Our new Indie Games subforum is now open for business in G&T. Go and check it out, you might land a code for a free game. If you're developing an indie game and want to post about it, follow these directions. If you don't, he'll break your legs! Hahaha! Seriously though.
Our rules have been updated and given their own forum. Go and look at them! They are nice, and there may be new ones that you didn't know about! Hooray for rules! Hooray for The System! Hooray for Conforming!
Well, there's a lot of reasons. i mean, roses only last like a couple weeks and that's if you leave them in water and they really only exist to be pretty so that's like saying "my love for you is transitory and based solely on your appearance". but a potato! potatos last for ever, man in fact, not only will they not rot, they actually grow shit even if you just leave them in the sack. that part alone makes it a good symbol but there's more!there are so many ways to enjoy a potato! you can even make a battery with it! and that's like saying "i have many ways in which I show my love for you" and potatos may be ugly, but they're still awesome so that's like saying "it doesn't matter at all what you look like, I'll still love you".
From the article it feels more like 'male lonely/bitter damaged goods vs female desperation/opportunism' with a side order of self-delusion on both sides.
The writer sums it up quite nicely by saying they basically want a wife who combines '50's subservience with 21st century bedroom antics.
Lady in the street and a freak in the bed.
There's nothing wrong with wanting that, really, as long as you don't force someone into it.
From the article it feels more like 'male lonely/bitter damaged goods vs female desperation/opportunism' with a side order of self-delusion on both sides.
The writer sums it up quite nicely by saying they basically want a wife who combines '50's subservience with 21st century bedroom antics.
Lady in the street and a freak in the bed.
There's nothing wrong with wanting that, really, as long as you don't force someone into it.
And when you DO get someone like that... it's a glorious thing.
Forcing or buying someone into that role seems... wrong.
you didn't say 'strictly adhering to the constitution'
or 'not applying a literalist viewpoint of the constitution'
you said you didn't see the point of applying the constitution
and you said there's precedent for judges not even 'basing' something on the constitution- as though that's a good thing
there's a difference between a living constitution and a total dismissal of the constitution's domain and application
what i'm saying is if you just want to 'wing it' and dismiss the constitution, it's tragic; you sure enjoy the many rights enumerated by said document
i am stunned that i'm the only one in disbelief by what you've said here
I don't really see the point in applying the constitution, and the rights enumerated within, to corporations. I see the point in applying rulings to corporations to ensure the rights enumerated within to citizens, and guess what? The decision the supreme court handed down is a pretty grave blow to democracy in my book. The only thing that court decision did was further consolidate political power into the hands of the few.
you said you didn't see the point of applying the constitution
regarding corporations
"Despite all the bitching, if Diablo 3 sucks, I will eat my own cock. Counter-claim: If Diablo 3 does not suck, I will have a list of whiners who need to eat cocks." - Zen Vulgarity
every legal decision in this country ought to be based upon the constitution
what you should be arguing for is certain rights to not be awarded to corporations as they are non citizens, non entities, non people, non rights bearers, non whatever
it is a far cry from what you actually said
either we are governed by a constitution or we are not
you didn't say 'strictly adhering to the constitution'
or 'not applying a literalist viewpoint of the constitution'
you said you didn't see the point of applying the constitution
and you said there's precedent for judges not even 'basing' something on the constitution- as though that's a good thing
there's a difference between a living constitution and a total dismissal of the constitution's domain and application
what i'm saying is if you just want to 'wing it' and dismiss the constitution, it's tragic; you sure enjoy the many rights enumerated by said document
i am stunned that i'm the only one in disbelief by what you've said here
The issue that most of us have with he ruling is not, necessarily, about the constitution or the decision.
It's about the definitions used to come to the conclusion.
It defined "Free Speech" as receivership, to begin. It isn't about me or you or anyone else actually speaking but about the ability for you and me to hear what is being said. It sidestepped the corporate personhood question by creating some sort of inverse concept of free speech in which it is more important that we be able to "hear" what AIG has to say than for anyone to actually be able to speak.
From the article it feels more like 'male lonely/bitter damaged goods vs female desperation/opportunism' with a side order of self-delusion on both sides.
The writer sums it up quite nicely by saying they basically want a wife who combines '50's subservience with 21st century bedroom antics.
Lady in the street and a freak in the bed.
There's nothing wrong with wanting that, really, as long as you don't force someone into it.
