I am arguing that if someone is capable of using the internet, they are aware enough to realize child porn may be on the public forum they converse with people on.
how does this argument lead to "condemning the institution and library goers"?
Ubik on
0
Options
Tossrocktoo weird to livetoo rare to dieRegistered Userregular
Like child porn as an eventuality of that site's size is the basest form of cyber-apologism I have seen
I think you are misinterpreting my position; I certainly don't believe that being large somehow excuses trafficking in child pornography! My observation is merely a factual one, in the same way that observing shooting in the head leads to death is not an attempt to excuse murder.
whether or not child porn or jailbait forums is an eventuality of something that size is besides the point, the conditions for that were fostered by staff inaction, and the overall community's inaction.
Oddly this reminds me of the Catholic Church molestation cases. It's not only the action of those involved, but the lack of action by figures in authority.
0
Options
BroloBroseidonLord of the BroceanRegistered Userregular
I am arguing that if someone is capable of using the internet, they are aware enough to realize child porn may be on the public forum they converse with people on.
and yet, people could be exchanging suggestive pictures of children in Critical Failures right now and I wouldn't have any idea because I never go in there.
I am arguing that if someone is capable of using the internet, they are aware enough to realize child porn may be on the public forum they converse with people on.
and yet, people could be exchanging suggestive pictures of children in Critical Failures right now and I wouldn't have any idea because I never go in there.
That is in fact all they do. They just roll dice before posting.
also a vocal Republican, gun lover, hippie hater and serves in the Army
It...huh. So does...is there like a Republican brony club? I guess I really do not have a grasp on the adult My Little Pony viewer demographic. I mean I would've assumed liberal nerds.
There is a lot of shit I apparantly do not know about My Little Pony and the people who watch it and I find that surprising, I am usually pretty much on top of what is stupid and upsetting on the internet.
HarrierThe Star Spangled ManRegistered Userregular
It's interesting that the idea of a persistent internet identity has come up a few times in this thread.
I have in recent years gone out of my way to avoid establishing such an identity. I prefer disparate identities on disparate sites, separate accounts, peculiar handles and usernames- connected thematically, perhaps, but not the same identity used everywhere. Any time I see the option to "log in with your Facebook account" I avoid it. It has become a goal of mine to keep my internet communities separate. This is partly because I like to explore different facets of my social personality in different settings.
It is also because I've become kind of paranoid about collected user information. I'm sure Google or the CIA can gather plenty of information about me, no matter what I do, but I don't want it to be easy. I specifically want to avoid becoming a whole person online. I'd rather become parts of persons in different places, as necessity dictates.
I don't wanna kill anybody. I don't like bullies. I don't care where they're from.
0
Options
BroloBroseidonLord of the BroceanRegistered Userregular
It's interesting that the idea of a persistent internet identity has come up a few times in this thread.
I have in recent years gone out of my way to avoid establishing such an identity. I prefer disparate identities on disparate sites, separate accounts, peculiar handles and usernames- connected thematically, perhaps, but not the same identity used everywhere. Any time I see the option to "log in with your Facebook account" I avoid it. It has become a goal of mine to keep my internet communities separate. This is partly because I like to explore different facets of my social personality in different settings.
It is also because I've become kind of paranoid about collected user information. I'm sure Google or the CIA can gather plenty of information about me, no matter what I do, but I don't want it to be easy. I specifically want to avoid becoming a whole person online. I'd rather become parts of persons in different places, as necessity dictates.
whatever you say
george f anderson of 32 Bellevue Court, Lakeport MA
Posts
how does this argument lead to "condemning the institution and library goers"?
I think you are misinterpreting my position; I certainly don't believe that being large somehow excuses trafficking in child pornography! My observation is merely a factual one, in the same way that observing shooting in the head leads to death is not an attempt to excuse murder.
I mean basically yeah
that's why I upgraded to internet2, the sequel to the internet
and yet, people could be exchanging suggestive pictures of children in Critical Failures right now and I wouldn't have any idea because I never go in there.
they got titties on that one yet?
Internet2 is lame, the outernet is where it's at
is internetcube anything like timecube?
Nah man, it's all about the Unternet
That is in fact all they do. They just roll dice before posting.
They roll 1d8. The result +10 is the age they post!
are we going to...you know what, fuck it
the only time I hate it is when I want to be meaner than I should
and it stops me
Yeah it's a good rule
What are you talking abo
http://kotaku.com/5888677/how-i-achieved-greatness-on-a-sonic-the-hedgehog+themed-bed
But who the fuck would comment on a kotaku article.
Yeah, but underground
also a vocal Republican, gun lover, hippie hater and serves in the Army
It...huh. So does...is there like a Republican brony club? I guess I really do not have a grasp on the adult My Little Pony viewer demographic. I mean I would've assumed liberal nerds.
even for kotaku this is just
I have in recent years gone out of my way to avoid establishing such an identity. I prefer disparate identities on disparate sites, separate accounts, peculiar handles and usernames- connected thematically, perhaps, but not the same identity used everywhere. Any time I see the option to "log in with your Facebook account" I avoid it. It has become a goal of mine to keep my internet communities separate. This is partly because I like to explore different facets of my social personality in different settings.
It is also because I've become kind of paranoid about collected user information. I'm sure Google or the CIA can gather plenty of information about me, no matter what I do, but I don't want it to be easy. I specifically want to avoid becoming a whole person online. I'd rather become parts of persons in different places, as necessity dictates.
whatever you say
george f anderson of 32 Bellevue Court, Lakeport MA