Goose!That's me, honeyShow me the way home, honeyRegistered Userregular
edited August 2010
Man that website probably got more hits in the last 3 days than ever before and they are milking it for all they're worth. There's another post up today.
I am trying to figure out where they got these lofty expectations of GnT from.
Isn't shakespearessister the same crazy lady who said that Joss Whedon, and all men in heterosexual relationships were all rapists?
I'm pretty sure that's the fundamental tenet of feminism
what no shut up
it's a tenet of lunatics who use feminism as their cover for being fucking lunatics
I would tend to apply that to anyone who self-identifies as a feminist at this point in our societal evolution.
Nah, you just don't know what you're talking about. Plenty of reasonable feminists out there, only you're too dense to realize that the most vocal and crazy don't represent all feminists. It's like saying Pat Robertson is representative of Christians just because he gets lots of airtime and says crazy shit.
That very well may be.
However, in my opinion, identifying as a "feminist" carries the same weight as identifying as a "tea partier" or " --- supremacist". My interpretation would be that ideology only supports the betterment of society through a narrow scope of what that group considers acceptable.
There is so much bullshit in this thread. I am face palming so hard I am going to leave a permanent indent on my forehead. If you are offended by a fucking webcomic, I don't think there is any hope for you at all. What a bunch of super-sensitive bitches.
Isn't shakespearessister the same crazy lady who said that Joss Whedon, and all men in heterosexual relationships were all rapists?
I'm pretty sure that's the fundamental tenet of feminism
what no shut up
it's a tenet of lunatics who use feminism as their cover for being fucking lunatics
I would tend to apply that to anyone who self-identifies as a feminist at this point in our societal evolution.
Nah, you just don't know what you're talking about. Plenty of reasonable feminists out there, only you're too dense to realize that the most vocal and crazy don't represent all feminists. It's like saying Pat Robertson is representative of Christians just because he gets lots of airtime and says crazy shit.
the loudmouth christians like him are just as capable of turning people off to religion as crazy feminists are. Most catholic priests are not pedophiles, yet it has had a clear impact on the religion and its following.
thanks for going off on your little tangent I guess, though I don't see how it contributes
Isn't shakespearessister the same crazy lady who said that Joss Whedon, and all men in heterosexual relationships were all rapists?
I'm pretty sure that's the fundamental tenet of feminism
what no shut up
it's a tenet of lunatics who use feminism as their cover for being fucking lunatics
I would tend to apply that to anyone who self-identifies as a feminist at this point in our societal evolution.
...
i would call myself a feminist because i think women have yet to achieve socioeconomic equality with men, so there is still a place for such advocacy
am i a lunatic because i want to be paid the same wage for the same work that a man does
This right here would be something to which I take objection. The debate is framed within a context of "man vs women", not inequity of pay, which would seemingly be a larger issue.
LTM on
0
Options
Quoththe RavenMiami, FL FOR REALRegistered Userregular
Isn't shakespearessister the same crazy lady who said that Joss Whedon, and all men in heterosexual relationships were all rapists?
I'm pretty sure that's the fundamental tenet of feminism
what no shut up
it's a tenet of lunatics who use feminism as their cover for being fucking lunatics
I would tend to apply that to anyone who self-identifies as a feminist at this point in our societal evolution.
Nah, you just don't know what you're talking about. Plenty of reasonable feminists out there, only you're too dense to realize that the most vocal and crazy don't represent all feminists. It's like saying Pat Robertson is representative of Christians just because he gets lots of airtime and says crazy shit.
That very well may be.
However, in my opinion, identifying as a "feminist" carries the same weight as identifying as a "tea partier" or " --- supremacist". My interpretation would be that ideology only supports the betterment of society through a narrow scope of what that group considers acceptable.
So I was right, you don't know what you're talking about. Thanks for clearing that up.
Isn't shakespearessister the same crazy lady who said that Joss Whedon, and all men in heterosexual relationships were all rapists?
I'm pretty sure that's the fundamental tenet of feminism
what no shut up
it's a tenet of lunatics who use feminism as their cover for being fucking lunatics
I would tend to apply that to anyone who self-identifies as a feminist at this point in our societal evolution.
...
i would call myself a feminist because i think women have yet to achieve socioeconomic equality with men, so there is still a place for such advocacy
am i a lunatic because i want to be paid the same wage for the same work that a man does
This right here would be something to which I take objection. The debate is framed within a context of "man vs women", not inequity of pay, which would seemingly be a larger issue.
uh, when women consistently get paid less for doing the exact same work as men, how else do you frame it?
