As was foretold, we've added advertisements to the forums! If you have questions, or if you encounter any bugs, please visit this thread: https://forums.penny-arcade.com/discussion/240191/forum-advertisement-faq-and-reports-thread/
Options

Happy Birthday, Science!

2456710

Posts

  • Options
    sarukunsarukun RIESLING OCEANRegistered User regular
    edited February 2009
    trentsteel wrote: »
    Can we dunk one more witch? Just for old times---

    dammit bogey

    You busted in asking dudes if you should bang your cousin


    you have no one to blame but yourself

    sarukun on
  • Options
    BogeyBogey I'm back, baby! Santa Monica, CAModerator mod
    edited February 2009
    we'd unfortunately need someone to be the control in the experiment.

    i am not being the control :P
    Well, there are 2 control candidates I can think of, Fiz and Nads.

    Fiz would rape you in the late stages of the experiment though.

    Bogey on
    Fitocracy: Join us in the SE++ group!
    XBox LIVE: Bogestrom | Destiny
    PSN: Bogestrom
  • Options
    FishmanFishman Put your goddamned hand in the goddamned Box of Pain. Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    So... Nads then?

    Fishman on
    X-Com LP Thread I, II, III, IV, V
    That's unbelievably cool. Your new name is cool guy. Let's have sex.
  • Options
    Shifty FisterShifty Fister Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    science is awesome because we can teleport information now. pretty soon we'll be teleporting people, too!*


    *well ok maybe not

    [tiny]calling all Myssts, calling all Myssts, this thread is in need of SCIENCE tattoos, stat![/tiny]

    I think I heard on the SGU podcast that quantum entanglement probably won't be able to be used for instant transmission of information.

    Shifty Fister on
  • Options
    BroloBrolo Broseidon Lord of the BroceanRegistered User regular
    edited February 2009
    science is awesome because we can teleport information now. pretty soon we'll be teleporting people, too!*


    *well ok maybe not

    [tiny]calling all Myssts, calling all Myssts, this thread is in need of SCIENCE tattoos, stat![/tiny]

    The caveat with entanglement is that no information will be teleported. You can send random signals to one another instantly, but they can only be verified at the speed of light.

    Quantum entanglement will never be able to teleport information without causing a causality paradox, so there's no way it and the general theory of relativity could be true at the same time. General relativity has been borne out in lots and lots of scientific experimentation, and has a great body of evidence supporting it, so I really don't expect entanglement to ever work as a means of instant communication or teleportation.

    Brolo on
  • Options
    sarukunsarukun RIESLING OCEANRegistered User regular
    edited February 2009
    science is awesome because we can teleport information now. pretty soon we'll be teleporting people, too!*


    *well ok maybe not

    [tiny]calling all Myssts, calling all Myssts, this thread is in need of SCIENCE tattoos, stat![/tiny]

    I think I heard on the SGU podcast that quantum entanglement probably won't be able to be used for instant transmission of information.

    Did they say why?

    Edit: Rolo nailed it.


    This is a good amount of science for the first two pages. I am pleased with the results of this, my fourth thread that I have ever made.

    sarukun on
  • Options
    trentsteeltrentsteel Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    What does that mean, "can only be verified at the speed of light"?

    trentsteel on
    http://www.botsnthings.com/
    I made a TD for iphone and windows phone!

  • Options
    sarukunsarukun RIESLING OCEANRegistered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Antimatter wrote: »
    My favorite quote: Physicist Richard Feynman ... "if you think you understand quantum mechanics, you don't understand quantum mechanics."
    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,482264,00.html
    Wait, holy balls, this can't be right, teleporting?

    sarukun on
  • Options
    sarukunsarukun RIESLING OCEANRegistered User regular
    edited February 2009
    trentsteel wrote: »
    What does that mean, "can only be verified at the speed of light"?

    It means you have to be doing crystal meth to understand it.

    sarukun on
  • Options
    potatoepotatoe Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    trentsteel wrote: »
    What does that mean, "can only be verified at the speed of light"?

    it's like the movie speed

    potatoe on
  • Options
    MarathonMarathon Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Dammit, I was going to make this thread tomorrow! Damn you Saru!
    That being said, as a good Biology major I have a healthy admiration for my lord and savior Charles Darwin. (or as I refer to him casually "my man, Chuck D.")

    I'm actually reading a biography on him right now.

