Our new Indie Games subforum is now open for business in G&T. Go and check it out, you might land a code for a free game. If you're developing an indie game and want to post about it,
follow these directions. If you don't, he'll break your legs! Hahaha! Seriously though.
Our rules have been updated and given
their own forum. Go and look at them! They are nice, and there may be new ones that you didn't know about! Hooray for rules! Hooray for The System! Hooray for Conforming!
[Arizona] says, you're pregnant for up to two weeks before you're pregnant.
Posts
Wait what? From pro choice Pentecost to pro life atheist?
Oh god, why did I look at the comments!? Why do I always look at the comments!?
A friend of mine taught me a sort-of mean trick once: show a 'pro-life' proponent an image of a rat fetus (because a rat fetus - and indeed virtually any fetus - is all but indistinguishable from a human fetus) and ask them to explain why they think this form of life should be protected. They'll ramble on about how it's heart develops soooo quickly and it has some limited autonomy or whatever, and then you tell them it's a picture of a rat fetus, not a human fetus, and they couldn't even tell the difference.
Like what does that even mean?
Well, having an extremely moralistic outlook on human life & fetal development means that both of those things are at the focus of the way you morally frame the world. Or that's what I meant by it, anyway.
In otherwords, if you believe that it is always immoral to terminate a human life, it would also make sense to believe that aborting a human fetus is immoral (...it wouldn't be necessary to also believe that, but it would be logical).
EDIT: In a parallel way, there are also some secular homophobes. Not very many, granted, but it's possible to construct the framework if you really want to be an asshole without scapegoating a deity.
The arguments were not very good, but it was interesting nonetheless.
http://www.pointofinquiry.org/jen_roth_atheist_against_abortion/
SODOMISE INTOLERANCE
Tide goes in. Tide goes out.
I think this is bonkers, but it's less because I'm atheist than it is because I reject certain sorts of metaphysical theories of personhood. People who think both that people are identical to certain animals and that there exist well-defined starting and ending conditions for animals are more likely to think that fetal life has moral relevance. On the other hand, people like me, who primarily identify people with streams of conscious experience, are unlikely to think that fetal life means anything at all.
So you're saying that they have a certain ethical view of abortion and the status of a fetus, and that effects their views and actions. Except wrapped up in such a way as to suggest that holding the moral views is the problem, not their content.
But they are.
If you say abortions are a necessary evil, you're admitting abortion is evil.
I sincerely hope that you didn't make that post in a serious manner.
Because if so:
"Whoosh!
I respect the rights of the individual to do as they please with their own body, and wouldn't dare suggest that outsiders have a say (certainly not religious people). I also know there have been definate benefits to abortion in the form of a reduced number of terrible parents raising children to be horrible people themselves etc.
But I can't get around the fact that abortion is essentially cutting off a potential human. Especially when the abortion occurs on grounds other than medical or as a result of rape/incest.
Let me be clear; I am pro-contraception. I'm just not pro-abortion-as-contraception.
But ultimately I feel it's better than children growing up neglected and abused...
But that doesn't mean I'll ever stop anyone from getting one, either.
Incidentally, I'm also a man.
Contraception also cuts off a potential human. Hell, so does abstinence. There's only a difference between them if you think that there's something really intrinsically important about fertilization, but that strikes me as an odd thing to think (though many people do indeed think it).
As it stands, they're all just a bunch of idiots who worship at the altar of White Fertility.
I've heard it was the preferred method of contraception in the Soviet Union, when the State provided abortions to Russian women for free, no questions asked. I don't know what happened to abortion rates after the USSR collapsed but Googling around, I see one blurb claiming that in 2006, there were 1.5 million live births in Russia and 1.6 million abortions.
Oh look, statistics concerning a country with a vastly different history and socio-economic structure from the United States.
Well done.
I used to have a problem with this, as well, until I realized that if using abortion as contraception gives off an irresponsible aura, it's all the worse to suggest that such a person carry a pregnancy to term. That is to say, if abortion as contraception reflects so badly on such a person in your mind, these are the people we want entrusting fetuses to the least.
After that, I say, some mythical person having an abortion as contraception because they don't know enough or care enough or have enough money for contraception (the last one being silly since BC is so much less expensive than an abortion)? Go for it. Please.
The only problem remaining is that in my country (the UK) my taxes pay for those idiots to do this. Admittedly it's an infinitesimally small amount for me personally, but the fact remains. Maybe those types of people should be charged some nominal amount?
You had sex but didn't use any contraception and have only just realised after 3 months that you're pregnant, and a baby doens't fit into your life plans right now? You get charged. Etc.
I'd suggest you learn more about the subject before sticking your feet in your mouth again.
Basically this is an incredibly simplistic view of the subject. And the argument "my taxes pay for X so it shouldn't happen!"
I guess we'll charge soldiers to serve in the army because some people are pacifists.
The menstrual cycle isn't the same for every woman, so saying "stupid woman, you didn't know you're pregnant after only three months geeeeeeze" is just horrifically incorrect.
You're trivializing what is a magnificently complicated decision for women.
I just saw someone had posted that was overwhelmingly the case, but cant find the damn post atm to check the source. Edit to be made...and it was good ol Wikipedia.
They were posting about Soviet Russia
Because 9% think it's too high, and shouldn't be cut! 9% of respondents could not fully
get their arms around the question. There should be another box you can check for, "I
have utterly no idea what you're talking about. Please, God, don't ask for my input."
Because 9% think it's too high, and shouldn't be cut! 9% of respondents could not fully
get their arms around the question. There should be another box you can check for, "I
have utterly no idea what you're talking about. Please, God, don't ask for my input."
Fair point, i'll retract the language, it was stupid. And maybe 3 months IS too short to realise.
But my overall point still stands. In my honest opinion, it is rediculous to abort a fetus simply because it would inconvinience you. Both partners using contraceptive should be ALL you need to prevent pregnancy. Hell, if either or both are THAT adverse to the idea, get some eggs/sperm frozen and get a vasectomy/tubal ligation until you are. We have the science!
No it isn't. Babies are expensive, and birth control isn't 100% effective. Shit happens. This is not a perfect world.
That is not even close to a legitimate solution, though. Again, at least not in the US. Access to "just freeze some eggs/sperm" doesn't exist. Vasectomies are probably more affordable, but probably still beyond the means of teenagers/twenty year olds.
I find it hard to believe that there are people going around having sex and this conversation happens:
"Should I get a condom?"
"No need, I'll just go get a suck and chuck in a few months."
"Sweet."
Not the post a few back, the one someone snagged the stats from wikipedia for the USA.
Would it shock you to find out that not everyone in the US has good access to contraception/sexual education, and that a lack of both correlates strongly with teen pregnancies and high abortion rates?
God I wish they did. I laughed way too hard at this.
This is ultimately my biggest problem with the 'pro-life' label: the vast majority are quite happy to deliver napalm baths to people overseas, have people executed in gas chambers, lobby for the murder of doctors, etc.
'Pro-life' my ass.