It's a series of 5 lectures by physicist Nima Arkani-Hamed which is an excellent summation of what is up in physics lately. And some very good explanations of what might be found at the large hadron collider.
I've had it opened in a tab since you last linked it but haven't gotten around to watching it yet.
Sarksus on
0
BobCescaIs a girlBirmingham, UKRegistered Userregular
edited November 2010
I am suffering from post-London sinus problems.
It's kinda minging.
BobCesca on
0
MrMisterJesus dying on the cross in pain? Morally better than us. One has to go "all in".Registered Userregular
A prohibition against expression of opinion, without any evidence that the rule is necessary to avoid substantial interference with school discipline or the rights of others, is not permissible under the First and Fourteenth Amendments.
There needs to be a finding to the effect that there is substantial interference with school discipline and the rights of others. And being offended, or exposed to contradictory opinion, is explicitly designated as insufficient.
MrMister on
0
ThomamelasOnly one man can kill this many Russians. Bring his guitar to me! Registered Userregular
Whereas I am really digging the Avengers because they've never really done a full-on, unapologetically epic, Stan Lee-style Marvel cartoon before. If you'd told me a year ago that I'd ever see Arnim Zola or Mandrill in a cartoon, I'd have laughed. But they've got those AND plots that are faithful to the early age of Marvel AND some really dead-on characterizations of some of my favorite characters.
The use of an LMD with Fury was a nice touch.
Yeah, it's a lot of little stuff like that that I'm digging - Ultrons as prison guards, cameos from actual SHIELD agents, Wolverine in WWII, etc.
A prohibition against expression of opinion, without any evidence that the rule is necessary to avoid substantial interference with school discipline or the rights of others, is not permissible under the First and Fourteenth Amendments.
[/QUOTE]
There needs to be a finding to the effect that there is substantial interference with school discipline and the rights of others. And being offended, or exposed to contradictory opinion, is explicitly designated as insufficient.[/QUOTE]
Doesn't take a genius to see that wearing t-shirts specifically meant to aggravate interferes with school discipline. Its like with those kids in CA who wore American Flag shirts just to aggravate hispanics on hispanic-pride day.
Tinker notwithstanding, most cases about free speech in schools go against the students.
It depends. Is the speech obscene? Is it in a reasonable time and place? Is the school engaging in viewpoint discrimination? (e.g. they are allowed to shut down all clubs, but not to shut down one club), and etc.
I don't think free speech rights in school are as strong as they should be, but they are most certainly there.
There needs to be a finding to the effect that there is substantial interference with school discipline and the rights of others. And being offended, or exposed to contradictory opinion, is explicitly designated as insufficient.
So you can't see how a quote affirming that it is just to kill homosexuals, worn on a day designed to foster a safe environment for gay students, would substantially interfere with school discipline and the right of certain students to not be assailed with inflammatory religious rhetoric?
I was thinking that if Netflix wants to call itself a streaming company it should have a hell of a lot more of its library available for streaming. They can call themselves a streaming company when every season of Top Gear is available!
I thought they had most of new format up for streaming, and really you aren't missing out on to much with the older stuff. Although seeing a young Jeremy Clarkson is pretty bizarre and interesting.
Whereas I am really digging the Avengers because they've never really done a full-on, unapologetically epic, Stan Lee-style Marvel cartoon before. If you'd told me a year ago that I'd ever see Arnim Zola or Mandrill in a cartoon, I'd have laughed. But they've got those AND plots that are faithful to the early age of Marvel AND some really dead-on characterizations of some of my favorite characters.
The use of an LMD with Fury was a nice touch.
Yeah, it's a lot of little stuff like that that I'm digging - Ultrons as prison guards, cameos from actual SHIELD agents, Wolverine in WWII, etc.
Doesn't take a genius to see that wearing t-shirts specifically meant to aggravate interferes with school discipline. Its like with those kids in CA who wore American Flag shirts just to aggravate hispanics on hispanic-pride day.
I bet you dollars to donuts those flag shirts were entirely protected speech. Overt political symbols are, like, the paradigm case.
School discipline does not mean "keeping people's feathers from getting ruffled." It means preventing literal brawls, allowing class to proceed, e.g. teachers silencing students who are trying to talk during lecture, and etc.
It's a good thing, too, otherwise those tinker kids would have had to lose the armbands.
MrMister on
0
ThomamelasOnly one man can kill this many Russians. Bring his guitar to me! Registered Userregular
So make the threat once and then the reminders that lack the explicit threat become okay?
Yeah its not like they hadn't already delivered the message they were going for. And again this came during a week preaching tolerance, which shows this was the parents using their kids to be good little christian asshole bigots.
Preacher on
I would like some money because these are artisanal nuggets of wisdom philistine.
There needs to be a finding to the effect that there is substantial interference with school discipline and the rights of others. And being offended, or exposed to contradictory opinion, is explicitly designated as insufficient.
So you can't see how a quote affirming that it is just to kill homosexuals, worn on a day designed to foster a safe environment for gay students, would substantially interfere with school discipline and the right of certain students to not be assailed with inflammatory religious rhetoric?
That, importantly, is not a right.
MrMister on
0
SarksusATTACK AND DETHRONE GODRegistered Userregular
I was thinking that if Netflix wants to call itself a streaming company it should have a hell of a lot more of its library available for streaming. They can call themselves a streaming company when every season of Top Gear is available!
I thought they had most of new format up for streaming, and really you aren't missing out on to much with the older stuff. Although seeing a young Jeremy Clarkson is pretty bizarre and interesting.