    Marathon on
  • Options
    TossrockTossrock too weird to live too rare to dieRegistered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Check it out, here is my layman's explanation of quantum entanglement
    Tossrock wrote: »
    JoeUser wrote: »
    Tossrock wrote: »
    Grey Ghost wrote: »
    If the gravitational pull of a large object were to suddenly not be there, I imagine all objects orbiting it would be immediately freed from their previous paths of movement

    but like Pony pointed out, it wouldn't happen like that anyway

    edit: but I guess Tossrock knows this better than I do

    Information can't move faster than the speed of light; if the sun collapsed into a blackhole and we were instantly pulled in, we would know about it before it should be possible. I'd point you guys at the gravitational waves wiki page but frankly it's a bunch of dense physics wankery. The takeaway is that it goes at the speed of light. Or more importantly, the speed of any massless phenomenon.

    Doesn't quantum entanglement mean that information can move faster than light though?

    No, no it fucking doesn't

    This is why I hate it when popular media reports on advanced physics.

    Here is what entanglement is:

    You have a bag. You know that in the bag are a blue marble and a red marble. You take one out of the bag and walk a few feet, then look at the marble. You now instantly know the color of the other marble. You did not transmit information.

    Replace marbles with rubidium atoms and color with spin and it's pretty much the same thing.

    Tossrock on
    sig.png
  • Options
    MikeRyuMikeRyu Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Science is a great thing and all but sometimes you guys scare me.

    MikeRyu on
    Ranmasig5.png
  • Options
    sarukunsarukun RIESLING OCEANRegistered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Marathon wrote: »
    Dammit, I was going to make this thread tomorrow! Damn you Saru!
    That being said, as a good Biology major I have a healthy admiration for my lord and savior Charles Darwin. (or as I refer to him casually "my man, Chuck D.")

    I'm actually reading a biography on him right now.

    The Economist had an article, and I knew if I didn't do it right now, I would forget.

    sarukun on
  • Options
    trentsteeltrentsteel Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Ok I'm confused, Rolo said no information can be teleported that way but that article there says they already did.

    trentsteel on
    http://www.botsnthings.com/
    I made a TD for iphone and windows phone!

  • Options
    trentsteeltrentsteel Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Ok, now Tossrock has confused me further. I thought entanglement meant that you could change one particle or the other and the other would instantly change.

    Oh but...oh wait now I think I get it. So, wait no I don't

    trentsteel on
    http://www.botsnthings.com/
    I made a TD for iphone and windows phone!

  • Options
    sarukunsarukun RIESLING OCEANRegistered User regular
    edited February 2009
    MikeRyu wrote: »
    Science is a great thing and all but sometimes you guys scare me.

    You have no reason to fear Science, my child.



    Until the dawn of the Zombie Apocalypse (Zombocalypse?) of 2391, when science undoes all that is Civilization, anyway.

    sarukun on
  • Options
    sarukunsarukun RIESLING OCEANRegistered User regular
    edited February 2009
    trentsteel wrote: »
    Ok, now Tossrock has confused me further. I thought entanglement meant that you could change one particle or the other and the other would instantly change.

    Oh but...oh wait now I think I get it. So, wait no I don't

    Basically the idea is that this stuff is Religion.

    sarukun on
  • Options
    potatoepotatoe Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    dammit, what are these scientists trying to do

    haven't they seen the fly?

    potatoe on
  • Options
    trentsteeltrentsteel Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Once two objects are put in an entangled state, their properties are inextricably entwined.

    Although those properties are inherently unknowable until a measurement is made, measuring either one of the objects instantly determines the characteristics of the other, no matter how far apart they are.

    Ok, so that makes sense with the red/blue marble example Tossrock used.

    So, what good is this then?

    I mean if you can't change one after they are separated to send a message or something then all you would know is the information already entered when the particles were entangled, yes? My fucking newspaper does that.

    I might not be getting this

    trentsteel on
    http://www.botsnthings.com/
    I made a TD for iphone and windows phone!

  • Options
    BogeyBogey I'm back, baby! Santa Monica, CAModerator mod
    edited February 2009
    I kinda want to be around for the Zombie Apocalypse, but at the same time I don't want to have to deal with the aftermath of the Zombie Apocalypse. :|

    Bogey on
    Fitocracy: Join us in the SE++ group!
    XBox LIVE: Bogestrom | Destiny
    PSN: Bogestrom
  • Options
    MikeRyuMikeRyu Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    sarukun wrote: »
    MikeRyu wrote: »
    Science is a great thing and all but sometimes you guys scare me.

