alone would push it down quite a bit in my opinion. Sadly I didn't vote so my opinion doesn't matter.
That's a lie.
3DS FC: 2148-9166-6811; Pokémon White 2 FC: 0304-9556-1797 Free flawless Japanese Dittos for trade.
What's a lie?
I'll tell you what's not a lie.
Robot Hell.
I write for these people. Just reviewed: Drox Operative
I figure either it's that, or Gordon is G-Man's employer.
MDK and Sonic are PC classics, eh?
And you realise that Mass Effect is about as much a "PC game" as Halo, Gears, or FF7. Those are all perfectly fine games, but people would laugh if you called them PC classics.
They programmed the engine they ran on, yes.
What Bioware does have a long tradition of is porting consolized RPGs to the PC.
How original, Valve.
Ah, geez. You may be torn apart for such a statement, maybe even banned.
Twitter
Yet, it made it to the top three!
3DS FC: 2148-9166-6811; Pokémon White 2 FC: 0304-9556-1797 Free flawless Japanese Dittos for trade.
It always struck me as more of an extra-long tech demo, rather than just a short game. If it had been a mod for Half Life 2 it would have been amazing, but from a company its just very good.
I'm not disputing the quality of it, nor the entertainment value. I had a great time playing it.
But does it REALLY belong above Team Fortress 2? Or above Deus Ex, Counterstrike, or Halo?
Personally, I think Barney is the G-Man. For one, they have the same voice actor. Two, that quote when he hands you the crowbar: "You left this back at Black Mesa!" No, you didn't. You left it in the Xen borderworld! So basically there's my conclusive argument