They only have seasons nine through twelve and some of the episodes are missing in a few of them. I've finished those already! I'd rather see everything rather than only some and then not have anything to watch.
Sarksus on
0
ThomamelasOnly one man can kill this many Russians. Bring his guitar to me! Registered Userregular
Doesn't take a genius to see that wearing t-shirts specifically meant to aggravate interferes with school discipline. Its like with those kids in CA who wore American Flag shirts just to aggravate hispanics on hispanic-pride day.
I bet you dollars to donuts those flag shirts were entirely protected speech. Overt political symbols are, like, the paradigm case.
School discipline does not mean "keeping people's feathers from getting ruffled." It means preventing literal brawls, allowing class to proceed, e.g. teachers silencing students who are trying to talk during lecture, and etc.
It's a good thing, too, otherwise those tinker kids would have had to lose the armbands.
You'd lose. The case for the biblical message being an implied threat is pretty easy. Without that passage, you'd be right. With it, those kids get laughed out of court.
Doesn't take a genius to see that wearing t-shirts specifically meant to aggravate interferes with school discipline. Its like with those kids in CA who wore American Flag shirts just to aggravate hispanics on hispanic-pride day.
I bet you dollars to donuts those flag shirts were entirely protected speech. Overt political symbols are, like, the paradigm case.
School discipline does not mean "keeping people's feathers from getting ruffled." It means preventing literal brawls, allowing class to proceed, e.g. teachers silencing students who are trying to talk during lecture, and etc.
It's a good thing, too, otherwise those tinker kids would have had to lose the armbands.
Actually it means enforcing a productive and smooth learning environment. Blocking offensive speech or actions falls under that provision, particularly when it creates a hostile environment for another group of students, in this case the gay students.
Styrofoam Sammich on
0
AriviaI Like A ChallengeEarth-1Registered Userregular
Posts
Wait what
I've had it opened in a tab since you last linked it but haven't gotten around to watching it yet.
It's kinda minging.
There needs to be a finding to the effect that there is substantial interference with school discipline and the rights of others. And being offended, or exposed to contradictory opinion, is explicitly designated as insufficient.
Did you miss this part:
Students have much less leeway when it comes to making threats.
But see thom administrators didn't read that as a threat...
pleasepaypreacher.net
further on it goes to say some kids wore shirts without that part
haha i was convinced somehow that yesterday was not thursday
i have no idea why
Yeah, it's a lot of little stuff like that that I'm digging - Ultrons as prison guards, cameos from actual SHIELD agents, Wolverine in WWII, etc.
she said you were eating like a mountain
but
i guess she thinks you might have taken offense
[/QUOTE]
There needs to be a finding to the effect that there is substantial interference with school discipline and the rights of others. And being offended, or exposed to contradictory opinion, is explicitly designated as insufficient.[/QUOTE]
Doesn't take a genius to see that wearing t-shirts specifically meant to aggravate interferes with school discipline. Its like with those kids in CA who wore American Flag shirts just to aggravate hispanics on hispanic-pride day.
Actually lately I have been a very lackadaisical cyclist.
I'm going to have a go at a potential commute route that doesn't seem quite so much like urban combat, though, so hopefully that will change.
It depends. Is the speech obscene? Is it in a reasonable time and place? Is the school engaging in viewpoint discrimination? (e.g. they are allowed to shut down all clubs, but not to shut down one club), and etc.
I don't think free speech rights in school are as strong as they should be, but they are most certainly there.
So you can't see how a quote affirming that it is just to kill homosexuals, worn on a day designed to foster a safe environment for gay students, would substantially interfere with school discipline and the right of certain students to not be assailed with inflammatory religious rhetoric?
https://twitter.com/Hooraydiation
So make the threat once and then the reminders that lack the explicit threat become okay?
So no offence taken, worry about it not.
They mostly sleep like rocks.
They eat continents.
I thought they had most of new format up for streaming, and really you aren't missing out on to much with the older stuff. Although seeing a young Jeremy Clarkson is pretty bizarre and interesting.
twitch.tv/tehsloth
It's pretty easy to lose your sense of time without some sort of structure.
I noticed Maria Hill. Doc Samson as well.
Some mountains are on special basalt-restricted diets
different kids
I bet you dollars to donuts those flag shirts were entirely protected speech. Overt political symbols are, like, the paradigm case.
School discipline does not mean "keeping people's feathers from getting ruffled." It means preventing literal brawls, allowing class to proceed, e.g. teachers silencing students who are trying to talk during lecture, and etc.
It's a good thing, too, otherwise those tinker kids would have had to lose the armbands.
Same message.
Yeah its not like they hadn't already delivered the message they were going for. And again this came during a week preaching tolerance, which shows this was the parents using their kids to be good little christian asshole bigots.
pleasepaypreacher.net
That, importantly, is not a right.
They only have seasons nine through twelve and some of the episodes are missing in a few of them. I've finished those already! I'd rather see everything rather than only some and then not have anything to watch.
You'd lose. The case for the biblical message being an implied threat is pretty easy. Without that passage, you'd be right. With it, those kids get laughed out of court.
i'm not contesting that fuck-with-gay-kids is a shitty message
I'm generally of the opinion that it is a bad law.
Actually it means enforcing a productive and smooth learning environment. Blocking offensive speech or actions falls under that provision, particularly when it creates a hostile environment for another group of students, in this case the gay students.
I'd generally agree, with exceptions, and schools are one of them.
we had a teacher try to do that to us once and she just wound up finding out that a bunch of 5th grade boys are perfectly okay with subverting others
i don't know what this is or means
you are talking in riddles, sir
You second rule of school club is dicks get whipped.
There, education sorted.
housin dem puppies