Our new Indie Games subforum is now open for business in G&T. Go and check it out, you might land a code for a free game. If you're developing an indie game and want to post about it, follow these directions. If you don't, he'll break your legs! Hahaha! Seriously though.
Our rules have been updated and given their own forum. Go and look at them! They are nice, and there may be new ones that you didn't know about! Hooray for rules! Hooray for The System! Hooray for Conforming!

First 5(+5) pages of a movie script - An edgy "Juno" meets "The Good House Wife"

LilnoobsLilnoobs Alpha Queue Registered User regular
It should be properly formatted in the spoiler below. There's a couple of transitions that I have just as filler for the moment, but if you have suggestions please help me! The fillers should be obvious to see, but I don't want to get hung up on things just yet.

Basically, I know it's only the first five pages but whatever thoughts you have I would like to know. This is from a full length movie script I'm re-writing/revising.


Spoiler:



Lilnoobs on

Posts

  • psolmspsolms Registered User regular
    i liked it.. its not really clear what happened with the movie theater employee, but i loved the playground blowjob bit. i can see the smirk on simon's face as he nods to the kid. it makes me lol.

  • LilnoobsLilnoobs Alpha Queue Registered User regular
    @psolms

    Could you expand on the movie theater bit? Was it too abrupt? forced? Did the employee seem to take too much of a 180? The scenes not clear enough? The point not clear enough? Thanks for the feedback so far. Even letting me know which scenes get a reaction is great feedback.

    Here's the next 5 pages. Any and all comments welcomed!

    edit: changed some formatting

    Spoiler:

    Lilnoobs on
  • psolmspsolms Registered User regular
    part of the problem with putting out 5 pages at a time is that its obvious youre setting something up, but in many cases, you cant tell what exactly. having read a bit more, it feels like the tone keeps switching back and forth (and maybe thats intentional).

    the scene with the movie theater employee feels like it was a set up to a confrontation to show us that simon has anger issues/is a smooth talker who can get out of anything/etc, but cutting away without a resolution to that bit makes it confusing. the employee reacting with that much anger is a bit of a stretch, but if, for example, he bought their SOB story and gave them a discount or something as an apology, he has much more reason to be upset.

    the scenes with sarah and simon feel light hearted, like there isnt a care in the world. juxtaposed with the fact that she is sneaking in and out of her house, and that her father seems to be raping her? (at least, thats the sense that i got from those ominous scenes) the tonal shift is dramatic and very interesting, and if thats what you were going for, then bravo.

    the only other thing that was confusing was does simon wear a wedding ring? he seemed to be playing with his ring finger, but you didnt say that there was a ring there. whether there is or isnt one, you should make that clear. "Plays with his ring finger, twisting the ring nervously" or "... rubs his empty finger, missing that part of him" or whatever it is.

    the transition from 'food comes' to 'empty plates' seems a bit abrupt, but im not really sure what else you could do with it.

  • JohnnyCacheJohnnyCache Starting Defense Registered User regular
    "wallah" is written "Viola" it's french for "there it is"

    "Maybe we're here to eat the sandwich." -- Joe Rogan
  • tapeslingertapeslinger utter Yog-Sothothery mmm, soulsRegistered User regular
    "voila", actually :)

    Hey! You! Go bid on awesome things! http://solidsaints.com
    jayxwolf.com || twit || fb || writing || ravelry || dA || g++
  • JohnnyCacheJohnnyCache Starting Defense Registered User regular
    hey at least I was in the spellcheck neighborhood

    seriously we gotta figure something out for scripts. I don't personally mind clicking through to google docs for them.

    "Maybe we're here to eat the sandwich." -- Joe Rogan
  • LilnoobsLilnoobs Alpha Queue Registered User regular
    Thanks @Johnnycache and @tapeslinger. I Totally bungled that "voila" so I'm glad it was caught now rather than after I sent the script off ><

    @psolms That's a great idea about the discount. Invest the employee more into the scene so then the turnaround seems more realistic. I really like that suggestion and I'm going to try it out, see where it goes. Simon is not wearing a wedding ring and I'll clear that up for sure because it's important that he's not, and the rest of your reading is pretty spot on.

    I'll see what I can do with google docs, pdf, or some other way to make available the script. I saw the recent scuffle with the TV show guy and didn't want to annoy anyone like he did. I'm thinking I'll just offer an alternative for those who prefer to read it from google docs.

