Our new Indie Games subforum is now open for business in G&T. Go and check it out, you might land a code for a free game. If you're developing an indie game and want to post about it, follow these directions. If you don't, he'll break your legs! Hahaha! Seriously though.
Our rules have been updated and given their own forum. Go and look at them! They are nice, and there may be new ones that you didn't know about! Hooray for rules! Hooray for The System! Hooray for Conforming!

Collect 'em all games

TalkaTalka Registered User regular
Some friends of mine got drunk last night and ending up singing the Pokemon theme song for hours last night, and it got me reminiscing about the games. I "caught them all" in the first generation, caught a few in the second generation, and then forgot about the series for a decade or so and never bothered with the third or fourth generations.

I thought it might be fun to have another go at the games, so I borrowed Emerald from my roommate and gave it a few hours. Unfortunately, the games are actually pretty terrible. They were fun as escapist garbage when I was a child, but in mechanics/design/depth they're so outdated and shallow that they really aren't worth my time anymore.

I still have a collecting itch, though, and now I'm wondering if anyone ever successfully advanced the genre in the fourteen years since Pokemon came out. Specifically, I have a hankering for "catching them all," but in a package with the gameplay and graphics that can satisfy me now that I'm no longer the guy in middle school who found Pokemon Blue so entertaining.

So what sort of games are out there? I've heard mention of Monster Hunter over the years, but I wasn't impressed the one time I gave it a go a few years ago. Is that what I'm looking for? Should I give Pokemon another shot? What else is out there?

Talka on
«1

Posts

  • s_86s_86 Registered User regular
    -

    s_86 on
  • -Loki--Loki- Don't pee in my mouth and tell me it's raining. Registered User regular
    Monster Hunter? Not the same gameplay, but the whole goal is to go beat a monster, carve it up, and use the bits to go beat a bigger monster. And then carve that up and use it's bits to go beat a bigger monster. Forever. More like kill 'em all, unless you like live capturing all of them.

  • TalkaTalka Registered User regular
    s_86 wrote: »
    Pokemon Leaf Green (and other colors)? It's an updated port of the original Pokemon games for the Game Boy Advance. Good stuff.

    But that's still the same game as the one released fourteen years ago, right? No battle animations, take turns to choose between four attacks, no real plot? That's not enough for me.

  • ElinElin Registered User regular
    Talka wrote: »
    s_86 wrote: »
    Pokemon Leaf Green (and other colors)? It's an updated port of the original Pokemon games for the Game Boy Advance. Good stuff.

    But that's still the same game as the one released fourteen years ago, right? No battle animations, take turns to choose between four attacks, no real plot? That's not enough for me.

    Monster Rancher, Dragon Quest Monster: Joker, Shin Megami Tensei: Nocturn.

    Nocturn, if you aren't aware, is a weird as hell, hard as fuck RPG. You can negotiate with demons and they will join your party. You can then combine those demons into bigger more badass demons. If you enjoy JRPG's you may like this one.

  • TarranonTarranon Registered User regular
    Talka I'm kinda in the same boat as you. I can see where people like pokemon these days, there's lots of room for min maxing and some people like that kind of thing, but I can't really play them anymore.

    You should give persona 3/4 a shot. I've heard 4 is better but I've never played it. 3, though, I was getting some good collecting vibes going through. There are tons of persona(e?) in the game, and as you go on they just keep getting larger and more badass, and the sort of fluid way your team develops is cool. It's sort of an evolutionary path in the sense that when you start with certain persona they naturally develop into other types of persona, keeping certain abilities from prior generations, and then you get like 15 generations down the line and you just have insane combinations. I rather liked that aspect.

    Story s'okay too.

  • Eat it You Nasty Pig.Eat it You Nasty Pig. tell homeland security 'we are the bomb'Registered User regular
    I was finishing up pokemon platinum the other day and I thought about this exact thing. The mechanics in pokemon games are so simple and popular (I love filling bars!) that I'm surprised no one has taken it and really wrapped a more interesting game around them. On the other hand if anyone ever did, I might play it forever.

