<!--
var linebreak = "<br />";
document.write(linebreak);
for(y = 2000; y < 2012; y++){
for(m = 01; m < 12; m++){
for(d = 01; d < 31; d++{
document.write("[img]http://cdn.leasticoulddo.com/comics/" + y + m + d + ".gif[/img]");
document.write(linebreak);
}
}
}
this doesn't actually work because any leading 0s will be omitted
I'm sure there's an actually competent programming person here though that could fully weaponize LICD
and then we will die
It'd be easy enough. Just have to use strings instead of integers when building the m and d values. At the start of the inner loop, assign new vars using the values of m and d. Then check to see if m and d are less than 10; if so prepend a zero to the respective strings.
So:
for(y = 2000; y < 2012; y++){
for(m = 1; m < 12; m++){
for(d = 1; d < 31; d++){
var m_str = m;
var d_str = d;
if (m < 10) {m_str = '0' + m_str;}
if (d < 10) {d_str = '0' + m_str;}
document.write("[img]http://cdn.leasticoulddo.com/comics/" + y + m_str + d_str + ".gif[/img]");
document.write(linebreak);
}
}
}
That should work - the quotes around the zeroes should make JS treat m_str and d_str as strings. If not you can always explicitly convert them using String().
... Is this what Oppenheimer felt like?
Supraluminal on
0
Options
BroloBroseidonLord of the BroceanRegistered Userregular
<!--
var linebreak = "<br />";
document.write(linebreak);
for(y = 2000; y < 2012; y++){
for(m = 01; m < 12; m++){
for(d = 01; d < 31; d++{
document.write("[img]http://cdn.leasticoulddo.com/comics/" + y + m + d + ".gif[/img]");
document.write(linebreak);
}
}
}
this doesn't actually work because any leading 0s will be omitted
I'm sure there's an actually competent programming person here though that could fully weaponize LICD
and then we will die
It'd be easy enough. Just have to use strings instead of integers when building the m and d values. At the start of the inner loop, assign new vars using the values of m and d. Then check to see if m and d are less than 10; if so prepend a zero to the respective strings.
So:
for(y = 2000; y < 2012; y++){
for(m = 1; m < 12; m++){
for(d = 1; d < 31; d++){
var m_str = m;
var d_str = d;
if (m < 10) {m_str = '0' + m_str;}
if (d < 10) {d_str = '0' + m_str;}
document.write("[img]http://cdn.leasticoulddo.com/comics/" + y + m_str + d_str + ".gif[/img]");
document.write(linebreak);
}
}
}
That should work - the quotes around the zeroes should make JS treat m_str and d_str as strings. If not you can always explicitly convert them using String().
GumpyThere is alwaysa greater powerRegistered Userregular
Good to bring this kinda shit up so us non twitterers are kept in the loop. Ain't no idea about why Gabe thinks this is a battle that needs to be fought.
sure i hate things that are misogynistic or trivialize rape and shit, but really fuck people who dictate what things should or should not be created
policing any culture at all, despite how fucking repulsive they can be, is something that ultimately has fascistic undertones
it's not a matter of policing it or censoring it
it's admonishing the people doing it for being grade-A assholes because it's some hurtful, hateful shit
is the "criticising bad things is CENSORSHIP" argument gonna come up over and over in here now? because i wanna get it out of the way because it's dumb and reductionist and worthless.
well i thought gabe was making his stand based on kickstarter cancelling the project funding which i guess in one aspect could be considered censorship
but upon further thinking, kickstarter is its own private company and it doesn't have to endorse certain products if it finds them unsuitable, especially in terms of representation
balerbower on
0
Options
ButtlordFornicusLord of Bondage and PainRegistered Userregular
Good to bring this kinda shit up so us non twitterers are kept in the loop. Ain't no idea about why Gabe thinks this is a battle that needs to be fought.
like the shitheads he represents gabe is obsessed with the idea of being free to say whatever you want without consequences (unless it offends his straight white male sensibilities in which case you're the devil)
and with that i'm going to shut up because i'm pretty sure i could Get In Trouble for this
Buttlord on
0
Options
ButtlordFornicusLord of Bondage and PainRegistered Userregular
well i thought gabe was making his stand based on kickstarter cancelling the project funding which i guess in one aspect could be considered censorship
but upon further thinking, kickstarter is its own private company and it doesn't have to endorse certain products if it finds them unsuitable, especially in terms of representation
that was how it started, then people asked what the hell why are you publicly supporting a game where the punchline is "rape" and now here we are
I think, and I am obviously a Krahulik expert, that he's spent so much time around awful fucking nerds that negative feedback feels like proof he's doing something right, no matter the source or subject matter
I dunno
he's stopped tweeting so maybe he's thinking about it
0
Options
FandyienBut Otto, what about us? Registered Userregular
last time this debate came up i was like fifteen or something and i was all about being able to make rape jokes
basically, if you're down with stuff like that, grow up and learn some more words
I knew that durn kickstarter would be nothin but trouble
Marty: The future, it's where you're going? Doc: That's right, twenty five years into the future. I've always dreamed on seeing the future, looking beyond my years, seeing the progress of mankind. I'll also be able to see who wins the next twenty-five world series.
well i thought gabe was making his stand based on kickstarter cancelling the project funding which i guess in one aspect could be considered censorship
but upon further thinking, kickstarter is its own private company and it doesn't have to endorse certain products if it finds them unsuitable, especially in terms of representation
but upon further thinking, kickstarter is its own private company and it doesn't have to endorse certain products if it finds them unsuitable, especially in terms of representation
Ding ding ding. Nobody's arguing for literal, legal censorship here. But just because you're free to make a rape-themed game or to support said game doesn't mean it's a good idea, or that people shouldn't call you out on it (or, in Kickstarter's case, opt not to do business with you).