  • JohnnyCacheJohnnyCache Starting Defense Registered User regular
    Well, if you feel you know the script format, just post it and let it left-justify. I was posting pages a while back looking for help with the actual format itself, so I pretty much had no choice but to host it

    Simon feels like you've already cast him too young, to me. He feels like he needs to be damn near thirty. Like if she had actually gone off with bateman in Juno - it would have been a creepier film.

    The implication with the dad is really, really, a creepy card to play. Until I read more, I can't say for sure, but it could be a note so dark it sours the rest of the movie (unless it's going to be a pretty cold movie)

    "Maybe we're here to eat the sandwich." -- Joe Rogan
  • tapeslingertapeslinger utter Yog-Sothothery mmm, soulsRegistered User regular
    There's also the fact that he basically didn't do as instructed twice in a row and responded to none of the actual critique, just sassed the volunteers who were generous enough to offer their time. I don't think there is anything wrong with offering the longform in a Google doc provided that you are also making it available for the forum as well, even if more gradual
    /notaMod

    Hey! You! Go bid on awesome things! http://solidsaints.com
    jayxwolf.com || twit || fb || writing || ravelry || dA || g++
  • MagellMagell Registered User regular
    It's hard to judge this because it feels like a lot of implication would be happening in the acting and what the actors portray that way as almost nothing comes through what they are saying as they always talk around things, which is the kind of thing that drives me nuts in literary stories and this kind of movie.

    The conversations are also too fragmented. They start conversations and they drift off in weird ways with nobody saying anything and then get picked up later and ignored again. The later part of that complain is more closely tied to the geese mating for life thing.

    It also feels too dark and jumps into the darkness quickly. Simon seems like a jerk quickly in the story and, I'm guessing as to the later parts of the movie, but he's probably going to leave Sarah like a dick, and you need to make him nice at first so that turn seems more interesting and surprising to the viewer.

    The Dad thing is too dark as well, which might work better as backstory especially seeing as Sarah has a grown up boyfriend she could talk to and have him help her and he'd notice something is wrong. I feel like too much of everything is happening underneath the actual story and the implications become important, but too much is implied, talked around, and ignored.

    The introduction of Tom is weird as well.

  • liquiddarkliquiddark Registered User
    There are a lot of details here that I'm not sure you're thinking about.

    First and foremost, there are a LOT of setups. Even when you go back to a place, there's nothing there to help establish there's a time difference. An audience watching is in danger of losing track, and filming it is going to be expensive. You're almost certainly going to have to condense some of these to single scenes.

    Other things that bothered me:

    - gut full of broken years - what exactly is this communicating?

    - cigarette - he's about to flick it out the window, so it's just about done, but his ash tray is clean? Is this relevant?

    - laughing with a gladlock bag with an apple in it in your mouth sounds hard. You sure you want to set that task for your poor actor? What human being does that?

    - popcorn: where is it? Unless I'm missing something, it must be in his lap, since she's got sour jacks and their arms are in between. Which doesn't fit with both of them reaching over anything.

    - your pacing is odd. You cut between scenes very quickly, but your stage directions are lavish without being particularly specific. The first sequence in particular is hard to read - the first time I read it it felt very slow because you're suggesting wide-open shots, but the second time I felt like the cuts necessitated something faster. I think the stage directions are part of the problem here.

    On the other hand, there's a good rhythm to what you're doing with these two characters. They feel like there's a need in each of them, although I agree that Simon is, so far, an obvious jerk, but then, Sarah feels like a pretty obvious teenage wreck, so the pair is either classic or cliche, depending on what gets done with them.

    Overall my concern right now is that you aren't necessarily earning your moments. I think this is what's wrong with the father bit. There's part of me that thinks the brushing of her teeth could act as an emotional wrench or motif, but I think you would need to repeat it at least once leading up to that point, preferably attached to a little more information about what's going on with her.

    liquiddark on
    Current project: Old Man Hero, a graphic novel in three parts
    @oldmanhero tumblr
  • psolmspsolms Registered User regular
    yeah the character dialog has a very interesting subtext to it. like, they both know what they're both doing, and they're not really happy about it, but they're trying to enjoy it in the moment because presumably the rest of their lives are shitty. its like a resigned 'carpe diem'. very interested to read more.

    the critique about not earning your moments is valid and even true, but in the first ten minutes of the film, youre really just establishing things, so, even if there are these jarring moments, it feels like its meant to be a part of that whimsical feeling. or maybe im giving you too much of a benefit of the doubt :P

  • LilnoobsLilnoobs Alpha Queue Registered User regular
    Hey all, thanks for feedback.