    You could try checking out the FFTactics series (and ogre battle and similar stuff.) It fed basically the same collect/develop impulse for me, and the combat and story are (slightly) more developed.

    ed: I played with digimon DS for about half an hour a while back and it seems a bit more complex, but also seemed like it suffered from most of the same issues the pokemon games do.

    hope? change? busproject.org
    my unofficial autobio will be accompanied with tips on how to smile
    cause I've found that when they don't see you frown, they never know that you're a threat
    and they don't sweat you when you came around
  • -SPI--SPI- Registered User regular
    Yeah go with a Shin Megami Tensei game, Nocturne or one of the Personas. They have a similar "catch em all" feel, but actually have more of a game around them. They don't feel stripped bare like Pokemon so often does.

  • FuriousJodoFuriousJodo Registered User regular
    Crackdown - though I guess it's a different sort of collect em all situation.

  • jothkijothki Registered User regular
    Does it have to be mons of some sort, or will other things work as well?

    If you're willing to go for RPGs that have some sort of collectable element to them, The World Ends with You might work.

  • -SPI--SPI- Registered User regular
    Also Enchanted Arms has a huge golem collection element to the game which feels a lot like a pokemon or SMT situation. Although to be honest I just stuck to the main characters and also the game is kind of mediocre.

  • ShivahnShivahn Registered User regular
    If you're in the mood for old school old school games, I enjoyed the game boy's Dragon Quest Monsters. Dragon Quest Monsters: Joker is ok, but I'm not as big a fan of it for some reason. I enjoyed it partially because breeding two different things gets a third thing. I used to have a binder with all the trees printed out.

    Like, breeding trees. Not the actual trees in the game. Those guys are scary.

  • WotanAnubisWotanAnubis Registered User regular
    Speaking of Shin Megami Tensei, Strange Journey is supposed to come out for the DS next week and it apparently sort of returns to Nocturne's demon gathering gameplay.

    Could be worth keeping an eye out for, I guess.

  • gunwarriorgunwarrior Registered User regular
    Disgaea

    There are always more powerful items, try to get all of them

    tf2_sig.png
  • SanderJKSanderJK Crocodylus Pontifex Sinterklasicus Madrid, 3000 ADRegistered User regular
    Disgaea is probably the best/worst, because you can grind current levels, total levels, character classes, spells, items, and item upgrades.

    Steam: SanderJK Origin: SanderJK
  • GoodOmensGoodOmens Registered User regular
    Borderlands has a similar feel, except instead of collecting electric mice you collect shotguns that shoot poison. OK, so it's not the same thing, but that "ooooh, what's this do?" feel is definitely strong.

    steam_sig.png
    IOS Game Center ID: Isotope-X
  • XagarathXagarath Registered User regular
    -SPI- wrote: »
    Yeah go with a Shin Megami Tensei game, Nocturne or one of the Personas. They have a similar "catch em all" feel, but actually have more of a game around them. They don't feel stripped bare like Pokemon so often does.

    This would be the way to go.

  • BelruelBelruel Registered User regular
    My favorite "collect all ___" after pokemans are the suikoden games. So many different stars of destiny to find and recruit.

    bounce.gif
  • KrathoonKrathoon Registered User regular
    All of the Donkey Kong games through Rare had intensive collecting. Donkey Kong 64 overdid it.

  • ConstrictorConstrictor The Dork Knight SuburbialandRegistered User regular
    Check out Fossil Fighter on the DS.

    My wife won it in a tricky tray and I had never heard of it before.

    I have over 60 hours logged on the game and I'm still going.

    Basically you dig up dinosaur fossils, clean them with drills and hammers, and revive the bones and force the revived dinosaurs (called vivosaurs) to fight for your pleasure. You collect up to 4 bones per vivosaur and they gain levels and powers as you collect more pieces and use them in battle.