    You have no reason to fear Science, my child.



    Until the dawn of the Zombie Apocalypse (Zombocalypse?) of 2391, when science undoes all that is Civilization, anyway.

    I don't blame science for that. It was either that or Voodoo was going to do it anyway.

    MikeRyu on
    Ranmasig5.png
  • Options
    AntimatterAntimatter Devo Was Right Gates of SteelRegistered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Bogey wrote: »
    I kinda want to be around for the Zombie Apocalypse, but at the same time I don't want to have to deal with the aftermath of the Zombie Apocalypse. :|

    Solution: Die at the hands of the Zombie horde.

    Antimatter on
  • Options
    potatoepotatoe Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Bogey wrote: »
    I kinda want to be around for the Zombie Apocalypse, but at the same time I don't want to have to deal with the aftermath of the Zombie Apocalypse. :|

    omegaman.jpg

    potatoe on
  • Options
    VicVic Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    trentsteel wrote: »
    Once two objects are put in an entangled state, their properties are inextricably entwined.

    Although those properties are inherently unknowable until a measurement is made, measuring either one of the objects instantly determines the characteristics of the other, no matter how far apart they are.

    Ok, so that makes sense with the red/blue marble example Tossrock used.

    So, what good is this then?

    I mean if you can't change one after they are separated to send a message or something then all you would know is the information already entered when the particles were entangled, yes? My fucking newspaper does that.

    I might not be getting this

    It is no good. It is pretty much a useless aspect of the universe.

    A lot of quantum theory is like that.

    Vic on
  • Options
    sarukunsarukun RIESLING OCEANRegistered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Bogey wrote: »
    I kinda want to be around for the Zombie Apocalypse, but at the same time I don't want to have to deal with the aftermath of the Zombie Apocalypse. :|

    The best way to do this is to either become a zombie or kill yourself in a tragically awesome way, like high fiving somebody else in mid-air using two of the only functioning airplanes on the planet.

    sarukun on
  • Options
    BroloBrolo Broseidon Lord of the BroceanRegistered User regular
    edited February 2009
    trentsteel wrote: »
    Once two objects are put in an entangled state, their properties are inextricably entwined.

    Although those properties are inherently unknowable until a measurement is made, measuring either one of the objects instantly determines the characteristics of the other, no matter how far apart they are.

    Ok, so that makes sense with the red/blue marble example Tossrock used.

    So, what good is this then?

    I mean if you can't change one after they are separated to send a message or something then all you would know is the information already entered when the particles were entangled, yes? My fucking newspaper does that.

    I might not be getting this

    It can be used for cryptography, and that's about it for practical uses.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_cryptography

    An important and unique property of quantum cryptography is the ability of the two communicating users to detect the presence of any third party trying to gain knowledge of the key. This results from a fundamental part of quantum mechanics: the process of measuring a quantum system in general disturbs the system. A third party trying to eavesdrop on the key must in some way measure it, thus introducing detectable anomalies. By using quantum superpositions or quantum entanglement and transmitting information in quantum states, a communication system can be implemented which detects eavesdropping. If the level of eavesdropping is below a certain threshold a key can be produced which is guaranteed as secure (i.e. the eavesdropper has no information about), otherwise no secure key is possible and communication is aborted.

    Brolo on
  • Options
    trentsteeltrentsteel Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Vic wrote: »
    trentsteel wrote: »
    Once two objects are put in an entangled state, their properties are inextricably entwined.

    Although those properties are inherently unknowable until a measurement is made, measuring either one of the objects instantly determines the characteristics of the other, no matter how far apart they are.

    Ok, so that makes sense with the red/blue marble example Tossrock used.

    So, what good is this then?

    I mean if you can't change one after they are separated to send a message or something then all you would know is the information already entered when the particles were entangled, yes? My fucking newspaper does that.

    I might not be getting this

    It is no good. It is pretty much a useless aspect of the universe.

    A lot of quantum theory is like that.

    The hell are they so excited about, then?

    trentsteel on
    http://www.botsnthings.com/
    I made a TD for iphone and windows phone!

  • Options
    sarukunsarukun RIESLING OCEANRegistered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Vic wrote: »
    trentsteel wrote: »
    Once two objects are put in an entangled state, their properties are inextricably entwined.