    @Magell
    The dad thing has been around since inception and it may be time for it to go. Alternatively, I could just make it seem like he's lazy and apathetic rather than straight out abusive. Part of me likes to be able to imply something without ever saying it and let the reader draw his or her own conclusions, but if the father thing overshadows the main narrative it may just have to go. I really don't want it to go, but so is life.

    @liquiddark
    Haha, you caught me on some of my more creative descriptions. A professor use to call me out on descriptions such as a "gut full of broken years" and ask, "what does that look like?" Sometimes though, I just get carried away with the language. For instance, I described a character once as someone who acted "as if the world owed him money". Again, I got called out on it--"what does that look like?"

    I really like the idea of with the brushing her teeth. I'll play around with that, see if I can do something with it, considering some other revisions with the father.



    As for dialogue and pacing, well, when I watch movies or shows I tend to get easily annoyed with dialogue that's obvious exposition and I roll my eyes. I don't like dialogue that asks a question that the audience is obvious pondering themselves--who talks like that? Part of the trick for me then, I think, is going to be balancing my disdain for expository dialogue with my love for implication only.

    Like the "geese" thing, originally I had Simon return that he looked it up and explain how geese don't mate for life--a little bit of a rift between the two. In retrospect, I thought I was giving away too much or being too "clever", but maybe not.


    A short there-abouts of the plot is below if you're interested. The only other main character we haven't met is Jen. She's pretty cool.
    Spoiler:

    @JohnnyCache
    I think you're right about Simon's age.

  • JohnnyCacheJohnnyCache Starting Defense Registered User regular
    There's lots of ways to make the dad creepy without it hitting that level. When you do, there's essentially no way her relationship with simon can be anything but a creepy projection of that creepy relationship

    The cigarette I took to be deliberate characterization - the implication to me is he generally litters, but changes his mind when being watched

    "Maybe we're here to eat the sandwich." -- Joe Rogan
  • VanityPantsVanityPants Registered User regular
    The scenes here change SO quickly and while I appreciate you not wanting to expound on things too much over dialogue, there's almost NO dialogue actually present here. There's a lot of idle talk and conversations like "What did you think?" "I liked it" feel like they stand out really awkwardly to me. I think it's perhaps this expectation that I should be feeling for these characters (or at least her), but so far there's really not a lot that makes me want to invest myself in them.

    I think @liquiddark hit the nail on the head in that you're using a lot of setups that are either classic or cliche and while you could still make it work, it feels like it's missing the mark for me. A window with a spiderweb crack, a fridge with mainly beer and bread, and broken lightbulbs do all set the scenes but it plays entirely into the hand you've already shown us of a sort of "typical" messed up teen from a messed up home with a jerk boyfriend. I need something that kind of shakes up the status of the whole thing and makes the more cliche parts seem more interesting.

    I understand this seems very minimalistic in dialogue on purpose and has a kind of muted tone (also on purpose, I'm assuming), but I think that's all the reason to make your details unique and have them stand out rather than playing into something the audience is already familiar with or can guess about. You picture a crappy home and this is pretty much exactly what you might picture, which doesn't leave a lot for me to guess about or be interested in.

    The line about the geese, for example, is passable, but her follow-up of "That's love, right?" while sounding typically teenagerish just sounds really cheesy to my ears and plays into the hand you've already set up.

  • LilnoobsLilnoobs Alpha Queue Registered User regular
    Thanks @vanitypants. I have some ideas already for adding more interesting elements and since I've begun writing them in, they've been working well with a revised father figure.

    I have plenty to work with now, so I'm going to get to it and also get a nicely formatted version available for the future. I've already made several revisions, but going to continue on some more and see if I can get at least until the inciting incident completed to come back with.

    Thanks all again, this has been excellent.