Isn't shakespearessister the same crazy lady who said that Joss Whedon, and all men in heterosexual relationships were all rapists?
I'm pretty sure that's the fundamental tenet of feminism
what no shut up
it's a tenet of lunatics who use feminism as their cover for being fucking lunatics
I would tend to apply that to anyone who self-identifies as a feminist at this point in our societal evolution.
...
i would call myself a feminist because i think women have yet to achieve socioeconomic equality with men, so there is still a place for such advocacy
am i a lunatic because i want to be paid the same wage for the same work that a man does
This right here would be something to which I take objection. The debate is framed within a context of "man vs women", not inequity of pay, which would seemingly be a larger issue.
Unless you rape me while i'm raping you while you rape me..recursive rape!
We'd be raping each other, forever
Darmak on
0
Options
Goose!That's me, honeyShow me the way home, honeyRegistered Userregular
edited August 2010
Man that website probably got more hits in the last 3 days than ever before and they are milking it for all they're worth. There's another post up today.
I am trying to figure out where they got these lofty expectations of GnT from.
Man that website probably got more hits in the last 3 days than ever before and they are milking it for all they're worth. There's another post up today.
I am trying to figure out where they got these lofty expectations of GnT from.
Isn't shakespearessister the same crazy lady who said that Joss Whedon, and all men in heterosexual relationships were all rapists?
I'm pretty sure that's the fundamental tenet of feminism
what no shut up
it's a tenet of lunatics who use feminism as their cover for being fucking lunatics
I would tend to apply that to anyone who self-identifies as a feminist at this point in our societal evolution.
Nah, you just don't know what you're talking about. Plenty of reasonable feminists out there, only you're too dense to realize that the most vocal and crazy don't represent all feminists. It's like saying Pat Robertson is representative of Christians just because he gets lots of airtime and says crazy shit.
That very well may be.
However, in my opinion, identifying as a "feminist" carries the same weight as identifying as a "tea partier" or " --- supremacist". My interpretation would be that ideology only supports the betterment of society through a narrow scope of what that group considers acceptable.
Really?
So because I want to earn the same salary as someone with a dick, I'm crazy?
Man that website probably got more hits in the last 3 days than ever before and they are milking it for all they're worth. There's another post up today.
I am trying to figure out where they got these lofty expectations of GnT from.
I wonder if it will top Fat Princess debacle of aught 8.
November6 on
fucos: Past tense of focus, you have already lost focus that you can't even spell focus. Can be combined with shit for impressing anonymous crowds; fucoshit. source: Wil Weaton
0
Options
Goose!That's me, honeyShow me the way home, honeyRegistered Userregular
edited August 2010
P.S. they're reading these threads and are very disappointed in us and our stream of rape jokes.
i would call myself a feminist because i think women have yet to achieve socioeconomic equality with men, so there is still a place for such advocacy
am i a lunatic because i want to be paid the same wage for the same work that a man does
This I have no issue with, there's honest to god misogyny going on out there and speaking out about it should be commended. But when people look for issues where there are none, and freak out about non offensive things because everyone has to speak in a completely politically correct fashion in fear of offending others it takes the spotlight away from real issues and places them on non issues. I also like how people who comment on the blogger's board disagreeing with the blogger are moderated, their posts deleted and replaced by calling them rapists. Censorship is the first form of admitting you can't win a debate.
i would call myself a feminist because i think women have yet to achieve socioeconomic equality with men, so there is still a place for such advocacy
am i a lunatic because i want to be paid the same wage for the same work that a man does
This I have no issue with, there's honest to god misogyny going on out there and speaking out about it should be commended. But when people look for issues where there are none, and freak out about non offensive things because everyone has to speak in a completely politically correct fashion in fear of offending others it takes the spotlight away from real issues and places them on non issues. I also like how people who comment on the blogger's board disagreeing with the blogger are moderated, their posts deleted and replaced by calling them rapists. Censorship is the first form of admitting you can't win a debate.
well yes, but to say that the root of that behavior is feminism is just silly
I'm fine with feminists like Quoth who are for /fight for equality. I'm not for "feminists" like our article-writing friend who are for tipping the scales in women's favor at the expense of men: their goal isn't equality but punishing men-folk for crimes they may or may not have committed. Their complaints ring hollow due to their ulterior motive. And just like with furries, the extremists have hijacked the term and made the movement seem like she-womyn man-haters who want a utopia filled with lesbians who have figured out how to reproduce without men who also are all now dead (which is why it's a utopia: only men create war, violence, and strife you see) so that's why people are wary of women who self-identify as being a feminist.