    Very good game.

  • RentRent I'm always right Fuckin' deal with itRegistered User regular
    I was going to say TWEWY

    Good it's already mentioned

    Talka, get TWEWY

  • UncleSporkyUncleSporky Registered User regular
    Check out Fossil Fighter on the DS.

    My wife won it in a tricky tray and I had never heard of it before.

    I have over 60 hours logged on the game and I'm still going.

    Basically you dig up dinosaur fossils, clean them with drills and hammers, and revive the bones and force the revived dinosaurs (called vivosaurs) to fight for your pleasure. You collect up to 4 bones per vivosaur and they gain levels and powers as you collect more pieces and use them in battle.

    Very good game.

    Everyone panned this game before it came out, mostly because it looks and sounds like a knockoff and it was advertised on all the kid channels and magazines. I wondered how it would turn out.

    3DS Friend Code: 0989 - 1731 - 9504
    Nintendo Network ID: unclesporky
  • YggiDeeYggiDee Registered User regular
    Nth-ing the Nocturne suggestion

    it's like Pokemon meets Lovecraft meets the Book of Revelations.

    ...meets the hardest JRPG

    Pokemon Black 2 FC: 1292 0661 1499
  • ArkanArkan Registered User
    If you're just looking for collectathon gameplay and not necessarily monster catching, try Rare games. The Banjo-kazooie series is all on Xbox 360.

    Big, honkin' pile of WoW characters
    I think it's hard for someone not to rage at mario kart, while shouting "Fuck you Donkey Kong. Whose dick did you suck to get all those red shells?"
  • KrunkMcGrunkKrunkMcGrunk Registered User regular
    To see the current evolution of the "collect-em-all" genre, go play WoW.

    You will never. Stop. Playing.

    mrsatansig.png
  • GoodOmensGoodOmens Registered User regular
    It's a trap!

    steam_sig.png
    IOS Game Center ID: Isotope-X
  • CoreCore Registered User
    Gotta go with what someone said earlier, the Suikoden series. 108 characters to recruit every game, always fun to try and get them all. Plus they are awesome games.

    core_pa_sig.jpg
  • CenoCeno Chumble spuzz. Registered User regular
    I've never played a Pokemon game, and it hasn't been due to the fact that I'm a 30 year old grown-ass man or that the gameplay didn't look fun, it's honestly been for two reasons (the first being 90% of the reason):

    1) YOU CANNOT COLLECT ALL POKEMON IN ONE GODDAMN GAME. You have to get six versions and trade and download from retailers and god knows what else. Put out Pokemon Complete, and we'll talk.

    2) Nintendo doesn't use their skillions of dollars on decent production value. Nothing would hurt the design and gameplay of any of their series if they also happened to be gorgeous.

    steam_sig.png
    GFWL: Genesius Prime / PSN: Genesius_Prime / Origin: genesiusprime / 3DS: 4871-3718-5715
  • Fleck0Fleck0 Registered User regular
    I'd go with Shin Megami Tensei as well (in particular Devil Survivor for the DS, cause it's the one I own)

    It doesn't have the depth (IVs and EVS and crap) or amount of pets that pokemon has, but it does capture the "Gotta Catch 'em all!" flavor really well, and you'll spend plenty oh time trying to do so cause all the demons are pretty badass

    steam_sig.png
  • XagarathXagarath Registered User regular
    Ceno wrote: »
    I've never played a Pokemon game, and it hasn't been due to the fact that I'm a 30 year old grown-ass man or that the gameplay didn't look fun, it's honestly been for two reasons (the first being 90% of the reason):

    1) YOU CANNOT COLLECT ALL POKEMON IN ONE GODDAMN GAME. You have to get six versions and trade and download from retailers and god knows what else. Put out Pokemon Complete, and we'll talk.

    2) Nintendo doesn't use their skillions of dollars on decent production value. Nothing would hurt the design and gameplay of any of their series if they also happened to be gorgeous.

