Well the makeup of semen is more... favorable for ingestion. Cooch-plegm-sauce basically tastes like you're eating a really wet runny nose, because, well, that's basically what it is.
The first time someone came in my mouth I literally spit it out before I knew what I was doing it tasted so foul--it was like biting into a rotten piece of fruit. 'Favorable for ingestion' my ass.
Rumor has it semen's flavor is affected by what the person eats. So if your dude is loading up on beer, asparagus, and rare angus steak that shit is going to be rancid.
not a doctor, not a lawyer, examples I use may not be fully researched so don't take out of context plz, don't @ me
0
Options
surrealitychecklonely, but not unloveddreaming of faulty keys and latchesRegistered Userregular
Well the makeup of semen is more... favorable for ingestion. Cooch-plegm-sauce basically tastes like you're eating a really wet runny nose, because, well, that's basically what it is.
The first time someone came in my mouth I literally spit it out before I knew what I was doing it tasted so foul--it was like biting into a rotten piece of fruit. 'Favorable for ingestion' my ass.
Rumor has it semen's flavor is affected by what the person eats. So if your dude is loading up on beer, asparagus, and rare angus steak that shit is going to be rancid.
maybe mrmister and i have opposite luck in this regard
found the subject rather tasteless, somewhat unpleasant in texture, and largely ignorable
whereas he's talking about it like it was rancid poison
So, what we talking about this fine morning, [chat]?
Going down on ladies, and pokemon?
Same as it ever was...
See
How can anyone not support the Oxford comma? You see how useful it is? How pleasing it is in God's eyes?
Hmm, I thought it was only an oxford comma in a list of three or more things, although I personally prefer its use. That comma to me seems to just be stylistic, indicating a pause, but grammatically unnecessary.
understand when people are apprehensive of gettin' blasted in the face for fear of it getting in the eyes
stuff burns, yo
0
Options
TehSlothHit Or MissI Guess They Never Miss, HuhRegistered Userregular
So, just made a pb&j sandwich for lunch. Got exactly the right amount of pb and the right amount of j to do each with only one swipe, then felt so good I cut that bitch from corner to corner.
It may be that philosophy has a different standard though since the argument is the thing.
that is more or less the case. In philosophy we show more than we tell, and what's valued above all else is clarity. For reference, here's an introduction for which I actually got high stylistic praise. By the time I'm done, the one I posted earlier will look more like it:
Christine Korsgaard has offered arguments against both Empiricist and Rationalist accounts of normativity, arguments that function by making special claims about the normativity of the hypothetical imperative. In this paper I will offer a response on behalf of the Rationalist. First, I will outline the extended version of the hypothetical imperative that Korsgaard employs, then I will set out what I take her arguments to be, and then I will offer an extended response.
My response to her arguments will consist in two main movements. In the first movement I will offer a Rationalist account that largely accepts Korsgaard's account of the hypothetical imperative, but nonetheless escapes her criticisms. In the second I will offer a Rationalist account that largely rejects her account of the hypothetical imperative. As will become clear, this move to rejecting her account of the hypothetical imperative will pay significant dividends in allowing us to defuse her arguments more swiftly and elegantly. But, in either case, we hold that her arguments can be defused.
Well the makeup of semen is more... favorable for ingestion. Cooch-plegm-sauce basically tastes like you're eating a really wet runny nose, because, well, that's basically what it is.
The first time someone came in my mouth I literally spit it out before I knew what I was doing it tasted so foul--it was like biting into a rotten piece of fruit. 'Favorable for ingestion' my ass.
Rumor has it semen's flavor is affected by what the person eats. So if your dude is loading up on beer, asparagus, and rare angus steak that shit is going to be rancid.
I used to be a healthy young vegetarian and now I am a curmudgeonly beer drinker and meat eater
Some of the crap you people talk about is stuff I'd only discuss with people I hated or wanted to fuck.
Weirdos.
Oh man on my last trip there was an officer who started talking religion with a couple of the enlisted guys and made everyone aware that he felt premarital sex was basically cheating, and people should have no right to do so.
From there on out for a month it was nothing but filthy sex talk around him by everyone.