From what they were saying they wanted it more like 'lady in the street, servant in the house, freak in the bed'. And while I'm sure none of them would admit to forcing anyone into the situation, they were all pretty damn clear on 'keeping them out of your money'.
It was my class from ME 1, Judas Shepard takes no shit from soldiers!
No, he just smears some of his on his lovers after taking it up the ass.
Do you... Do you even know how gay people have sex?
Do you even know how gay people have sex in space?
"Despite all the bitching, if Diablo 3 sucks, I will eat my own cock. Counter-claim: If Diablo 3 does not suck, I will have a list of whiners who need to eat cocks." - Zen Vulgarity
So spoiler for Mass Effect 2 early game one of the first 3 people you are sent to recruit.
Spoiler:
Man I totally called Jack as being such a lame lame character. As soon as I got her on board I've ignored her entirely, f you stupid character..
Yeah, I'm not a fan of characters with little man syndrome writ large.
Spoiler:
Grunt
is in many ways the same.
Spoiler to your spoiler I'm guessing early game.
Spoiler:
Is that the krogan? After I got him I was sent to go get pissed off that ashely is still alive (I fucked her in the first game but regret that like space herpes). Still haven't let him out, my current crew is space boobs and garrus, because garrus is as always my homeboy.
So spoiler for Mass Effect 2 early game one of the first 3 people you are sent to recruit.
Spoiler:
Man I totally called Jack as being such a lame lame character. As soon as I got her on board I've ignored her entirely, f you stupid character..
Spoiler:
I think that a younger me would have thought she was a great character. But older me just doesn't want to put up with her self-centered melodramatic grrrl bullshit. I guess I have already dated a few of those in real life and don't need to indulge more of that crap in my recreation.
Jack actually hasn't gotten on my nerves like I expected her to from the promo material. Hasn't wowed me with any dialog yet, but damn that shockwave is fun!
"Despite all the bitching, if Diablo 3 sucks, I will eat my own cock. Counter-claim: If Diablo 3 does not suck, I will have a list of whiners who need to eat cocks." - Zen Vulgarity
every legal decision in this country ought to be based upon the constitution
what you should be arguing for is certain rights to not be awarded to corporations as they are non citizens, non entities, non people, non rights bearers, non whatever
it is a far cry from what you actually said
either we are governed by a constitution or we are not
You telling me what I'm actually saying and what I ought to be arguing for I find to be quite hilarious.
From the article it feels more like 'male lonely/bitter damaged goods vs female desperation/opportunism' with a side order of self-delusion on both sides.
The writer sums it up quite nicely by saying they basically want a wife who combines '50's subservience with 21st century bedroom antics.
Lady in the street and a freak in the bed.
There's nothing wrong with wanting that, really, as long as you don't force someone into it.
From what they were saying they wanted it more like 'lady in the street, servant in the house, freak in the bed'. And while I'm sure none of them would admit to forcing anyone into the situation, they were all pretty damn clear on 'keeping them out of your money'.
Most people who buy Russian wives do it so they're basically guaranteed 2 years that the woman won't leave, and they can use the threat of divorce to get what they want unfortunately.
So spoiler for Mass Effect 2 early game one of the first 3 people you are sent to recruit.
Spoiler:
Man I totally called Jack as being such a lame lame character. As soon as I got her on board I've ignored her entirely, f you stupid character..
Spoiler:
I think that a younger me would have thought she was a great character. But older me just doesn't want to put up with her self-centered melodramatic grrrl bullshit. I guess I have already dated a few of those in real life and don't need to indulge more of that crap in my recreation.
Spoiler:
She is unpleasant but strikes me as very realistic in that regard.
Mordin and Agent Walker, because a) they've been a great team for bagging some achievements, b) Mordin has some hilarious comments in battle and c) Garrus has barely said two words to me on the ship. We used to be buddies, Garrus. Open up. Tell me what the problem is.
Is that the krogan? After I got him I was sent to go get pissed off that ashely is still alive (I fucked her in the first game but regret that like space herpes). Still haven't let him out, my current crew is space boobs and garrus, because garrus is as always my homeboy.
Yep.
Just in general I hate that 'lol I'm always angry and tryng to prove to the world that I'm a big dog' archetype.
Spoiler:
Garrus
never leaves my party. Though I swap the other slot out between a few people.