    The first point here is also why I refuse to buy any game in the series.

  • DeMoNDeMoN Registered User regular
    Xagarath wrote: »
    Ceno wrote: »
    I've never played a Pokemon game, and it hasn't been due to the fact that I'm a 30 year old grown-ass man or that the gameplay didn't look fun, it's honestly been for two reasons (the first being 90% of the reason):

    1) YOU CANNOT COLLECT ALL POKEMON IN ONE GODDAMN GAME. You have to get six versions and trade and download from retailers and god knows what else. Put out Pokemon Complete, and we'll talk.

    2) Nintendo doesn't use their skillions of dollars on decent production value. Nothing would hurt the design and gameplay of any of their series if they also happened to be gorgeous.

    The first point here is also why I refuse to buy any game in the series.

    That's a terrible reason! The games are super fun. Just pretend there's only 250 pokemon instead of 300 or whatever the hell the numbers are.

    PSN: Toxic_Cizzle Steam id : Toxic Cizzle
    *TyCart*_banner.jpg
  • Brainiac 8Brainiac 8 Registered User regular
    I could see people not being interested in Pokemon, but to call them shallow is incorrect.

    They are probably some of the deepest RPGs that you can find. Just talk to anyone (mostly adult) that is a hardcore battler in competitions and such. The intricacies of the stat building/natures/types/ etc are innumerable.

    I'm not into the hardcore battling, so I usually ignore all that, but they are by no means shallow.


    As far as collectathon type gaming, I also say you may like the Suikoden games. Suikoden II is by far the best one.

    3DS Friend Code - 1032-1293-2997
    Nintendo Network ID - Brainiac_8
    PSN - Brainiac_8
    Add me!
  • RentRent I'm always right Fuckin' deal with itRegistered User regular
    Yeah, what Brainiac 8 said

    Watching a level 100 Magikarp sweep a team of legendaries made me realize how deep the game was

    Either that or FEAR

  • travathiantravathian Registered User
    I think he meant depth as far as story, not depth as far as strategy layer.

  • TheUnsane1TheUnsane1 Registered User regular
    As a single player game Pokemon is pretty shallow for sure. Multiplayer... not even close. For me the king of all collection games would have to be Diablo 2 followed closely by WoW.

    steam_sig.png
  • CullenCullen Registered User
    Xagarath wrote: »
    Ceno wrote: »
    I've never played a Pokemon game, and it hasn't been due to the fact that I'm a 30 year old grown-ass man or that the gameplay didn't look fun, it's honestly been for two reasons (the first being 90% of the reason):

    1) YOU CANNOT COLLECT ALL POKEMON IN ONE GODDAMN GAME. You have to get six versions and trade and download from retailers and god knows what else. Put out Pokemon Complete, and we'll talk.

    2) Nintendo doesn't use their skillions of dollars on decent production value. Nothing would hurt the design and gameplay of any of their series if they also happened to be gorgeous.

    The first point here is also why I refuse to buy any game in the series.

    You do you know can trade with other people to get the ones that aren't in your version, and have been able to since the first gen? The current gen is online so you could trade either with people here, or with randoms on the Global Trade Service. I only have a copy of Pokemon Diamond this gen and I have all 493. I wonder how this could be...

    EDIT: actually you mentioned trading. Why on Earth wouldn't you want to?

    sig.gif
  • CenoCeno Chumble spuzz. Registered User regular
    Cullen wrote: »
    Xagarath wrote: »
    Ceno wrote: »
    I've never played a Pokemon game, and it hasn't been due to the fact that I'm a 30 year old grown-ass man or that the gameplay didn't look fun, it's honestly been for two reasons (the first being 90% of the reason):

    1) YOU CANNOT COLLECT ALL POKEMON IN ONE GODDAMN GAME. You have to get six versions and trade and download from retailers and god knows what else. Put out Pokemon Complete, and we'll talk.

    2) Nintendo doesn't use their skillions of dollars on decent production value. Nothing would hurt the design and gameplay of any of their series if they also happened to be gorgeous.