    Although those properties are inherently unknowable until a measurement is made, measuring either one of the objects instantly determines the characteristics of the other, no matter how far apart they are.

    Ok, so that makes sense with the red/blue marble example Tossrock used.

    So, what good is this then?

    I mean if you can't change one after they are separated to send a message or something then all you would know is the information already entered when the particles were entangled, yes? My fucking newspaper does that.

    I might not be getting this

    It is no good. It is pretty much a useless aspect of the universe.

    A lot of quantum theory is like that.

    Question:


    Do two particles have to be super close to each other in order to entangle them?

    My brain says yes but anything is possible with Science.

    sarukun on
  • Options
    MikeRyuMikeRyu Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    sarukun wrote: »
    Bogey wrote: »
    I kinda want to be around for the Zombie Apocalypse, but at the same time I don't want to have to deal with the aftermath of the Zombie Apocalypse. :|

    The best way to do this is to either become a zombie or kill yourself in a tragically awesome way, like high fiving somebody else in mid-air using two of the only functioning airplanes on the planet.

    subtle :wink:

    MikeRyu on
    Ranmasig5.png
  • Options
    trentsteeltrentsteel Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Ah, so could it be like, comparable to a home security system then? I dunno, can you explain how the cryptography works with that red/blue marble analogy?

    trentsteel on
    http://www.botsnthings.com/
    I made a TD for iphone and windows phone!

  • Options
    MarathonMarathon Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    What's all this quantum mumbo jumbo. Let's check out some evolution related coolness.

    Evidence of the oldest known terrestrial life
    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/02/090204135731.htm

    Early whales gave birth on land.
    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/02/090204085133.htm

    Huge fucking snake.
    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/02/090204112217.htm

    Marathon on
  • Options
    BogeyBogey I'm back, baby! Santa Monica, CAModerator mod
    edited February 2009
    potatoe wrote: »
    Bogey wrote: »
    I kinda want to be around for the Zombie Apocalypse, but at the same time I don't want to have to deal with the aftermath of the Zombie Apocalypse. :|

    The Omega Man
    Sweet! I haven't seen this, but I just added it to my Netflix Instant Queue.

    Bogey on
    Fitocracy: Join us in the SE++ group!
    XBox LIVE: Bogestrom | Destiny
    PSN: Bogestrom
  • Options
    sarukunsarukun RIESLING OCEANRegistered User regular
    edited February 2009
    Marathon wrote: »
    Now that is some fucking Science.

    sarukun on
  • Options
    MikeRyuMikeRyu Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    hey guys I got some science for ya, I gotta pee

    MikeRyu on
    Ranmasig5.png
  • Options
    trentsteeltrentsteel Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    urinate Mike, urinate.

    trentsteel on
    http://www.botsnthings.com/
    I made a TD for iphone and windows phone!

  • Options
    fightinfilipinofightinfilipino Angry as Hell #BLMRegistered User regular
    edited February 2009
    jesus, fossil animal steroids?

    even the invertebrates were juicin'!

    fightinfilipino on
    ffNewSig.png
    steam | Dokkan: 868846562
  • Options
    MarathonMarathon Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    trentsteel wrote: »
    urinate Mike, urinate.

    micturate

    Marathon on
  • Options
    VicVic Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    trentsteel wrote: »
    Ah, so could it be like, comparable to a home security system then? I dunno, can you explain how the cryptography works with that red/blue marble analogy?

    Alright, let us say that each time a quantum entanglement occurs one red ball goes one way and a blue ball goes the other.

    Now let us say that two people wish to make a secure cryptographic code. They make one quantum entanglement happen for each letter in the alphabet, and if there is a red ball they will replace the letter with the next letter in the alphabet, and if there is a blue ball they will replace it with the previous letter of the alphabet.

    Now when they send the encrypted message, the other dude will just have to follow the same procedure to unencrypt the message, as the sequence of balls he received was the mirror of the one used to encrypt the message.

    The point of the system is that the encryption code is known only to the two people that received the balls. It is not possible to eavesdrop on the information, because the only way to do so would be to catch the ball on route.

    Vic on
  • Options
    vsovevsove ....also yes. Registered User regular
    edited February 2009
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=suazwrc2RPU

    The best science related song there is.

    vsove on
    WATCH THIS SPACE.
Sign In or Register to comment.