So spoiler for Mass Effect 2 early game one of the first 3 people you are sent to recruit.
Spoiler:
Man I totally called Jack as being such a lame lame character. As soon as I got her on board I've ignored her entirely, f you stupid character..
Is that the tattooed chick? That was the lamest character video I've ever seen, I have no idea what kind of target group she's designed for.
That's the one, I have had minimal interaction with the character so far, to the extent the only interaction I've had was story mandated. I have no idea, maybe teenagers who think rebels are so awesome? Seems like the kind of character you come up with when you are 15 and writing the coolest story ever.
"Ok so like this guy is covered in tattoos and he's like the toughest guy ever, and he takes no shit from everyone and like he's in prison but busts out because you can't like keep this guy down ever."
Posts
Wait.
Take THAT, roses!
or 'not applying a literalist viewpoint of the constitution'
you said you didn't see the point of applying the constitution
and you said there's precedent for judges not even 'basing' something on the constitution- as though that's a good thing
there's a difference between a living constitution and a total dismissal of the constitution's domain and application
what i'm saying is if you just want to 'wing it' and dismiss the constitution, it's tragic; you sure enjoy the many rights enumerated by said document
i am stunned that i'm the only one in disbelief by what you've said here
Man I totally called Jack as being such a lame lame character. As soon as I got her on board I've ignored her entirely, f you stupid character..
No, he just smears some of his on his lovers after taking it up the ass.
There's nothing wrong with wanting that, really, as long as you don't force someone into it.
And when you DO get someone like that... it's a glorious thing.
Forcing or buying someone into that role seems... wrong.
I don't really see the point in applying the constitution, and the rights enumerated within, to corporations. I see the point in applying rulings to corporations to ensure the rights enumerated within to citizens, and guess what? The decision the supreme court handed down is a pretty grave blow to democracy in my book. The only thing that court decision did was further consolidate political power into the hands of the few.
Do you... Do you even know how gay people have sex?
what you should be arguing for is certain rights to not be awarded to corporations as they are non citizens, non entities, non people, non rights bearers, non whatever
it is a far cry from what you actually said
either we are governed by a constitution or we are not
The issue that most of us have with he ruling is not, necessarily, about the constitution or the decision.
It's about the definitions used to come to the conclusion.
It defined "Free Speech" as receivership, to begin. It isn't about me or you or anyone else actually speaking but about the ability for you and me to hear what is being said. It sidestepped the corporate personhood question by creating some sort of inverse concept of free speech in which it is more important that we be able to "hear" what AIG has to say than for anyone to actually be able to speak.
Also, money is not speech.
From what they were saying they wanted it more like 'lady in the street, servant in the house, freak in the bed'. And while I'm sure none of them would admit to forcing anyone into the situation, they were all pretty damn clear on 'keeping them out of your money'.
Time for more tea, I think.
Spoiler to your spoiler I'm guessing early game.
Is that the krogan? After I got him I was sent to go get pissed off that ashely is still alive (I fucked her in the first game but regret that like space herpes). Still haven't let him out, my current crew is space boobs and garrus, because garrus is as always my homeboy.
YOU!
I WILL BE SENDING YOU A PM SHORTLY!
Is that the tattooed chick? That was the lamest character video I've ever seen, I have no idea what kind of target group she's designed for.
I would go with that team but M, is too much like my infiltrator I do love his conversation options.
namely SQL related services refusing to start
You telling me what I'm actually saying and what I ought to be arguing for I find to be quite hilarious.
smearing is involved.
I'D RATHER YOU DID NOT
IT'S IMPORTANT BUSINESS RELATED MATTERS!
I DO NOT WISH TO MAKE SEXY TIMES WITH YOU!
Actual Play: Mage: the Awakening - At the Edge of All Things
WELL THEN OK I GUESS
Yep.
Just in general I hate that 'lol I'm always angry and tryng to prove to the world that I'm a big dog' archetype.
You and me Bama. We're like this.
That's the one, I have had minimal interaction with the character so far, to the extent the only interaction I've had was story mandated. I have no idea, maybe teenagers who think rebels are so awesome? Seems like the kind of character you come up with when you are 15 and writing the coolest story ever.
"Ok so like this guy is covered in tattoos and he's like the toughest guy ever, and he takes no shit from everyone and like he's in prison but busts out because you can't like keep this guy down ever."
not what was said