Edit: Alright, yeah, enough people have piled on at this point. Probably time to stop typing for a little while.
Supraluminal on
0
Options
ButtlordFornicusLord of Bondage and PainRegistered Userregular
well i thought gabe was making his stand based on kickstarter cancelling the project funding which i guess in one aspect could be considered censorship
but upon further thinking, kickstarter is its own private company and it doesn't have to endorse certain products if it finds them unsuitable, especially in terms of representation
yeah y'all can stop stompin on my balls now
this isn't why people are yelling at gabe though
it's his continued defense of it when people want to know why one of the founders of an empire, because that's what PA is at this point, is publically throwing support behind a card game that's literally about rape
Buttlord on
0
Options
FandyienBut Otto, what about us? Registered Userregular
i am mighty proud of this forum for overwhelmingly not being down with rape jokes, because a few years back, that's practically what se++ was all about
Posts
It'd be easy enough. Just have to use strings instead of integers when building the m and d values. At the start of the inner loop, assign new vars using the values of m and d. Then check to see if m and d are less than 10; if so prepend a zero to the respective strings.
So:
for(y = 2000; y < 2012; y++){ for(m = 1; m < 12; m++){ for(d = 1; d < 31; d++){ var m_str = m; var d_str = d; if (m < 10) {m_str = '0' + m_str;} if (d < 10) {d_str = '0' + m_str;} document.write("[img]http://cdn.leasticoulddo.com/comics/" + y + m_str + d_str + ".gif[/img]"); document.write(linebreak); } } }That should work - the quotes around the zeroes should make JS treat m_str and d_str as strings. If not you can always explicitly convert them using String().
... Is this what Oppenheimer felt like?
which one is he
sure i hate things that are misogynistic or trivialize rape and shit, but really fuck people who dictate what things should or should not be created
policing any culture at all, despite how fucking repulsive they can be, is something that ultimately has fascistic undertones
also this was BOTP'd
im both of those boids please admire my willowy plume and handsome scottish consort
you're wrong
people arent saying 'no one talk about rape ever' people are saying 'a rape boardgame is an awful idea why would you publicly support it'
take a moment and ask your wife why everyone is angry at you if you don't have the basic empathy to understand it
like i keep saying
he'd be a terrible figurehead for a bunch of privileged assholes if he wasn't one himself
edit: to buttlord
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugin_and_munin
berks favourite activities
That's fantastic
Ooh, cool! Thank you!
it's not a matter of policing it or censoring it
it's admonishing the people doing it for being grade-A assholes because it's some hurtful, hateful shit
yeah i'll admit this is a really peculiar way to make a stand on anti-censorship
pretty dumb actually and why wouldn't he expect controversy
Wait, did Neil Gaiman ever contribute to a webcomic?
Steam ID: Obos Vent: Obos
Thats near me!
is the "criticising bad things is CENSORSHIP" argument gonna come up over and over in here now? because i wanna get it out of the way because it's dumb and reductionist and worthless.
They'll have to travel an hour and half to get to me... but yay!
Can't wait to see what happens
but upon further thinking, kickstarter is its own private company and it doesn't have to endorse certain products if it finds them unsuitable, especially in terms of representation
like the shitheads he represents gabe is obsessed with the idea of being free to say whatever you want without consequences (unless it offends his straight white male sensibilities in which case you're the devil)
and with that i'm going to shut up because i'm pretty sure i could Get In Trouble for this
that was how it started, then people asked what the hell why are you publicly supporting a game where the punchline is "rape" and now here we are
I dunno
he's stopped tweeting so maybe he's thinking about it
basically, if you're down with stuff like that, grow up and learn some more words
Doc: That's right, twenty five years into the future. I've always dreamed on seeing the future, looking beyond my years, seeing the progress of mankind. I'll also be able to see who wins the next twenty-five world series.
yeah y'all can stop stompin on my balls now
1) no
2) fuck you
3) go to step 1
Ding ding ding. Nobody's arguing for literal, legal censorship here. But just because you're free to make a rape-themed game or to support said game doesn't mean it's a good idea, or that people shouldn't call you out on it (or, in Kickstarter's case, opt not to do business with you).
Edit: Alright, yeah, enough people have piled on at this point. Probably time to stop typing for a little while.
this isn't why people are yelling at gabe though
it's his continued defense of it when people want to know why one of the founders of an empire, because that's what PA is at this point, is publically throwing support behind a card game that's literally about rape
Hey, this? This helps even less.