i would call myself a feminist because i think women have yet to achieve socioeconomic equality with men, so there is still a place for such advocacy
am i a lunatic because i want to be paid the same wage for the same work that a man does
This I have no issue with, there's honest to god misogyny going on out there and speaking out about it should be commended. But when people look for issues where there are none, and freak out about non offensive things because everyone has to speak in a completely politically correct fashion in fear of offending others it takes the spotlight away from real issues and places them on non issues. I also like how people who comment on the blogger's board disagreeing with the blogger are moderated, their posts deleted and replaced by calling them rapists. Censorship is the first form of admitting you can't win a debate.
The annoying part isn't that some people get offended by humor. It's that a subsection of that group takes it upon themselves to make sure that they make as many people aware of the fact that they're offended as possible. You can be offended till your little heart's content. Just shut the fuck up about it.
You know what offends me?
No, you don't.
Because I keep my fucking mouth shut.
That one stupid fuck finds something offensive is a tidbit of useless information too useless even for the internet.
I'm fine with feminists like Quoth who are for /fight for equality. I'm not for "feminists" like our article-writing friend who are for tipping the scales in women's favor at the expense of men: their goal isn't equality but punishing men-folk for crimes they may or may not have committed. Their complaints ring hollow due to their ulterior motive. And just like with furries, the extremists have hijacked the term and made the movement seem like she-womyn man-haters who want a utopia filled with lesbians who have figured out how to reproduce without men who also are all now dead (which is why it's a utopia: only men create war, violence, and strife you see) so that's why people are wary of women who self-identify as being a feminist.
and people are wary of gamers because they like to shoot up schools
Posts
I am trying to figure out where they got these lofty expectations of GnT from.
That very well may be.
However, in my opinion, identifying as a "feminist" carries the same weight as identifying as a "tea partier" or " --- supremacist". My interpretation would be that ideology only supports the betterment of society through a narrow scope of what that group considers acceptable.
Oh Tobias, you blowhard!
Silly geese like Sarah Palin, who use feminism as some sort of rallying call for women, are.
no, you're a lunatic because you're a woman
thanks for going off on your little tangent I guess, though I don't see how it contributes
This right here would be something to which I take objection. The debate is framed within a context of "man vs women", not inequity of pay, which would seemingly be a larger issue.
it is true, this vagina has cursed me from birth to be insane
I have no idea. I've gotten into a "mood"...
I'm...sorry
So I was right, you don't know what you're talking about. Thanks for clearing that up.
Don't be silly
Shes not a feminist.
She's a Grizzliest.
uh, when women consistently get paid less for doing the exact same work as men, how else do you frame it?
As in she is someone who rapes grizzly bears?
Wait, why the hell is feminism men vs. women?
We'd be raping each other, forever
I am trying to figure out where they got these lofty expectations of GnT from.
rapetown
Empathetic sons of bitches.
Really?
So because I want to earn the same salary as someone with a dick, I'm crazy?
You're coming off as extremely ignorant.
I wonder if it will top Fat Princess debacle of aught 8.
Well if that dosnt just rape me in the ass.
It's been a low flow day, yeah
We can step it up though
this feels like the "i love to laugh" scene from mary poppins
This I have no issue with, there's honest to god misogyny going on out there and speaking out about it should be commended. But when people look for issues where there are none, and freak out about non offensive things because everyone has to speak in a completely politically correct fashion in fear of offending others it takes the spotlight away from real issues and places them on non issues. I also like how people who comment on the blogger's board disagreeing with the blogger are moderated, their posts deleted and replaced by calling them rapists. Censorship is the first form of admitting you can't win a debate.
It's going to have to wait in line, I'm still raping you and probably won't be done for another 5-6 hours or so.
well yes, but to say that the root of that behavior is feminism is just silly
Just like Sarah Palin's Facebook wall
I'm fairly certain that their disapproval indicates that we're doing something right.
You know what offends me?
No, you don't.
Because I keep my fucking mouth shut.
That one stupid fuck finds something offensive is a tidbit of useless information too useless even for the internet.
and people are wary of gamers because they like to shoot up schools