|
 02-12-2009, 08:57 PM
 | The pulp fiction drawing is exactly the kind of thing I like to see. You're making mistakes and that's a GOOD thing. If you don't stumble a bit then it's not a study worth doing.
It looks like you're jumping a little too soon into the latter steps of the study and not spending enough time observing and setting up your drawing to ensure accuracy. I did a little paintover that will reiterate this, but two things to always keep in the forefront of your thoughts when drawing from observation are: Is the angle of the contour or edge accurate, and does this shape line up where it should relative to others on the same axis in the canvas/page (plumb lines).
So here is a section your reference side by side with your painting and some notations that I have made in red, corresponding to explanations below. Almost everything noted here is spotted using some simple tricks for analyzing shapes.

A. The window frame in the background isn't just window dressing, it's part of the scene and is actually a very helpful tool to ensure accuracy of your foreground figures if you know what to look for. Notice the strong, sharp edge that the light from the window creates against the suit (You may recall the term "negative shapes". Sometimes it's easier to draw the background against an object than the object itself). Notice in your painting how this edge is wobbly, and the shape is a bit off.
B. I've drawn here a horizontal "plumb line", which is simply a vertical or horizontal straight edge that you can use to compare how various features should line up on your drawing. In real life you can hold your arm out and use a ruler, pencil, string, or any other straight edge to do the same thing. Notice in the reference how the top of the gun lines up neatly with John Travolta's chin. In your painting the gun has fallen too low and it throws the gesture of the whole figure off. John's pose doesn't have the same intensity from just this little mistake.
C. One of the most appealing parts of this photo is the cool graphic effect the strong rim lighting makes when it plays with the suits and arms. In the photo the folds of the jacket fabric create strong, graphic shapes, but you've muddled around with little brushes and grays. You're too concerned with getting every little crease and furrow in there and not enough with the big picture. These edges should be high contrast and sharp.
D. Faces are always tricky, especially celebrities when you have to be foremost concerned with likeness. I could write a whole post about getting John's face right, but I'll just boil it down to a few things to watch out for. His head just a little bit too big in general. John has a big forehead but it's not quite as big as you've drawn it. His face meeting his hair creates a very high contrast edge, it's almost white up against black. That means you have to be extremely delicate and careful with getting the contour right. The features are also handled a little too heavily to match the slightly overexposed look in the photo, and the handling of his mandible is also not quite subtle enough. John has a very slight scowl that is mostly lost in your drawing of the mouth, and again goes to show how just a little mistake can take away greatly from the character of a figure.
E. Once again, negative shapes are our friend here. In this case, the negative shape of the back wall against Mr. Jackson's shoulder reveals a big error-- Mr. Jackson has slid far too much over to the left in the framing. We can also see a sliver of light from the window behind detailing John's other arm that has been almost totally lost in your painting.
F. Angles are important to pay attention to! For every shape, that goes for the background too. If you look closely you can see that the frame leans to the left in the photo reference but in your painting it's gone the other way. A little mistake like this can throw the construction of the scene off and make things look lopsided and skewed out of perspective. It can also make it hard to use things like negative shapes to help you (like in E.) when you have inconsistencies between big forms like this.
G. This shape has gotten a little too thin in your painting, which can again throw off your negative shapes, plumb lines, and all sorts of other details. It's an important bit of his jacket so it's important to make sure it's properly proportioned. If we look a little to the right we can also see John's undershirt-- notice how it's just a bit darker than the bright white we see up near his collar.
H. John's shoulder is raised up almost like a little hill here. It's subtle but it's important to getting the gesture correct. We can see in your painting that the angle isn't quite high enough and the shoulder just kind of wobbles down.
Whew! Anyway, here is a QUICK little summary paintover taking most of these changes into affect and showing what a few little fixes can do for you. I'm sure mine is a bit off in some places and the likeness isn't perfect but hopefully it gets the point across for you.
One final bit of advice is to USE BIGGER BRUSHES! Use the biggest brush you can get away with when painting something. Be foremost concerned with the whole image, then the major shapes before the details.
 |
|
|
Last edited by Scosglen; 02-12-2009 at 09:00 PM.
| #39
|
|
|