    @Johnncache, I think you mentioned earlier you were looking for advice to format a script? There's a nice free program at www.celtx.com that may help you out. There's limitations on the free version (no PDF, can't export, and some others), but it's a cloud based system (can work from anywhere with the net) and an easy to navigate UI. If you want to buy, I think you can do a monthly or yearly sub.

    Lilnoobs on
  • liquiddarkliquiddark Registered User
    Just curious, is everyone familiar with what I mean by a "setup"? That is, a physical camera location and angle? It's not something you necessarily think about when you're writing a script, but when you're revising it's something you absolutely have to look at. Every time that camera changes, you're burning money.

    Current project: Old Man Hero, a graphic novel in three parts
    @oldmanhero tumblr
  • LilnoobsLilnoobs Alpha Queue Registered User regular
    Ah, I was taught to not bother with camera shots and have limited movement with actors because the camera is for the director and the actions are for the actors. So yeah, I'm not particularly thinking about camera placement at this venture =p I shall now though

    Lilnoobs on
  • psolmspsolms Registered User regular
    i dont think that you need to be worried about that, thats for the producer/director to worry about. if your screenplay is telling an interesting story well, they will make any number of setups work to deliver it.

    unless, that is, you are planning on directing/producing this as an indie film. in which case, maybe take it into consideration, but dont let it drive your storytelling. someone can always go back and make revisions (in fact, if it gets picked up, they ABSOLUTELY will) - the diner scene works better as a hot dog stand, the car should be red to symbolize x, etc. your job is to tell the story. if you try and think about the production costs of actually filming it, youre limiting yourself creatively, for honestly, no reason.

  • psolmspsolms Registered User regular
    oh, also, i meant to ask:

    who is the protagonist in this story? looking at the outline:
    Lilnoobs wrote: »
    Spoiler:

    so Simon is married, and the fact that he's not wearing his ring is important... you should try to make that clear earlier. maybe in the scene where he drops sarah off, we linger on him as he pulls out his ring from the glove box and puts it back on or something similar.

    but getting back to the protagonist...

    it feels like youre setting up sarah to be the protag, but she doesnt really seem to grow or change in this plot overview. in fact, i just have so many questions:
    Spoiler:

    if you feel like your script will answer any of them for itself, thats fine, dont feel like you need to justify yourself to me. these are just the nagging questions i have about the outline.

    in many ways, this feels more like an outline of events, rather then a plot. i would challenge you to try to write out an overview of the plot in 5-7 sentences that would give a very general look at the story being told.

    as an example (making some assumptions based on what i've seen so far):
    Spoiler:

  • MagellMagell Registered User regular
    One small thing is you are writing your description like you would in a story, but that isn't the place for fluff and BS. Just say what is there. It's not supposed to be florid language just the facts so a casting director knows what to find in an actor, and set design knows what to create, or the location to scout for.

  • liquiddarkliquiddark Registered User
    Like I said, don't think about the production process when you're writing the script. But when you're revising, as I assume you are right now, you should absolutely think about it. If you don't, you're just asking for someone else to come and rip the guts out of your words.
    psolms wrote: »
    if your screenplay is telling an interesting story well, they will make any number of setups work to deliver it.
    This is flat-out wrong. Individual setups can cost hundreds of thousands of dollars when you factor in crew time, location rentals, extras, craft services, and any number of other expenses. Even when you are filming a very low-budget movie, you will at some point have to worry about these things. I would recommend anyone who writes for film read at least one book on production or (even better) production management. If you're not aware of the expense list for a film it can be shocking how much everything costs.

    liquiddark on
    Current project: Old Man Hero, a graphic novel in three parts
    @oldmanhero tumblr
  • liquiddarkliquiddark Registered User
    I don't know if any of you list to John August and Craig Mazin's podcast, Scriptnotes, but there's a ton of good insight in there about writing for the screen. John's blog is pretty wonderful as well. One of the things that they talk about fairly often in the podcast is the idea that screenwriting is not like other forms of writing. It's a set of instructions for how to make a movie. You want your instructions to be engaging enough to keep the readers' attention, but you HAVE to make them clear enough to make the movie.

