the basic premise of it is that racism is still alive. the idea is that while've encouraged diversity and tolerance (much less successfully than one would think), we haven't at all pushed equality and justice.
the basic premise of it is that racism is still alive. the idea is that while've encouraged diversity and tolerance (much less successfully than one would think), we haven't at all pushed equality and justice.
the basic premise of it is that racism is still alive. the idea is that while've encouraged diversity and tolerance (much less successfully than one would think), we haven't at all pushed equality and justice.
first reactions?
I'm sorry, I live in Canada. :P
James on
0
Options
Zen VulgarityWhat a lovely day for teaSecret British ThreadRegistered Userregular
the basic premise of it is that racism is still alive. the idea is that while've encouraged diversity and tolerance (much less successfully than one would think), we haven't at all pushed equality and justice.
Are you kidding me? Puppies are fucking adorable. Who doesn't love puppies? Bunnies on the other hand, are fucking evil. I once saw a bunny attack a squirrel outside of my house, they chased eachother for hours.
To be fair though, the squirrel did start it.
Bunnies aren't just cute like everybody suppose
They got them hoppy legs and twitchy little noses
And what's with all the carrots?
What do they need such good eyesight for anyway?:whistle:
the basic premise of it is that racism is still alive.
This premise is not controversial in academia, given that academics study actual data and are not retards.
the idea is that while've encouraged diversity and tolerance (much less successfully than one would think), we haven't at all pushed equality and justice.
I don't know enough about what you mean by these terms to know if they constitute an interesting thesis.
Good luck, though.
MrMister on
0
Options
HacksawJ. Duggan Esq.Wrestler at LawRegistered Userregular
the basic premise of it is that racism is still alive.
This premise is not controversial in academia, given that academics study actual data and are not retards.
the idea is that while've encouraged diversity and tolerance (much less successfully than one would think), we haven't at all pushed equality and justice.
I don't know enough about what you mean by these terms to know if they constitute an interesting thesis.
Good luck, though.
The implication, I guess, is that we are focused more on being content to say 'everyone's okay and racism is bad mmkay?' than actually saying 'not only that, but how about actually giving formerly oppressed people a real chance to play on an even field'?
the basic premise of it is that racism is still alive.
This premise is not controversial in academia, given that academics study actual data and are not retards.
the idea is that while've encouraged diversity and tolerance (much less successfully than one would think), we haven't at all pushed equality and justice.
I don't know enough about what you mean by these terms to know if they constitute an interesting thesis.
Good luck, though.
it's an article for the student newspaper, not for anything academic.
it's an article for the student newspaper, not for anything academic.
an op-ed piece, if you will.
Ooooh, I thought you meant, like, academic journal article.
In that case, carry on and educate the fuckers. People who act like racial equality already happened sometime in the late 60s are one of my number one pet peeves.
Posts
Why does the "race dating" thread exist?
I mean, what the Christ?
...
I don't even know where to find your family.
in other news, i am crafting an article.
the basic premise of it is that racism is still alive. the idea is that while've encouraged diversity and tolerance (much less successfully than one would think), we haven't at all pushed equality and justice.
first reactions?
puppies
police officers
farmers
hippies
prison guards
Or you would bro rape me. One of the two.
Everyone will call you a racist.
I'm sorry, I live in Canada. :P
I'm sorry you're a bunch of inbreds. :P
I'd start a thread, but I really fucking hate the "_______ has outraged me!" trend in threads.
Because that would be an insult to black people.
South Park.
Haven't watched it in 4+ years.
Bunnies on the other hand, are fucking evil. I once saw a bunny attack a squirrel outside of my house, they chased eachother for hours.
To be fair though, the squirrel did start it.
Not Al Sharpton.
Oh. Old man.
They got them hoppy legs and twitchy little noses
And what's with all the carrots?
What do they need such good eyesight for anyway?:whistle:
Yes.
But merely middle aged compared with Jeff and Will.
They are in their early thirties.
Oh fuck.
An angrier, bitterer man.
Why not just put a crown on him?
Anything over twenty is old here.
This premise is not controversial in academia, given that academics study actual data and are not retards.
I don't know enough about what you mean by these terms to know if they constitute an interesting thesis.
Good luck, though.
The implication, I guess, is that we are focused more on being content to say 'everyone's okay and racism is bad mmkay?' than actually saying 'not only that, but how about actually giving formerly oppressed people a real chance to play on an even field'?
Games: Ad Astra Per Phalla | Choose Your Own Phalla
it's an article for the student newspaper, not for anything academic.
an op-ed piece, if you will.
Am I doing it right?
But being over twenty doesn't stop me from being immature, right?
I don't want to be an old man.
Hush up grandpa.
Ooooh, I thought you meant, like, academic journal article.
In that case, carry on and educate the fuckers. People who act like racial equality already happened sometime in the late 60s are one of my number one pet peeves.
prison guards
police officers
hippies
Though, depending on my mood, hippies can switch from 4th to 2nd.
Puppies don't make the list, because puppies are awesome.
first one is clickable