I would love for everyone to expound on the issue because I don't understand the argument.
as in I don't get what either side is saying.
Men say women are emotional then say reason is the ultimate power in the universe because it is all about being rational and unemotional thus it opresses women.
Kagera on
My neck, my back, my FUPA and my crack.
0
Donkey KongPutting Nintendo out of business with AI nipsRegistered Userregular
Smart people will notice where I'm from, it's 3am.
This is because I'm up for an early morning code release.
An early morning code release which, according to my emails, has been cancelled.
Fun*!
*Not really
RMS Oceanic on
0
JacobkoshGamble a stamp.I can show you how to be a real man!Moderatormod
edited November 2010
Hello. I am your friendly D&D mod for tonight, here to tell you that generally speaking, we prefer it when people say things and explain what they mean instead of darkly hinting at their possible meanings.
Jacobkosh on
0
AriviaI Like A ChallengeEarth-1Registered Userregular
edited November 2010
J: Alcoff on emotion, Vandana Shiva for how we interpret emotion into women's knowledge. Merchant if you really want to have fun!
Pony: Jacob wants us to cool it, so I won't countertroll. Thanks for playing, though.
We need to decouple logical systems from being the only right or proper answer to a question/inquiry, and accept that "reasonable" thought is transitive, contextual, and embodies power relations within it. Illogical as a disparaging remark needs to be stopped; we need to move towards understanding and reclaiming logic, emotion, and others as acceptable and reasonable approaches in and of themselves and stop thinking of them as being antithetical. Such an approach also attacks the privilege inherent in proper, schooled, or learned thought by understanding context and self-determination as integral to any life and freeing reason from the academy.
Hello. I am your friendly D&D mod for tonight, here to tell you that generally speaking, we prefer it when people say things and explain what they mean instead of darkly hinting at their possible meanings.
I'm with matt, philosophy is best taken in drinking-song form
Senjutsu on
0
Donkey KongPutting Nintendo out of business with AI nipsRegistered Userregular
edited November 2010
It's like in an anime where they're talking about scientific principles and they start using phrases like "conservation of mass" and "laws of thermodynamics" in the same sentences as "the power of our friendship" and "the energy of our suffering".
It makes my brain leak out.
Donkey Kong on
Thousands of hot, local singles are waiting to play at bubbulon.com.
We need to decouple logical systems from being the only right or proper answer to a question/inquiry, and accept that "reasonable" thought is transitive, contextual, and embodies power relations within it. Illogical as a disparaging remark needs to be stopped; we need to move towards understanding and reclaiming logic, emotion, and others as acceptable and reasonable approaches in and of themselves and stop thinking of them as being antithetical. Such an approach also attacks the privilege inherent in proper, schooled, or learned thought by understanding context and self-determination as integral to any life and freeing reason from the academy.
Your argument relies upon the rules you seek to refute.
I guess my confusion is coming from the idea that i see logic and rationality primarily as tools for solving problems
I've never thought of emotion as a tool for solving a problem. it should definitely factor in to HOW you solve problems, since we're all human and we all feel things, and those should be taken into account. but I have trouble imagining approaching a problem, and then wielding emotion to hammer it out
We need to decouple logical systems from being the only right or proper answer to a question/inquiry, and accept that "reasonable" thought is transitive, contextual, and embodies power relations within it. Illogical as a disparaging remark needs to be stopped; we need to move towards understanding and reclaiming logic, emotion, and others as acceptable and reasonable approaches in and of themselves and stop thinking of them as being antithetical. Such an approach also attacks the privilege inherent in proper, schooled, or learned thought by understanding context and self-determination as integral to any life and freeing reason from the academy.
Your argument relies upon the rules you seek to refute.
Ahah, I know intro WMST classes give you a lot of little tools to unpack and use, but playing shake them up and put them in random order on the page doesn't get you any sort of cogent argument.
I guess my confusion is coming from the idea that i see logic and rationality primarily as tools for solving problems
I've never thought of emotion as a tool for solving a problem. it should definitely factor in to HOW you solve problems, since we're all human and we all feel things, and those should be taken into account. but I have trouble imagining approaching a problem, and then wielding emotion to hammer it out
This is a fairly common feature of western thinking, but it's important to realize that the belief that rationality and logic as the only tools for deriving truth are neither universal nor grounded in fact.
Posts
Men say women are emotional then say reason is the ultimate power in the universe because it is all about being rational and unemotional thus it opresses women.
Your mother!
This is because I'm up for an early morning code release.
An early morning code release which, according to my emails, has been cancelled.
Fun*!
*Not really
Pony: Jacob wants us to cool it, so I won't countertroll. Thanks for playing, though.
We need to decouple logical systems from being the only right or proper answer to a question/inquiry, and accept that "reasonable" thought is transitive, contextual, and embodies power relations within it. Illogical as a disparaging remark needs to be stopped; we need to move towards understanding and reclaiming logic, emotion, and others as acceptable and reasonable approaches in and of themselves and stop thinking of them as being antithetical. Such an approach also attacks the privilege inherent in proper, schooled, or learned thought by understanding context and self-determination as integral to any life and freeing reason from the academy.
What are you trying to say
There is a distinction to be made between knowledge and truth functionality within arithmetic systems.
Wilhelm Friedrick Hegel
It makes my brain leak out.
what exactly does an emotional approach to something entail?
On the black screen
Fuzzy logic is a means of sustaining the Ursidaearchy
And that is when I stopped watching anime entirely and I will never ever watch it again.
Your argument relies upon the rules you seek to refute.
More like say "What the fuck?" a few more times.
hey
you just made me realize I could totally star in a Uwe Boll film
brb filming demo tape
@kagera: haha, of course!
Here, hold on to my innocuous black notebook.
In fact, it's a present! Why don't you write your name in it?
Non-rational feewings?
Was that the original one? I don't remember that in brotherhood.
One of the sub-teams at work called themselves the
philosoraptors
It was the original one. I was more let down than the time I got a trampoline for christmas but I was too fat to use it.
Headdesk's Law
Steam | Twitter
I've never thought of emotion as a tool for solving a problem. it should definitely factor in to HOW you solve problems, since we're all human and we all feel things, and those should be taken into account. but I have trouble imagining approaching a problem, and then wielding emotion to hammer it out
On the black screen
Well the original one quickly went off the manga. Brotherhood is much better.
Just out of curiosity DK, are you the Donkey Kong on the mc forums who did all the work on biomes?
This is a fairly common feature of western thinking, but it's important to realize that the belief that rationality and logic as the only tools for deriving truth are neither universal nor grounded in fact.