    The first point here is also why I refuse to buy any game in the series.

    You do you know can trade with other people to get the ones that aren't in your version, and have been able to since the first gen? The current gen is online so you could trade either with people here, or with randoms on the Global Trade Service. I only have a copy of Pokemon Diamond this gen and I have all 493. I wonder how this could be...

    EDIT: actually you mentioned trading. Why on Earth wouldn't you want to?

    Because multiplayer should never be necessary or prioritized in the completion of a game. This goes for achievements, unlocks, everything. It's a matter of principle, or at least a crotchety old back-in-my-day holdover. I'd even go so far as to lock out multiplayer until you've finished the single-player campaign.

    steam_sig.png
    GFWL: Genesius Prime / PSN: Genesius_Prime / Origin: genesiusprime / 3DS: 4871-3718-5715
  • ElinElin Registered User regular
    Ceno wrote: »
    Cullen wrote: »
    Xagarath wrote: »
    Ceno wrote: »
    I've never played a Pokemon game, and it hasn't been due to the fact that I'm a 30 year old grown-ass man or that the gameplay didn't look fun, it's honestly been for two reasons (the first being 90% of the reason):

    1) YOU CANNOT COLLECT ALL POKEMON IN ONE GODDAMN GAME. You have to get six versions and trade and download from retailers and god knows what else. Put out Pokemon Complete, and we'll talk.

    2) Nintendo doesn't use their skillions of dollars on decent production value. Nothing would hurt the design and gameplay of any of their series if they also happened to be gorgeous.

    The first point here is also why I refuse to buy any game in the series.

    You do you know can trade with other people to get the ones that aren't in your version, and have been able to since the first gen? The current gen is online so you could trade either with people here, or with randoms on the Global Trade Service. I only have a copy of Pokemon Diamond this gen and I have all 493. I wonder how this could be...

    EDIT: actually you mentioned trading. Why on Earth wouldn't you want to?

    Because multiplayer should never be necessary or prioritized in the completion of a game. This goes for achievements, unlocks, everything. It's a matter of principle, or at least a crotchety old back-in-my-day holdover. I'd even go so far as to lock out multiplayer until you've finished the single-player campaign.

    It's done that way on purpose to get kids to interact. Like that one game (that I can't remember the name of) that had the sun sensor in it so you would go outside to play it.

    edit: Boktai, that's the one.

  • Eat it You Nasty Pig.Eat it You Nasty Pig. tell homeland security 'we are the bomb'Registered User regular
    It seems really silly to stand on "I have to interact with others!" as a reason to not even play such games, especially now that "interacting with others" doesn't even mean that you need to have a buddy who has the other version.

    hope? change? busproject.org
    my unofficial autobio will be accompanied with tips on how to smile
    cause I've found that when they don't see you frown, they never know that you're a threat
    and they don't sweat you when you came around
  • PoochPooch Registered User regular
    Krathoon wrote: »
    All of the Donkey Kong games through Rare had intensive collecting. Donkey Kong 64 overdid it.

    I miss those games, though especially Banjo Kazooie. I've yet to see a platformer pull of a semi-open world with as much exploration as those N64 Rare ones.

  • PataPata Registered User regular
    Ceno wrote: »
    Because multiplayer should never be necessary or prioritized in the completion of a game. This goes for achievements, unlocks, everything. It's a matter of principle, or at least a crotchety old back-in-my-day holdover. I'd even go so far as to lock out multiplayer until you've finished the single-player campaign.

    You can easily beat the game with the Pokemon you get in the game itself! There are nearly 500 of them! Many of them pretty similar!

    If you're such a silly goose that not being able to do every single thing in a mulitplayer focused game without interacting with other people offends you then you have no hope.

    You don't need to buy another version, anyone who says so is the silliest of geese, just spend a few minutes asking for a trade. It's really easy.

    Spoiler:
Sign In or Register to comment.