    Current project: Old Man Hero, a graphic novel in three parts
    @oldmanhero tumblr
  • psolmspsolms Registered User regular
    liquiddark wrote: »
    Even when you are filming a very low-budget movie, you will at some point have to worry about these things.

    this is the key.

    the 'at some point' is 'when production is starting'. no executive producer/director looks at a finished script and says "man, that looks surprisingly easy to film. its a good thing the script writer did our job for us. better go make his movie now, regardless of how good it is."

    if you are writing a script, your job is to tell an interesting story. period.

    if you want to be involved in the production, that might be a different story, but dont let that distract you from writing an interesting story first.

    when i said 'they'll make it work', i was being hyperbolic. what i meant was that before production starts, they (the producer, the director) will go through your script and make changes. some of those changes will be the location/time of scenes. some of them will be the order of scenes. whatever they feel like is needed to make the movie work, both creatively, and financially. except in the case of a very small budget indie film, this is not the screenwriter's job.

    there's nothing saying you cant try to make this easier by thinking about it, and if you want to, sure. but, right now at least, you should be focusing on telling an interesting story. i guess thats my main point - your story has potential, but it needs a thorough revision, simply for the story's sake. dont let the production costs distract you from that goal.

    besides, regardless of what you do, when a director gets attached, (s)he will have a vision for the film, and (s)he will change whatever (s)he needs to make it fit that.

    edit: to your other point @liquiddark - i agree with you. the screenplay should be essentially an instruction manual for making this a movie, but at the core of it, you still need to be telling an interesting story.

    psolms on
  • liquiddarkliquiddark Registered User
    I guess it's a difference in approaches. I'm with Mamet on this one
    THINK LIKE A FILMMAKER RATHER THAN A FUNCTIONARY, BECAUSE, IN TRUTH, YOU ARE MAKING THE FILM. WHAT YOU WRITE, THEY WILL SHOOT.

    Current project: Old Man Hero, a graphic novel in three parts
    @oldmanhero tumblr
  • psolmspsolms Registered User regular
    liquiddark wrote: »
    I guess it's a difference in approaches. I'm with Mamet on this one
    THINK LIKE A FILMMAKER RATHER THAN A FUNCTIONARY, BECAUSE, IN TRUTH, YOU ARE MAKING THE FILM. WHAT YOU WRITE, THEY WILL SHOOT.

    im content to agree - it lies in the differences in approaches. the only caveat being that in that memo, he is talking to the TV writing staff- TV is a different beast all together. many shows (cartoons notwithstanding) often start shooting with an incomplete script, due to the hectic schedule of weekly (or bi weekly) drama/comedy/etc. and for TV - absolutely, you need to be thinking about how they are going to shoot it, because its unlikely that they will have time to change it before they start shooting.

    to be fair though, you also get to work with a large writing staff, so probably makes it a bit easier to keep that kind of stuff in mind.

    anyways, im glad to have had this discussion, because it is a fundamentally interesting question: ideas vs execution. how much should you take execution into account while developing your ideas? very interesting to see other opinions on it.

  • JohnnyCacheJohnnyCache Starting Defense Registered User regular
    liquiddark wrote: »
    Like I said, don't think about the production process when you're writing the script. But when you're revising, as I assume you are right now, you should absolutely think about it. If you don't, you're just asking for someone else to come and rip the guts out of your words.
    psolms wrote: »
    if your screenplay is telling an interesting story well, they will make any number of setups work to deliver it.
    This is flat-out wrong. Individual setups can cost hundreds of thousands of dollars when you factor in crew time, location rentals, extras, craft services, and any number of other expenses. Even when you are filming a very low-budget movie, you will at some point have to worry about these things. I would recommend anyone who writes for film read at least one book on production or (even better) production management. If you're not aware of the expense list for a film it can be shocking how much everything costs.

    Could you recommend a few?

    "Maybe we're here to eat the sandwich." -- Joe Rogan
  • liquiddarkliquiddark Registered User
    I like Deb Patz's book, but you can find a bunch of good ones on the TheatreBooks Producing list. If you live in Ontario, TheatreBooks is generally a great place to start for anything in the performing arts.

    Current project: Old Man Hero, a graphic novel in three parts
    @oldmanhero tumblr
  • JohnnyCacheJohnnyCache Starting Defense Registered User regular
    I will check those out, although sadly I do not live in toronto. I admire the moose and health care system of my comrades to the north immensely, though.

    "Maybe we're here to eat the sandwich." -- Joe Rogan
Sign In or Register to comment.