Hadn't seen Casino in 10+ years, had forgotten how good it is.
the bit where
where joe pesci and his brother get got
still haunts me. it gave me nightmares as a kid. not the gore, necessarily, but having to watch it happen to someone i cared about first.
It's a very good scene, but far from the only one. The whole setup is brilliant. The characters' relations are all kinds of fucked up. As it's been so long, I had forgotten a lot of details and was able to enjoy it a lot. Also, how the fuck did Sharon Stone never got cast in a decent role after it?;o/
Posts
Going down on ladies, and pokemon?
Same as it ever was...
Hmm
Rumor has it semen's flavor is affected by what the person eats. So if your dude is loading up on beer, asparagus, and rare angus steak that shit is going to be rancid.
basically it's like swallowing snot
in terms of consistency and whatnot
as someone with allergies who has had to deal with post-nasal drip and stuff
man, whatever
ain't no thang
NIce....
See
How can anyone not support the Oxford comma? You see how useful it is? How pleasing it is in God's eyes?
I used to eat boogers
does that mean I should swallow semen
maybe mrmister and i have opposite luck in this regard
found the subject rather tasteless, somewhat unpleasant in texture, and largely ignorable
whereas he's talking about it like it was rancid poison
man what have yo boys been eating, dude
Pony this is the kind of motivated self-starting that pushed your resume to the top of the Supervillain Human Resources Consideration List.
"should" is less of the issue
"can"? yeah i bet
Hmm, I thought it was only an oxford comma in a list of three or more things, although I personally prefer its use. That comma to me seems to just be stylistic, indicating a pause, but grammatically unnecessary.
twitch.tv/tehsloth
understand when people are apprehensive of gettin' blasted in the face for fear of it getting in the eyes
stuff burns, yo
Fuck yeah lunch!
twitch.tv/tehsloth
It's a rough, since I just started writing; I post it largely as "hey check out what I'm working on!" So it is not particularly polished.
But, additionally:
that is more or less the case. In philosophy we show more than we tell, and what's valued above all else is clarity. For reference, here's an introduction for which I actually got high stylistic praise. By the time I'm done, the one I posted earlier will look more like it:
My response to her arguments will consist in two main movements. In the first movement I will offer a Rationalist account that largely accepts Korsgaard's account of the hypothetical imperative, but nonetheless escapes her criticisms. In the second I will offer a Rationalist account that largely rejects her account of the hypothetical imperative. As will become clear, this move to rejecting her account of the hypothetical imperative will pay significant dividends in allowing us to defuse her arguments more swiftly and elegantly. But, in either case, we hold that her arguments can be defused.
because, when it is requested of me, it's generally after a very extended go of things without release
and i get a little bit Peter North up in here
so i'm afraid they're asking for more than they realize
I used to be a healthy young vegetarian and now I am a curmudgeonly beer drinker and meat eater
Perceptible difference :l
I'll take Semen for $100, Alex.
Oh, your prices went up, Bowen?
Fuck you, Alex.
Sometimes they do go to pretty unexpected places. I was watching the other night and one of the topics was "Erotic Literature". It was fantastic.
twitch.tv/tehsloth
I don't think [chat] is capable of not being gross.
Weirdos.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bw9CALKOvAI
QEDMF xbl: PantsB G+
Structural superiority over the two rectangles approach.
Hatefuck
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IjvYiSDJujA
the bit where
still haunts me. it gave me nightmares as a kid. not the gore, necessarily, but having to watch it happen to someone i cared about first.
i applied for a different job with this agency months ago, which isn't the one i applied for yesterday and am interviewing for tuesday
but apparently in applying they still did some background checking and there's some "issues we need to discuss" regarding things they found out
can't be anything too serious or disqualifying or they'd not have bothered calling me at all
but it will be interesting to see what dirt they've dug up on me
Oh man on my last trip there was an officer who started talking religion with a couple of the enlisted guys and made everyone aware that he felt premarital sex was basically cheating, and people should have no right to do so.
From there on out for a month it was nothing but filthy sex talk around him by everyone.
It's a very good scene, but far from the only one. The whole setup is brilliant. The characters' relations are all kinds of fucked up. As it's been so long, I had forgotten a lot of details and was able to enjoy it a lot. Also, how the fuck did Sharon Stone never got cast in a decent role after it?;o/